Durapore vs. Hy-Tape for securing endotracheal tubes during general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: Adhesive tape is commonly used to secure endotracheal tubes (ETT) during general anaesthesia. Although a variety of adhesives are used in practice, few studies have investigated the likelihood of different adhesives in producing facial skin injury. Given that differences in cost exist between adhesives that are often used interchangeably, it would be prudent to use the most economical option. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of patients undergoing general anaesthesia with an ETT was conducted. Patients were randomised in a blinded fashion to use Durapore (DP) on either the right or left side of the face to secure the ETT, with Hy-Tape (HT) on the contralateral side. Skin photographs were taken prior to tape application and following tape removal. These were evaluated by three dermatologists to determine presence or absence of facial skin erythema, scaling, oedema, and tearing. Differences were compared using McNemar's test. For outcomes analysis, a non-inferiority margin of 20% difference was used with respect to the 95% CI. RESULTS: Among 112 patients, 33.0% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 55.6 (15.9) years. Comparing DP vs. HT, noninferiority was demonstrated in the patients with skin erythema (1.8% difference, 95% CI: -5.6 to 9.2, P = 0.79), oedema (3.6% difference, 95% CI: -2.8 to 10.0%, P = 0.34), scaling (5.4% difference, 95% CI: -4.1 to 14.8, P = 0.31), and tearing (0.9% difference, 95% CI: -5.2 to 7.3, P > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: There is a non-inferior difference in the proportion of patients with facial skin erythema after use of DP vs. HT to secure the ETT.

The effect of Tegaderm™ versus EyeGard® on eyelid erythema during general anesthesia: a randomized-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Application of adhesive tape to the eyelids during general anesthesia decreases the risk of corneal abrasion but may increase the risk of eyelid injury. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in eyelid erythema when covering the eyelid with either Tegaderm™ or an EyeGard®. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face study of patients undergoing general anesthesia at an urban tertiary care academic medical centre. Each patient was randomized to having one eyelid covered with Tegaderm and the other with EyeGard. Photographs were taken prior to extubation and evaluated by three dermatologists. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative eyelid erythema. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of corneal abrasion and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included in our final analysis. Erythema was present on 117 (77%) eyelids covered with Tegaderm and 105 (70%) eyelids covered with EyeGard (% difference, 8; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 14; P = 0.03). No corneal abrasions were reported. The median [interquartile range] patient satisfaction score with eyelid condition was similar with Tegaderm vs EyeGard (5 [5-5] vs 5 [5-5], respectively; P = 0.84). CONCLUSION: We found a small increase in postoperative eyelid erythema when using Tegaderm compared with EyeGard. While EyeGard could decrease the risk of eyelid erythema, this should be balanced against other potential benefits of Tegaderm such as protection from fluids leaking onto the cornea. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03549429); registered 8 June, 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'application de ruban adhésif sur les paupières pendant l'anesthésie générale réduit le risque d'abrasion cornéenne mais pourrait augmenter le risque de lésion aux paupières. L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer s'il existe une différence dans l'incidence d'érythème de la paupière lorsque l'on couvre la paupière à l'aide d'un Tegaderm™ ou d'un EyeGard®. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude prospective, randomisée, à double insu et à visage divisé auprès de patients subissant une anesthésie générale dans un centre médical universitaire urbain de soins tertiaires. Chaque patient a été randomisé à avoir une paupière couverte de Tegaderm et l'autre d'un EyeGard. Des photos ont été prises avant l'extubation et évaluées par trois dermatologistes. Le critère d'évaluation principal était l'incidence d'érythème postopératoire de la paupière. Les critères secondaires comprenaient l'incidence d'abrasion cornéenne et la satisfaction des patients. RéSULTATS: Au total, 151 patients ont été inclus dans notre analyse finale. Il y avait présence d'érythème sur 117 (77 %) paupières couvertes de Tegaderm et 105 (70 %) paupières couvertes d'un EyeGard (% de différence, 8; intervalle de confiance 95 %, 2 à 14; P = 0,03). Aucune abrasion cornéenne n'a été rapportée. Le score médian [écart interquartile] de satisfaction des patients en ce qui touchait à l'état de leurs paupières était semblable pour le Tegaderm et le EyeGard (5 [5­5] vs 5 [5­5], respectivement; P = 0,84). CONCLUSION: Nous avons observé une légère augmentation du nombre d'érythèmes postopératoires de la paupière lors de l'utilisation du Tegaderm comparativement au EyeGard. Alors que le EyeGard pourrait réduire le risque d'érythème de la paupière, il convient de sous-peser ses avantages par rapport aux autres avantages potentiels du Tegaderm tels que la protection contre les liquides coulant sur la cornée. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03549429); enregistrée le 8 juin 2018.

Nonscarring alopecia associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Vitamin D is well known for its role in bone health and immune regulation, playing a role in cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. Vitamin D deficiency also has been associated with various forms of nonscarring hair loss. We describe a notable case of nonscarring alopecia associated with only vitamin D deficiency in which vitamin D replacement therapy helped promote hair regrowth. We also discuss diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of vitamin D deficiency.

The effect of phototherapy on progression to tumors in patients with patch and plaque stage of mycosis fungoides.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy has been a mainstay in the treatment of mycosis fungoides (MF). However, the recent findings of UV-induced p53 mutations in advanced MF suggest that phototherapy may contribute to disease progression. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of phototherapy on the time to tumor progression and overall survival in MF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients seen at the University of Pittsburgh Cutaneous Lymphoma Clinic from 1979 to 2016. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients with MF were identified. 258 (74.8%) were diagnosed at stage IA or IB. 43 out of the 258 (16.6%) progressed to tumor stage. Before tumor development, 30 out of the 43 (69.8%) patients received phototherapy, and 13 (30.2%) did not. Patients who received phototherapy had a longer median time to tumor progression than those who did not: 3.5 years (interquartile range = 1.9-5.7) versus 1.2 years (0.2-2.3) (p = .001). Patients who received phototherapy also survived longer: 6.9 years (interquartile range = 4.3-9.5) versus 3.8 years (3.0-4.5) (p = .014). LIMITATIONS: Limited information on specific phototherapy start dates, durations, and treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic effects of phototherapy, with longer times to tumor progression and increased overall survival, appear to outweigh its potential adverse effects.

The Skin Cancer Objective Structured Clinical Examination (SCOSCE): A multi-institutional collaboration to develop and validate a clinical skills assessment for melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Assessing medical students on core skills related to melanoma detection is challenging in the absence of a well-developed instrument. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an objective structured clinical examination for the detection and evaluation of melanoma among medical students. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort analysis of student and objective rater agreement on performance of clinical skills and assessment of differences in performance across 3 schools. RESULTS: Kappa coefficients indicated excellent agreement for 3 of 5 core skills including commenting on the presence of the moulage (k = 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.96), obtaining a history for the moulage (k = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.94), and making a clinical impression (k = 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.92). There were no differences in performance across schools with respect to 3 of 5 core skills: commenting on the presence of the moulage (P = .15), initiating a history (P = .53), and managing the suspicious lesion (P value range .07-.17). Overall, 54.2% and 44.7% of students commented on the presence of the moulage and achieved maximum performance of core skills, respectively, with no difference in performance across schools. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include overall sample size of students and schools. CONCLUSION: The Skin Cancer Objective Structured Clinical Examination represents a potentially important instrument to measure students' performance on the optimal step-by-step evaluation of a melanoma.