ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

Personalizing, not patronizing: the case for patient autonomy by unbiased presentation of management options in stage I testicular cancer.

Testicular cancer (TC) is the most common neoplasm in males aged 15-40 years. The majority of patients have no evidence of metastases at diagnosis and thus have clinical stage I (CSI) disease [Oldenburg J, Fossa SD, Nuver J et al. Testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013; 24(Suppl 6): vi125-vi132; de Wit R, Fizazi K. Controversies in the management of clinical stage I testis cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5482-5492.]. Management of CSI TC is controversial and options include surveillance and active treatment. Different forms of adjuvant therapy exist, including either one or two cycles of carboplatin chemotherapy or radiotherapy for seminoma and either one or two cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminoma. Long-term disease-specific survival is ∼99% with any of these approaches, including surveillance. While surveillance allows most patients to avoid additional treatment, adjuvant therapy markedly lowers the relapse rate. Weighing the net benefits of surveillance against those of adjuvant treatment depends on prioritizing competing aims such as avoiding unnecessary treatment, avoiding more burdensome treatment with salvage chemotherapy and minimizing the anxiety, stress and life disruption associated with relapse. Unbiased information about the advantages and disadvantages of surveillance and adjuvant treatment is a prerequisite for informed consent by the patient. In a clinical scenario like CSI TC, where different disease-management options produce indistinguishable long-term survival rates, patient values, priorities and preferences should be taken into account. In this review, we provide an overview about risk factors for relapse, potential benefits and harms of adjuvant chemotherapy and active surveillance and a rationale for involving patients in individualized decision making about their treatment rather than adopting a uniform recommendation for all.

Cisplatin resistance in germ cell tumours: models and mechanisms.

Recent years have led to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying cisplatin response and resistance in germ cell tumours (GCT), and several promising targets have been identified. Two main mechanisms of the responsiveness to DNA damaging agents have been postulated. Firstly, GCT readily activate a DNA damage response, but show deficits in several damage repair pathways. In particular, they have been found to have defects in interstrand crosslink repair and in homologous recombination (HR). Secondly, GCT, especially embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, show a hypersensitive apoptotic response to DNA damage, which activates p53, and leads to up-regulation of the pro-apoptotic factors Noxa, Puma and Fas in non-resistant EC. These cells fail to activate p21 which induces a G1/S arrest, but accumulate in G2/M phase. In the absence of functional p53, family members like p73 and GTAp63 might be important in initiating this response. Mechanisms involved in cisplatin resistance are as follows: down-regulation of Oct4 (e.g. as a result of hypoxia, treatment with retinoic acid or exposure to cisplatin) and failure to induce Puma and Noxa; changes in the expression levels of micro-RNAs such as miR-17/-106b, miR-302a, or miR-371 to -373; elevated levels of MDM2 and cytoplasmic translocation of p21 by phosphorylation; and activation of the PDGFRß/PI3K/pAKT pathway. Several approaches to overcome resistance have been successfully examined in vitro and in vivo, including PARP inhibitors, especially in cells showing deficient HR-repair; stabilization of p53 using nutlin-3; inhibition of several components of the PI3K/pAKT pathway using small molecules; and DNA demethylation by 5-azacytidine or 5-aza-deoxy-cytidine, among others. Many of these substances deserve further exploration, alone or in combination with DNA damaging agents, and the most promising approaches should be taken forward to clinical testing. Targeted therapy based on mechanistic insights holds the promise to turn cisplatin-resistant GCT into a curable disease.

Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer.

In November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.

Anti-tumour activity of two novel compounds in cisplatin-resistant testicular germ cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to cisplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with poor prognosis in testicular germ cell cancer, emphasising the need for new therapeutic approaches. In this respect, the therapeutic concept of anti-angiogenesis is of particular interest. In a previous study, we presented two novel anti-angiogenic compounds, HP-2 and HP-14, blocking the tyrosine kinase activity of angiogenic growth factor receptors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), and related signalling pathways in testicular cancer. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of these new compounds in platinum-resistant testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs), in vitro and in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Drug-induced changes in cell proliferation of the cisplatin-sensitive TGCT cell line 2102EP and its cisplatin-resistant counterpart 2102EP-R, both expressing the VEGFR-2, were evaluated by crystal violet staining. Both compounds inhibited the growth of cisplatin-resistant TGCT cells in a dose-dependent manner. In combination experiments with cisplatin, HP-14 revealed additive growth-inhibitory effects in TGCT cells, irrespective of the level of cisplatin resistance. Anti-angiogenic effects of HP compounds were confirmed by tube formation assays with freshly isolated human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Using TGCT cells inoculated onto the chorioallantoic membrane of fertilised chicken eggs (chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay), the anti-angiogenic and anti-proliferative potency of the novel compounds was also demonstrated in vivo. Gene expression profiling revealed changes in the expression pattern of genes related to DNA damage detection and repair, as well as in chaperone function after treatment with both cisplatin and HP-14, alone or in combination. This suggests that HP-14 can revert the lost effectiveness of cisplatin in the resistant cells by altering the expression of critical genes. CONCLUSION: The novel compound HP-14 effectively inhibits the growth of cisplatin-resistant TGCT cells and suppresses tumour angiogenesis. Thus, HP-14 may be an interesting new agent that should be further explored for TGCT treatment, especially in TGCTs that are resistant to cisplatin.

Treatment of patients with relapsed and/or cisplatin-refractory metastatic germ cell tumours: an update.

Since the introduction of cisplatin-based therapy in the late 1970s, germ cell tumours (GCT) have been one of the successes in oncology with high cure rates even in patients presenting with metastatic disease. For patients with relapse after cisplatin-based therapy, treatment is still curative in approximately 50% of the cases. Management options for these patients include surgery, radiotherapy and use of conventional dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). Therefore, treatment of relapsed or refractory patients is complex and there is no uniformly accepted approach available. Data comparing conventional dose and HDCT in the first salvage therapy is limited to one randomized trial which was not able to ultimately define optimal treatment. More recently, a large retrospective analysis of nearly 1600 patients not only identified prognostic factors in relapse, but retrospectively suggested a 10-15% benefit regarding overall survival for patients receiving HDCT plus autologous stem cell transplantation over patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy. Prognosis in multiply relapsed and primary cisplatin-refractory patients is generally poor. Currently, a number of mechanisms of cisplatin resistance and potential drug targets like global methylation and BRAF mutation status are under investigation in refractory GCT.

Preclinical and clinical activity of sunitinib in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germ cell tumors: a Canadian Urologic Oncology Group/German Testicular Cancer Study Group cooperative study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to investigate the activity of sunitinib in a cell line model and subsequently in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germ cell tumors (GCT). METHODS: The effect of sunitinib on cell proliferation in cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-refractory GCT cell lines was evaluated after 48-h sunitinib exposure by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay, and IC(50) (concentration that causes 50% inhibition of growth) doses were determined. Sunitinib was subsequently administered at a dose of 50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week break to 33 patients using a Simon two-stage design. RESULTS: Sunitinib demonstrated comparable dose-dependent growth inhibition in cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant cell lines, with IC(50) between 3.0 and 3.8 µM. Patient characteristics were as follows: median of 2 (1-6) cisplatin-containing regimens; high-dose chemotherapy 67%; late relapse 33%; and cisplatin refractory or absolute cisplatin refractory 54%. Toxic effects included fatigue (39%), anorexia (21%), diarrhea (27%), mucositis (45%), nausea (33%), hand-foot syndrome (12%), dyspepsia (27%), and skin rash (18%). No unexpected side-effects were observed. Thirty -two of 33 patients were assessable for response. Three confirmed partial responses (PRs) and one unconfirmed PR were seen for a total response rate of 13%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months, with a 6-month PFS rate of 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib shows in vitro activity in cisplatin-resistant GCT cell lines. Modest clinical activity in heavily pretreated GCT patients was observed.

[A multi-disciplinary approach to the treatment of germ cell tumors]. / Multimodale Therapiekonzepte von Keimzelltumoren.

The management of patients with germ cell tumors must be based upon complete staging and should be risk-adapted. Seminoma stage I can be managed by either active surveillance, adjuvant carboplatin therapy, or radiotherapy. Seminoma stage IIA should receive radiotherapy, stage IIB can be managed with either radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Seminoma stage IIC and III are treated with three (to four) cycles of PEB (cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin). Nonseminoma stage I should be managed by either active surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy with one (to two) cycles of PEB, based upon the risk factor vascular invasion. Treatment of advanced nonseminoma consists of either 3 or 4 cycles of PEB and must be guided by the IGCCCG prognostic subgroup. Prognosis is particularly poor in patients with either primary mediastinal nonseminoma, and/or metastases to liver, brain or bone, or inadequate tumor marker decline. In these cases, intensification of therapy with high dose chemotherapy can be justified. Complex cases with poor prognosis and all patients with relapsed disease should exclusively be treated by experts in a tertiary care setting to achieve highest possible cure rates in these young patients.

Pharmacotherapy of relapsed metastatic testicular cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic testicular cancer exhibit an excellent prognosis. However, the outcome for patients with relapse after cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains unsatisfactory. Several larger studies have been recently published. OBJECTIVE: To review the treatment of patients with testicular cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A literature search was performed for studies investigating therapies for relapsed testicular cancer. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients relapsing after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy has improved with multimodality therapy, including conventional and high-dose chemotherapy, surgery and radiation. Prognostic factors are increasingly used to guide treatment intensity. High-dose chemotherapy has become an accepted treatment option, in particular in patients with poor risk factors at relapse. The outcome of patients with multiply relapsed or cisplatin-refractory disease remains particularly poor. Treatment of relapsed patients requires a close cooperation of medical oncologists, urologists, surgeons and radiation oncologists with extensive experience in this disease.

Cerebral metastases in non-seminomatous germ cell tumour patients undergoing primary high-dose chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective analysis of characteristics and outcome of germ cell tumour (GCT) patients with cerebral metastases (CM) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CTX) or relapsing with CM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients initially presenting with CM (N=50 pts) or at first relapse (n=19 pts) after primary HD-CTX (434 pts) were analysed. RESULTS: Patients with primary CM (N=50) had elevated ss-human chorion gonadotropin (ss-HCG) in 88% and lung metastases in 90%. Eighty six percent responded to HD-CTX and 40% underwent CNS radiotherapy. Forty four percent achieved long-term survival after primary and 16% after salvage treatment (60% in total). All patients relapsing with CM (n=19) presented initially with ss-HCG-elevation and pulmonary metastases. Treatment consisted of CTX in 78%, irradiation in 90% and surgery in 63%. Twenty six percent achieved long-term survival. CONCLUSION: An interdisciplinary approach of HD-CTX, radiotherapy and surgery leads to long-term survival in 60% of patients with CM at initial diagnosis and 26% relapsing with CM.

Stem cell factor as a novel diagnostic marker for early malignant germ cells.

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the testis is the pre-invasive stage of type II testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) of adolescents and adults. These tumours are the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Caucasian adolescents and young adults. In dysgenetic gonads, the precursor of type II GCTs can be either CIS or a lesion known as gonadoblastoma (GB). CIS/GB originates from a primordial germ cell (PGC)/gonocyte, ie an embryonic cell. CIS can be cured by local low-dose irradiation, with limited side effects on hormonal function. Therefore, strategies for early diagnosis of CIS are essential. Various markers are informative to diagnose CIS in adult testis by immunohistochemistry, including c-KIT, PLAP, AP-2gamma, NANOG, and POU5F1 (OCT3/4). OCT3/4 is the most informative and consistent in presence and expression level, resulting in intense nuclear staining. In the case of maturational delay of germ cells, frequently present in gonads of individuals at risk for type II (T)GCTs, use of these markers can result in overdiagnosis of malignant germ cells. This demonstrates the need for a more specific diagnostic marker to distinguish malignant germ cells from germ cells showing maturation delay. Here we report the novel finding that immunohistochemical detection of stem cell factor (SCF), the c-KIT ligand, is informative in this context. This was demonstrated in over 400 cases of normal (fetal, neonatal, infantile, and adult) and pathological gonads, as well as TGCT-derived cell lines, specifically in cases of CIS and GB. Both membrane-bound and soluble SCF were expressed, suggestive of an autocrine loop. SCF immunohistochemistry can be a valuable diagnostic tool, in addition to OCT3/4, to screen for precursor lesions of TGCTs, especially in patients with germ cell maturation delay.

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germ-cell tumors: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine feasibility and efficacy of the combination regimen gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel (GOP) in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germ-cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2003 to October 2006, 41 patients refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with relapse after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus stem-cell support (peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation: PBSCT) received 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine, 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel (Taxol), both on days 1 + 8, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle for a minimum of two cycles. Primary end point was response rate. Patients were pretreated with a median of two lines of platin-based chemotherapy (range, 1-3), and 78% had relapsed after HDCT/PBSCT. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of patients had relapsed within 3 months after the last cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Five percent of the patients achieved a complete response, and 34% and 12% a marker-negative and marker-positive partial response, respectively (overall response rate 51%). After a median follow-up of 5 months (range, 0-20), 15% of the patients remain in complete remission after GOP chemotherapy +/- residual tumor resection with a median response duration of 8 months (1 to 17+). Main toxicity was leucocytopenia grade 3/4 in 15%, anemia in 7%, and thrombocytopenia in 49% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with GOP is feasible and effective with acceptable toxicity in patients with treatment-refractory germ-cell tumors.

A phase I study of the humanized monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody EMD 72000 (matuzumab) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 80%-90% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Matuzumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G(1) (IgG(1)) anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, blocks activation of EGFR. Paclitaxel and EGFR inhibitors have additive antitumour effects in vitro. This phase I study assessed the tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the combination of matuzumab and paclitaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen chemotherapy-naïve (n = 9) or pretreated (n = 9) patients with stage IIIB or IV EGFR-positive NSCLC received weekly doses of matuzumab (100, 200, 400 or 800 mg) followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Toxicity was evaluated weekly and pharmacokinetics were measured during cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: The maximum planned matuzumab dose of 800 mg was achieved without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in one of three patients at 800 mg but resolved within 1 week; five additional patients treated with 800 mg had no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Grade 1/2 acneiform skin rash in 14 patients was the most frequent matuzumab-related side-effect. There were no higher-grade adverse events. Grade 2 toxicities included pruritus (n = 2), bronchospasm (n = 1), fissures (n = 1), abdominal pain (n = 1) and hot flushes (n = 1). Paclitaxel was discontinued in four patients due to allergic reactions. Coadministration of paclitaxel did not alter matuzumab pharmacokinetics. Responses occurred in four of 18 patients and included one complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Matuzumab doses up to 800 mg weekly with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks are well tolerated, with no apparent drug interactions and with evidence of antitumor activity.

Differentiation and development of human female germ cells during prenatal gonadogenesis: an immunohistochemical study.

BACKGROUND: In the development of the human ovary, the second trimester includes the transition from oogonial replication to primordial follicle formation. The present study was carried out to assess differentiation and proliferation of germ cells in a series of female gonads from 19 fetuses from the second and third trimester, and two neonates. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, the following markers were studied: placental/germ-like cell alkaline phosphatases (PLAP), the marker of pluripotency OCT3/4, the proliferation marker Ki-67, beta-catenin and E-cadherin, the stem cell factor receptor c-KIT, and VASA, a protein specific for the germ cell lineage. RESULTS: PLAP and OCT3/4 were seen during oogenesis, but not in germ cells engaged in folliculogenesis. A similar pattern was observed for Ki-67. Loss of pluripotency occurs once oocytes engage in follicle formation, suggesting a role of cell-cell interactions in the process of germ cell maturation. VASA, c-KIT, beta-catenin and E-cadherin were found in germ cells at all developmental stages of oogenesis and folliculogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemically, two groups of germ cells can be distinguished. Germ cells that are predominantly found in the cortical region of the ovary before weeks 22-24 of gestation, showing an immature phenotype, are mitotically active, and express OCT3/4, a marker of pluripotency. On the other hand, germ cells undergoing folliculogenesis have lost their pluripotent potential and no longer proliferate.

Chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer. Part II: Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Increasing interest in the treatment of elderly patients or patients with poor performance status (PS) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to a number of subgroup analyses of clinical trials, and even more importantly, the conduction of trials specifically designed for this cohort. These studies allow some important conclusions. Data from retrospective studies and meta-analyses indicate that the use of platinum-based two-drug combinations in selected, fit elderly patients may produce response rates, survival, and toxicity comparable to those in younger patients. This excludes a per se inferior effectiveness of chemotherapy in the population of elderly patients with NSCLC. A number of more recently introduced agents with a favourable toxicity profile have significantly increased treatment options. Single- agent therapy with vinorelbine, when compared to best supportive care, has been shown to give a statistically significant survival benefit and improve quality of life. Conflicting data from phase II/III trials in elderly patients with NSCLC exist regarding a potential benefit of combination chemotherapy over single-agent treatment in the total cohort of elderly patients, including those with comorbidities or declining functional reserve. A review of the most important trials, assessing treatment options in elderly patients with lung cancer, either prospectively or retrospectively, is provided, and still unresolved issues are addressed.