Analysis of the causal relationship between gut microbiota and bone remodeling growth factor from the gene association.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence indicates a close association between the gut microbiota (GM) and the bone remodeling (BR) process, raising suspicions that the GM may actively participate in BR by modulating the levels of growth factors. However, the precise causal relationship between them remains unclear. Due to many confounding factors, many microorganisms related to BR growth factors have not been identified. We aimed to elucidate the causal relationship between the GM and BR growth factors. METHODS: We evaluated the genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for GM and five common growth factors associated with BR: namely, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), transforming growth factors(TGF), insulin growth factors (IGFs), epidermal growth factors (EGFs), and fibroblast growth factors (FGF). The causal relationship between the GM and BR growth factors was studied by double-sample Mendelian randomized analysis. We used five Mendelian randomization (MR) methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, simple mode, weighted median, and weighted model methods. RESULTS: Through MR analysis, a total of 56 bacterial genera were co-identified as associated with BMP, TGF, IGF, EGF, and FGF. Among them, eight genera were found to have a causal relationship with multiple growth factors: Marvinbryantia was causally associated with BMP-6 (P = 0.018, OR = 1.355) and TGF-ß2 (P = 0.002, OR = 1.475); Lachnoclostridium, BMP-7 (P = 0.021, OR = 0.73) and IGF-1 (P = 0.046, OR = 0.804); Terrisporobacter, TGF-ß (P = 0.02, OR = 1.726) and FGF-23 levels (P = 0.016, OR = 1.76); Ruminiclostridium5, TGF-ß levels (P = 0.024, OR = 0.525) and FGFR-2 (P = 0.003, OR = 0.681); Erysipelatoclostridium, TGF-ß2 (P = 0.001, OR = 0.739) and EGF and its receptor (EGFR) (P = 0.012, OR = 0.795); Eubacterium_brachy_group, FGFR-2 (P = 0.045, OR = 1.153) and EGF (P = 0.013, OR = 0.7); Prevotella9 with EGFR (P = 0.022, OR = 0.818) and FGFR-2 (P = 0.011, OR = 1.233) and Faecalibacterium with FGF-23 (P = 0.02, OR = 2.053) and IGF-1 (P = 0.005, OR = 0.843). CONCLUSION: We confirmed the causal relationship between the GM and growth factors related to BR, which provides a new perspective for the study of BR, through targeted regulation of specific bacteria to prevent and treat diseases and growth factor-mediated BR disorders.

Brain effect mechanism of lever positioning manipulation on LDH analgesia based on multimodal MRI: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical symptoms of Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) can be effectively ameliorated through Lever Positioning Manipulation (LPM), which is closely linked to the brain's pain-regulating mechanisms. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers an objective and visual means to study how the brain orchestrates the characteristics of analgesic effects. From the perspective of multimodal MRI, we applied functional MRI (fMRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectrum (MRS) techniques to comprehensively evaluate the characteristics of the effects of LPM on the brain region of LDH from the aspects of brain structure, brain function and brain metabolism. This multimodal MRI technique provides a biological basis for the clinical application of LPM in LDH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 60 LDH patients and 30 healthy controls, matched by gender, age, and years of education, will be enrolled in this study. The LDH patients will be divided into two groups (Group 1, n = 30; Group 2, n = 30) using a random number table method. Group 1 will receive LPM treatment once every two days, for a total of 12 times over 4 weeks. Group 2 will receive sham LPM treatment during the same period as Group 1. All 30 healthy controls will be divided into Group 3. Multimodal MRI will be performed on Group 1 and Group 2 at three time points (TPs): before LPM (TP1), after one LPM session (TP2), and after a full course of LPM treatment. The healthy controls (Group 3) will not undergo LPM and will be subject to only a single multimodal MRI scan. Participants in both Group 1 and Group 2 will be required to complete clinical questionnaires. These assessments will focus on pain intensity and functional disorders, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems, respectively. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study is to investigate the multimodal brain response characteristics of LDH patients after treatment with LPM, with the goal of providing a biological basis for clinical applications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05613179 , identifier: NCT05613179.

Gene association analysis to determine the causal relationship between immune cells and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a type of chronic childhood arthritis with complex pathogenesis. Immunological studies have shown that JIA is an acquired self-inflammatory disease, involving a variety of immune cells, and it is also affected by genetic and environmental susceptibility. However, the precise causative relationship between the phenotype of immune cells and JIA remains unclear to date. The objective of our study is to approach this inquiry from a genetic perspective, employing a method of genetic association analysis to ascertain the causal relationship between immune phenotypes and the onset of JIA. METHODS: In this study, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with immune cells as instrumental variables to analyze the bidirectional causal relationship between 731 immune cells and JIA. There were four types of immune features (median fluorescence intensity (MFI), relative cellular (RC), absolute cellular (AC), and morphological parameters (MP)). Finally, the heterogeneity and horizontal reproducibility of the results were verified by sensitivity analysis, which ensured more robust results. RESULTS: We found that CD3 on CM CD8br was causally associated with JIA at the level of 0.05 significant difference (95% CI = 0.630 ~ 0.847, P = 3.33 × 10-5, PFDR = 0.024). At the significance level of 0.20, two immunophenotypes were causally associated with JIA, namely: HLA DR on CD14+ CD16- monocyte (95% CI = 0.633 ~ 0.884, P = 6.83 × 10-4, PFDR = 0.16) and HLA DR on CD14+ monocyte (95% CI = 0.627 ~ 0.882, P = 6.9 × 10-4, PFDR = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Our study assessed the causal effect of immune cells on JIA from a genetic perspective. These findings emphasize the complex and important role of immune cells in the pathogenesis of JIA and lay a foundation for further study of the pathogenesis of JIA.