Growth modulation response in vertebral body tethering depends primarily on magnitude of concave vertebral body growth.

PURPOSE: There is variability in clinical outcomes with vertebral body tethering (VBT) partly due to a limited understanding of the growth modulation (GM) response. We used the largest sample of patients with 3D spine reconstructions to characterize the vertebra and disc morphologic changes that accompany growth modulation during the first two years following VBT. METHODS: A multicenter registry was used to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with 2 years of follow-up. Calibrated biplanar X-rays obtained at longitudinal timepoints underwent 3D reconstruction to obtain precision morphological measurements. GM was defined as change in instrumented coronal angulation from post-op to 2-years. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age: 12.5 ± 1.3yrs) were analyzed over a mean of 27.7 months. GM was positively correlated with concave vertebra height growth (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), 3D spine length growth (r = 0.36, p = 0.008), and decreased convex disc height (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002). High modulators (patients experiencing GM > 10°) experienced an additional 1.6 mm (229% increase) of mean concave vertebra growth during study period compared to the Poor Modulators (GM < - 10°) group, (2.3 vs. 0.7 mm, p = 0.039), while convex vertebra height growth was similar (1.3 vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: When successful, VBT enables asymmetric vertebra body growth, leading to continued postoperative coronal angulation correction (GM). A strong GM response is correlated with concave vertebral body height growth and overall instrumented spine growth. A poor GM response is associated with an increase in convex disc height (suspected tether rupture). Future studies will investigate the patient and technique-specific factors that influence increased growth remodeling.

Analysis of three-dimensional spine growth for vertebral body tethering patients at 2 and 5 years post operatively.

PURPOSE: Scoliosis can be treated with vertebral body tethering (VBT) as a motion-sparing procedure. However, the knowledge of how growth is affected by a tether spanning multiple levels is unclear in the literature. Three-dimensional true spine length (3D-TSL) is a validated assessment technique that accounts for the shape of the spine in both the coronal and sagittal planes. This study aimed to assess if 3D-TSL increases over a five-year period after VBT implantation in thoracic curves for idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Prospectively collected radiographic data from an international pediatric spine registry was analyzed. Complete radiographic data over three visits (post-operative, 2 years, and 5 years) was available for 53 patients who underwent VBT. RESULTS: The mean age at instrumentation of this cohort was 12.2 (9-15) years. The average number of vertebrae instrumented was 7.3 (SD 0.7). Maximum Cobb angles were 50° pre-op, which improved to 26° post-op (p < 0.001) and was maintained at 5 years (30°; p = 0.543). Instrumented Cobb angle was 22° at 5 years (p < 0.001 vs 5-year maximum Cobb angle). An accentuation was seen in global kyphosis from 29° pre-operative to 41° at 5 years (p < 0.05). The global spine length (T1-S1 3D-TSL) started at 40.6 cm; measured 42.8 cm at 2 years; and 44.0 cm at the final visit (all p < 0.05). At 5 years, patients reached an average T1-S1 length that is comparable to a normal population at maturity. Immediate mean post-operative instrumented 3D-TSL (top of UIV-top of LIV) was 13.8 cm two-year length was 14.3 cm; and five-year length was 14.6 cm (all p < 0.05). The mean growth of 0.09 cm per instrumented level at 2 years was approximately 50% of normal thoracic growth. Patients who grew more than 0.5 cm at 2 years had a significantly lower BMI (17.0 vs 19.0, p < 0.05) and smaller pre-operative scoliosis (48° vs 53°, p < 0.05). Other subgroup analyses were not significant for age, skeletal maturity, Cobb angles or number of spanned vertebras as contributing factors. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that 3D-TSL increased significantly over the thoracic instrumented levels after VBT surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. This represented approximately 50% of expected normal thoracic growth over 2 years.

Differential vertebral body growth is maintained after vertebral body tethering surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: 4-year follow-up on 888 peri-apical vertebrae and 592 intervertebral discs.

PURPOSE: To radiographically evaluate if vertebral body tethering (VBT) can maintain differential peri-apical vertebral growth at medium-term follow-up of 4 years. METHODS: A prospective, international, multicenter database was queried to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with thoracic VBT. Concave vs. convex vertebral body height, vertebral wedging, and disc wedging of the 3 peri-apical vertebrae were measured by two independent observers at 5 timepoints (pre-operative to 4-year follow-up). RESULTS: 65 skeletally immature patients (60 female, mean 12.8 years old, 21 with open triradiate cartilages) met inclusion criteria. Mean pre-operative maximum scoliosis of 50 ± 8° decreased significantly post-operatively to 27 ± 9° (p < 0.001), which remained stable at 4-year follow-up 30 ± 17° (p = 0.38 vs. post-operative). Mean instrumented scoliosis was 21 ± 14° at 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different than 4-year maximum scoliosis (p < 0.001). Mean pre-operative kyphosis of 30 ± 12° did not significantly change post-operatively (p = 1.0) and remained stable at 4-year follow-up (35 ± 18°; p = 0.05). Mean individual convex vertebral height increased from 17.7 ± 1.9 mm to 19.8 ± 1.5 mm (p < 0.001), while mean individual concave height increased from 14.8 ± 1.9 mm to 17.6 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). Summing the peri-apical heights, the difference in height from pre-operative to 4-year follow-up was greater on the concave (8.3 ± 4.7 mm) than on the convex side (6.2 ± 4.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Mean individual vertebral wedging decreased from 6 ± 2° at pre-operative to 4 ± 2° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean total vertebral and disc wedging started at 29 ± 7° pre-operatively, decreased to 16 ± 6° at post-operative (p < 0.001), then further decreased to 14 ± 8° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with open triradiate cartilages at the time of surgery had a larger height change over the 4 years compared to those with closed triradiate cartilages (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBT demonstrated differential vertebral growth which was maintained at minimum 4-year follow-up. This effect was more pronounced in patients whose triradiate cartilages were open at the time of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A low-dose biplanar X-ray imager has RSA level precision in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The low radiation biplanar X-ray imager (EOS imaging, Paris, France) scans patients in a weight-bearing position, provides calibrated images, and limits radiation, an asset for serial radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies. RSA in vivo precision values have not been published for this type of imaging system, thus the goal of this study was to assess the precision of RSA in vivo utilizing a low radiation biplanar imager. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At a mean of 5 years post-surgery (range 1.4-7.5 years), 15 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) participants (mean age 67 years at the time of imaging, 12 female, 3 male) with RSA markers implanted during index surgery were scanned twice at the same visit in the EOS imager. Precision of marker-based analysis was calculated by comparing the position of the implant relative to the underlying bone between the 2 examinations. RESULTS: The 95% limit of precision was 0.11, 0.04, and 0.15 mm along the x, y, and z axes, respectively and 0.15°, 0.20°, and 0.14° around the same axes. CONCLUSION: This precision study has shown an in vivo RSA precision of ≤ 0.15 mm and ≤ 0.20°, well within published uniplanar values for conventional arthroplasty RSA, with the added benefit of weight-bearing imaging, a lower radiation dose, and without the need for a reference object during the scan.

Growth friendly surgeries increase 3D true spine length at two-years post-operative.

PURPOSE: Traditional coronal-plane vertical spine height measurements, such as T1-T12 and T1-S1 spine height, are influenced by 3-dimensional spinal deformity. Therefore, they are unreliable indicators of true spine growth. The novel 3D true spine length (3D-TSL) technique assesses spine growth regardless of the presence of 3D spinal deformity. This study evaluates the effect of growth friendly surgery on spine growth using the 3D-TSL technique at two years follow-up. METHODS: Radiographs of early onset scoliosis (EOS) participants undergoing growth friendly surgery at a single institution were evaluated at pre-index, post-index, and at 2-year follow-up. Scoliosis, kyphosis, traditional coronal height and 3D-TSL were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-four EOS patients (14 female) with a mean age of 6.3 years were included. Scoliosis improved from 77.8 ± 18.7° pre-index to 56.0 ± 17.8° post-index (p < 0.001); but increased at 2 years to 65.9 ± 20.1° (p < 0.05). Kyphosis improved from 56.0 ± 20.7° pre-index to 39.3 ± 13.8° post-index (p < 0.001); and increased again at 2 years to 48.6 ± 16.4° (p < 0.05). Traditional T1-S1 height increased from pre-index to post-index, to 2-year follow-up (245.5 ± 37.2 mm to 275.8 ± 42.7 mm; p < 0.001, to 288.0 ± 41.7 mm; p = 0.005). As expected, T1-S1 3D-TSL did not change from pre to immediately post-index (305.6 ± 43.9 mm vs 306.5 ± 44.0 mm); there was a significant change from post-index to 2-year follow-up (334.1 ± 48.0 mm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Out of plane changes in scoliosis and kyphosis over time justify the use of the 3D-TSL for this cohort of patients. There was no significant change in 3D-TSL from pre-index to post-operatively; however, during the growth phase of treatment 3D-TSL increased significantly by 27.6 mm.

Low radius of curvature growth-friendly rib-based implants increase the risk of developing clinically significant proximal junctional kyphosis.

BACKGROUND: Clinically significant proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) occurs in 20% of children with scoliosis treated with posterior distraction-based growth-friendly surgery. In an effort to identify modifiable risk factors, it has been theorized biomechanically that low radius of curvature (ROC) implants (i.e., more curved rods) may increase post-operative thoracic kyphosis, and thus may pose a higher risk of developing PJK. We sought to test the hypothesis that early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with low ROC distraction-based implants will have a greater risk of developing clinically significant PJK as compared to those treated with high ROC (straighter) implants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained from a multi-centre EOS database on children treated with rib-based distraction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Variables of interest included: implant ROC at index (220 mm or 500 mm), participant age, pre-operative scoliosis, pre-operative kyphosis, and scoliosis etiology. PJK was defined as clinically significant if revision surgery with a superior extension of the upper instrumented vertebrae was performed. RESULTS: In 148 participants with scoliosis, there was a higher risk of clinically significant PJK with low ROC (more curved) rods (OR: 2.6 (95% CI 1.09-5.99), χ2 (1, n = 148) = 4.8, p = 0.03). Participants had a mean pre-operative age of 5.3 years (4.6y 220 mm vs 6.2y 500 mm, p = 0.002). A logistic regression model was created with age as a confounding variable, but it was determined to be not significant (p = 0.6). Scoliosis etiologies included 52 neuromuscular, 52 congenital, 27 idiopathic, 17 syndromic with no significant differences in PJK risk between etiologies (p = 0.07). Overall, participants had pre-op scoliosis of 69° (67° 220 mm vs 72° 500 mm, p = 0.2), and kyphosis of 48° (45° 220 mm vs 51° 500 mm, p = 0.1). The change in thoracic kyphosis pre-operatively to final follow-up (mean 4.0 ± 0.2 years) was higher in participants treated with 220 mm implants compared to 500 mm implants (220 mm: 7.5 ± 2.6° vs 500 mm: - 4.0 ± 3.0°, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Use of low ROC (more curved) posterior distraction implants is associated with a significantly greater increase in thoracic kyphosis which likely led to a higher risk of developing clinically significant PJK in participants with EOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - retrospective comparative study.

Reliability of radiographic assessment of growth modulation from anterior vertebral body tethering surgery in pediatric scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). METHODS: Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements. RESULTS: From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSION: Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.

The Effect of Proximal Anchor Choice During Distraction-based Surgeries for Patients With Nonidiopathic Early-onset Scoliosis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the type of proximal anchor affects the spine length achieved with distraction-based surgeries in patients with nonidiopathic early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Since distraction may produce kyphosis, spine length should be assessed in the sagittal plane using the sagittal spine length (SSL-curved arc length of the spine in the sagittal plane). Our purpose was to determine if the type of proximal anchor in distraction-based surgeries will affect final spine length. METHODS: Patients with nonidiopathic EOS treated with distraction-based systems (minimum 5 y follow-up, 5 lengthenings) were identified from 2 EOS registries. Radiographic analysis preoperative, postimplant (L1), and after each lengthening (L2-L5, L6-L10, L11-L15) was performed with the primary outcome of T1-S1 SSL. RESULTS: We identified 126 patients-70 had rib-based implants (52 congenital, 9 syndromic, 9 neuromuscular) and 56 had spine-based implants (15 congenital, 29 syndromic, 12 neuromuscular) with preoperative age 4.6 years, scoliosis 75 degrees, and kyphosis 48 degrees. After initial correction (P<0.05), scoliosis remained constant [58 degrees (13 to 104 degrees) at L11-L15] and kyphosis increased over time [38 degrees (9 to 108 degrees) at L1 to 60 degrees (17 to 134 degrees) at L11-L15] (P<0.05). Preoperative SSL was higher in the spine-based group (29.6 cm) when compared with the rib-based group (25.2 cm) (P<0.05). This difference was maintained after initial implantation (spine-based: 32.2 cm vs. rib-based: 26.7 cm, P<0.05) and at final follow-up (spine-based: 37.0 cm vs. rib-based: 34.4 cm, P<0.05). As preoperative SSL differed between groups, maximum SSL gains per interval were also normalized to preoperative SSL. There was no statistically significant difference between groups at L1, L2-L5, and L6-L10. However, at L11-L15, the rib-based group achieved a more relative increase in spine length compared with the spine-based group (45% vs. 31%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: At minimum 5 year follow-up, distraction-based surgeries increased spine length for patients with nonidiopathic EOS; regardless of proximal anchor type.

Can distraction-based surgeries achieve minimum 18 cm thoracic height for patients with early onset scoliosis?

PURPOSE: Karol et al. introduced the concept that 18 cm thoracic height is the critical point where a patient with early onset scoliosis (EOS) can maintain adequate pulmonary function. Our purpose was to determine if distraction-based surgeries will increase thoracic spine height to at least 18 cm in patients with EOS. METHODS: Patients with EOS treated with distraction-based systems (minimum 5 years follow up, minimum five lengthenings). Radiographic analysis of thoracic spine height (T1-T12) at the last lengthening procedure. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-three patients (67 congenital, 21 neuromuscular, 38 syndromic, 27 idiopathic) with pre-operative mean age 4.6 years, scoliosis 75°, kyphosis 47° were evaluated. Their mean age at final lengthening procedure was 11 years (6-16), average number of lengthening procedures was 10.5 (4-21), mean final scoliosis was 53°, and mean final kyphosis was 58°. Final thoracic height was > 18 cm in 65% and was > 22 cm in 31% of patients. Based on etiology, only 48% of the congenital patients reached 18 cm compared to 81% neuromuscular, 84% syndromic and 67% idiopathic. This height gain was closely related to the percentage of scoliosis correction achieved for each etiology. Comparing congenital etiology to other etiologies, there was a lower percentage of patients in the congenital group that passed the 18 cm threshold (48% vs. 78%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: At minimum 5 years follow up, distraction-based surgeries increased thoracic height for patients with EOS to greater than 18 cm in 65% of patients; however, only 48% of congenital patients reached this thoracic height threshold. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected registry data. LOI III.

The Effect of Spinopelvic Parameters on the Development of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Early Onset: Mean 4.5-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a major complication after posterior spinal surgery. It is diagnosed radiographically based on a proximal junctional angle (PJA) and clinically when proximal extension is required. We hypothesized that abnormal spinopelvic alignment will increase the risk of PJK in children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). METHODS: A retrospective study of 135 children with EOS from 2 registries, who were treated with distraction-based implants. Etiologies included 54 congenital, 10 neuromuscular, 37 syndromic, 32 idiopathic, and 2 unknown. A total of 89 rib-based and 46 spine-based surgeries were performed at a mean age of 5.3±2.83 years. On sagittal radiographs, spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively and at last follow-up: scoliosis angle (Cobb method, CA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope and PJA. Radiographic PJK was defined as PJA≥10 degrees and PJA≥10 degrees greater than preoperative measurement. The requirement for the proximal extension of the upper instrumented vertebrae was considered a proximal junctional failure (PJF). Analysis of risk factors for the development of PJK and PJF was performed. RESULTS: At final follow-up (mean: 4.5±2.6 y), CA decreased (P<0.005), LL (P=0.029), and PI (P<0.005) increased, whereas PI-LL (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis) did not change (P=0.706). Overall, 38% of children developed radiographic PJK and 18% developed PJF. Preoperative TK>50 degrees was a risk factor for the development of radiographic PJK (relative risk: 1.67, P=0.04). Children with high postoperative CA [hazard ratio (HR): 1.03, P=0.015], postoperative PT≥30 degrees (HR: 2.77, P=0.043), PI-LL>20 degrees (HR: 2.92, P=0.034), as well as greater preoperative to postoperative changes in PT (HR: 1.05, P=0.004), PI (HR: 1.06, P=0.0004) and PI-LL (HR: 1.03, P=0.013) were more likely to develop PJF. Children with rib-based constructs were less likely to develop radiographic PJK compared with children with spine-based distraction constructs (31% vs. 54%, respectively, P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In EOS patients undergoing growth-friendly surgery for EOS, preoperative TK>50 degrees was associated with increased risk for radiographic PJK. Postoperative PI-LL>20 degrees, PT≥30 degrees, and overcorrection of PT and PI-LL increased risk for PJF. Rib-based distraction construct decreased the risk for radiographic PJK in contrast with the spine-based constructs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Distraction-Based Surgeries Increase Spine Length for Patients With Nonidiopathic Early-Onset Scoliosis-5-Year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative. OBJECTIVES: To determine if distraction-based surgeries will increase spine length in patients with nonidiopathic EOS and whether etiology affects final spine length. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has many etiologies, it is unclear whether etiology affects the spine length achieved with distraction-based surgeries. Since distraction may produce kyphosis, sagittal spine length (SSL; curved arc length of the spine in the sagittal plane) should be utilized. METHODS: Patients with nonidiopathic EOS treated with distraction-based systems (minimum 5-year follow-up, 5 lengthenings) were identified from two EOS registries. Radiographic analysis preoperation, postimplant (L1), and after each lengthening (L2-L5, L6-L10, L11-L15) was performed with primary outcome of T1-S1 SSL. RESULTS: We identified 126 patients (67 congenital, 38 syndromic, 21 neuromuscular) with a mean preoperative age of 4.6 years, scoliosis 75°, kyphosis 48°, and a mean of 12 lengthenings. After initial correction (p < .05), scoliosis remained constant (58° at L11-L15) and kyphosis increased (38° at L1 to 60° at L11-L15) (p < .05). SSL increased for the entire group from 27.1 cm preoperation to 35.3 cm at L11-L15 (p < .05) and during the distraction phase (29.2 cm at L1 to 35.3 cm at L11-L15) (p < .05). Preoperative SSL was higher in neuromuscular compared with congenital patients and maintained that difference until the 10th lengthening. Preoperative SSL did not differ between syndromic and congenital patients (28.0 cm vs. 25.6 cm); however, syndromic patients had greater SSL after implantation (L1: 30.5 cm vs. 26.8 cm) (p < .05) and maintained that difference until the 15th lengthening (37.1 cm vs. 34.3 cm) (p < .05). CONCLUSION: At minimum 5-year follow-up, distraction-based surgeries increased spine length for all patients with nonidiopathic EOS; however, neuromusculars had higher preoperative spine length compared with congenital patients and maintained that difference until the 10th lengthening. Although congenital and syndromic patients had similar preoperative spine length, syndromic patients had greater SSL after implantation (L1) and maintained that difference until the 15th lengthening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The reliability of radiostereometric analysis in determining physeal motion in slipped capital femoral epiphysis in standard uniplanar and low-dose EOS biplanar radiography: a phantom model study.

Physeal closure after slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation can be difficult to assess on two-dimensional conventional radiographs. Radiostereometric analysis offers improved motion detection over conventional radiography, whereas the EOS biplanar imager provides a means for low radiation weight-bearing images. This phantom study assessed the reliability of measuring motion using radiostereometric analysis in the EOS using a slipped capital femoral epiphysis model. The accuracy and precision were better than 0.09±0.05 mm and 0.20°±0.36° when centered in the imaging space, were within the limits of clinical significance, and were not different from a standard uniplanar radiostereometric system.

Three-dimensional True Spine Length: A Novel Technique for Assessing the Outcomes of Scoliosis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current assessment of spine growth for patients undergoing growth friendly surgical treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is the use of serial, 1-dimensional standard-of-care coronal vertical spine height (SoCVH) measurements. Any growth of the spine out of the coronal plane is missed by the SoCVH, which may underestimate the actual growth of the spine. This study set to validate the novel 3-dimensional true spine length (3DTSL) radiographic measurement technique for measuring growth of EOS patients. METHODS: 3DTSL measurement accuracy, reliability, and repeatability was assessed using 10 physical model configurations. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliabilities (IRRs) were assessed using interclass coefficient (ICC) analyses of 23 retrospective EOS patient clinical radiographs. 3DTSL measurements were compared with SoCVH measurements. RESULTS: The model assessment showed excellent accuracy with a mean error of 1.2 mm (SD=0.9; range, 0.0 to 3.0) and mean ICC of 0.999.IRR ICCs of the clinical radiographs averaged 0.952 for the 3DTSL and 0.975 for the vertical height whereas IRRs averaged 0.944 and 0.965, respectively (all P<0.001).Mean clinical 3DTSL curve lengths were 193.9 mm (SD=30.0; range, 142.8 to 276.8), whereas the SoCVH averaged 156.1 mm (SD=29.7; range, 74.7 to 207.3). The mean difference between the matched 3DTSL and SoCVH measurements was 37.8 mm (SD=21.4; range, 1.3 to 95.4) and was statistically significant (P<0.0001). On average, the 3DTSL of the measured spines was 124.2% of the measured SoCVH, with a progressive difference as the Cobb or kyphosis angles increased. CONCLUSIONS: The novel 3DTSL measurement is accurate, repeatable, and complements the current growth assessments for EOS treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic study-development of a diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients, with gold standard.

Paper #42: Spinopelvic alignment affects Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) for Patients with Early Onset Scoliosis.

Recent studies in the adult scoliosis population have shown effects of spinopelvic parameters on HRQoL outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study of 75 EOS patients treated with growth-friendly surgery, spinopelvic parameters affected HRQoL (EOSQ-24). Pre-operative PI>60° increased the risk for poor pain outcomes, pre- and post-operative LL>60° increased the risk for poor satisfaction, post-operative PI-LL mismatch of O >20° and post-operative PJK increased the risk of Fatigue.

Paper #29: Does the Type of Proximal Anchor Used During Distraction-Based Surgeries for Patients With Non-Idiopathic EOS Affect Spine Length?

At minimum 5 yr f/u, distraction-based surgeries (Spine-based (SB)&Rib-based (RB)) are an effective way to increase spine length for non-idiopathic EOS. Spine length is greater for spine based implants pre-operatively and this length is maintained to the 15th lengthening; however, if normalized to pre-op spine length, rib-based implants achieved greater percentage of increase in spine length beyond the 10th lengthening surgeries.

Sagittal Spine Length Measurement: A Novel Technique to Assess Growth of the Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: The accuracy and repeatability of a novel sagittal spine length (SSL) radiographic measurement was examined using photographic and radiographic imaging. OBJECTIVES: To validate the new SSL technique for measuring growth in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current assessment of patient growth undergoing growth-friendly surgical treatment for EOS is the use of serial vertical spine height measurements (VH) on coronal radiographs. Spine-based distraction implants are able to control the coronal plane deformity of scoliosis, but exhibit a "law of diminishing returns" in the impact of each follow-up lengthening surgery. As these treatments are kyphogenic, we hypothesize that the increase in kyphosis is, in fact, growth out of plane, not captured by standard spine height measurements. METHODS: Measurement accuracy was assessed using 6 spine model alignments and clinical radiographs of 23 retrospective EOS patients. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were assessed using interclass coefficient (ICC) analyses. The discrepancy between the VH and SSL was also investigated. RESULTS: The model assessment showed excellent accuracy, with a 1.54 mm (SD: 1.07, range: 0.03-3.14, p = .226) mean error and mean ICCs of 0.999. As the kyphosis increased, a progressive difference between the phantom VH and SSL was observed. Interrater reliability ICCs of the clinical radiographs averaged 0.981 and 0.804, whereas intrarater reliabilities averaged 0.966 and 0.826, for the coronal and sagittal radiographs, respectively. Mean clinical SSLs were 177.5 mm (SD: 28.5, range: 114.3-250.3), whereas the VH averaged 161.6 mm (SD: 31.8, range: 58.5-243.0), resulting in a 16.0-mm (SD: 16.7, range: 0.3-90.3, p < .0001) difference between the two measurements with a progressive difference as the kyphosis increased. CONCLUSIONS: The novel SSL measurement is accurate, repeatable, and complements the current growth assessments for EOS treatments. Until sagittal spine lengths are taken into consideration, the "law of diminishing returns" should be interpreted with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II - Prospective Comparative Study.