Systemic lupus erythematosus in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia: addressing disparities and barriers to optimising patient care.

The first inhabitants of Australia and the traditional owners of Australian lands are the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are two to four times more likely to have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) than the general Australian population. Phenotypically, SLE appears distinctive in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and its severity is substantially increased, with mortality rates up to six times higher than in the general Australian population with SLE. In particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with SLE have increased prevalence of lupus nephritis and increased rates of progression to end-stage kidney disease. The reasons for the increased prevalence and severity of SLE in this population are unclear, but socioeconomic, environmental, and biological factors are all likely to be implicated, although there are no published studies investigating these factors in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with SLE specifically, indicating an important knowledge gap. In this Review, we summarise the data on the incidence, prevalence, and clinical and biological findings relating to SLE in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and explore potential factors contributing to its increased prevalence and severity in this population. Importantly, we identify health disparities and deficiencies in health-care provision that limit optimal care and outcomes for many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with SLE and highlight potentially addressable goals to improve outcomes.

Autoimmune rheumatic disease in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples: What do we know?

Autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD) is a collective term, which comprises a group of multisystem inflammatory autoimmune diseases, including connective tissue disease, chronic inflammatory arthritis, sarcoidosis and systemic vasculitis. Some AIRD are prevalent in the general population, and all can cause significant morbidity and reduced quality of life, with some increasing the risk of premature mortality, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a connective tissue disease that is more prevalent and severe in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples with high mortality rates. To ensure that management of AIRD can be optimised for all Australians, it is important that we understand the prevalence and potential phenotypic variations of AIRD across the Australian population. However, to date there have been few described cases of AIRD other than SLE in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. In this review, we summarise what is known about AIRD other than SLE in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, particularly with regards to prevalence, phenotype and disease outcomes, and highlight the current gaps in knowledge.

Primary aldosteronism: an unsuspected culprit of hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus?

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. Patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a multisystem and multifactorial autoimmune disease, experience a high burden of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Importantly, cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in SLE. Very limited evidence suggests an increased proportion of autoimmune diseases such as SLE in patients with PA. However, studies evaluating the prevalence of PA in the SLE population are lacking. Despite the potential for curative or targeted treatments, guidelines for the management of hypertension in SLE do not currently recommend testing for PA. This review highlights PA as a potentially over-looked secondary cause of hypertension in SLE, and offers future directions in research to improve the detection of this highly modifiable cardiovascular risk factor in the SLE population.

Treatment Update in Systemic Lupus Erythematous.

The recent updates on treatment recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematous have provided greater clarity in the way existing anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs are used, in treating disease activity, preventing flares, and reducing irreversible organ damage and toxicity arising from the treatments themselves. Novel therapies will provide more options in the armamentarium for treating this complex disease, but ongoing studies are needed to improve understanding of the optimal treatment algorithm to maintain quality of life and improve survival for patients.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is not pathogenic in lupus nephritis.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus) is an autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibodies that form immune complexes with self-antigens, which deposit in various tissues, leading to inflammation and disease. The etiology of disease is complex and still not completely elucidated. Dysregulated inflammation is an important disease feature, and the mainstay of lupus treatment still utilizes nonspecific anti-inflammatory drugs. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a growth, survival, and activation factor for neutrophils and a mobilizer of hematopoietic stem cells, both of which underlie inflammatory responses in lupus. To determine whether G-CSF has a causal role in lupus, we genetically deleted G-CSF from Lyn-deficient mice, an experimental model of lupus nephritis. Lyn-/- G-CSF-/- mice displayed many of the inflammatory features of Lyn-deficient mice; however, they had reduced bone marrow and tissue neutrophils, consistent with G-CSF's role in neutrophil development. Unexpectedly, in comparison to aged Lyn-deficient mice, matched Lyn-/- G-CSF-/- mice maintained neutrophil hyperactivation and exhibited exacerbated numbers of effector memory T cells, augmented autoantibody titers, and worsened lupus nephritis. In humans, serum G-CSF levels were not elevated in patients with lupus or with active renal disease. Thus, these studies suggest that G-CSF is not pathogenic in lupus, and therefore G-CSF blockade is an unsuitable therapeutic avenue.

Associations of serum soluble Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) with outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) and B cell-activating factor (BAFF) signalling have pivotal roles in SLE pathogenesis. We investigated the clinical associations of serum concentrations of soluble Fas (sFas) and soluble FasL (sFasL) in SLE and their relationship with BAFF. METHODS: Serum sFas and sFasL were quantified by multiplex assay, and BAFF by ELISA, in 118 patients with SLE and 17 healthy controls (HC). SLE disease activity and organ damage were assessed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index. RESULTS: sFas, sFasL and BAFF were detectable in all samples. Serum sFas and sFasL were significantly higher in SLE compared with HC. In univariable regression analyses, patients with active renal disease and those with flare had significantly higher levels of sFas compared with those without. High serum BAFF in patients with SLE was associated with increased sFas but not sFasL. The association between sFas and renal disease remained significant after adjusting for BAFF, but the association with flare attenuated. High sFas levels were associated with increased time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K, even after adjusting for BAFF, and with higher odds of flare over time. In contrast, high sFasL was associated with reduced organ damage over time. Serum sFasL/sFas ratio was negatively associated with active overall disease, flare and organ damage. CONCLUSIONS: Serum sFas is associated with active renal SLE, and active disease and flare over time, while sFasL/sFas ratio is negatively associated with disease activity and organ damage accrual. Treatments correcting abnormal levels of sFas/FasL may be worthy of evaluation in SLE.

Analysis of serum B cell-activating factor from the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) and its soluble receptors in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the presence and clinical associations of the soluble receptors of B cell-activating factor from the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) in serum of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Serum BAFF and soluble BAFF receptor (sBAFF-R) were quantified using ELISA, and soluble B cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) and transmembrane activator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (sTACI) by Luminex, in 87 SLE patients and 17 healthy controls (HC). Disease activity and organ damage were assessed using SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) SLE Damage Index (SDI), respectively. RESULTS: BAFF and all receptors were detectable in all serum samples. Serum sBCMA and sTACI, but not sBAFF-R, were significantly higher in SLE than in HC. Serum BAFF was also increased in SLE, but this association was attenuated after adjusting for age and ethnicity. Increased serum BAFF was associated with flare and organ damage. Increased serum sBCMA was associated with the presence of anti-dsDNA, but not with overall or organ-specific disease activity, flare or organ damage. Neither sTACI nor sBAFF-R was associated with any SLE clinical parameters in multivariable analysis. While serum BAFF correlated negatively with sBAFF-R in HC, no statistically significant correlations were observed between BAFF and its receptors in SLE patients. CONCLUSION: Serum BAFF was associated with flare and organ damage independent of the presence of its soluble receptors. While sBCMA was associated with anti-dsDNA positivity, other soluble BAFF receptors were not associated with SLE clinical indicators.

Machine learning applied to whole-blood RNA-sequencing data uncovers distinct subsets of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease that is difficult to treat. There is currently no optimal stratification of patients with SLE, and thus, responses to available treatments are unpredictable. Here, we developed a new stratification scheme for patients with SLE, based on the computational analysis of patients' whole-blood transcriptomes. METHODS: We applied machine learning approaches to RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data sets to stratify patients with SLE into four distinct clusters based on their gene expression profiles. A meta-analysis on three recently published whole-blood RNA-seq data sets was carried out, and an additional similar data set of 30 patients with SLE and 29 healthy donors was incorporated in this study; a total of 161 patients with SLE and 57 healthy donors were analysed. RESULTS: Examination of SLE clusters, as opposed to unstratified SLE patients, revealed underappreciated differences in the pattern of expression of disease-related genes relative to clinical presentation. Moreover, gene signatures correlated with flare activity were successfully identified. CONCLUSION: Given that SLE disease heterogeneity is a key challenge hindering the design of optimal clinical trials and the adequate management of patients, our approach opens a new possible avenue addressing this limitation via a greater understanding of SLE heterogeneity in humans. Stratification of patients based on gene expression signatures may be a valuable strategy allowing the identification of separate molecular mechanisms underpinning disease in SLE. Further, this approach may have a use in understanding the variability in responsiveness to therapeutics, thereby improving the design of clinical trials and advancing personalised therapy.

Analysis of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor and D-dopachrome tautomerase in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and D-dopachrome tautomerase (DDT), members of the same cytokine superfamily, are linked to the pathogenesis of a number of inflammatory diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate their clinical relevance in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: Serum MIF and DDT were quantified in 105 SSc patients by ELISA and levels compared to healthy controls (HC) (47) and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (184). Clinical parameters included organ involvement, serum laboratory markers and results of pulmonary function tests, and overall disease activity assessed using the European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) activity index. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in serum DDT concentrations between patients with SSc and HC. However, serum MIF was significantly increased in SSc compared to both HC and SLE cohorts. Serum MIF was increased in SSc patients with low forced vital capacity (FVC) and was also associated with the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers and beta blockers in SSc, confirmed after adjusting for the presence of systemic hypertension and low FVC. Serum DDT was significantly higher in SSc patients with low FEV1 and negatively correlated with EUSTAR score, particularly in patients with limited disease. CONCLUSION: Although not significantly linked to specific clinical parameters, serum MIF was significantly higher in SSc patients than in HC and SLE patients, suggesting a fundamental role for MIF in SSc. DDT, while closely related to MIF, did not show a similar expression profile, suggesting functional differences between these molecules.

Analysis of urinary macrophage migration inhibitory factor in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the clinical relevance of urinary macrophage migration inhibitory factor (uMIF) concentrations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: MIF, adjusted for urine creatinine, was quantified by ELISA in urine samples from 64 prospectively recruited patients with SLE. Serum MIF and urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (uMCP-1) were quantified by ELISA in a subset of patients (n = 39). Disease activity was assessed using the SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score. RESULTS: uMIF was detectable in all patients with SLE. uMIF was positively correlated with overall SLEDAI-2K, was significantly higher in patients with SLE with high disease activity (SLEDAI-2K≥10) compared with those with inactive disease (SLEDAI-2K<4), and this association remained significant after adjusting for ethnicity, flare and use of immunosuppressants. uMIF was also significantly higher in SLE patients with flare of disease, although not confirmed in multivariable analysis. No significant differences in uMIF levels were observed according to the presence of renal disease activity, as assessed by renal SLEDAI-2K or biopsy-confirmed lupus nephritis. In contrast, uMCP-1 was significantly higher in SLE patients with active renal disease. uMIF expression was not associated with irreversible organ damage accrual or glucocorticoid use. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest uMIF as a potential overall but not renal-specific SLE biomarker, whereas uMCP-1 is a renal-specific SLE biomarker.

Analysis of Serum Interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-18 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by biological and clinical heterogeneity. The interleukin (IL)-1 superfamily is a group of innate cytokines that contribute to pathogenesis in many autoimmune diseases. IL-1ß and IL-18 are two members that have been shown to play a role in murine lupus-like models, but their role in human SLE remains poorly understood. Here, IL-1ß and IL-18 were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the serum of healthy controls (HCs) and SLE patients from a prospectively followed cohort. Disease activity and organ damage were assessed using SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and SLE damage index scores (SDI), respectively. 184 SLE patients (mean age 44.9 years, 91% female, 56% double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid positive) were compared to 52 HC. SLE patients had median [IQR] SLEDAI-2K of 4 [2,6], and SDI of 1 [0-2]. Serum IL-18 levels were statistically significantly higher in SLE patients compared to HCs. Univariable linear regression analyses showed that patients with active renal disease or irreversible organ damage had statistically significantly elevated serum IL-18 levels. The association between serum IL-18 and active renal disease was confirmed in multivariable analysis after adjusting for ethnicity and organ damage. High baseline serum IL-18 levels were associated with organ damage at the subsequent visit. Serum IL-1ß levels were not significantly elevated in SLE patients when compared to HCs and had no association with overall or organ-specific disease activity or organ damage in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Our data suggest that serum IL-18 and IL-1ß have different clinical implications in SLE, with IL-18 being potentially associated with active renal disease.

Cardiovascular risk profiles in a lupus cohort: what do different calculators tell us?

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and this risk is increased in patients with SLE who may not conform to traditional cardiovascular risk profiles. AIMS: To determine the prevalence of high CVD risk among patients with SLE calculated using different risk calculators, and to characterise those identified as high risk. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis to estimate CVD risk using the Framingham Risk Equation (Framingham score) and an SLE-specific CVD risk equation (SLE score) was undertaken using data from a single centre cohort. The characteristics of patients identified as 'high risk' by the SLE score only (the 'missed group') were compared with those identified by the Framingham score (the 'conventional group'). RESULTS: 146 patients were included; 22 (15%) and 44 (30%) were determined to be at 'high risk' based on the Framingham and SLE scores, respectively. Patients in the 'missed group' were less likely to have traditional risk factors and were more likely to be female (81% vs 50%; p=0.03), younger (mean age 54 vs 69 years p<0.01) and have lower systolic blood pressure (132 vs 143 mm Hg; p=0.05). Of those deemed high risk, only a minority were treated to target blood pressure and lipid levels. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients with SLE could be re-classified as high risk using a formula that incorporates SLE disease-related parameters. These patients have different profiles to those identified using a conventional risk model. Optimal CVD risk assessment and management warrants further attention in SLE.

Quality of Care for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Mind the Knowledge Gap.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical chronic multiorgan autoimmune disorder that can lead to significant burden of disease and loss of life expectancy. The disease burden is the result of a complex interplay between genetic, biologic, socioeconomic, and health system variables affecting the individual. Recent advances in biological understanding of SLE are yet to translate to transformative therapies, and genetic and socioeconomic variables are not readily amenable to intervention. In contrast, healthcare quality, a variable readily amenable to change, has been inadequately addressed in SLE, despite evidence in other chronic diseases that quality of care is strongly associated with patient outcomes. This article will analyze the available literature on the quality of care relevant to SLE, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest ways to address this in future research.

Abatacept in the treatment of lupus.

INTRODUCTION: In contrast to other areas in rheumatology, the therapeutic armamentarium in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has lagged behind due to a number of reasons. While SLE is the prototypical multi-system autoimmune disease, its low incidence and the heterogeneity in its clinical manifestations have made it difficult to study. Despite advances in the understanding and application of immunology, the emergence of new targets has not been successfully validated largely due to the difficult-to-use outcome measures. Among the many targets studied, co-stimulation blockade that prevents activation of T cells by antigen-presenting cells, poses an interesting concept that is plausible based on basic science, animal and early human studies. AREAS COVERED: The authors hereby review the development of abatacept in the treatment of SLE and possible future directions. EXPERT OPINION: Despite failure to achieve primary efficacy end points, the studies of abatacept in lupus provided tantalising evidence that co-stimulatory blockade is a feasible option worthy of further exploration.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a therapeutic target across inflammatory diseases.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a cytokine originally reported in the 1960s as the prototypic T lymphokine, has emerged in recent years as a key factor regulating inflammatory responses. Both by directly activating immune cells, and by participating in activation entrained by other stimuli, MIF is important in innate and adaptive immune responses as well as tissue-specific mechanisms of damage. As a consequence of its involvement in multiple stages of the immune-inflammatory response, MIF has the potential to be involved in the pathogenesis of a range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases affecting multiple organ systems. Diseases in which a role for MIF has been strongly validated include rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, atherosclerosis, asthma, inflammatory liver disease, and most recently systemic lupus erythematosus. Recent data have provided mechanisms of action for MIF which further support its suitability as a therapeutic target. Finally, MIF has a unique relationship with glucocorticoids, acting to counter-regulate their anti-inflammatory effects, such that MIF antagonist therapy may be a direct route to 'steroid-sparing'. Methods of targeting MIF therapeutically have also emerged in recent years, based on the unique protein structure of MIF which affords opportunities for direct antagonism by small molecules, as well as by protein therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies. Clinical trials of MIF antagonist therapies are likely before the end of the current decade.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor deficiency attenuates macrophage recruitment, glomerulonephritis, and lethality in MRL/lpr mice.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious systemic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a proinflammatory cytokine that is operative in innate and adaptive immunity and important in immune-mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis. The functional relevance of MIF in systemic autoimmune diseases such as SLE is unknown. Using the lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice, we aim to examine the expression and function of MIF in this murine model of systemic autoimmune disease. These experiments revealed that renal MIF expression was significantly higher in MRL/lpr mice compared with nondiseased control mice (MRL/MpJ), and MIF was also markedly up-regulated in skin lesions of MRL/lpr mice. To examine the effect of MIF on development of systemic autoimmune disease, we generated MRL/lpr mice with a targeted disruption of the MIF gene (MIF(-/-)MRL/lpr), and compared their disease manifestations to MIF(+/+)MRL/lpr littermates. MIF(-/-)MRL/lpr mice exhibited significantly prolonged survival, and reduced renal and skin manifestations of SLE. These effects occurred in the absence of major changes in T and B cell markers or alterations in autoantibody production. In contrast, renal macrophage recruitment and glomerular injury were significantly reduced in MIF(-/-)MRL/lpr mice, and this was associated with reduction in the monocyte chemokine MCP-1. Taken together, these data suggest MIF as a critical effector of organ injury in SLE.

Is macrophage migration inhibitory factor a therapeutic target in systemic lupus erythematosus?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the prototype of a cluster of diseases that are characterized by a loss of self tolerance and chronic inflammation in organs including skin, kidney, brain and joints. Researchers have long debated the varying contributions of the components of the immune system to the pathogenesis of SLE, but the emigration of leucocytes from the microcirculation, and the subsequent tissue inflammation mediated by these inflammatory cells, are key features of chronic inflammation seen in SLE. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a broad-spectrum pro-inflammatory cytokine. We hypothesize that MIF is an important inflammatory mediator in the perpetuation of immune activation in SLE, via its effects on activation of T and B cells, and endothelial and effector cells. As MIF exerts anti-apoptotic effects, it may also play a role in promoting abnormal survival of autoreactive lymphocytes, thus perpetuating autoimmune reactivity. In addition, MIF has a unique relationship with glucocorticoids, in that MIF can override the effects of glucocorticoids and may be important in steroid resistance. By virtue of its pluripotent functions, we propose that MIF may be a critical mediator of inflammation and damage in SLE, and that targeting of MIF may offer therapeutic benefits in this disease.