Embedded Specialist Palliative Care in Cystic Fibrosis: Results of a Randomized Feasibility Clinical Trial.

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a progressive genetic disease characterized by multisystem symptom burden. Specialist palliative care (PC), as a model of care, has been shown to be effective in improving quality of life and reducing symptom burden in other conditions, but has not been tested in CF. Objectives: To develop and test the feasibility and acceptability of a specialist PC intervention embedded within an outpatient CF clinic. Design: Single-site, equal-allocation randomized pilot study comparing usual care with addition of four protocolized quarterly visits with a PC nurse practitioner. Participants: Adults with CF age ≥18 years with any of the following: FEV1% predicted ≤50, ≥2 CF-related hospitalizations in the past 12 months, supplemental oxygen use, or noninvasive mechanical ventilation use, and moderate-or-greater severity of any symptoms on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Measurements: Randomization rate, intervention visit completion, data completements, participant ratings of intervention acceptability and benefit, and intervention delivery fidelity. Results: We randomized 50 adults with CF of 65 approached (77% randomization rate) to intervention (n = 25) or usual care (n = 25), mean age 38, baseline mean FEV1% predicted 41.8 (usual care), and 41.2 (intervention). No participants withdrew, five were lost to follow-up, and two died (88% retention). In the intervention group, 23 of 25 completed all study visits; 94% stated the intervention was not burdensome, and 97.6% would recommend the intervention to others with CF. More than 90% of study visits addressed topics prescribed by intervention manual. Conclusions: Adding specialist PC to standard clinic visits for adults with CF is feasible and acceptable.

Primary palliative care for heart failure provided within ambulatory cardiology: A randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is characterized by physical and emotional symptoms and decreased quality of life (QoL). Palliative care can reduce burdens of serious illness but often is limited to inpatient or academic settings. OBJECTIVES: To develop and test the Primary Education for Nurses in Palliative care-HF (PENPal-HF) intervention, training outpatient cardiology nurses to address symptom burden, patient priorities for care and QoL, and advance care planning as part of quarterly HF visits. METHODS: We conducted a pilot randomized clinical trial for adults with NYHA Stage III or IV HF and ≥ 2 hospitalizations in the past 12 months, recruited from a community-based cardiology clinic. Participants were randomized 2:1, PENPal-HF plus usual care versus usual care alone. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. RESULTS: We randomized 30 adults with Stage III HF - 20 to PENPal-HF and 10 to usual care. Most in the intervention group (71%) and in the control group (62%) completed the study through the final outcome assessment in week 56; 5 participants died. Of 20 participants in the intervention, 14 (70%) remained in the study through the end of intervention visits; 11 (55%) completed all visits. Most intervention participants (93.75%) agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their care, and 87.5% agreed or strongly agreed that all people with HF should receive the intervention. Most intervention group participants (93.75%) reported a perceived improvement in physical symptoms, mood, and/or QoL. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that nurse-led primary palliative care in outpatient cardiology settings is promising. Research is warranted to determine efficacy and effectiveness.

Associations between demographic characteristics and unmet supportive care needs in adults with cystic fibrosis.

CONTEXT: Patients living with cystic fibrosis (CF) report impaired quality of life. Little is known about unmet supportive care needs among adults living with CF and how they are associated with demographic characteristics. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to identify associations between demographic variables and unmet supportive care needs regarding anxiety, sadness, pain and uncertainty about the future of living with CF. METHODS: We recruited 165 adults with CF from a single academic medical centre to complete a brief demographic survey and the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-34), a validated self-reported needs assessment that measures the prevalence of and preferences for support for 34 needs that commonly occur in patients with serious illness. RESULTS: Approximately half of the participant sample was male, with a median age of 29 years, varying income levels and a range of lung disease severity. We found statistically significant associations between insufficient income and increased odds of reporting need for support regarding anxiety (OR: 6.48; 95% CI 2.08 to 20.2), sadness (OR: 6.15; 95% CI 2.04 to 18.5), pain (OR: 7.06; 95% CI 2.22 to 22.4) and worries surrounding uncertainty about the future (OR: 3.43; 95% CI 1.18 to 9.99). CONCLUSION: Adults with CF report significant unmet needs for support in several physical and emotional domains. Many of these domains were associated with demographic characteristics, most notably, income. Our findings underscore the importance of developing treatment approaches that are sensitive to patient demographics when addressing unmet supportive care needs among adults with CF.

Prevalence of unmet palliative care needs in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Physical and emotional burdens impair quality of life (QoL) in many adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Palliative care (PC) improves QoL in other serious illnesses, yet the full array of palliative needs amenable to PC are unknown in CF. METHODS: We surveyed 164 adults with CF using the Supportive Care Needs Survey 34 (SCNS-34) to assess unmet PC needs across five domains, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to assess symptom burden, and the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) to assess CF-specific QoL. We assessed associations between SCNS-34 domain scores and respondent characteristics, including symptom burden and FEV1. RESULTS: Median age was 29 years; 56% of respondents were male. Median FEV1 was 57% predicted. 78% of respondents reported ≥1 unmet PC need; physical and daily living (72%) and psychological (66%) needs were most prevalent. Symptom burden was correlated with all SCNS-34 domains scores, and strongly correlated with the physical (r = 0.79) and psychological (r = 0.72) domain scores. FEV1 was moderately inversely correlated with the physical domain score (r = -0.41). Forty-four of the 45 inverse correlations between SCNS-34 domain scores and CFQ-R domain scores were significant. Patient-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with higher scores in five and four SCNS-34 domains, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CF have substantial unmet PC needs. Patient-reported symptom burden is more strongly associated with reporting unmet PC needs than FEV1. Routine screening of unmet PC needs, using tools such as the SCNS-34, may enable CF care teams to optimize the provision of primary and specialist PC.

Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: The use of palliative care programs and the number of trials assessing their effectiveness have increased. Objective: To determine the association of palliative care with quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, survival, and other outcomes for people with life-limiting illness and for their caregivers. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL to July 2016. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of palliative care interventions in adults with life-limiting illness. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Narrative synthesis was conducted for all trials. Quality of life, symptom burden, and survival were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis, with estimates of QOL translated to units of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-palliative care scale (FACIT-Pal) instrument (range, 0-184 [worst-best]; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 9 points); and symptom burden translated to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) (range, 0-90 [best-worst]; MCID, 5.7 points). Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality of life, symptom burden, survival, mood, advance care planning, site of death, health care satisfaction, resource utilization, and health care expenditures. Results: Forty-three RCTs provided data on 12 731 patients (mean age, 67 years) and 2479 caregivers. Thirty-five trials used usual care as the control, and 14 took place in the ambulatory setting. In the meta-analysis, palliative care was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in patient QOL at the 1- to 3-month follow-up (standardized mean difference, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.83; FACIT-Pal mean difference, 11.36] and symptom burden at the 1- to 3-month follow-up (standardized mean difference, -0.66; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.07; ESAS mean difference, -10.30). When analyses were limited to trials at low risk of bias (n = 5), the association between palliative care and QOL was attenuated but remained statistically significant (standardized mean difference, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.34; FACIT-Pal mean difference, 4.94), whereas the association with symptom burden was not statistically significant (standardized mean difference, -0.21; 95% CI, -0.42 to 0.00; ESAS mean difference, -3.28). There was no association between palliative care and survival (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.17). Palliative care was associated consistently with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and lower health care utilization. Evidence of associations with other outcomes was mixed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, palliative care interventions were associated with improvements in patient QOL and symptom burden. Findings for caregiver outcomes were inconsistent. However, many associations were no longer significant when limited to trials at low risk of bias, and there was no significant association between palliative care and survival.