Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthopade ; 48(2): 119-124, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30574675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that excellent therapeutic outcomes can be achieved with conservative treatment of proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures in patients younger than 11 years old; however, the outcomes of conservative treatment for children older than 11 years are controversial. To address this problem, this study compared outcomes of conservative treatment for proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures in pediatric patients of different ages. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups for comparative purposes based on age. Group I consisted of 34 patients who were less than 11 years old (average age: 5 years) and group II included 21 patients who were 11 years of age or older (average age: 14 years). Patients in both groups underwent conservative treatment and follow-up examination, where they first were examined with X­radiography for assessment of deformity, fracture union and loss of reduction. At the final follow-up after 2 years, patients were assessed by an interview and a detailed physical examination including the assessment of shoulder function using the Constant-Murley score. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the grading scale of varus deformity between the two groups (P > 0.05) after immediate postreduction X­radiography; however, there were significant differences in the grading scale of varus deformity between group I and group II at the 2­year follow-up (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the Constant-Murley score and arm length discrepancy (P > 0.05) at final follow-up examinations. CONCLUSION: In general, the results suggested that the outcomes, as measured with radiographs, for both older and young children were comparable after immediate postreduction roentgenograms. For long-term follow-up there was a difference between the two groups and the degree of angulation and displacement might be associated with treatment outcomes for older children. Thus, these factors should be considered when treating and evaluating the outcomes for older children.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Fraturas do Ombro , Ombro , Atividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Epífises , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Úmero , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Zhongguo Gu Shang ; 29(3): 275-8, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27149801

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the clinical effects of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation in the treatment of pediatric distal femur fractures. METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2014, 17 children of distal femur fractures were treated by external fixator combined with limited internal fixation. There were 12 males and 5 females, aged from 6 to 13 years old with an average of 10.2 years, ranged in the course of disease from 1 h to 2 d. Preoperative diagnoses were confirmed by X-ray films in all children. There were 11 patients with supracondylar fracture , and 6 patients with intercondylar comminuted fracture. According to AO/ASIF classification, 9 fractures were type A1, 5 cases were type A2,and 3 cases were type C1. The intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative radiological examination, lower limbs length and motion of knee joints were observed. Knee joint function was assessed by KSS score. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up from 6 to 38 months with an average of 24.4 months. No nerve or blood vessel injury was found. One case complicated with the external fixation loosening, 2 cases with the infection of pin hole and 3 cases with the leg length discrepancy. Knee joint mobility and length measurement (compared with the contralateral), the average limited inflexion was 10 degrees (0 degrees to 20 degrees), the average limited straight was 4 degrees (0 degrees to 10), the average varus or valgus angle was 3 degrees (0 degrees to 5 degrees). KSS of the injured side was (96.4 +/- 5.0) points at final follow-up, 16 cases got excellent results and 1 good. All fractures obtained healing and no epiphyseal closed early was found. CONCLUSION: External fixator combined with limited internal fixation has advantages of simple operation, reliable fixation, early functional exercise in treating pediatric distal femurs fractures.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Fixadores Externos , Feminino , Fêmur/lesões , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fixadores Internos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA