Sputum culture and antibiotic resistance in elderly inpatients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at a tertiary geriatric hospital in southern Vietnam.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of positive culture sputum and related factors as well as the microorganism features and antibiotic susceptibility of pathogens in elderly inpatients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Thong Nhat Hospital, Vietnam. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included elderly patients admitted to the hospital because of exacerbation of COPD. Data of their medical history, symptoms and signs were collected, and the patients were instructed to collect sputum sample. A positive culture was identified with the growth of ≥ 105 colony-forming units per milliliter. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. RESULTS: There were 167 participants (mean age: 77.5 ± 8.8 years, 87.4% male). The culture-positive rate was 25.1%. A higher proportion of positive culture was among participants with purulent sputum (p = 0.029) and with severe and very severe airflow obstruction (p = 0.005). Three most common agents were Acinetobacter baumannii (24.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (22.2%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.6%). Despite high resistance to almost other antibiotics (> 50% resistance), Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were sensitive to colistin, tobramycin, and gentamicin (> 80% susceptibility). Klebsiella pneumoniae was highly sensitive to almost common antibiotics (> 80% susceptibility). Among Gram-positive pathogens, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was completely sensitive to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid. CONCLUSION: The sputum culture-positive rate in this study was not high. Most prevalent isolated pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were sensitive to tobramycin, gentamicin, and colistin. Commonly used antibiotics remained effective against Klebsiella pneumoniae. MRSA was sensitive to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid.

Preadmission use of antidiabetic medications and mortality among patients with COVID-19 having type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. We compared the effects of the preadmission use of antidiabetic medications on the in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19 having type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed to include studies (except case reports and review articles) published until November 30, 2021. We excluded papers regarding in-hospital use of antidiabetic medications. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate the pooled OR (95% CI) and performed a sensitivity analysis to confirm the robustness of the meta-analyses. MAIN FINDINGS: We included 61 studies (3,061,584 individuals), which were rated as having low risk of bias. The OR (95% CI) indicated some medications protective against COVID-related death, including metformin [0.54 (0.47-0.62), I2 86%], glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) [0.51 (0.37-0.69), I2 85%], and sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) [0.60 (0.40-0.88), I2 91%]. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) [1.23 (1.07-1.42), I2 82%] and insulin [1.70 (1.33-2.19), I2 97%] users were more likely to die during hospitalization. Sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitor were mortality neutral [0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.01, I2 44%), 0.90 (95% CI 0.71-1.14, I2 46%), and 0.61 (95% CI 0.26-1.45, I2 77%), respectively]. The sensitivity analysis indicated that our findings were robust. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin, GLP-1RA, and SGLT-2i were associated with lower mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 having type 2 diabetes. DPP-4i and insulin were linked to increased mortality. Sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors were mortality neutral. These findings can have a large impact on the clinicians' decisions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.