RESUMO
Almost half of NHS doctors are junior doctors, while high proportions are women and/or Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) individuals. Discrimination against this population is associated with poorer career-related outcomes and unequal representation. We aimed to qualitatively explore junior doctors' experience of workplace racial and gender-based discrimination, and its impact on their psychological distress (PD). In this study, we carried out a secondary analysis of data from a UK-based parent study about junior doctors' working cultures and conditions. Interview data was examined using thematic analysis. Transcripts (n = 14) documenting experiences of race and/or gender-based discrimination were sampled and analysed from 21 in-depth interviews conducted with UK junior doctors. Four themes were generated about the experiences and perpetrators of discrimination, the psychological impact of discrimination, and organisational interventions that tackle discrimination. Discrimination in various forms was reported, from racially charged threats to subtle microaggressions. Participants experienced profoundly elevated levels of PD, feeling fearful, undermined, and under-confident. Discrimination is associated with elevated levels of PD, whilst negatively impacting workforce sustainability and retention. This reduces the opportunity for more diversity in NHS medical leadership. We encourage NHS hospitals to review their policies about discrimination and develop in-person workshops that focus on recognising, challenging, and reporting workplace discrimination.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The recurrence of symptoms following primary nerve compression surgery can occur in up to 25% of cases. Nerve wrapping can be utilised for revision surgery. An ideal barrier should minimise the chance of fibrosis, scarring and allow for adequate nerve gliding. This review evaluates the use of autologous or commercially available allograft and xenograft options as barriers against nerve scarring following revision surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid Embase and Cochrane databases were searched using the All Fields Index. Nine hundred titles underwent title screening with 11 studies being included in the final analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool. PRISMA guidelines were followed at all stages and the review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42020182818). RESULTS: The 11 studies comprised of all case series. In total, 114 patients were included, with ages ranging from 28 to 90. Previously, the number of revision surgeries ranged from 0 to 5. Autologous veins were used in 6 studies, collagen in 3 studies and human amniotic membrane in 2 studies. Improvements in subjective and objective outcomes were seen with all wrap types. Pain was the most common residual symptom (46% of patients). The most common complication was pain at the donor site following vein harvest (19% of patients). CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review to summarise the outcomes of nerve wraps for revision compression neuropathy. While improvements in outcomes were reported, further comparative studies are needed to determine the best nerve wrap.