Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Physiol Res ; 69(Suppl 4): S661-S679, 2020 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33646007

RESUMO

Growing worldwide efforts to replace (reduce) animal testing and to improve alternative in vitro tests which may be more efficient in terms of both time, cost and scientific validity include also genotoxicity/mutagenicity endpoints. The aim of the review article was to summarize currently available in vitro testing approaches in this field, their regulatory acceptance and recommended combinations for classification of chemicals. A study using the combination of Comet Assay performed on two cell lines and the Chromosomal Aberration test on human peripheral lymphocytes was performed with the aim to predict the genotoxic potential of selected paraben esters, serving as a model chemical group. Parabens are widely used in consumer products as preservatives and have been reported to exhibit inconclusive results in numerous genotoxicity studies. The Comet Assay identified Ethylparaben and Benzylparaben as potentially genotoxic. The Chromosomal Aberration test revealed weak genotoxic potential in case of Ethylparaben and positive genotoxicity in case of Butylparaben, Propylparaben and Isopropylparaben. The main reasons for variability seem to be limited water solubility of parabens, determining their bioavailability at the cellular level, and absence of metabolic activation in the Comet Assay. The results confirmed that the Comet Assay should serve as a screening test and should not be used as a stand-alone method for classification of genotoxicity. The weight of evidence approach in risk assessment should be supported with data generated with the use of human relevant in vitro methods based on cells / tissues of human origin.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Aberrações Cromossômicas/induzido quimicamente , Dano ao DNA , Linfócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Mutagênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Parabenos/toxicidade , Animais , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaio Cometa , Células HaCaT , Humanos , Linfócitos/patologia , Micronúcleos com Defeito Cromossômico/induzido quimicamente , Testes para Micronúcleos , Medição de Risco
2.
Physiol Res ; 68(Suppl 4): S467-S474, 2019 12 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118478

RESUMO

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses photosensitive substance to provoke a cytotoxic reaction causing a cell damage or cell death. The substances, photosensitizers, are usually derivates of porphyrine or phtalocyanine. Photosensitizers must be activated by light in order to produce reactive oxygen species, mainly singlet oxygen. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) utilizes ultrasound to enhance a cytotoxic effects of compounds called sonosensitizers. In this study we investigated photodynamic and sonodynamic effect of chloraluminium phtalocyanine disulfonate (ClAlPcS(2)) on HeLa cells. DNA damage, cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production were assessed to find whether the combination of PDT and SDT inflicts HeLa cells more than PDT alone. We found that the combined therapy increases DNA fragmentation, enhances ROS production and decreases cell survival. Our results indicate that ClAlPcS(2) can act as a sonosentitiser and combined with PDT causes more irreversible changes to the cells resulting in cell death than PDT alone.


Assuntos
Indóis , Compostos Organometálicos , Fotoquimioterapia , Ensaios de Seleção de Medicamentos Antitumorais , Células HeLa , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA