Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 150(2): 179-180, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060219

RESUMO

A 65-year-old man presented with a 2-year history of left nasal obstruction and large tumor in the left nasal cavity. What is your diagnosis?


Assuntos
Obstrução Nasal , Neoplasias Nasais , Humanos , Obstrução Nasal/diagnóstico , Obstrução Nasal/etiologia , Cavidade Nasal , Septo Nasal , Neoplasias Nasais/complicações , Neoplasias Nasais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Nasais/cirurgia
2.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 13(10): 1982-1986, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36965128

RESUMO

KEY POINTS: nNO levels decreased at 3 and 6 months and recovered at 12 months after radiotherapy in NPC. nNO may be a feasible biomarker for mucociliary function in post-irradiated NPC patients. Lower nNO levels were associated with more sinonasal burdens in post-irradiated NPC patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/complicações , Óxido Nítrico , Doença Crônica , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia
3.
Ear Nose Throat J ; : 1455613221091098, 2022 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440219

RESUMO

Objective: While septoplasty with turbinoplasty is commonly performed for patients with nasal obstruction, no study has addressed its efficacy and related determinants in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and various symptoms. This study aimed to identify potential factors associated with surgical outcomes in patients with persistent AR (PAR) who underwent septoplasty with turbinoplasty. Methods: We prospectively recruited patients with PAR and positive allergy test results for surgical treatment. We also collected relevant preoperative laboratory data. The Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) survey was administered to all patients one day before and one year after surgery. Results: A total of 128 patients who completed a one-year postoperative follow-up were enrolled. The total SNOT-22 score and five subdomain scores significantly improved postoperatively. We found that women and those with higher preoperative SNOT-22 scores experienced more postoperative improvement and had a greater potential to reach minimal clinically important differences (MCID). A preoperative SNOT-22 score greater than the determined cut-off value of 42.5 had an approximately 6-fold likelihood of MCID achievement. Patients in the nasal obstruction group and non-smokers demonstrated greater postoperative improvement in the sleep subdomain. Conclusions: Women with PAR and those with a preoperative SNOT-22 score above 42.5 were preferable candidates for surgery and expressed greater satisfaction. Notably, rhinologic presentations and non-rhinologic symptoms of PAR patients could benefit from within one year after surgery. Here, we discuss the factors associated with subjective surgical outcomes to help physicians and patients with AR in preoperative consultations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA