High-dose trimetrexate and minimal-dose leucovorin: a case for selective protection?

Our objective was to find the minimum dose of leucovorin (LV; 5-formyltetrahydrofolate) needed to potentially provide selective protection of normal tissue in patients with tumors resistant to methotrexate (MTX) by virtue of transport during prolonged therapy with high-dose trimetrexate (TMTX). Based upon the known daily requirement for folate, that tumors are often resistant to methotrexate via a transport-based mechanism, and that large doses of trimetrexate can be given with large doses of leucovorin for the treatment of patients with Pneumocystis carinii, a protocol was designed to find the minimum LV dose required to allow the administration of large doses of TMTX. Patients were treated in 28-day cycles consisting of 14 consecutive days of oral TMTX (45 mg/m2 every 12 h), followed by 14 days of rest. The dose of concurrent LV was started at 5 mg/m2 twice daily. Cohorts of patients received successive half doses of LV so long as three consecutive patients had less than or equal to grade 3 toxicity. Ten patients received 29 courses of therapy. The most common toxicities encountered were thrombocytopenia (38%), mucositis (14%), and neutropenia (10%). At a LV dose of 2.5 mg/m2, toxicities were consistently limited to less than or equal to grade 3 and only one episode of grade 4 hematological toxicity. Although there was marked interpatient variability, the minimally effective LV dose for selective protection seems to be 2.5 mg/m2. If tumors are resistant to methotrexate because of decreased transport of drug (and also folate), then the same pharmacological principle used to develop TMTX/LV for the treatment of P. carinii may be applied to treatment of some patients with cancer.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of aminopterin in patients with refractory malignancies.

PURPOSE: Aminopterin (AMT) is a potent folate analog that is no longer in routine clinical use. Because of laboratory data that suggests improved metabolism of AMT versus methotrexate (MTX) in lymphoblasts, we developed a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of AMT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with refractory malignancies were treated. The starting dose of AMT was 2.5 mg/m2 every 12 hours for two doses weekly: the dose of AMT was decreased and leucovorin (LV) rescue was added after the DLT was observed. Pharmacokinetics were performed after both intravenous (i.v.) and oral AMT administration. RESULTS: Mucosal toxicity was dose-limiting and resulted in the need for a dose reduction (dose level 2: AMT 2 mg/m2 every 12 hours for two doses weekly) and, subsequently, the addition of scheduled LV rescue (dose level 3: AMT 2 mg/m2 every 12 hours for two doses followed by LV 5 mg/m2 orally every 12 hours for two doses, starting 24 hours after the second dose of AMT). The mean areas under the curve (AUC) for the i.v. (n = 14) and oral (n = 13) doses were 1.20 +/- 0.09 (SE) and 1.05 +/- 0.14 micromol x h/L respectively. The half-life was 3.64 +/- 0.28 hours and the oral bioavailability in 12 matched subjects was 83.5% +/- 8.3%. One patient with endometrial adenocarcinoma achieved a complete response (CR) and remains on therapy at 11+ months. Seven patients had stable disease (SD) for 8 weeks or greater, which included one patient with a metastatic nerve sheath tumor who was stable for 9 months. CONCLUSION: We conclude that AMT has good oral bioavailability and that, when given on a q12 hour x two weekly schedule, the MTD is 2 mg/m2 with delayed LV rescue.

Evidence for negative feedback of extracellular methotrexate on blasts of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in vitro.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of high-dose methotrexate (MTX). SUBJECTS: Blast cells from 15 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. INTERVENTIONS: We compared uptake and polyglutamation of [3H]-MTX by freshly isolated leukemic blasts in vitro after 24-hour exposure to 1, 10, and 50 microM [3H]-MTX. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean MTX uptake (pmol/10(6) cells) was 0.78 +/- 0.19, 2.3 +/- 0.54, and 5.9 +/- 1.9, respectively, and mean polyglutamation was 82%, 66%, and 46%. Consequently, mean MTX polyglutamates were 0.68 +/- 0.18, 1.5 +/- 0.47, and 2.2 +/- 0.67 pmol/10(6) cells. Three of 15 patient samples had no detectable polyglutamation of MTX at 50 microM but MTX polyglutamates were detectable at 1 microM. Two of these three had a decrease in MTX polyglutamates at 10 versus 1 microM. In eight precursor B cell samples there was a significant difference in median MTX polyglutamates at 1 versus 10 microM but not 10 versus 50 microM. CONCLUSION: Increasing extracellular MTX concentrations may be counterproductive for some patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. If MTX polyglutamates are important for efficacy, optimal delivery of MTX may have to be determined by individual metabolism rather than by targeting a specific drug concentration.

A case for the use of aminopterin in treatment of patients with leukemia based on metabolic studies of blasts in vitro.

Clinical and laboratory investigations during the past four decades have resulted in numerous schedules, doses, and routes of delivery for methotrexate (MTX). It remains as an important drug for the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Aminopterin (AMT) was the initial antifolate showing promise as an anticancer drug. It is more potent than MTX and also is known to be accumulated more efficiently than MTX in model systems. Because Whitehead et al. (Blood, 76: 44-49, 1990) have shown that MTX accumulation by blasts at diagnosis is of prognostic significance in children with ALL, we reasoned that if accumulation of a "stoichiometric inhibitor" of dihydrofolate reductase by leukemic blasts was of prognostic importance, then whether it was AMT or MTX may be relevant only with respect to the absolute dose. To compare MTX and AMT metabolism, we incubated lymphoblasts with 1 microM radiolabeled drug in vitro. MTX and AMT accumulation by ALL cells (n = 24) was 0.7 +/- 0.7 and 1.47 +/- 0.9 pmol/10(6) cells, respectively. Based on the data of Whitehead et al., this predicts pharmacological success in 59 and 84% of the MTX and AMT groups, respectively. Moreover, 5 of 10 patients considered poor risks based on MTX accumulation would be "cures" based on AMT uptake. Even at only 0.1 microM AMT, a concentration at which there is little accumulation of MTX, 5 of 11 patients studied would be "pharmacological cures" based on AMT uptake. Accumulation of AMT by blasts from 11 patients with T-cell-lineage ALL and 5 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia was also found to be twice the uptake of MTX. These data allow the suggestion that AMT, despite increased potential for toxicity, may be useful in children who are identified as poor risks with respect to MTX uptake.