Assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness to salbutamol or ipratropium using different criteria in treatment-naïve patients with asthma and COPD.

Background: The criteria for significant bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) were published in 2005 by the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society, which were revised in 2021, however, data on the agreement between these two recommendations in untreated patients with airflow limitation are missing. Aims: We aimed to study BDR to salbutamol (SABA) or ipratropium bromide (SAMA) in patients with suspected bronchial asthma or COPD at initial clinical presentation using the 2005 and 2021 criteria and explore clinical factors associated with BDR+. Methods: Symptomatic, treatment-naïve patients with expiratory airflow limitation (n = 105, 57 men, age (mean ± standard deviation): 65 ± 10 years) underwent BDR testing with 400 mcg salbutamol (day 1) or 80 mcg ipratropium bromide (day 2) and BDR was measured after 15 and 30 minutes. Clinical factors with risk for BDR+ were assessed with binomial logistic regression analysis. Results: We found a good agreement between the number of 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ patients at 15 and 30 minutes post-salbutamol and post-ipratropium (88.6-94.8%). More patients showed BDR+ after 30 minutes than following 15 minutes using either criterion. When results at 30 minutes are considered, the number of patients with 2005-BDR+ (82%) was higher than that of 2021-BDR+ (75%), with the proportion of SAMA+ patients being higher than that of SABA+ (2005: 70% vs. 49%, Fisher exact p < 0.01; 2021: 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.001). 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ to SABA were associated with decreasing pre-BD FEV1% predicted and the presence of cough. More patients with asthma were in the SABA+ group compared to the SAMA+ group (2005: 71% vs. 53%, Fischer exact p = 0.04; 2021: 77% vs. 52%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Fewer patients show BDR+ according to the 2021 criteria in comparison with the 2005 recommendations, and protocols for BDR testing may consider the assessment of response to both SABA and SAMA after 30 minutes.

Comparative study of the inhalation parameters of COPD patients through NEXThaler® and Ellipta® dry powder inhalers.

The deposition of dry powder aerosol drugs depends on the inhalation parameters of the patients through the inhaler. These data are not directly measured in clinical practice. Their prediction based on the routinely measured spirometric data could help in choosing the appropriate device and optimizing the therapy. The aim of this study was to perform inhalation experiments to find correlations between inhalation parameters of COPD patients through two DPI devices and their native spirometric data, gender, age and disease severity. Another goal was to establish relationships between peak inspiratory flows through NEXThaler® and Ellipta® inhalers and their statistical determinants. Breathing parameters of 113 COPD patients were measured by normal spirometry and while inhaling through the two DPIs. Statistical analysis of the measured data was performed. The average values of peak inspiratory flow through the devices (PIFdev) were 68.4 L/min and 78.0 L/min for NEXThaler® and Ellipta®, respectively. PIFdev values were significantly higher for males than for females, but differences upon age, BMI and disease severity group were not significant. PIFdev values correlated best with their native spirometric counterparts (PIF) and linear relationships between them were revealed. Current results may be used in the future to predict the success of inhalation of COPD patients through DPI devices, which may help in the inhaler choice. By choosing the appropriate device-drug pair for each patient the lung dose can be increased and the efficiency of the therapy improved. Further results of the clinical study will be the subject of a next publication.

Risk of exacerbation and mortality in asthma: a 10-year retrospective financial database analysis of the Hungarian Health Insurance Fund.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is the most prevalent obstructive pulmonary disease, with drastically improved treatment options over the past decades. However, there is still a proportion of patients with suboptimal level of asthma control, leading to multiple hospitalisation due to severe acute exacerbation (SAE) and earlier death. In our study, we aimed to assess the risk of SAEs and mortality in patients who suffered an SAE. METHODS: The database of the National Health Insurance Fund was used to retrospectively analyse the data of all asthmatic patients who had been hospitalised for an SAE between 2009 and 2019. We used a competing risk model to analyse the effect of each exacerbation on the risk of further SAEs with age, sex, Charlson index and the number of severe and moderate exacerbations included as covariates. RESULT: Altogether, 9257 asthmatic patients suffered at least one exacerbation leading to hospitalisation during the study time. The majority (75.8%) were women, and the average age was 58.24 years. Most patients had at least one comorbidity. 3492 patients suffered at least one further exacerbation and 1193 patients died of any cause. In the competing risk model, each SAE increased the risk of further exacerbations (HR=2.078-7.026; p<0.0001 for each case) but not death. The risk of SAEs was also increased by age (HR=1.008) female sex (HR=1.102) and with the number of days of the first SAE (HR=1.007). CONCLUSIONS: Even though asthma is generally a well-manageable disease, there still are many patients who suffer SAEs that significantly increase the risk of further similar SAEs.