Analysis of sagittal parameters for easier and more accurate determination of cervical spine alignment.

Cross-sectional comparative study. This study aimed to analyze the role of cervical parameters, in terms of the perception process, when evaluating cervical sagittal balance on an X-ray image. Reports on the role of cervical parameters in the perception of cervical sagittal balance have not been made. The study included 4 board-certified neurosurgeons and 6 residents of a neurosurgical department. They were instructed to answer a total of 40 questions. The parameter that was the most helpful in deriving the answer was checked. The correct answer rate, dependency on the parameter, and correct answer contribution of the parameter were analyzed. Among the various parameters, 5 parameters [C2-7 angle (C2-7A), T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1s-CL), C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis) were selected. The simple parameter (C2s, C7s) has a higher dependency and correct answer contribution than the complex parameter (C2-7A, T1s-CL). The angular (C2-7A, T1s-CL, C2s, C7s) parameters have a higher dependency; however, both the length and angular parameters correct answer contribution were similar. The cervical parameters that have simpler properties were highly preferred and had a lower perception error.

The safety and effectiveness of lumbar drainage for cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal surgery.

PURPOSE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a frequent complication after spinal surgery. The lumbar drainage procedure (LDP) is the preferred method for early closure of a dural tear. This study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of LDP after spinal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 122 patients (55 male and 67 female) who underwent LDP after spinal surgery between January 2010 and June 2021. LDP was performed on patients with suspected CSF leakage due to a dural tear during spinal surgery or in whom mixed-color CSF was observed in the hemo-drain after surgery. LDP was performed aseptically by a resident according to our institution's protocol, and the amount drained was from 200cc to 300cc per day. Absolute bed rest was maintained during the lumbar drainage period. The hemo-drain was opened to confirm that CSF was no longer mixed or oozing, at which time the lumbar drain was removed. Culture was performed at the drain tip when the lumbar drain was removed. RESULTS: The spinal surgery level was cervical in 23 patients, thoracic in 27 patients, and lumbar in 72 patients. The mean duration of the indwelling lumbar drain was 7.2 days (2 days-18 days), and the mean amount of drainage was 1198.2cc (100cc-2542cc). Among the 122 patients, the CSF leakage in 101 patients was resolved with the initial procedure, but 21 patients required re-insertion. Of those 21 patients, improper insertion due to a technical problem occurred in 15 patients, poor line fixation occurred in 2 patients, and CSF leakage was again observed after removal of the lumbar drain in 4 patients. In only 1 case was open surgery done after LDP because follow-up magnetic resonance imaging showed a suspected infection. During lumbar drainage, 76 patients used antibiotics, and 46 patients did not. Four patients showed bacterial growth in the tip culture, and 3 of them had been using antibiotics. All 4 of those patients were treated without complications and discharged. Among the 122 patients, 1 patient was discharged with left hemiparesis due to cerebral venous infarction (CVI) and hemorrhage after LDP, and 1 patient underwent re-operation because the CSF collection was not resolved. CONCLUSIONS: No major complications such as systemic infection, deep vein thrombosis, or aspiration pneumonia occurred during the lumbar drainage, except for 1 patient (0.8%) with CVI caused by over-drainage. One patient (0.8%) required open surgery after LDP, but no cases of systemic infection occurred while maintaining lumbar drainage, irrespective of antibiotic use. In conclusion, LDP is a safe and effective treatment for CSF leakage after spinal surgery.

Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Doppler Sonography-Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation-A Retrospective Comparison with Conventional Pedicle Screw Implantation.

STUDY DESIGN: A Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new Doppler sonography-assisted pedicle screw fixation technique that enables vertebral artery (VA) monitoring during surgery and compares the accuracies of Doppler sonography-assisted cervical pedicle screw fixation and the conventional technique. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 164 consecutive patients that underwent pedicle-based screw fixation from C2 to C6 between January 2013 and August 2020. Surgery was performed without intraoperative Doppler sonography in 84 cases (the Control group) or with intraoperative Doppler sonography in 80 cases (the Doppler group). Proper positioning of pedicle screws was graded, and the incidences of VA injury and screw breach in the Control and Doppler groups were compared. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-nine screws were placed in the 164 patients (Doppler, 186 screws; Control, 213 screws). The percentages of well-positioned screws in the two groups were significantly different (Doppler, 97.8%; Control, 85.0%). There were two cases of VA injury in the Control group, an incidence of 2.4%, but no case in the Doppler group. CONCLUSION: Doppler sonography can be used intraoperatively to help guide the trajectory of the cervical pedicle screw insertion. It can detect the VA inside the screw trajectory and may reduce the risk of VA injury during cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Failure to Obtain Baseline Signals of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials in Spine Surgery: Analysis of the Reasons.

OBJECTIVE: Among the various intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) techniques, transcranial motor-evoked potential (Tc-MEP) has recently become the most widely used method to monitor motor function. However, we often find that Tc-MEP is not sufficiently detected at the start of surgery. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the reasons and risk factors for not detecting sufficient baseline signal of Tc-MEP from the beginning of spinal surgery. METHODS: We categorized IONM data from 1058 patients who underwent spine surgeries at a single institution from 2014 to 2020 and categorized them into 2 groups: 1) "poor MEP" if Tc-MEP could not be sufficiently obtained and 2) "normal MEP" if Tc-MEP could be sufficiently obtained from the surgery. We analyzed the patient's age, gender, underlying disease, operation type, level numbers, baseline motor function, existence of pathologic reflex, myelopathy, and duration from the onset and clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: The rate of failure to obtain sufficient baseline Tc-MEP signals in spine surgery was 21.8% (231/1058). Multivariate analysis showed significant associations of existence of diabetes mellitus, myelopathy, thoracic spine surgery, baseline motor deficit and tumor, and trauma disease with loss of meaningful and interpretable signals in baseline Tc-MEP (P < 0.05). Only 15 of 231 patients (6.4%) showed a trend of signal recovery after decompression procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Various factors (myelopathy, diabetes mellitus, thoracic surgery, baseline motor deficit, tumor, and trauma) were closely related to not obtaining sufficient baseline signals for Tc-MEP. When operating on patients with these considerations, we need to consider the efficacy and usefulness of Tc- MEP.

Screw Insertional Torque Measurement in Spine Surgery: Correlation With Bone Mineral Density and Hounsfield Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Achieving successful fusion during spine surgery is dependent on rigid pedicle screw fixation. To assess fixation strength, the insertional torque can be measured during intraoperative screw fixation. This study aimed to explore the technical feasibility of measuring the insertional torque of a pedicle screw, while investigating its relationship with bone density. METHODS: Thoraco-lumbar screw fixation fusion surgery was performed on 53 patients (mean age, 65.5 ± 9.8 years). The insertional torque of 284 screws was measured at the point passing through the pedicle using a calibrated torque wrench, with a specially designed connector to the spine screw system. The Hounsfield units (HU) value was determined by assessing the trabecular portion of the index vertebral body on sagittal computed tomography images. We analyzed the relationship between the measured insertional torque and the following bone strength parameters: bone mineral density (BMD) and HU of the vertebral body. RESULTS: The mean insertion torque was 105.55 ± 58.08 N∙cm and T-score value (BMD) was -1.14 ± 1.49. Mean HU value was 136.37 ± 57.59. Screw insertion torque was positively correlated with BMD and HU in whole patients. However, in cases of osteopenia, all variables showed very weak correlations with insertional torque. In patients with osteoporosis, there was no statistically significant correlation between BMD and torque strength; HU showed a significant correlation. CONCLUSION: The insertional torque of screw fixation significantly correlated with bone density (BMD and HU). HU measurements showed greater clinical significance than did BMD values in patients with osteoporosis.

Surgical Versus Conservative Management for Treating Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter study compared radiological parameters and clinical outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical management and investigated treatment characteristics associated with the successful management of unstable atlas fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fracture who underwent halo-vest immobilization (HVI) or surgical fixation. Clinical outcomes were assessed using neck visual analogue scale and disability index. The radiological assessment included total lateral mass displacement (LMD) and the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent surgical fixation and 21 received HVI (mean follow-up, 24.9 months). In the surgical fixation, but not in the HVI, LMD, and AADI showed statistically significant improvements at the last follow-up. The osseous healing rate and time-to-healing were 100% and 14.3 weeks with surgical fixation, compared with 71.43% and 20.0 weeks with HVI, respectively. Patients treated with HVI showed poorer neck pain and neck disability outcomes than those who received surgical treatment. LMD showed an association with osseous healing outcomes in nonoperative management. Clinical outcomes and osseous healing showed no significant differences according to Dickman's classification of transverse atlantal ligament injuries. CONCLUSION: Surgical internal fixation had a higher fusion rate, shorter fracture healing time, more favorable clinical outcomes, and a more significant reduction in LMD and AADI compared to nonoperative management. The pitfalls of external immobilization are inadequate maintenance and a lower probability of reducing fractured lateral masses. Stabilization by surgical reduction with interconnected fixation proved to be a more practical management strategy than nonoperative treatment for unstable atlas fractures.

Are plain radiographic measurements still consistent with a diagnosis of basilar invagination in the era of cross-sectional images?

Retrospective cross-sectional study To evaluate the validity and obtain optimal cutoff values of 3 radiologic measurements for the diagnosis of basilar invagination (BI). Two hundred seventy-six patients (46 patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion for BI and 230 patients who were treated for minor cervical trauma) seen in a single institution from January 2010 to December 2016 were included in this study. Age, sex, and body mass index were adjusted for the patients. The Ranawat index (RI), modified Ranawat method (MRM), and Redlund-Johnell method (RJM) were used to diagnose BI on plain radiographs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio of 3 radiologic measurements were compared. We also calculated the optimized cutoff values of 3 radiologic measurements using the receiver operating characteristic curve in our patients. The mean age of the 130 women and 146 men was 58.3 ±â€…14.5 years. The mean values of RI, MRM, and RJM in the BI group were 12.5 ±â€…3.3, 23.1 ±â€…3.8, and 27.3 ±â€…3.6 in women and 13.6 ±â€…2.6, 26.8 ±â€…4.2, and 34.7 ±â€…5.1 in men. There was a significant difference between the sexes (P < .05). The accuracies of RI, MRM, and RJM were 95%, 89.6%, and 92.3% in women and 93%, 68.2%, and 85.4% in men, respectively. The optimized cutoff values of RI, MRM, and RJM were 14, 26, and 32 mm in women and 15, 29, and 38 mm in men. Three radiologic measurements (RI, MRM, and RJM) are reliable for the diagnosis of BI even in the era of cross-sectional images. The validity of these measurements depends on sex and particular radiologic measurement. The optimized cutoff values of RI, MRM, and RJM were 14, 26, and 32 mm in women and 15, 29, and 37 mm in men. These cutoff values showed high validity when compared to the CT and MRI findings.

Analysis of Parameters That Can Predict the Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis in Cervical Fusion Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The absolute value of the cervical sagittal parameters cannot be guaranteed with certainty on all follow-up cervical radiographs. With the assumption that neck posture changes can occur at any time at each follow-up radiographic session, we examined whether the sagittal parameters change meaningfully and identified the factors most closely related to the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). METHODS: We enrolled 200 patients who had undergone either anterior cervical fusion (n = 100) or posterior cervical fusion (n = 100). The craniovertebral angle (CVA), mandible angle (MA), occipital slope (Os), C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), and C2-C7 SVA were measured on 2 different follow-up radiographs after surgery. The C2-C7 angle (C2-C7A) and changes (Δ) in the sagittal parameters between the 2 radiographs were then calculated. RESULTS: The ΔC2s and ΔCVA showed a very strong correlation with the ΔC2-C7 SVA (r = |0.70-0.93|). An independent t test showed a statistically significant difference for multiple sagittal parameters (i.e., ΔMA, ΔOs, ΔC2s, ΔC7s, and ΔCVA) between the large and small ΔC2-C7 SVA groups. In contrast, the change in the C2-C7A was without statistical significance. A stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed a high adjusted R2 value (0.841) between the ΔC2-C7 SVA and 2 parameters (standardized coefficient: ΔCVA, -0.563; ΔC2s, -0.398). CONCLUSIONS: During cervical fusion surgery, the CVA was the most predictable parameter reflecting the C2-C7 SVA in various analyses. The upper cervical parameters (Os and C2s) provided more explanatory power regarding the C2-C7 SVA changes than did the lower cervical parameter (C7s) or the presence of cervical lordosis (C2-C7A).

Analysis of Associating Radiologic Parameters With Clinical Outcomes After Posterior C1-2 Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which radiologic parameters affect clinical outcomes in patients underwent posterior C1-2 fusion for atlantoaxial dislocation. METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2017, among 98 patients underwent C1-2 posterior fusion, patients with previous cervical surgery or extending to subaxial spine or basilar invagination were excluded. Finally, 38 patients were included. O-C2, C1-2, C1-C7, C2-C7 cobb angle (CA), T1 slope, C1-7, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and posterior atlantodental interval (PADI) were measured at preoperative and postoperative 1 year. The difference between postoperative and preoperative values for each parameter was designated as Δvalue. Postoperative subaxial kyphosis (PSK) was defined to decrease ≥ 10° at subaxial spine. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.4 ± 15.9. Male to female was 14 to 24. Of radiologic parameters, C1-7 SVA and PADI were significantly changed from 26.4 ± 12.9 mm, 17.1 ± 3.3 mm to 22.6 ± 13.0 mm, 21.6 ± 3.4 mm. ΔC1-2 CA was correlated with ΔC1-7 CA and ΔC2-7 SVA. ΔPADI correlates with ΔO-C2 CA. VAS correlates with ΔC1-7 CA (p = 0.03). JOA score also correlates with ΔC2-7 SVA (p = 0.02). NDI was associated with ΔPADI (p < 0.01). The incidence of PSK was 23.7%, and not significant with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: ΔC1-2 CA was correlated with ΔC1C7 CA, ΔC2-7 SVA. ΔC1-7 CA, ΔC2-7 SVA, and ΔPADI were the key radiologic parameters to influence clinical outcomes. Postoperative C1-2 angle should be carefully determined as a factor affecting clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment.

Hounsfield unit measurement method and related factors that most appropriately reflect bone mineral density on cervical spine computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Our study's purpose was to determine the most reliable Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement method to reflect bone mineral density (BMD) on cervical spine computed tomography (CT) and to identify any factors that influence these results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 439 consecutive patients with mild head and neck injuries. Mean HU values of the C2-C7 vertebra were determined on each sagittal, coronal, and axial CT image. Correlation patterns were analyzed between the HU value and corresponding dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the lumbar vertebra (T-score) and femoral neck (T-score). A sub-group analysis was performed according to patient age, sex, and degree of spinal degeneration. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for HU and DXA ranged from 0.52 to 0.65 in all cervical segments. A simple linear regression analysis revealed the following formula: T-score = 0.01 × (HU) - 4.55. The mean HU values for osteopenia and osteoporosis were 284.0 ± 63.3 and 231.5 ± 52.8, respectively. The ROC curve indicated that the HU method has a sensitivity of 89.2% and specificity of 88.7% to diagnose osteoporosis. The HU measurement showed a high correlation value (range: r = 0.64-0.70) with spine DXA score regardless of the degree of degeneration or patient age or sex. CONCLUSION: HU values using the upper two cervical vertebrae (C2 and C3) reflected a more reliable BMD level than other segments. Additionally, the HU of cervical CT provided reliable information regardless of measurement plane, age or sex, and degree of degeneration.

Analyzing the Significance of T1 Slope minus Cervical Lordosis in Patients with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of T1 slope (a component of T1s minus cervical lordosis [CL]) is often constrained by anatomical limitations. In this situation, efforts should be made to find the exact meaning of T1s-CL and whether there are any alternatives to it. METHODS: We enrolled 117 patients who received two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Occipital slope, C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), T1, O-C2 angle (O-C2A), C2-7 angle (C2-7A), O-C7 angle (O-C7A), T1s-CL, C7-T1 angle (C7-T1A), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis were measured. We determined 16° (T1s-CL) as the reference point for dividing subjects into the mismatch group and the balance group, and a comparative analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean value of C7-T1A was constantly maintained within 2.6° peri-operatively. In addition, C2s and T1s-CL showed the same absolute change (Δ|0.8|°). The mean values of T1s-CL of the mismatch and balance groups were 23.0° and 7.6°, respectively. The five factors with the largest differences between the two groups were as follows : C2s (Δ13.3°), T1s-CL (Δ15.4°), O-C2A (Δ8.7°), C2-7A (Δ14.7°), and segmental angle (Δ7.9°) before surgery. Only four factors showed statistically significant change between the two groups after ACDF : T1s-CL (Δ4.0° vs. Δ0.2°), C2s (Δ3.2° vs. Δ0.7°), O-C2A (Δ2.6° vs. Δ1.3°), C2-7A (Δ6.3° vs. Δ1.3°). A very strong correlation between T1s-CL and C2s was also found (r=|0.88-0.96|). CONCLUSION: C2s itself may be the essential key to represent T1s-CL. The amounts and directions of change of these two factors (T1s-CL and C2s) were also almost identical. The above phenomenon was re-confirmed once again through the correlation analysis.

Physiologic Cervical Alignment Change between Cervical Spine X-ray and Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlations among various radiological parameters used to determine cervical alignment from cervical spine radiographs (X-CS) and cervical spine computed tomography (CT-CS), both within and between modalities. METHODS: This study included 168 patients (≤60 years old) without a definite whole spine deformity who underwent CT-CS and X-CS. We measured occipital slope (O-s), C1 slope, C2 slope, C7 slope, sella turcica - C7 sagittal vertical axis (StC7-SVA), spinocranial angle, T1 slope, and C27-SVA. We calculated the O-C2 angle, O-C7 angle, and C2-7 angle from the measured parameters and conducted correlation analyses among multiple parameters. RESULTS: The intrinsic correlation features among multiple cervical parameters were very similar for both X-CS and CT-CS. The two SVA parameters (C27-SVA and StC7-SVA) were mainly influenced by the upper cervical slope parameters (r=|0.13-0.74|) rather than the lower slope cervical parameters (r=|0.08-0.13|). The correlation between X-CS and CT-CS for each radiological parameter was statistically significant (r=0.26-0.44) except for O-s (r=0.10) and StC7-SVA (r=0.11). CONCLUSION: The correlation patterns within X-CS and CT-CS were very similar in this study. The correlation between X-ray and CT was statistically significant for most radiological parameters, and the correlation score increased when the horizontal gaze was consistently maintained. The lower cervical parameters were not statistically associated with translation-related parameters (C2-7 SVA and StC7-SVA). Therefore, the upper cervical segment may be a better predictor for determining head and neck translation.

Significance of Cervical Spine Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units to Predict Bone Mineral Density and the Subsidence After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation analysis between Hounsfield units (HU) and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) based on the clinical results of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no technique to directly measure bone mineral density (BMD) in the cervical spine. As computed tomography is a very popular preoperative planning modality, using the HU value from that analysis to predict osteoporosis is important for patient outcomes and applications in the clinical field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records for 235 patients who underwent 1-level (n=120) or 2-level (n=115) ACDF surgery. In the 1-level ACDF group, the HU was measured from C3 to C6 vertebra, while that for the 2-level ACDF group was measured from 3 surgical index vertebrae. The correlation patterns were analyzed with the corresponding DXA (T-score) for each patient. Subsidence of fusion segment was defined as change in distance between plate-tip and upper (lower) margin of the vertebra (index level) after 4 months of follow-up. In addition, to determine the relevant factors that influence fusion segment subsidence, other preoperative (C2 slope, C7 slope, C2-C7 angle, and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis) and postoperative parameters (coronal angle and segmental angle change) were measured. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between HU and DXA ranged from 0.57 to 0.71 in the 1-level ACDF group and from 0.59 to 0.66 in the 2-level ACDF group. The correlation between HU and DXA was statistically significant regardless of the degree of anterior osteophyte (r=-0.65 to 0.78). Total subsidence height was 3.8 mm after ACDF, and both HU and DXA were statistically correlated with total subsidence (r=0.26-0.28). In multivariate analysis, HU (middle vertebra) value was statistically associated with the degree of total subsidence. The high-subsidence group (≥4.5 mm) showed smaller HU values (284.1 vs. 316.0) and T-scores (-0.5 vs. 0.1) compared to the low-subsidence group (<4.5 mm). The discrepancy group, defined as cases with excess plate shift on 1 side, also showed smaller HU values (260.4 vs. 312.4) and higher degrees of total subsidence than the matched group. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between HU in cervical computed tomography and lumbar DXA (T-score) was statistically significant in both 1-level and 2-level ACDF. The level of BMD (HU or DXA) is a very important factor for clinically determining the amount and regularity of subsidence after ACDF. Therefore, HU can be a good alternative assessment to accurately reflect as much of the BMD degree as DXA in the cervical spine.

A new nomenclature system for the surgical treatment of cervical spine deformity, developing, and validation of SOF system.

PURPOSE: To develop and assess the reliability of new nomenclature system that systematically organizes osteotomy techniques and briefly describes the surgical approach, the surgical sequence, and the fixation technique for cervical spine deformity (CSD). METHODS: We developed a new classification system (SOF system) for CSD surgery that describes the sequence of surgical approach (S), the grade of osteotomy (O), and the information of fixation (F) using alphanumeric codes. Twenty CSD osteotomies (8 anterior osteotomies, 12 posterior osteotomies) were included in this study to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement based on operation records. Six observers performed independent evaluations of the operation records in random order. Each observer described 20 CSD surgeries using the SOF system twice (> 30 days between assessments) based on operation records to validate SOF system. RESULTS: Overall agreement (among all six observers at the initial assessment) on the anterior and posterior osteotomy was ICC = 0.96 and ICC = 0.91, respectively. Overall agreement (repeat observations after at least 30 days) on the anterior and posterior osteotomy was ICC = 0.96 and ICC = 0.91, respectively. This data showed that both inter- and intra-observer agreement revealed 'excellent'. CONCLUSION: This study introduces the SOF system of the CSD surgery to understand the surgical sequence, the type of osteotomy and the fixation techniques. The investigation of the inter- and intra-observer agreement revealed 'excellent agreement' for both anterior and posterior osteotomies. Thus, SOF system can provide a consistent description of the various CSD surgeries and its use will provide a common frame for CSD surgery and help communicate between surgeons.

Influence of dynamic neck motion on the clinical usefulness of multi-positional MRI in cervical degenerative spondylosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find out additional indications for multi-positional MRI in cervical degenerative spondylosis (CDS) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy that underwent multi-positional MRI and X-ray were included. Muhle's grade, C2-7 angle, and C7 slope were measured. Patients were assigned to the stenosis group (Group S) when Muhle's grades were increased by more than two or maximum grade was reached. Other patients were assigned to the maintenance group (Group M). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. Statistical significance was accepted for p values of < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were assigned to the S group and 39 patients to the M group. Mean C2-7 angle difference in extension (eC27A) between S and M groups was 10.97° (p = 0.002). The mean inter-group difference between C2-7 angle in extension and neutral positions (e-nC27A) was 14.39° (p = 0.000). Mean C7 slope difference in neutral position was - 6.53° (p = 0.002). Based on areas under ROC curves (AUCs), e-nC27A, eC27A, and negative C7 slope had AUCs of 0.934 (95% CI 0.876-0.992), 0.752 (95% CI 0.624-0.880), and 0.720 (95% CI 0.588-0.851), respectively. The optimal cutoff value of e-nC27A was 15.4 degrees, which had a diagnostic accuracy of 88.9%. CONCLUSION: Multi-positional MRI helps to find dynamic cord compressive lesion in CDS patients. The higher eC27A, e-nC27A values and smaller C7 slope were found to increase the likelihood of cervical dynamic stenosis. Among other factors, we recommend multi-positional MRI before surgery especially when a patient's e-nC27A is > 15.4 degrees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Intraoperative surveillance of the vertebral artery using indocyanine green angiography and Doppler sonography in craniovertebral junction surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate the usefulness of indocyanine green (ICG) angiography and Doppler sonography for monitoring the vertebral artery (VA) during craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery and compare the incidence of VA injury (VAI) between the groups with and without the monitoring of VA using ICG angiography and Doppler sonography. METHODS: In total, 344 consecutive patients enrolled who underwent CVJ surgery. Surgery was performed without intraoperative VA monitoring tools in 262 cases (control group) and with VA monitoring tools in 82 cases (monitoring group). The authors compared the incidence of VAI between groups. The procedure times of ICG angiography, change of VA flow velocity measured by Doppler sonography, and complication were investigated. RESULTS: There were 4 VAI cases in the control group, and the incidence of VAI was 1.5%. Meanwhile, there were no VAI cases in the monitoring group. The procedure time of ICG angiography was less than 5 minutes (mean [± SD] 4.6 ± 2.1 minutes) and VA flow velocity was 11.2 ± 4.5 cm/sec. There were several cases in which the surgical method had to be changed depending on the VA monitoring. The combined use of ICG angiography and Doppler sonography was useful not only to monitor VA patency but also to assess the quality of blood flow during CVJ surgery, especially in the high-risk group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of ICG angiography and Doppler sonography enables real-time intraoperative monitoring of the VA by detecting blood flow and flow velocity. As the arteries get closer, they provide auditory and visual feedback to the surgeon. This real-time image guidance could be a useful tool, especially for high-risk patients and inexperienced surgeons, to avoid iatrogenic VAI during any CVJ surgery.

Endovascular Treatment of a Lumbar Spinal Epidural Arteriovenous Fistula with Radiculopathy: A Case Report.

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEDAVFs) are rare spinal vascular malformations that are difficult to diagnose and treat. SEDAVFs can be asymptomatic; however, symptoms can arise from the compression of adjacent nerve roots by dilated vein and perimedullary venous reflux, caused by shunting into the epidural venous plexus. A 31-year-old male presented to our institution with a 2-year history of progressively worsening low-back pain, radiating thigh pain, and sensory changes in his lower extremities. MRI and CT angiography demonstrated dilated epidural vascular lesion compressing the nerve root. The SEDAVF was embolized with multiple coils, which alleviated the nerve root compression from the engorged venous varix and improved the patient's radiculopathy. Our experience from this case shows that endovascular coil embolization using the transarterial approach can be an effective treatment for SEDAVF and an alternative to surgical ligations.

Is the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score Accurate and Reliable in Predicting Vertebral Compression Fractures for Spinal Metastasis? A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.

Spinal metastases can present with varying degrees of mechanical instability. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was developed as a tool to assess spinal neoplastic-related instability while helping to guide referrals among oncology specialists. Some previous papers suggested that the SINS was accurate and reliable, while others disagreed with this opinion. We performed a systematic review regarding the SINS to evaluate its accuracy and precision in predicting vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). The 21 included studies investigated a total of 2118 patients. Thirteen studies dealt with the accuracy of SINS to predict postradiotherapy VCFs, and eight dealt with the precision. Among 13 studies, 11 agreed that the SINS categories showed statistically significant accuracy in predicting VCF. Among eight studies, body collapse was effective for predicting VCFs in six studies, and alignment and bone lesion in two studies. Location has no statistical significance in predicting VCFs in any of the eight studies. The precision of SINS categories was substantial to excellent in six of eight studies. Among the six components of the SINS, the majority of the included studies reported that location showed near perfect agreement; body collapse, alignment, and posterolateral involvement showed moderate agreement; and bone lesion showed fair agreement. Bone lesion showed significant accuracy in predicting VCFs in half of eight studies, but displayed fair reliability in five of seven studies. Although location was indicated as having near perfect reliability, the component showed no accuracy for predicting VCFs in any of the studies and deleting or modifying the item needs to be considered. The SINS system may be accurate and reliable in predicting the occurrence of postradiotherapy VCFs for spinal metastasis. Some components seem to be substantially weak and need to be revised.

SOF System; A New Nomenclature System for the Surgical Techniques of Cervical Spine Deformity.

Although cervical spinal deformity (CSD) can have a profoundly negative impact on an individual's quality of life and there have been many advances in surgical treatment of CSD in recent years, there exists no comprehensive classification system of surgical treatment that categorizes anterior and posterior surgery separately according to the grade of surgery. The objective of this study is to introduce the new classification system of various surgical treatments for CSD. We developed a new classification system (SOF system) for CSD surgery that describes the sequence of surgical approach (S), the grade of osteotomy (O), and the information of fixation (F) using alphanumeric codes. This new classification system can provide a consistent description of the various osteotomies performed in CSD surgery. Especially, regarding research, there has been a clear benefit to this classification. Having a standardized classification that allows for common frame for cervical deformity correction surgery, communication between surgeons and the evaluation of the CSD surgeries make it possible to conduct global comparative research about surgical outcome.