Effectiveness and safety of bridging therapy and endovascular therapy in patients with large cerebral infarctions: from ANGEL-ASPECT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The benefits of thrombolytic therapy before endovascular thrombectomy in cases of acute ischaemic stroke, with a large infarction volume, remain unclear. This analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bridging therapy and endovascular therapy among patients with large cerebral infarctions. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of the multicentre prospective study of ANGEL-ASPECT (Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core), participants were divided into two groups: an endovascular therapy group and a bridging therapy group. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to compare the primary endpoint between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted to further explore potential risk factors associated with the outcomes. RESULTS: 122 patients were included, of whom 77 (63%) underwent endovascular therapy and 45 (37%) underwent bridging therapy. The median scores on mRS at 90 days of the bridging therapy group and the endovascular therapy group were 3 (2-5) and 4 (2-6), with no significant differences (common OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.71 to 2.61). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was reported in three patients who were in the endovascular and bridging therapy groups (relative risk (RR) 1.71; 95% CI 0.36 to 8.12). The mortality between two groups did not differ (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that endovascular therapy alone might be a viable option for patients with large cerebral infarctions, displaying no noticeable disparity in outcomes compared with bridging therapy.

Endovascular therapy in acute ischaemic stroke with large infarction with matched or mismatched clinical-radiological severities: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial.

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) was demonstrated effective in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) with large infarction. Revealing subgroups of patients who would or would not benefit from EVT will further inform patient selection for EVT. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial, a randomised controlled trial of 456 adult patients with acute anterior-circulation LVO and large infarction, defined by ASPECTS 3-5 or infarct core volume 70-100 mL, enrolled from 46 centres across China, between October 2, 2020 and May 18, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receiving EVT and medical management or medical management alone. One patient withdrew consent, 455 patients were included in this post-hoc analysis and categorised into 4 subgroups by lower or higher NIHSS (< or ≥16) and smaller or larger infarct core (< or ≥70 mL). Those with lower NIHSS & smaller core, and higher NIHSS & larger core were considered clinical-radiological matched subgroups; otherwise clinical-radiological mismatched subgroups. Primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). ANGEL-ASPECT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04551664. Findings: Overall, 139 (30.5%) patients had lower NIHSS & smaller core, 106 (23.3%) higher NIHSS & larger core, 130 (28.6%) higher NIHSS & smaller core, and 80 (17.6%) lower NIHSS & larger core. There was significant ordinal shift in the 90-day mRS toward a better outcome with EVT in clinical-radiological matched subgroups: lower NIHSS & smaller core (generalised OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18-2.62; p = 0.01) and higher NIHSS & larger core (1.64; 1.06-2.54; 0.01); but not in the two clinical-radiological mismatched subgroups. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that in patients with anterior-circulation LVO and large infarction, EVT was associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes in those with matched clinical and radiological severities, but not in those with mismatched clinical and radiological severities. Simultaneous consideration of stroke severity and infarct core volume may inform patient selection for EVT. Funding: Unrestricted grants from industry [Covidien Healthcare International Trading (Shanghai), Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Genesis MedTech (Shanghai), and Shanghai HeartCare Medical Technology].

Outcome Comparison of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Large Artery Atherosclerosis and Cardioembolism in the Chinese Population: Data from the ANGEL Registry.

Background and Purpose: Studies on outcome comparison after endovascular treatment (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) between large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardioembolism (CE) in the Asian population are scarce. We aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes after EVT for anterior circulation LVO with LAA and CE in the Chinese population. Methods: Patients were selected from the ANGEL registry and divided into LAA and CE groups. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. The secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS distribution, 90-day mRS 0-1, 90-day mRS 0-3, and early neurological improvement. The safety outcomes included death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and any intracranial hemorrhage. We conducted logistic regression models with adjustments to compare the outcomes. Results: A total of 632 patients were included, of whom, 488 were in the LAA group and 144 were in the CE group. No significant difference in 90-day mRS 0-2 was observed between LAA and CE groups (55.7%vs.43.1%, odds ratio[OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval(CI), 0.92-1.53, P=0.190). The LAA group exhibited a higher frequency of mRS 0-3 compared to the CE group (69.1% vs 32.6%, OR1.32, 95% CI 1.02-1.72, P=0.038). However, the incidence of death within 90 days did not significantly differ between the LAA and CE groups (10.9%vs.24.3%, OR0.91, 95% CI0.66-1.25, P=0.545), nor did the occurrences of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage(SICH) (4.5%vs.9.7%,OR1.08, 95% CI 0.65-1.78, P=0.779) or intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) (21.9%vs.30.6%, OR 0.94, 95% CI0.71-1.25, P=0.680). Moreover, no significant disparities were detected in other outcomes between the two groups (All P>0.05). Conclusion: In the ANGEL registry, a higher prevalence of patients undergoing EVT for acute anterior circulation LVO with LAA was found than those with CE. However, our study revealed that the efficacy and safety of EVT remained consistent regardless of the stroke's etiology such as LAA or CE.

The impact of intraarterial, intravenous, and combined tirofiban on endovascular treatment for acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion.

Background and purpose: Adjunctive tirofiban administration in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been investigated in several studies. However, the findings are conflict. This study aimed to compare the effect of different administration pathways of tirofiban on patients undergoing EVT for acute LVO with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Methods: Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Registry Study) and divided into four groups: intra-arterial (IA), intravenous (IV), and intra-arterial plus intravenous (IA+IV) and non-tirofiban. The primary outcome was 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcomes included the rates of mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3 at 90-day, successful recanalization. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and other safety endpoints. The multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential baseline confounders were performed to compare the outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1:1:1 ratio was conducted among four groups, and the outcomes were then compared in the post-matched population. Results: A total of 502 patients were included, 80 of which were in the IA-tirofiban group, 73 in IV-tirofiban, 181 in (IA+IV)-tirofiban group, and 168 in the non-tirofiban group. The median (IQR) 90-day mRS score in the four groups of IA, IV, IA+IV, and non-tirofiban was, respectively 3(0-5) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 3(0-5). The adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.45-1.30, P = 0.330), with IV-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.78-2.36, P = 0.276), and with (IA+IV)-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.64-1.64, P = 0.912). The adjusted OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.98, P = 0.042) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.26-0.94, P = 0.033). The other outcomes of each group were similar with non-tirofiban group, all P was >0.05. After PSM, the common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.18-0.94, P = 0.036), and the OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11-0.74, P = 0.011) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006). Conclusions: Intra-arterial administration of tirofiban was associated with worse outcome than non-tirofiban, which suggested that intra-arterial tirofiban had a harmful effect on patients undergoing EVT for ICAD-LVO. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Outcomes of antiplatelet therapy before endovascular treatment of acute large vessel occlusion: Data from the ANGEL-ACT registry.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT or DAPT) within 24 hours before endovascular treatment (EVT) could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: Patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry were divided into antiplatelet therapy (APT) and non-APT groups. The APT group was divided into SAPT and DAPT groups. Outcome measurement included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution, change in the NIHSS at 7 days or discharge, number of passes, modified first pass effect (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and mortality within 90 days. To compare the outcomes, we performed multivariable analyses by adjusting for the propensity score calculated by the logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 1611 patients, 1349 were in the non-APT group, while 262 (16.3 %) were in the APT group (122 [46.6 %] received SAPT, 140 [53.4 %] received DAPT). APT, SAPT or DAPT were not associated with a shift to better outcomes (non-APT vs. APT, 3[0-5] vs. 3[0-5], common odds ratio [OR], 1.04, 95 %confidence interval [CI]:0.82-1.34, P = 0.734). DAPT was associated with mFPE (OR,2.05, 95 %CI:1.39-3.01, P<0.001), more NIHSS reduction at 7 days or discharge (ß, -2.13, 95 %CI: -4.02--0.24, P = 0.028), lower number of passes (ß, -0.40, 95 %CI: -0.68--0.12, P=0.006), and shorter procedure duration (ß, -12.4, 95 %CI: -23.74--1.05, P = 0.032) without increasing odds of successful recanalization, PH within 24 hours and mortality with 90 days . CONCLUSIONS: APT before MT for AIS due to LVO does not affect clinical outcome in 90 days despite a tendency to reduce MT procedure time and number of passes. APT before MT in LVO does not increase SICH or mortality rates.

Unsuccessful Recanalization versus Medical Management of Patients with Large Ischemic Core : Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The outcomes of patients with large ischemic core who fail to recanalize with endovascular therapy (EVT) compared to medical management (MM) are uncertain. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who underwent EVT in patients with large ischemic core and unsuccessful recanalization. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT randomized trial. Unsuccessful recanalization was defined as patients who underwent EVT with eTICI 0-2a. The primary endpoint was 90-day very poor outcome (mRS 5-6). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted controlling for ASPECTS, occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and time to treatment. RESULTS: Of 455 patients 225 were treated with MM. Of 230 treated with EVT, 43 (19%) patients had unsuccessful recanalization. There was no difference in 90-day very poor outcomes (39.5% vs. 40%, aOR 0.93, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.47-1.85, p = 0.95), sICH (7.0% vs. 2.7%, aOR 2.81, 95% CI 0.6-13.29, p = 0.19), or mortality (30% vs. 20%, aOR 1.65, 95% CI 0.89-3.06, p = 0.11) between the unsuccessful EVT and MM groups, respectively. There were higher rates of ICH (55.8% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001), infarct core volume growth (142.7 ml vs. 90.5 ml, ß = 47.77, 95% CI 20.97-74.57 ml, p < 0.001), and decompressive craniectomy (18.6% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the unsuccessful EVT versus MM groups. CONCLUSION: In a randomized trial of patients with large ischemic core undergoing EVT with unsuccessful recanalization, there was no difference in very poor outcomes, sICH or death versus medically managed patients. In the unsuccessful EVT group, there were higher rates of any ICH, volume of infarct core growth, and decompressive craniectomy.

Sex differences in outcomes of endovascular therapy for acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT Registry.

BACKGROUND: Understanding sex disparities in stroke can identify gaps in clinical care. The objective of this study was to investigate whether sex differences could influence clinical outcomes of patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT). METHODS: Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3). Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS distribution, excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), functional independence (mRS 0-2), early neurological improvement, recanalization, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days. The above outcomes were compared by two adjustment models, including (1) multivariable logistics analysis adjusting for all baseline and procedural variables with a P < 0.05; (2) adjusting for the propensity score. RESULTS: There were 347 acute VBAO patients treated with EVT included, of whom 72 (20.7%) were women and 275 (79.3%) were men. Women were older (72[63-76] vs. 62[53-69], P < 0.001) and had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (31.9% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.001), lower rates of underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (30.6% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.007), and tandem occlusion (8.3% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.009) than men. The rate of favorable outcome (mRS 0-3) was similar between women and men (41.7% vs. 51.3%, adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95%CI: 0.83-2.95, P = 0.171). There were no sex differences in other clinical outcomes (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the ANGEL-ACT registry, the percentage of men with acute VBAO undergoing EVT was approximately fourfold higher than that of women with acute VBAO undergoing EVT. Sex differences did not modify the outcomes of acute VBAO after EVT.

Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, Infarct Core Volume, and Endovascular Therapy Outcomes in Patients With Large Infarct: A Secondary Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial.

Importance: Endovascular therapy (EVT) demonstrated better outcomes compared with medical management in recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with large infarct. Objective: To compare outcomes of EVT vs medical management across different strata of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) and infarct core volume in patients with large infarct. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified secondary analysis of subgroups of the Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients With a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT) RCT included patients from 46 stroke centers across China between October 2, 2020, and May 18, 2022. Participants were enrolled within 24 hours of symptom onset and had ASPECTS of 3 to 5 or 0 to 2 and infarct core volume of 70 to 100 mL. Patients were divided into 3 groups: ASPECTS of 3 to 5 with infarct core volume less than 70 mL, ASPECTS of 3 to 5 with infarct core volume of 70 mL or greater, and ASPECTS of 0 to 2. Interventions: Endovascular therapy or medical management. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Results: There were 455 patients in the trial; median age was 68 years (IQR, 60-73 years), and 279 (61.3%) were male. The treatment effect did not vary significantly across the 3 baseline imaging subgroups (P = .95 for interaction). The generalized odds ratio for the shift in the 90-day mRS distribution toward better outcomes with EVT vs medical management was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.06-1.85; P = .01) in patients with ASPECTS of 3 to 5 and infarct core volume less than 70 mL, 1.22 (95% CI, 0.81-1.83; P = .23) in patients with ASPECTS of 3 to 5 and infarct core volume of 70 mL or greater, and 1.59 (95% CI, 0.89-2.86; P = .09) in patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, no significant interaction was found between baseline imaging status and the benefit of EVT compared with medical management in patients with large infarct core volume. However, estimates within subgroups were underpowered. A pooled analysis of large core trials stratified by ASPECTS and infarct core volume strata is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04551664.

Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases: executive summary and 2023 update.

BACKGROUND: China is one of the countries with the highest burden of stroke. Implementing multidimensional management guidelines will help clinicians practise evidence-based care, improve patient outcomes and alleviate societal burdens. This update of the 2019 edition will provide the latest comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search on MEDLINE (via PubMed) up to 31 August 2023. The writing team established the recommendations through multiple rounds of online and offline discussions. Each recommendation was graded using the evidence grading algorithm developed by the Chinese Stroke Association (CSA). The draft was reviewed and finalised by the CSA Stroke Guidelines Writing Committee. RESULTS: This update included revisions of 15 existing recommendations and 136 new recommendations in the following areas of stroke care: emergency assessment and diagnosis of ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, acute-phase reperfusion therapy, evaluation of underlying mechanisms, antithrombotic therapy, prevention and treatment of complications, and risk factor management. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline updated the recommendations for the clinical management of ischaemic cerebrovascular disease from 2019.

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: New Evidence and Indications.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. In the past few years, endovascular treatment indications have expanded to include patients being treated in the extended window, with large ischemic core infarction, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) thrombectomy, as demonstrated by several randomized clinical trials. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) bridging to mechanical thrombectomy has also been studied via several randomized clinical trials, with the overall results indicating that IVT should not be skipped in patients who are candidates for both IVT and EVT. Simplification of neuroimaging protocols in the extended window to permit non-contrast CT, CTA collaterals have also expanded access to mechanical thrombectomy, particularly in regions across the world where access to advanced imaging may not be available. Ongoing study of areas to develop include rescue stenting in patients with failed thrombectomy, medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy, and carotid tandem occlusions. In this narrative review, we summarize recent trials and key data in the treatment of patients with large ischemic core infarct, simplification of neuroimaging protocols for the treatment of patients presenting in the late window, bridging thrombolysis, and BAO EVT evidence. We also summarize areas of ongoing study including medium and distal vessel occlusion.

Incidence and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion patients: insight from the ANGEL-ACT registry.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the occurrence rate and predictors of futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO). METHODS: Participants of the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischaemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) registry were selected for the analysis. Futile recanalisation was defined as patients did not achieve a 90-day good outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) despite successful recanalisation (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischaemia Scale ≥2b) after the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to find independent predictors of futile recanalisation in VBAO patients undergoing EVT. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen patients with VBAO who achieved successful recanalisation after EVT were included in current analysis, of whom, 155 (49.2%) suffered futile recanalisation, and 160 achieved effective recanalisation. After the multivariable analysis, we found admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥19 (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.76 to 8.39, p<0.001), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥162.2 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.27, p=0.001), onset-to-puncture time (OTP) ≥334 min (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.68, p=0.005) and use of general anesthesia (GA) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.22, p=0.024) were associated with futile recanalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Futile recanalisation after EVT occurred 49.2% of VBAO patients in the ANGEL-ACT registry. NIHSS≥19, PLR≥162.2, OTP≥334 min and use of GA were independent predictors of futile recanalisation.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of acute ischemic stroke worldwide. Patients with acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying ICAD (ICAD-LVO) often do not achieve successful recanalization when undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone, requiring rescue treatment, including intra-arterial thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stenting. Therefore, early detection of ICAD-LVO before the procedure is important to enable physicians to select the optimal treatment strategy for ICAD-LVO to improve clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of ICAD-LVO is challenging in the absence of consensus diagnostic criteria on noninvasive imaging and early digital subtraction angiography. In this review, we summarize the clinical and diagnostic criteria, prediction of ICAD-LVO prior to the procedure, and EVT strategy of ICAD-LVO and provide recommendations according to the current literature.

History of Neurointervention.

In this review article, we aim to provide a summary of the discoveries and developments that were instrumental in the evolution of the Neurointerventional field. We begin with developments in the advent of Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and progress to cerebral aneurysm treatment, embolization in AVMs and ischemic stroke treatment. In the process we discuss many persons who were key in the development and maturation of the field. A pivotal aspect to rapid growth in the field has been the multidisciplinary involvement of the different neuroscience specialties and therefore we close out our discussion with excitement about ongoing and future developments in the field with a focus on treatments in the non-cerebrovascular disease realm.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An Evolution of Trials.

The last decade's progress in demonstrating the clinical benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke has transformed the paradigm of care for these patients. This review presents the milestones in implementing EVT as standard of care, demonstrates the current state of evidence, provides guidance for identifying the candidate patient for EVT, and highlights unsolved and controversial issues. Ongoing trials investigate broadening of EVT indications for patients who present with large core infarction, adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis, medium vessel occlusion, low NIHSS, and tandem occlusion.

Effectiveness of a Quality Improvement Intervention on Reperfusion Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Reperfusion therapy is the most effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke but remains underused in China. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a problem-oriented, culturally adapted, targeted quality improvement intervention on reperfusion therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke in China. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, patients from 16 secondary and 33 tertiary hospitals in China with acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset were consecutively recruited between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2020. Interventions: Hospitals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 sequences to receive the targeted quality improvement intervention (n = 5689), in which workflow reconstruction was promoted to reduce in-hospital reperfusion treatment delays, or usual care (n = 6443), in which conventional stroke care was left to the discretion of the stroke team. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the reperfusion therapy rate, a composite outcome of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for eligible patients who arrived within 3.5 or 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Secondary outcomes were the IV rtPA administration rate among eligible patients who arrived within 3.5 hours of symptom onset, the EVT rate among eligible participants who arrived within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, the proportion of patients with door-to-needle time within 60 minutes, the proportion of patients with door-to-puncture time within 90 minutes, in-hospital mortality, and 3-month disability as measured by a modified Rankin Scale score greater than 2. Results: All 12 132 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 66 [12.1] years; 7759 male [64.0%]) completed the trial. The reperfusion rate was 53.5% (3046 of 5689) for the eligible patients in the intervention period and 43.9% (2830 of 6443) in the control period. No significant improvement in primary outcomes was found for the intervention after adjusting for cluster, period, and imbalanced baseline covariates (adjusted risk difference [ARD], 5.5%; 95% CI, -8.0% to 19.0%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.72-2.21) or for the secondary outcomes. However, significant improvements were found in secondary hospitals for reperfusion therapy (1081 of 1870 patients [57.8%] vs 945 of 2022 patients [42.9%]; ARD, 19.0%; 95% CI, 6.4%-31.6%; AOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.29-3.88), IV rtPA administration (1062 of 1826 patients [58.2%] vs 916 of 2170 patients [42.2%]; ARD, 20.3%; 95% CI, 7.4%-33.1%; AOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.34-4.19), and EVT (51 of 231 patients [22.1%] vs 37 of 259 patients [14.3%]; ARD, 13.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-26.3%; AOR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.11-8.25) in subgroup analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial of patients with acute ischemic stroke in China, the use of a targeted quality improvement intervention compared with usual care did not improve the reperfusion therapy rate. However, the intervention may be effective in secondary hospitals. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03578107.

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct in China.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy administered within 24 hours has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarction, but the data on its cost-effectiveness are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarction in China, the largest low- and middle-income country. METHODS: A short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model were used to analyze the cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarction. Outcomes, transition probability, and cost data were obtained from a recent clinical trial and published literature. The benefit of endovascular therapy was assessed by the cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained in the short and long term. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Compared with medical management alone, endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarction was found to be cost-effective from the fourth year onward and during a lifetime. In the long term, endovascular therapy yielded a lifetime gain of 1.33 QALYs at an additional cost of ¥73 900 (US$ 11 400), resulting in an incremental cost of ¥55 500 (US$ 8530) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that endovascular therapy was cost-effective in 99.5% of the simulation runs at a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥243 000 (3 × gross domestic product per capita of China in 2021) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarction could be cost-effective in China.

The Effects of Pressure Gradient on Papilledema Improvement After Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pressure gradient on papilledema after stenting in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients and venous sinus stenosis (VSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we examined 121 patients with IIH and VSS who underwent stenting. The papilledema Frisen grade at the 1-month follow-up was used as a grouping factor (favorable outcome: 0-1; unfavorable outcome: 2-5). We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine independent predictors of favorable outcome. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients had papilledema grades 0 to 1, and 25 patients had papilledema grades 2 to 5. Patients with the first group had significantly lower gradient pressures preoperatively (15.2 mmHg vs. 21.4 mmHg, p=0.001) and postoperatively (2 mmHg vs. 3.3 mmHg, p=0.002) relative to those in the second group. Multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative pressure gradient (odds ratio [OR] = 1.119; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.034-1.211]) and postoperative pressure gradient (OR = 1.498; 95% CI = 1.147-1.957) were independent predictors of favorable outcome. In the ROC analysis, the cut-off pressure gradient for the highest sensitivity (0.44) and specificity (0.874) was 22.75 mmHg, with a Youden's index of 0.314. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with a preoperative pressure gradient <22.75 mmHg had more rapid improvement of papilledema than did those with a pressure gradient >22.75 mmHg (mean+SD: 2.639+0.382 [95% CI: 1.890-3.388] versus mean+SD: 3.882+0.884 [95% CI: 2.149-5.616]; p=0.004). CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in the pressure gradient appears to be strongly correlated with the success of VSS in patients with IIH. A higher preoperative pressure gradient may reduce stenting efficacy in patients with IIH. CLINICAL IMPACT: Venous sinus stenting has the potential to yield substantial clinical advantages in individuals diagnosed with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis. Nevertheless, a heightened preoperative pressure gradient could lead to less favorable results. Thus, the early adoption of venous sinus stenting is advised to avert additional irreversible clinical deterioration among idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients with venous sinus stenosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Butylphthalide in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: DL-3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) is a drug for treating acute ischemic stroke and may play a neuroprotective role by acting on multiple active targets. The efficacy of NBP in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy remains unknown. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of NBP in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy of intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel randomized clinical trial was conducted in 59 centers in China with 90-day follow-up. Of 1236 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 1216 patients 18 years and older diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ranging from 4 to 25 who could start the trial drug within 6 hours from symptom onset and received either intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or endovascular treatment or intravenous rt-PA bridging to endovascular treatment were enrolled, after excluding 20 patients who declined to participate or did not meet eligibility criteria. Data were collected from July 1, 2018, to May 22, 2022. Interventions: Within 6 hours after symptom onset, patients were randomized to receive NBP or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome based on 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (a global stroke disability scale ranging from 0 [no symptoms or completely recovered] to 6 [death]) thresholds of 0 to 2 points, depending on baseline stroke severity. Results: Of 1216 enrolled patients, 827 (68.0%) were men, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (56-72) years. A total of 607 were randomly assigned to the butylphthalide group and 609 to the placebo group. A favorable functional outcome at 90 days occurred in 344 patients (56.7%) in the butylphthalide group and 268 patients (44.0%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.35-2.14; P < .001). Serious adverse events within 90 days occurred in 61 patients (10.1%) in the butylphthalide group and 73 patients (12.0%) in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment, NBP was associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving a favorable functional outcome at 90 days compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03539445.

Does MRI add value in selecting patients for thrombectomy beyond the 6 h window? A matched-control analysis.

Background: Controversy exists regarding the need of advanced imaging for patient selection in the extended window. Aims: To analyze the effect of initial imaging modalities on clinical outcomes of patients underwent MT in the extended window. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry, the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ANGEL-ACT) registry which was conducted at 111 hospitals between November 2017 and March 2019 in China. Primary study cohort and Guideline like cohort were identified, in each cohort, two imaging modalities for patient selection in 6 to 24 h window were defined: (1) NCCT ± CTA, (2) MRI. Guideline-like cohort were further screened based on key features of the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials. The primary outcome was 90 day mRS. The safety outcomes were sICH, any ICH and 90-day mortality. Results: After adjusting for covariates, there were no significant differences in 90 day mRS or any safety outcomes between two imaging modalities groups in both cohorts. All outcome measures of mixed-effects logistic regression model were consistent with propensity score matching model. Conclusion: Our results indicate that patients presented with anterior large vessel occlusion in the extended time window can potentially benefit from MT even in the absence of MRI selection. This conclusion needs to be verified by the prospective randomized clinical trials.

Necessity and timing of angioplasty in acute large-vessel occlusion strokes due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease: A cohort analysis with data from the angel-ACT registry.

Background: The effects of angioplasty on intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD)-related acute large-vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) are unknown. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of angioplasty or stenting for ICAD-related LVOS and the optimal treatment duration. Methods: Patients with ICAD-related LVOS from a prospective cohort of the Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Work Flow Improvement of Acute Ischemia Stroke registry were classified as follows: the early intraprocedural angioplasty and/or stenting (EAS) group was defined as the strategy using angioplasty or stenting without mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or one attempt of MT; the non-angioplasty and/or stenting (NAS) group, MT procedure without any angioplasty; and the late intraprocedural angioplasty and/or stenting (LAS) group, using same angioplasty techniques following two or more passes of MT. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Other efficacy outcomes included mRS scores 0-1, mRS 0-2, and successful recanalization. Death within 90 days, and symptomatic ICH were safety endpoints. We use propensity score method to diminish the effect of treatment-selection bias. The odds ratio of recanalization rate and mRS score among EAS, NAS, and LAS groups were examined by unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis among unweighted samples and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) samples. Results: We divided 475 cases into three groups. Functional outcomes at 90 days were better in the EAS group than in the NAS and LAS groups. The proportion of mRS 0-1, mRS 0-2, and successful recanalization cases were the highest in the EAS group. However, after IPTW, mortality rate among the three groups were similar (EAS vs. NAS vs. LAS: 19.0 vs. 18.1 vs. 18.7%, p = 0.98) as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h however, mortality rate and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage among the three groups were similar. Logistic regression analysis in unweighted samples and IPTW samples both showed that EAS group had better outcomes. IPTW-adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the EAS group had better outcomes (mRS 0-1) than the NAS group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.88, p = 0.01) and LAS (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.22-0.68, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Angioplasty and/or stenting should be performed at an early stage for ICAD-related acute LVOS. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03370939.