A retrospective cohort study of patients with eosinophilia referred to a tertiary centre.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with eosinophilia (an increased number of eosinophilic granulocytes > 0.5 × 108/l in the blood) are encountered in all medical specialties and frequently need thorough workup to identify the eliciting causes and decide whether treatment is indicated. In Denmark, highly specialised centres for eosinophilic diseases or conditions have been established to provide a foundation for the management of complicated cases. Here, we present experiences from such a multidisciplinary centre. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients seen in our tertiary centre for eosinophilia in the 2016-2019 period. RESULTS: Referrals mainly derived from specialised secondary care and to a lesser degree from primary care physicians. Patients were either asymptomatic or exhibited symptoms from up to three organ systems and presented a median eosinophil count of 1.7 × 108/l. Up to eight new clonality analyses or imaging studies per patient were performed after referral. One of these, T-cell receptor analysis, was performed frequently but provided limited information, whereas, e.g., flow cytometry proved more clinically applicable owing to its broader diagnostic range. In total, 51 patients were evaluated and classified as secondary (59%), myeloid neoplasm with PDGFRA rearrangement (2%), idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (31%) and idiopathic hypereosinophilia (8%). CONCLUSION: The value of a multidisciplinary and versatile approach in a highly specialised centre has a positive impact on diagnostic processes as well as on the evaluation of treatment need. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Hospitalised patients' experiences during Negative Pressure Wound Therapy due to surgical site infection after vascular and cardiac surgery.

Surgical site infections that develop after vascular and cardiac surgery are often treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). Due to the severity of the infection and risk of bleeding, this NPWT often requires hospitalisation. Fourteen patients were selected for qualitative interviews to investigate their experiences and the meaning of patient participation during hospitalisation with NPWT. Results show that hospitalisation induces tension between an intrusion of privacy and being part of a community. Patients do not feel ill nor are considered ill. They feel minimised, lack participation and miss continuity, yet they still accept their circumstances by adjusting to hospital routines and treatment. The hospital's organisational framework compromises patient participation, yet patients still participate in supporting their own wound healing. They worry, are bored, lack a clear time horizon, and appear to be in an apathetic mood despite having significant time on their hands. In conclusion, the tension between a patient's privacy and sense of community, as well as involuntary participation in other patients' lives, compromises dignity and increases stress. Wound healing appears to be prolonged due to fasting, inactivity and stress. Self-reliant patients are at risk of being minimised and lack adequate emotional care, and the hospital's organisational framework hampers patient feelings of involvement and participation.