Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Adolesc Health ; 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597841

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To characterize opioid toxicity deaths among adolescents and young adults in Ontario, Canada, prior to and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study of opioid toxicity deaths among individuals aged 15-24 in Ontario in the year prior to (March 17, 2019, to March 16, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic (March 17, 2020, to March 16, 2021) using administrative health databases. We analyzed circumstances surrounding death, substances contributing to death, and health-care encounters prior to death. RESULTS: We identified 284 deaths among Ontarians aged 15-24, including 115 in the year preceding and 169 in the first year of the pandemic. Fentanyl contributed to 84.3% of deaths in the prepandemic year, rising to 93.5% (p = .012) the following year. Stimulants contributed to approximately half of deaths in both periods (41.7% prepandemic and 49.1% during pandemic). In both periods, roughly one in 4 decedents had a health-care encounter in the week prior to death and less than 20% of those with an opioid use disorder received opioid agonist treatment in the 30 days prior to death. DISCUSSION: Among young Ontarians, the number of opioid-related deaths increased by 47% in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fentanyl contributed to the vast majority of deaths, with non-opioid substances (primarily stimulants) also contributing to approximately half of deaths. Patterns of health-care utilization prior to death suggest opportunities to better connect this population to services that address opioid use disorder needs and promote harm reduction.

2.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 254: 111032, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uptake and retention for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) remains low. Novel extended-release formulations may improve OAT accessibility by reducing the frequency of healthcare visits. Our aim was to examine uptake, characteristics, treatment patterns and retention of individuals initiating extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine (BUP-ER), a monthly injectable OAT. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study among adults aged 18+ initiated on BUP-ER between February 3, 2020 and March 31, 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Using administrative health data, we defined continuous BUP-ER use based on repeat injections within a 56-day period and used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate time on treatment. Among new BUP-ER recipients, we described individual and prescriber characteristics, healthcare utilization and treatment patterns. RESULTS: 2366 individuals initiated BUP-ER. The median time to BUP-ER discontinuation was 183 days (interquartile range: 66-428 days) and 52.0% of individuals were co-prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone at least once throughout the period of BUP-ER receipt. Among individuals who initiated on a dose of 300mg BUP-ER and had three or more injections, 18.8% continued to receive only 300mg doses (N=276 of 1470). Furthermore, 28.6% of those whose dose was reduced to 100mg (N=341 of 1194) had a subsequent dose increase to 300mg. CONCLUSIONS: On average, people initiating BUP-ER discontinue within the first 6 months of treatment. While BUP-ER is likely providing an important OAT option, the high occurrence of discontinuation, supplementation with buprenorphine/naloxone, and frequent dose increases suggest inadequacy of current dosing recommendations among a proportion of individuals.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Ontário , Estudos de Coortes , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação Buprenorfina e Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37350151

RESUMO

Depression and social isolation increase risk for executive function declines and are among the top five modifiable risk factors for dementia. However, the interrelationships between depression, social isolation and executive function are not well established. Further evidence is needed to inform strategies to promote executive function and independence in older age. We examined whether social isolation mediated the association between depression and executive function in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults and whether this association was modified by age and sex. Adults aged 45 to 85 years from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Comprehensive cohort were followed over three years (complete case analysis, n = 14,133). Baseline depressive symptoms, a history of clinical depression, and functional social isolation (perceived lack of social support) were self-reported. Executive function at follow-up was a composite measure of five cognitive tests. Conditional process analysis assessed the mediating effects of functional social isolation across age group and sex, adjusted for sociodemographic and health covariates. Functional social isolation significantly mediated the association of depressive symptoms (proportion mediated [PM] = 8.0%) or clinical depression (PM = 17.5%) with executive function only among women aged 75+ years. Functional social isolation explains a proportion of the total effect of depressive symptoms or clinical depression on executive function in women aged 75 and older. Although reverse causation cannot be ruled out, our findings suggest that interventions that reduce functional social isolation or depression in older women may promote executive function.

4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(1): 242-251, 2022 12 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36374569

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin received widespread attention after initial studies suggested that they were effective against COVID-19. However, several of these studies were later discredited. OBJECTIVES: We explored the impact of scientific articles, public announcements and social media posts on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin purchases in the USA and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based time series analysis of retail hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin purchases in the USA and Canada from February 2016 through to December 2021, using IQVIA's Multinational Integrated Data Analysis database. We fitted the purchasing rates with interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models. We used Google Trends to identify the most influential interventions to include in the models. RESULTS: There were significant pulse increases in hydroxychloroquine purchases in March 2020 in both the USA (P < 0.0001) and Canada (P < 0.0001). For ivermectin, there were no significant changes in April 2020 in either the USA (P = 0.41) or Canada (P = 0.16); however, significant pulse increases occurred from December 2020 to January 2021 in both the USA (P = 0.0006) and Canada (P < 0.0001), as well as significant ramp increases from April to August 2021 in both the USA (P < 0.0001) and Canada (P = 0.02). The increases in ivermectin purchases were larger in the USA than in Canada. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin purchasing rates aligned with controversial scientific articles and social media posts. This highlights the importance of scientific integrity and disseminating accurate epidemiologic information during pandemics.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
5.
Drugs Aging ; 39(10): 811-827, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976489

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain is common among older residents of long-term care (LTC) homes and often poorly recognized and treated. With heightened concerns regarding opioid prescribing in recent years, it is important to examine the current prevalence of opioid use and its association with resident characteristics to help identify those potentially at risk of medication harms as well as suboptimal pain management. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate the prevalence and correlates of opioid use among non-palliative LTC residents and explore variation in opioid prevalence and correlates across strata defined by pain frequency and intensity. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of all older (aged > 65 years) LTC residents (excluding those with cancer or receiving palliative care) in Ontario, Canada during 2018-2019. Health administrative databases were linked with standardized clinical assessment data to ascertain residents' health and pain characteristics and their opioid and other medication use. Modified Poisson regression models estimated unadjusted and adjusted associations between residents' characteristics and opioid use, overall and across strata capturing pain frequency and intensity. RESULTS: Among 75,020 eligible residents (mean age 85.1 years; 70% female), the prevalence of opioid use was 18.5% and pain was 29.4%. Opioid use ranged from 12.2% for residents with no current pain to 55.7% for those with severe pain. In adjusted models, residents newly admitted to LTC (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.62) and with moderate to severe cognitive impairment (aRR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.72) or dementia (aRR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.79) were significantly less likely to receive an opioid, whereas residents with select conditions (e.g., arthritis, aRR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.32-1.41) and concurrently using gabapentinoids (aRR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.74-1.86), benzodiazepines (aRR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.38), or antidepressants (aRR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.27-1.35) were significantly more likely to receive an opioid. The associations observed for residents newly admitted, with dementia, and concurrently using gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants were largely consistent across all pain strata. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings describe resident sub-groups at potentially higher risk of adverse health outcomes in relation to both opioid use and non-use. LTC clinical and policy changes informed by research are required to ensure the appropriate recognition and management of non-cancer pain in this setting.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Demência , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Demência/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Casas de Saúde , Ontário/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA