A novel contact force sensing pulsed field ablation catheter in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel non-thermal modality with highly myocardium-specific. However, the PFA catheter based on contact force (CF)-sensing has not been reported. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel CF-sensing PFA catheter. METHODS: First, different CF (5, 15, 25, and 35 g) of the novel PFA catheter were evaluated on lesion dimensions during ablation on right and left ventricle in two pigs. Next, this catheter was further evaluated on four typical sites of superior vena cava (SVC), cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), and right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) for atrial ablation in another six pigs. Electrical isolation was evaluated immediately after ablation and 30-day survival. Chronic lesions were assessed via histopathology after euthanasia. Acute and chronic safety outcomes were observed peri- and post-procedurally. RESULTS: In ventricular ablation, increased CF from 5 to 15 g produced significantly greater lesion depth but nonsignificant increases from 15 to 35 g. In atrial ablation, the novel CF-sensing PFA deliveries produced an acute attenuation of local electrograms and formation of a continuous line of block in all 6 pigs. The ablation line remained sustained blockage at the 30-day survival period. The CF of SVC, CTI, RSPV, and RIPV was 9.4 ± 1.5, 14.5 ± 3.2, 17.2 ± 2.6, and 13.4 ± 2.8 g, respectively. Moreover, no evidence of damage to esophagus or phrenic nerve was observed. CONCLUSION: The novel CF-sensing PFA catheter potentiated efficient, safe, and durable ablation, without causing damage to the esophagus or phrenic nerve.

Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for High-Degree Atrioventricular Block in a 6-Year-Old Child with 2-Year Follow-Up.

The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) used in pediatric patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) have not been well demonstrated. Currently, only several case reports for pediatric patients have been published since the advent of LBBAP, with 3 months to 1 year follow-up. Here, we present a case of LBBAP in a 6-year-old child with a high-degree AVB secondary to the transcatheter device closure of congenital ventricular septal defect. No procedure-related complications were observed, and the electrical parameters were stable at 2-year follow-up. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature review on pediatric patients with LBBAP. Fifteen cases were retrieved after systematically searching PubMed and Embase databases. No complications have been reported among these published cases. In conclusion, consistent with previous cases, our case with 2-year follow-up has demonstrated that LBBAP may be an alternative pacing modality from a very early age. However, given the limited evidence, the long-term outcomes of LBBAP in pediatric patients should be further investigated.

Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has developed in an effort to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between LBBAP and biventricular pacing (BIVP) in patients with heart failure (HF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Consecutive patients with HF and CLBBB requiring CRT received either LBBAP or BIVP were recruited at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from February 2018 to May 2019. We assessed their implant parameters, electrocardiogram (ECG), clinical outcomes at implant and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Forty-one patients recruited including 21 for LBBAP and 20 for BIVP. Mean follow-up duration was 23.71 ± 4.44 months. LBBAP produced lower pacing thresholds, shorter procedure time and fluoroscopy duration compared to BIVP. The QRS duration was significantly narrower after LBBAP than BIVP (129.29 ± 31.46 vs. 156.85 ± 26.37 ms, p = 0.005). Notably, both LBBAP and BIVP significantly improved LVEF, LVEDD, NYHA class, and BNP compared with baseline. However, LBBAP significantly lowered BNP compared with BIVP (416.69 ± 411.39 vs. 96.07 ± 788.71 pg/ml, p = 0.007) from baseline to 24-month follow-up. Moreover, patients who received LBBAP exhibited lower number of hospitalizations than those in the BIVP group (p = 0.019). In addition, we found that patients with moderately prolonged left ventricular activation time (LVAT) and QRS notching in limb leads in baseline ECG respond better to LBBAP for CLBBB correction. LBBAP might be a relative safe and effective resynchronization therapy and as a supplement to BIVP for patients with HF and CLBBB.

Efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of chronic heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease: A protocol of randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease is a serious cardiovascular disease. There is coronary atherosclerosis, resulting in lumen stenosis, blockage, and then the symptoms of insufficient blood supply and hypoxia in the myocardium. Chronic heart failure is a kind of syndrome with abnormal ventricular filling and ejection function, which is the final stage of the development of coronary heart disease. At present, the treatment plan of Western medicine can significantly reduce the hospitalization rate, but it is still not satisfactory for the prognosis and mortality of patients. Shenfu injection has advantages in the treatment of heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease, but there is a lack of standard clinical studies to verify it, so the purpose of this randomized controlled study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of chronic heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of chronic heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease. The patients will be randomly divided into a treatment group and the control group according to 1:1, in which the treatment group is treated with Shenfu injection combined with sodium nitroprusside, and the control group is treated with sodium nitroprusside alone. Both groups will be treated with standard treatment for 7 days and followed up for 30 days to pay attention to their efficacy and safety indexes. The observation indexes include TCM syndrome score, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, stroke volume, adverse reactions and so on. We will use SPSS 25.0 software for data analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection combined with sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of chronic heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease. The results of this experiment will provide a clinical basis for Shenfu injection combined with sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of chronic heart failure in coronary heart disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/4KNG3.

The efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous trials have investigated the effect of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients receiving contrast medium (CM). This meta analysis aims to validate the role of RIC in preventing CIN. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before April 27, 2019. Two investigators independently extracted basic characteristics from each study. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to examine the treatment effect. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies comprising 2,503 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with conventional therapy, RIC significantly reduced the risk of CIN (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.56, p < .05). Subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of RIC was stronger in the low-osmolar contrast media group (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.45, p < .05) and the nondiabetic group (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.53 p < .05). RIC also significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events within the first 6 months (OR = 0.39; p < .05), but the influence was not present after long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that RIC could effectively reduce CIN risk and decrease the short-term incidence of relevant adverse events. Furthermore, the effects of CIN are more pronounced in nondiabetic patients and with the use of low-osmolar contrast medium. This meta-analysis of small trials suggests a possible protective effect of RIC on contrast-induced nephropathy and favors the performance of a large randomized trial to further investigate this strategy.

Efficacy of Nifekalant in Patients With Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiological and Clinical Findings.

Background The efficacy of nifekalant in preexcited atrial fibrillation ( AF ) has not been assessed. Methods and Results The study populations consisted of patients with sustained preexcited AF (n=51), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n=201), and persistent AF (n=87). Effects of intravenous infusion of nifekalant were assessed on electrophysiological and clinical parameters. Nifekalant prolonged the shortest preexcited R-R, the average preexcited R-R, and the average R-R intervals from 290±35 to 333±44 ms, 353±49 to 443±64 ms, and 356±53 to 467±75 ms, respectively, in patients with preexcited AF (all P<0.001). Nifekalant also decreased the percentage of preexcited QRS complexes, heart rate, and increased systolic pressure (all P<0.001). Nifekalant terminated AF in 33 of 51 patients (65%). Similar effects were also observed in a subgroup of 12 patients with preexcited AF and impaired left ventricular function. In patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, nifekalant significantly prolonged the effective refractory period, the block cycle length of the antegrade accessory pathway, and the atrial effective refractory period (all P<0.001). Nifekalant had no effect on the effective refractory period of the antegrade atrioventricular node. Finally, in patients with persistent AF without an accessory pathway, nifekalant did not significantly decrease the ventricular rate of AF . One patient developed Torsades de Pointes. No other adverse effects were observed. Conclusions Nifekalant prolongs the effective refractory period of the antegrade accessory pathway and atrium without blocking antegrade conduction through the atrioventricular node, leading to slowing and/or to termination of preexcited AF . Thus, nifekalant might be an effective and a relatively safe drug in patients with preexcited AF .