Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 96(6): 919-930, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37225876

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Keokuk County Rural Health Study (KCRHS) is a longitudinal population-based study conducted in rural Iowa. A prior analysis of enrollment data identified an association of airflow obstruction with occupational exposures only among cigarette smokers. The current study used spirometry data from all three rounds to investigate whether level of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and longitudinal change in FEV1 were associated with occupational vapor-gas, dust, and fumes (VGDF) exposures, and whether these associations were modified by smoking. METHODS: This study sample comprised 1071 adult KCRHS participants with longitudinal data. A job-exposure matrix (JEM) was applied to participants' lifetime work histories to assign exposures to occupational VGDF. Mixed regression models of pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (millimeters, ml) were fit to test for associations with occupational exposures while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Mineral dust had the most consistent association with change in FEV1, including ever/never ( - 6.3 ml/year) and nearly every level of duration, intensity, and cumulative exposure. Because 92% of participants with mineral dust also had organic dust exposure, the results for mineral dust may be due to a combination of the two. An association of FEV1 level with fumes was observed for high intensity ( - 91.4 ml) among all participants, and limited to cigarette smokers with results of - 104.6 ml ever/never exposed, - 170.3 ml high duration, and - 172.4 ml high cumulative. CONCLUSION: The current findings suggest that mineral dust, possibly in combination with organic dust, and fumes exposure, especially among cigarette smokers, were risk factors for adverse FEV1 results.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Iowa/epidemiologia , População Rural , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Poeira/análise
2.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 95(8): 1741-1754, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35482110

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Farmers have an increased risk for chronic bronchitis and airflow obstruction. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of these health outcomes with farm activities. METHODS: We evaluated the Keokuk County Rural Health Study (KCRHS) enrollment data for farm activities and the two health outcomes chronic bronchitis based on self-reported symptoms and airflow obstruction based on spirometry. We used logistic regression to model the health outcomes, yielding an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for farm activities while adjusting for potential confounders and other risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 1234 farmers, 104 (8.4%) had chronic bronchitis, 75 (6.1%) fulfilled the criteria for airflow obstruction, and the two outcomes overlapped by 18 participants. Chronic bronchitis without airflow obstruction (n = 86) had a statistically significant association with crop storage insecticides (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.6, 6.1) and a low number of years (≤ 3) worked with turkeys (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2, 9.4). The latter result should be interpreted with caution because it is based on a small number of cases (n = 5). Airflow obstruction with or without chronic bronchitis (n = 75) was significantly associated with ever working in a hog or chicken confinement setting (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0, 4.5). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that work with crop storage insecticides or turkeys may increase the risk for chronic bronchitis and work in hog or chicken confinement may increase the risk for airflow obstruction.


Assuntos
Bronquite Crônica , Inseticidas , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Bronquite Crônica/epidemiologia , Fazendas , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(5): 417-428, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32154609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asthma-related health outcomes are known to be associated with indoor moisture and renovations. The objective of this study was to estimate the frequency of these indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors in healthcare facilities and their association with asthma-related outcomes among workers. METHODS: New York City healthcare workers (n = 2030) were surveyed regarding asthma-related symptoms, and moisture and renovation factors at work and at home during the last 12 months. Questions for workplace moisture addressed water damage (WD), mold growth (MG), and mold odor (MO), while for renovations they addressed painting (P), floor renovations (FR), and wall renovations (WR). Regression models were fit to examine associations between work and home IEQ factors and multiple asthma-related outcomes. RESULTS: Reports of any moisture (n = 728, 36%) and renovations (n = 1412, 70%) at work were common. Workplace risk factors for asthma-related outcomes included the moisture categories of WD by itself, WD with MO (without MG), and WD with MG and MO, and the renovation category with the three factors P, FR, and WR. Reports of home IEQ factors were less frequent and less likely to be associated with health outcomes. Data analyses suggested that MG and/or MO at work and at home had a synergistic effect on the additive scale with a symptom-based algorithm for bronchial hyperresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The current study determined that moisture and renovation factors are common in healthcare facilities, potentially putting workers at risk for asthma-related outcomes. More research is needed to confirm these results, especially prospective studies.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Arquitetura Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Umidade/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco
4.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 222(2): 211-220, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30327176

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested an association of asthma onset and exacerbation with cleaning and disinfecting activities in a number of industries, including healthcare. The objective of the current study was to investigate the association of asthma and related outcomes with occupations and tasks in urban healthcare workers in the United States. METHODS: A questionnaire was implemented in a sample of workers from nine healthcare occupations in New York City. We used regression models to examine the association of post-hire asthma, current asthma, exacerbation of asthma, a symptom algorithm for bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR-related symptoms), a symptom-based asthma score, and the symptom wheeze with occupation and four healthcare tasks, while adjusting for other risk factors and potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 2030 participants completed the questionnaire. The task of cleaning fixed surfaces was significantly associated with most outcome variables, including current asthma (odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.68), moderate exacerbation (OR = 3.10, 95% CI 1.25-7.67), and BHR-related symptoms (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.77). In comparison to nursing assistants, the occupations environmental service workers and registered nurses were at higher risk for current asthma, and licensed practical nurses were at higher risk for moderate exacerbation. Other tasks associated with outcomes were administering aerosolized medications with current asthma and moderate exacerbation, and sterilizing medical equipment with BHR-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings add to the growing body of evidence for the association of asthma with cleaning and other activities in healthcare. Further research is especially needed to investigate the association of asthma-related outcomes with exposure metrics based on tasks, products, and chemical exposures in healthcare.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Desinfecção , Pessoal de Saúde , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional , Adulto , Detergentes , Desinfetantes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Sons Respiratórios , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 66(21): 1-5, 2017 11 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29095802

RESUMO

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Many rural residents work in the field of agriculture; however, employment in nonagricultural jobs also is common. Because previous studies in rural communities often have focused on agricultural workers, much less is known about the occupational exposures in other types of jobs in rural settings. Characterizing airborne occupational exposures that can contribute to respiratory diseases is important so that differences between rural and urban working populations can be assessed. REPORTING PERIOD: 1994-2011. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: This investigation used data from the baseline questionnaire completed by adult rural residents participating in the Keokuk County Rural Health Study (KCRHS). The distribution of jobs and occupational exposures to vapor-gas, dust, and fumes (VGDF) among all participants was analyzed and stratified by farming status (current, former, and never) then compared with a cohort of urban workers from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Occupational exposure in the last job was assessed with a job-exposure matrix (JEM) developed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The COPD JEM assesses VGDF exposure at levels of none or low, medium, and high. RESULTS: The 1,699 KCRHS (rural) participants were more likely to have medium or high occupational VGDF exposure (43.2%) at their last job than their urban MESA counterparts (15.0% of 3,667 participants). One fifth (20.8%) of the rural participants currently farmed, 43.1% were former farmers, and approximately one third (36.1%) had never farmed. These three farming groups differed in VGDF exposure at the last job, with the prevalence of medium or high exposure at 80.2% for current farmers, 38.7% for former farmers, and 27.4% for never farmers, and all three percentages were higher than the 15.0% medium or high level of VGDF exposure for urban workers. INTERPRETATION: Rural workers, including those who had never farmed, were more likely to experience occupational VGDF exposure than urban workers. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: The occupational exposures of rural adults assessed using the COPD JEM will be used to investigate their potential association with obstructive respiratory health problems (e.g., airflow limitation and chronic bronchitis). This assessment might highlight occupations in need of preventive interventions.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Poeira/análise , Gases/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Gases/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(1): 101-11, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351791

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers have an elevated prevalence of asthma and related symptoms associated with the use of cleaning/disinfecting products. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize cleaning/disinfecting tasks and products used among hospital occupations. METHODS: Workers from 14 occupations at five hospitals were monitored for 216 shifts, and work tasks and products used were recorded at five-minute intervals. The major chemical constituents of each product were identified from safety data sheets. RESULTS: Cleaning and disinfecting tasks were performed with a high frequency at least once per shift in many occupations. Medical equipment preparers, housekeepers, floor strippers/waxers, and endoscopy technicians spent on average 108-177 min/shift performing cleaning/disinfecting tasks. Many occupations used products containing amines and quaternary ammonium compounds for >100 min/shift. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that many occupations besides housekeeping incur exposures to cleaning/disinfecting products, albeit for different durations and using products containing different chemicals.


Assuntos
Desinfecção/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Zeladoria Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Detergentes/química , Detergentes/uso terapêutico , Desinfetantes/química , Desinfetantes/uso terapêutico , Desinfecção/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/classificação , Hospitais , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Fichas de Dados de Segurança de Materiais , New England , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Sudeste dos Estados Unidos
7.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ; 23(3): 299-305, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23321860

RESUMO

The objectives of this study were to characterize rural populations' indoor and outdoor exposure to particulate matter (PM)(10), PM(2.5), and endotoxin and identify factors that influence these concentrations. Samples were collected at 197 rural households over five continuous days between 2007 and 2011. Geometric mean (GM) indoor PM(10) (21.2 µg/m(3)) and PM(2.5) (12.2 µg/m(3)) concentrations tended to be larger than outdoor PM(10) (19.6 µg/m(3)) and PM(2.5) (8.2 µg/m(3)) concentrations (PM(10) P=0.086; PM(2.5) P<0.001). Conversely, GM outdoor endotoxin concentrations (1.93 EU/m(-3)) were significantly larger than indoor (0.32 EU/m(3); P<0.001). Compared with measurements from previous urban studies, indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM(10) and PM(2.5) in the study area tended to be smaller, whereas ambient endotoxin concentrations measured outside rural households were 3-10 times larger. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, seasonality did not have a significant effect on mean ambient PM(10) concentrations; however, endotoxin concentrations in the autumn were almost seven times larger than winter. Excluding home cleanliness, the majority of agricultural and housing characteristics evaluated were found to be poorly associated with indoor and outdoor particulate and endotoxin concentrations.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Endotoxinas/toxicidade , Exposição Ambiental , Endotoxinas/análise , Humanos
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 55(10): 904-16, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22674632

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among agricultural populations, hearing loss caused by excessive noise exposure is common. However, examinations of associations between exposure to agricultural tasks and hearing loss are limited. METHODS: Audiometry and lifetime exposure to 11 agricultural tasks were analyzed among 1,568 participants. Gender stratified multivariable linear regression was used to estimate associations between exposure duration and three hearing loss metrics. RESULTS: Among men, significant associations were observed between hearing loss and hunting or target shooting, all-terrain vehicle (ATV) or motorcycle riding, chain saw use, electric or pneumatic tool use, living on a farm, and all agricultural tasks combined. When all significant exposure metrics were included in a single model, associations remained for hunting or target shooting, electric or pneumatic tool use and living on a farm. Significant associations were sparse among women, and in all cases paradoxical. CONCLUSIONS: Despite imprecise estimation of noise exposure, specific agricultural tasks were associated with hearing loss.


Assuntos
Agricultura , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Audiometria , Feminino , Armas de Fogo , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Saúde Ocupacional , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
J Agromedicine ; 10(1): 23-37, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15927915

RESUMO

The scientific literature is lacking in published agricultural noise assessments for employees of swine confinement facilities that have included dosimeter data, octave band analysis, or specific task exposure assessments. This study reports on the former three types of noise assessments in the farrowing stage of swine. Dosimeter data on workers revealed all assessments to be greater than 90 decibels measured on the A-scale (dBA), which exceeds the 85 dBA National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limit (REL). RELs were exceeded for all of the employees monitored in the swine facility, as well as the part-time employees who power-washed the farrowing rooms. The recorded time-weighted values were actually underestimated slightly because the dosimeters were set to record only noise at 85 dBA and higher.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/prevenção & controle , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/etiologia , Animais , Humanos , Iowa , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Suínos , Níveis Máximos Permitidos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA