Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 36(3): 354-360, 2023 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36994742

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This mini-review is aimed to provide an overview and discuss procedural sedation and analgesia for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with focus at qualification of staff, patient evaluation, monitoring, medication and postprocedural care. RECENT FINDINGS: Sleep-disordered breathing is highly prevalent in patients with AF. Impact of often used STOP-BANG questionnaire to detect sleep-disordered breathing in AF patients is limited due to its restricted validity. Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used drug in sedation, but is shown not to be superior to propofol in sedation during AF-ablation. Alternatively use of remimazolam has characteristics that makes it a promising drug for minimal to moderate sedation for AF-ablation. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has shown to reduce the risk of desaturation in adults receiving procedural sedation and analgesia. SUMMARY: An optimal sedation strategy during AF ablation should be based on AF patient characteristics, the level of sedation needed, the procedure (duration and type of ablation) and the education and experience of the sedation provider. Patient evaluation and post procedural care are part of sedation care. More personalized care based on use of various sedation strategies and types of drugs as related to the type of AF-ablation is the way to further optimize care.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Anestesia , Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Propofol , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono , Adulto , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Propofol/uso terapêutico , Analgesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Trials ; 23(1): 378, 2022 May 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35534903

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there are few trials studying the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during deep sedation. Our hypothesis is that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) will prevent hypoxemia and desaturation as compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC) during prolonged deep sedation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). METHODS: A single-centre, randomised controlled trial with HFNC as the intervention and LFNC as the control group. A total of 94 adult patients per group undergoing elective radiofrequency atrial fibrillation catheter ablation under deep sedation. will be included. The primary outcome is the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2). Secondary outcomes are as follows: the duration of lowest SpO2, cross over from oxygen therapy in both directions, incidence of SpO2 below 90% > 60 seconds, adverse sedation events, adverse effects of HFNC, mean CO2, peak CO2 and patients experience with oxygen therapy. The study will take place during the 2-day admission period for RFCA. Patients can fill out their questionnaires in the first week after treatment. DISCUSSION: HFNC is increasingly used as a technique for oxygen delivery in procedural sedation and analgesia. We hypothesise that HFNC is superior to the standard treatment LFNC in patients under deep sedation with respect to the incidence of desaturation. To our knowledge, there are no adequately powered clinical trial studies on the effects of HFNC in prolonged deep sedation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04842253. Registered on 04 April 2021.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Sedação Profunda , Adulto , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Cânula/efeitos adversos , Dióxido de Carbono , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Sedação Profunda/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Oxigênio , Oxigenoterapia/efeitos adversos , Oxigenoterapia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA