Polymyalgia rheumatica following COVID-19 vaccination: Case series of 3 patients and literature review on polymyalgia rheumatica induced by various vaccines.

RATIONALE: Since the onset of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 2019, considerable resources have been devoted to developing vaccines to reduce related deaths and the burden of disease. Various vaccine formulations eventually became available and were approved for clinical use. In this article, we have conducted a review of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) cases induced by different COVID-19 vaccines [Pfizer: BNT162b2, AstraZeneca: ChAdOx1-S, Moderna: mRNA-1273, and Janssen: Ad26.COV2.S)], as well as non-COVID-19 vaccines, such as influenza, zoster, hepatitis B, and tetanus vaccines. Additionally, this article investigates 3 cases with clinical presentations suggestive of PMR following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. This study aims to offer valuable insights through sharing diagnostic and therapeutic experiences. PATIENT CONCERNS: Three patients presented with severe pain and stiffness in both shoulder and pelvic girdle muscles, following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. DIAGNOSES: Clinical presentations, laboratory parameters, and echographic findings confirmed the diagnosis of PMR following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received Prednisone and/or Methotrexate adjusted to body weight. OUTCOMES: Polymyalgia rheumatica resolved successfully without any adverse events. LESSONS: Although direct causality was not definitively established in this article, the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, similar to other vaccines, might be considered a potential trigger for PMR. This raises the need for further research into this issue and potentially other immunological outcomes.

COVID-19 among people living with HIV in Lebanon.

Background: There are conflicting reports of the interaction between COVID-19 and HIV infection among coinfected individuals, and there is a particular dearth of evidence among populations in the Middle East. Aim: To determine if living with HIV and use of antiretroviral therapy increases susceptibility to, and severity of, COVID-19. Methods: This cross-sectional study was based on telephone survey of COVID-19 symptoms duration and clinical course among 200 people living with HIV (PLWHs) and a review of medical records in Beirut, Lebanon, during Spring 2021. Data were collected from consenting patients using standardized forms. The laboratory and medical characteristics of PLWHs with and without COVID-19 were compared and the outcomes of COVID-19 were described. A binary logistic regression model for contracting COVID-19 was constructed based on clinically relevant covariates consistently associated with COVID-19. Significance level was set at 0.05 and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0. The Lebanese American University Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol. Results: Fifty-two of 200 PLWHs contracted COVID-19 but only 4 progressed to severe COVID-19. No significant differences were found with respect to gender, time since HIV diagnosis, most recent CD4 count, viral load, substance use, comorbidities, or use of antiretroviral therapy. Older PLWHs were at lower risk of contracting COVID-19; COVID-19 infection was significantly associated with younger age. Conclusions: COVID-19 infection was associated with younger age among PLWHs in Lebanon, possibly due to behavioural and socioeconomic factors.

Mapping of infection prevention and control education and training in some countries of the World Health Organization's Eastern Mediterranean Region: current situation and future needs.

BACKGROUND: A strong understanding of infection prevention and control (IPC) procedures and comprehensive training among healthcare workers is essential for effective IPC programs. These elements play a crucial role in breaking the chain of nosocomial infections by preventing the transmission of resistant organisms to patients and staff members. This study mapped the components of IPC education and training across various member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) at national, academic, and healthcare institutional levels. METHODS: A self-administered structured online questionnaire based on the WHO "Core Component 3" of IPC programs at the national and acute healthcare facility levels (IPC education and training) was given to national IPC focal persons in each of the WHO's EMR countries between February and March 2023. RESULTS: From 14 of the 22 countries,15 IPC persons participated in the survey. Most countries have scattered nonhomogeneous IPC education programs in human health undergraduate majors without considering it a standalone module. Academic institutions are rarely involved, and elaborate and predefined undergraduate IPC education programs provided by universities are present in 21.4% of the countries. In 71.4% of these countries, postgraduate training targeting IPC professionals is provided by national IPC teams, primarily based on national IPC guidelines developed with the aid of the WHO. Generally, healthcare worker training relies heavily on healthcare facilities in 92.9% of the countries, rather than on a national training program. In 42.9% of the countries, practicing IPC physicians are not necessarily specialists of infectious disease or medical microbiologists and IPC nurses are not required to specialize in IPC. However, nonspecialized IPC professionals are expected to undergo training upon employment and before beginning practice. Nongovernmental organizations such as the WHO play a significant role in IPC education and in supporting national IPC authorities in establishing national IPC guidelines, as it is the case in 78.6% of these countries. CONCLUSION: Clear disparities exist in IPC education and training across different countries in the WHO's EMR. Establishing a regional scientific network specializing in IPC would help bridge the existing gaps and standardize this education within individual countries and across countries in the region. This region needs to establish IPC certification standards and standardized education curricula.

The effect of the BNT162b2 vaccine on antinuclear antibody and antiphospholipid antibody levels.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in December 2020. New adverse events have emerged since these vaccines have reached market. Although no clear association between messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines and autoimmunity has emerged, the significance of such an association warrants further exploration. After obtaining consent, a standardized survey on baseline characteristics and other relevant variables was conducted on unvaccinated individuals who were scheduled for vaccination and had not previously contracted COVID-19. Blood samples were collected from participants prior to the first dose, prior to the second dose, and 1 month after the second dose. All collected samples were tested for antinuclear antibody (ANA) titers using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy kits, and antiphospholipid (APS) immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels using an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) technique. ANA titers were positive for 9 participants out of 101 (8.9%) in the first pre-vaccination draw. For the second draw, the number of participants testing positive for ANA decreased to 5 (5%). For the last draw, 6 (5.9%) participants tested positive for ANA titers. One participant tested positive for APS IgM at the first pre-vaccination draw, 2 tested positive at the second draw, and 2 at the third draw. As for APS IgG titers, all participants tested negative in the three draws. McNemar's test for two dependent categorical outcomes was conducted on all variables and did not show a statistical significance. The McNemar test of these two composite variables (i.e., ANA/APS, first draw vs. ANA/APS, second and third draws) did not show statistical significance. The 2-sided exact significance of the McNemar test was 1.0. The Friedman test also showed no significance (p = 0.459). No association was found between BNT162b2 vaccine administration and changes in APS and ANA titers. The benefits of the BNT162b2 vaccine significantly outweigh any possible risk of autoimmune dysregulation considering the current evidence.