Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Screening and Operative Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many areas of health care and had a significant impact on care delivery, including breast cancer. METHODS: To better understand the changes to detection and treatment of breast cancer at our institution, we analyzed mammogram rates (screening and diagnostic) and breast cancer operations in 2019-2020. Mammography rates were calculated using county level census data for eligible women (Z-test). For breast cancer staging, a stage severity score was analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U-test (two-tail, P < .05) with proportions derived from WFBH operative volume quarterly reports. Results: Data revealed a relative decline from 2019 to 2020 in breast cancer screening. Screening mammograms decreased by 44% or 1558 fewer screening mammograms (Z = 4.75, P < .00001) and by 21% or 771 fewer for diagnostic mammograms (Z = 2.16, P = .03). With regards to breast cancer operations, we did not identify a statistically significant difference in number of new breast cancer operations at WFBH with 340 cases in 2020 as compared to 384 cases in 2019 (P = .9905). We compared a breast cancer severity score (weighted by stage at time of operation), which did not reveal statistically significant difference in clinical stage of breast cancer at time of operation (P = .71, U = 28). CONCLUSION: Mammography was impacted more than breast surgery cases by the COVID-19 pandemic. More data needs to be collected to evaluate future morbidity and mortality related to breast cancer operations and persistent disparities related to delay in breast cancer care due to COVID-19.

Feasibility of lung cancer RNA acquisition from a single transbronchial or transthoracic needle pass (FASTT trial).

INTRODUCTION: RNA isolation from tumor tissue is used for biomarker analyses and validation. Limited diagnostic material from small volume biopsies combined with an increasing demand for standard histologic, molecular characterization, and next generation sequencing applications often leads to limited material for research. We sought to evaluate small volume sampling of lung cancer tissue collected from a single needle pass during a diagnostic procedure and determine if it can provide RNA of acceptable quantity and quality. METHODS: We enrolled 140 patients with probable primary bronchogenic carcinoma and collected RNA from a dedicated FNA aspiration. Total RNA (ηg), RNA integrity number (RIN), and %Mass in base pairs were evaluated from each patient sample. A customized nanoString nCounter® 95-gene panel was used to profile the expression patterns of feature NSCLC genes. We compared gene expression patterns that distinguish lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) in our cohort with a corresponding Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) NSCLC datasets. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients consented. RNA-extraction was performed in 101 eligible patients. A satisfactory total RNA mass and RIN was quantified for all samples with a similar distribution among cellular subtypes. Mean %-Mass over 300 base pairs was noted for all specimens and 96% of samples met criteria to perform genetic evaluation with our commercialized gene expression assay. The FNA-derived transcriptomic results showed excellent consistency with the TCGA counterparts, and the differential expression pattern of LUAD vs LUSC subtypes were highly similar. DISCUSSION: In this study, RNA retrieval from a single-pass FNA regardless of procedural approach showed equivalence and suitability for gene expression assessments. RNA extraction from small volume samples has the potential to provide valuable material for genetic profiling.