Respiratory microbiome and clinical course of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in critically Ill patients.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) pneumonia has been a serious problem in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, defined characteristics of respiratory microbiome in CRAB pneumonia are lacking nowadays. This study aimed to analyze respiratory microbiome of CRAB pneumonia compared to non-CRAB pneumonia and reveal the clinical significance of respiratory microbiome data in these patients. Patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia with mechanical ventilation were enrolled in the ICU of a tertiary care hospital. Respiratory specimens were collected on days 1, 4, 7, and 14 in each participant via tracheal aspiration. Clinical data and outcomes of each enrolled patient were collected via electronic medical records. Microbiome analysis was conducted with collected respiratory specimens undergone by next-generation sequencing of microbial 16S ribosomal DNA. Six CRAB pneumonia, 4 non-CRAB pneumonia and 5 healthy controls were enrolled. In CRAB pneumonia, CRAB was detected in 3 patients by sputum culture at day 1, while it was negative at day 1 and detected later in the others by follow-up sputum culture. Beta diversity plot analysis showed differences between each group. Shannon index was decreased markedly at day 4 in CRAB pneumonia compared to the others. Among CRAB pneumonia cases, 3 respiratory specimens were culture-negative, but positive by microbiome analysis. Lower respiratory microbiome in CRAB pneumonia had distinct characteristics and early loss of diversity compared to non-CRAB pneumonia, which might be related to poor clinical course. Moreover, CRAB acquisition and colonization would be predicted by preemptive microbiome analysis, which will contribute to effective infection control in the ICU.

Comparative safety analysis of mRNA and adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines: a nationwide cohort study using an emulated target trial approach.

OBJECTIVE: This nationwide cohort study compared the incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) between adenoviral vector-based (ChAdOx1) and mRNA-based (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. METHODS: A targeted trial emulation study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service database. Vaccinees aged 18-85 years who had received at least one dose of ChAdOx1 or an mRNA-based vaccine were identified. The 42-day risks of AESIs were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1 767 539 ChAdOx1 vaccinees were matched exactly with mRNA vaccinees according to their risk factors. The 42-day risks of adverse events were low (∼0 to 176 events per 100 000 persons in both vaccine groups), and the incidence rates of AESIs were comparable between the two platforms, except for a higher occurrence of acute cardiac injury (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.35), myocarditis or pericarditis (IRR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.14-4.04), and arrhythmia (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.71) in mRNA vaccinees. The incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (IRR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69), vasovagal syncope (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), radiculopathy (IRR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), and aseptic arthritis (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93) was significantly lower in mRNA-based vaccinees compared with ChAdOx1 vaccinees. DISCUSSION: A remarkable platform-dependent difference was observed in the safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for myocarditis or pericarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. However, the overall risk of AESIs was low for both vaccine platforms.