Proposal and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Modification of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Diagnostic Criteria for Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) criteria were launched nearly 20 years ago. Following the revised conceptual definition of sepsis and subsequent omission of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score from the latest sepsis diagnostic criteria, we omitted the SIRS score and proposed a modified version of JAAM DIC criteria, the JAAM-2 DIC criteria. OBJECTIVES: To validate and compare performance between new JAAM-2 DIC criteria and conventional JAAM DIC criteria for sepsis. METHODS: We used three datasets containing adult sepsis patients from a multicenter nationwide Japanese cohort study (J-septic DIC, FORECAST, and SPICE-ICU registries). JAAM-2 DIC criteria omitted the SIRS score and set the cutoff value at ≥3 points. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed between the two DIC criteria to evaluate prognostic value. Associations between in-hospital mortality and anticoagulant therapy according to DIC status were analyzed using propensity score weighting to compare significance of the criteria in determining introduction of anticoagulants against sepsis. RESULTS: Final study cohorts of the datasets included 2,154, 1,065, and 608 sepsis patients, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that curves for both JAAM and JAAM-2 DIC criteria as predictors of in-hospital mortality were almost consistent. Survival curves for the anticoagulant and control groups in the propensity score-weighted prediction model diagnosed using the two criteria were also almost entirely consistent. CONCLUSION: JAAM-2 DIC criteria were equivalent to JAAM DIC criteria regarding prognostic and diagnostic values for initiating anticoagulation. The newly proposed JAAM-2 DIC criteria could be potentially alternative criteria for sepsis management.

Heparins May Not Be the Optimal Anticoagulants for Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Historically, heparin has had the longest historical use as an anticoagulant and continues this day to be the primary therapeutic option for preventing thrombosis and thromboembolism in critically ill hospitalized patients. Heparin is also used to treat sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in various countries. However, the efficacy and safety of heparin for this indication remains controversial, as adequately powered randomized clinical studies have not demonstrated as yet a survival benefit in sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC, despite meta-analyses and propensity analyses reporting improved outcomes without increasing bleeding risk. Further, activated protein C and recombinant thrombomodulin showed greater improvements in outcomes compared with heparin, although these effects were inconclusive. In summary, further research is warranted, despite the ongoing clinical use of heparin for sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Based on Japanese guidelines, antithrombin or recombinant thrombomodulin may be a preferable choice if they are accessible.

Managing sepsis and septic shock in an endothelial glycocalyx-friendly way: from the viewpoint of surviving sepsis campaign guidelines.

Maintaining tissue perfusion in sepsis depends on vascular integrity provided by the endothelial glycocalyx, the critical layer covering the luminal surface of blood vessels. The glycocalyx is composed of proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, and functional plasma proteins that are critical for antithrombogenicity, regulating tone, controlling permeability, and reducing endothelial interactions with leukocytes and platelets. Degradation of the glycocalyx in sepsis is substantial due to thromboinflammation, and treatments for sepsis and septic shock may exacerbate endotheliopathy via additional glycocalyx injury. As a result, therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving glycocalyx integrity should be considered, including modifications in fluid volume resuscitation, minimizing catecholamine use, controlling hyperglycemia, and potential use of corticosteroids and anticoagulants. In this review, we explore treatment strategies aligned with the recommendations outlined in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 with a special emphasis on evidence regarding glycocalyx protection.

Efficacy of antithrombin administration for patients with sepsis: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Aims: There have been inconsistent reports regarding the effect of antithrombin on sepsis; furthermore, there are limited reports on how dosage affects therapeutic efficacy. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of antithrombin for sepsis and a meta-regression analysis of antithrombin dosage. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of adult patients with sepsis who received antithrombin. Outcomes included all-cause mortality and serious bleeding complications. Statistical analyses and data synthesis were performed using a random-effects model; further, meta-regression and funnel plots were used to explore heterogeneity and biases. Results: Seven RCTs and six observational studies were included. Most patients in the RCTs and observational studies had severe sepsis and septic-disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), respectively. A meta-analysis using RCTs showed no significant differences in mortality between the antithrombin and control groups. However, the meta-analysis of observational studies indicated a trend of decreasing mortality rates with antithrombin administration (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.92; p = 0.002). Bleeding complications were significantly higher in the antithrombin group than in the control group in both study types (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.52-2.37; p < 0.01). The meta-regression analysis showed no correlation between antithrombin dosage and mortality. Conclusion: A meta-analysis of RCTs confirmed no survival benefit of antithrombin, whereas that of observational studies, which mostly focused on septic DIC, showed a significant beneficial effect on improving outcomes. Indications of antithrombin should be considered based on its beneficial and harmful effects.

Four years into the pandemic, managing COVID-19 patients with acute coagulopathy: what have we learned?

Coagulopathy alongside micro- and macrovascular thrombotic events were frequent characteristics of patients presenting with acute COVID-19 during the initial stages of the pandemic. However, over the past 4 years, the incidence and manifestations of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy have changed due to immunity from natural infection and vaccination and the appearance of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Diagnostic criteria and management strategies based on early experience and studies for COVID-19-associated coagulopathy thus require reevaluation. As many other infectious disease states are also associated with hemostatic dysfunction, the coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 may be compounded, especially throughout the winter months, in patients with diverse etiologies of COVID-19 and other infections. This commentary examines what we have learned about COVID-19-associated coagulopathy throughout the pandemic and how we might best prepare to mitigate the hemostatic consequences of emerging infection agents.

2023 ISTH update of the 2022 ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19.

Based on emerging evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19 were published in 2022. Since then, at least 16 new randomized controlled trials have contributed additional evidence, which necessitated a modification of most of the previous recommendations. We used again the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology for assessment of level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Five recommendations had the LOE upgraded to A and 2 new recommendations on antithrombotic treatment for patients with COVID-19 were added. Furthermore, a section was added to answer questions about COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), for which studies have provided some evidence. We only included recommendations with LOE A or B. Panelists agreed on 19 recommendations, 4 for nonhospitalized, 5 for noncritically ill hospitalized, 3 for critically ill hospitalized, and 2 for postdischarge patients, as well as 5 for vaccination and VITT. A strong recommendation (COR 1) was given for (a) use of prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin in noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin/unfractionated heparin in preference to prophylactic dose, and (c) for use of antiplatelet factor 4 enzyme immunoassays for diagnosing VITT. A strong recommendation was given against (COR 3) the addition of an antiplatelet agent in hospitalized, noncritically ill patients. These international guidelines provide recommendations for countries with diverse healthcare resources and COVID-19 vaccine availability.

The role of thromboinflammation in acute kidney injury among patients with septic coagulopathy.

Inflammation and coagulation are critical self-defense mechanisms for mitigating infection that can nonetheless induce tissue injury and organ dysfunction. In severe cases, like sepsis, a dysregulated thromboinflammatory response may result in multiorgan dysfunction. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant contributor to patient morbidity and mortality. The connection between AKI and thromboinflammation is largely due to unique aspects of the renal vasculature. Specifically, the interaction between blood cells with the endothelial, glomerular, and peritubular capillary systems during thromboinflammation reduces oxygen supply to tubular epithelial cells. Previous studies have focused on tubular epithelial cell damage due to hypoxia, oxidative stress, and nephrotoxins. Although these factors are pivotal in acute tubular injury or necrosis, recent studies have demonstrated that AKI in sepsis encompasses a mixture of tubular and glomerular damage subtypes. In cases of sepsis-induced coagulopathy, thromboinflammation within the glomerulus and peritubular capillaries is an important pathogenic mechanism for AKI. Unfortunately, and despite the use of renal replacement therapy, the development of AKI in sepsis continues to be associated with high morbidity, mortality, and clinical challenges requiring alternative approaches. This review introduces the important role of thromboinflammation in AKI pathogenesis and details innovative vascular-targeting therapeutic strategies.

Thromboinflammation and microcirculation damage in heatstroke.

Rising temperatures associated with climate change have significantly increased the risk of heatstroke. Unfortunately, the trend is anticipated to persist and increasingly threaten vulnerable populations, particularly older adults. According to Japan's environment ministry, over 1000 people died from heatstroke in 2021, and 86% of deaths occurred in those above 65. Since the precise mechanism of heatstroke is not fully understood, we examined the pathophysiology by focusing on the microcirculatory derangement. Online search of published medical literature through MEDLINE and Web of Science using the term "heatstroke," "heat-related illness," "inflammation," "thrombosis," "coagulation," "fibrinolysis," "endothelial cell," and "circulation." Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to heatstroke, inflammation, and thrombosis. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles. Other than preexisting conditions (genetic background, age, etc.), factors such as hydration status, acclimatization, dysregulated coagulation, and inflammation are the additional major factors that promote tissue malcirculation in heatstroke. The fundamental pathophysiologic mechanisms significantly overlap with those seen in the systemic inflammatory response to sepsis, and as a result, coagulation-predominant coagulopathy develops during heat stress. Although a bleeding tendency is not common, bleeding frequently occurs in the microcirculation, causing additional injury. Sterile inflammation is mediated by proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and other humoral mediators in concert with cellular factors, including monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and endothelial cells. Excess inflammation results in inflammatory cell death, including pyroptosis and necroptosis, and the release of danger signals that further propagate systemic inflammation and coagulopathy. Consequently, thromboinflammation is the critical factor that induces microcirculatory disturbance in heatstroke.

Effects of combination therapy of antithrombin and thrombomodulin for sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome is a highly lethal condition characterized by the complication of multiple organ damage. Although the effects of combined antithrombin (AT) and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) on DIC syndrome have previously been examined, the results are inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review on the combined administration of AT and rTM for the treatment of septic DIC to investigate the superiority of the combination therapy over either AT or rTM monotherapy using a random-effects analysis model. METHOD: We searched electronic databases, including Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Igaku-Chuo Zasshi (ICHU-SHI) Japanese Central Review of Medicine Web from inception to January 2022. Studies assessing the efficacy of combined AT and rTM were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was occurrence of serious bleeding complications compared to monotherapy. We presented the pooled odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) depending on reporting results in each primary study. RESULTS: We analyzed seven enrolled clinical trials, all of which were observational studies. Combination therapy had a non-significant favorable association with lower 28-day mortality compared to monotherapy (HR 0.67 [0.43-1.05], OR 0.73 [0.45-1.18]). The I2 values were 60% and 72%, respectively, suggesting high heterogeneity. As a secondary outcome, bleeding complications were similar between the two groups (pooled OR 1.11 [0.55-2.23], I2 value 55%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings in this analysis could not confirm a statistically significant effect of AT and rTM combination therapy for septic DIC, it showed a promising effect in terms of improving mortality. The incidence of bleeding was low and clinically feasible. Further research is warranted to draw more conclusive results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN ID: 000049820).

Thromboinflammation in acute injury: infections, heatstroke, and trauma.

Tissue microcirculation is essential for the maintenance of organ homeostasis. Following acute infections, activation of coagulation and inflammation, which are critical interconnected responses, lead to thromboinflammation and microthrombosis, thereby contributing to multiorgan dysfunction. Sepsis is the most common underlying disease and has been extensively studied. However, the COVID-19 pandemic further illustrated the pathomechanisms of diseases in which thromboinflammation plays a critical role. During thromboinflammation, injury to monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and endothelial cells, along with coagulation and complement activation, was further characterized. Thrombin is pivotal in orchestrating thrombosis and inflammation and has long been considered a potential therapeutic target in sepsis. Although thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism with heparins is part of standard management for COVID-19, it also potentially attenuates organ dysfunction due to thrombotic sequela. In contrast, the effectiveness of anticoagulation with heparin, antithrombin, or thrombomodulin to reduce mortality has not conclusively been proven in sepsis. Nonetheless, thromboinflammation has also been reported as an important pathophysiologic mechanism in other critical illnesses, including heatstroke, trauma, and ischemia/reperfusion injury, and may provide a potential therapeutic target for future clinical studies.

Hemostatic capability of ultrafiltrated fresh frozen plasma compared to cryoprecipitate.

This in vitro study evaluated the potential hemostatic effect of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) ultrafiltration on clotting factors, coagulation parameters, and plasma properties. ABO-specific units of FFP (n = 40) were prepared for the concentrated FFP and cryoprecipitate. Plasma water was removed from FFP by ultrafiltration using a dialyzer with a pump running at a 300 mL/min. The aliquot of each concentrated FFP after 50, 100, 200, and 250 mL of fluid removal were measured the standard coagulation assay, clotting activity, and plasma properties to compare those parameters of cryoprecipitate. Concentrated FFP contained 36.5% of fibrinogen in FFP with a mean concentration of 7.2 g/L, lower than the cryoprecipitate level. The levels of factor VIII (FVIII), von Willebrand factor (VWF):antigen (Ag), and VWF:ristocetin cofactor (RCo) were also lower in concentrated FFP, whereas the levels of factor V, factor IX, factor XIII, antithrombin and albumin was higher in concentrated FFP. Maximum clot firmness (MCF) in thromboelastometry was approximately one-half of that in cryoprecipitate. Although the levels of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII differed depending on the ABO blood types, fibrinogen levels, and MCF were not significantly different among the ABO blood groups in FFP and concentrated FFP.

Risk stratification utilizing sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, antithrombin activity, and demographic data in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a frequent complication in patients with sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Anticoagulant therapy may be appropriate for certain patients with DIC, particularly those with increased disease severity and deficiency in the physiologic anticoagulant antithrombin. We retrospectively analyzed post-marketing survey data from 1562 patients with sepsis-associated DIC and antithrombin activity of 70% or less. All the patients were treated with antithrombin concentrates. Baseline sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, DIC score, and antithrombin activity were assessed. Cox multivariate regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of variables used to assess mortality. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to classify the risk of 28-day mortality. COX multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant association of age, sex, baseline SOFA score, baseline antithrombin activity, and the presence of pneumonia or skin/soft tissue infection with increased mortality. The area under the curve of SOFA score or antithrombin activity for mortality was 0.700 and 0.614, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly higher in patients with SOFA score ≥ 12 and antithrombin activity < 47%. The decision tree analysis accurately classified the risk of death into high (> 40%), medium (40%-20%), and low (< 20%) categories in 86.1% of the cohort. Twenty eight-day mortality can be strongly predicted using baseline SOFA score, antithrombin activity, infection site, age, and sex as variables in the clinical decision tree for patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

The antithrombin activity recovery after substitution therapy is associated with improved 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common and critical complication in sepsis. Antithrombin activity, which is considered a biomarker for disease severity, was measured in septic DIC treated with antithrombin concentrates in this study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of post-marketing survey data that included 1,800 patients with sepsis-associated DIC and antithrombin activity of 70% or less who were treated with antithrombin concentrates. The changes in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, DIC score, and antithrombin activity were sequentially assessed. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of antithrombin activity to assess 28-day survival. Furthermore, the relationship between post-treatment antithrombin activity and survival was examined by Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Sex, baseline SOFA score, baseline antithrombin activities, and the presence of pneumonia and soft tissue infection were significantly associated with 28-day mortality. The area under the curve for mortality was 0.639 for post-treatment antithrombin activity, and higher than those of baseline- and delta antithrombin activities. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher post-treatment antithrombin activity was associated with better 28-day survival. When post-treatment antithrombin activity was more than 80%, the estimated survival was 88.2%. Whereas, the survival was 74.4% when the antithrombin activity was 80% or less (P < 0.0001). However, the relationship between post-treatment antithrombin activity and 28-day survival was considerably different between patients who recovered from DIC by Day 6 compared to those who did not. Similarly, the estimated 28-day survival, based on antithrombin activity, varied among patients with high and low SOFA scores, and the calculation needs to be adjusted based on the severity of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment antithrombin activity measurement was helpful in estimating the 28-day survival in patients with sepsis-associated DIC. However, patient outcomes vary considerably depending on factors that include baseline SOFA score, age, and baseline antithrombin activity. These variables play a substantial role in determining patient prognosis and should be considered when evaluating and interpreting the results.

Persistent and Late-Onset Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Are Closely Related to Poor Prognosis in Patients with Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Septic-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is heterogeneous regarding prognosis and responsiveness to anticoagulant therapy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the timing of development and recovery of DIC, its prognosis, and the difference in response to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-associated DIC patients. METHODS: This study was performed with a dataset from a multicenter nationwide retrospective cohort study (J-Septic DIC registry) in Japan between 2011 and 2013 to reveal the subgroup "high risk of death in DIC" and investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use and mortality. Patients were assigned to four groups based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-overt DIC status at days 1 and 3: non-DIC (-/-), early-recovered DIC (+/-), late-onset DIC (-/+), and persistent DIC (+/+). RESULTS: A total of 1,922 patients were included. In-hospital mortality in persistent and late-onset DIC patients was significantly higher than in patients with non-DIC and early-recovered DIC. This finding indicates that persistent DIC and late-onset DIC were a poor-prognosis subgroup, "high-risk" DIC. Meanwhile, patients with high-risk DIC treated with anticoagulants had significantly better outcomes than those without anticoagulants after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSION: This study showed that individuals with a high risk of death, persistent DIC, and late-onset DIC were a poor-prognostic subgroup in septic DIC; however, high-risk DIC is also a subgroup that can obtain more benefits from anticoagulant therapy.

What Role Does Microthrombosis Play in Long COVID?

Soon after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexplained sustained fatigue, cognitive disturbance, and muscle ache/weakness were reported in patients who had recovered from acute COVID-19 infection. This abnormal condition has been recognized as "long COVID (postacute sequelae of COVID-19 [PASC])" with a prevalence estimated to be from 10 to 20% of convalescent patients. Although the pathophysiology of PASC has been studied, the exact mechanism remains obscure. Microclots in circulation can represent one of the possible causes of PASC. Although hypercoagulability and thrombosis are critical mechanisms of acute COVID-19, recent studies have reported that thromboinflammation continues in some patients, even after the virus has cleared. Viral spike proteins and RNA can be detected months after patients have recovered, findings that may be responsible for persistent thromboinflammation and the development of microclots. Despite this theory, long-term results of anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and vascular endothelial protection are inconsistent, and could not always show beneficial treatment effects. In summary, PASC reflects a heterogeneous condition, and microclots cannot explain all the presenting symptoms. After clarification of the pathomechanisms of each symptom, a symptom- or biomarker-based stratified approach should be considered for future studies.

Mechanisms and management of the coagulopathy of trauma and sepsis: trauma-induced coagulopathy, sepsis-induced coagulopathy, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation can occur due to different causes but commonly following sepsis. Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) occurs on hospital arrival in approximately 25% of seriously injured patients who initially presents with impaired hemostasis and a bleeding phenotype that can later progress to a prothrombotic phase. Following traumatic injury, ineffective hemostasis is driven by massive blood loss, tissue damage, and hyperfibrinolysis. This initial impaired hemostasis continues until surgical or other management strategies not only to stop the causes of hemorrhage but also progresses to a prothrombotic and hypofibrinolytic state, also termed fibrinolytic shutdown. Prothrombotic progression is also promoted by inflammatory mediator release, endothelial injury, and platelet dysregulation, which is commonly seen in sepsis with increased mortality. Unlike TIC, the early phase of sepsis is frequently complicated by multiorgan dysfunction described as sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) that lacks a hemorrhagic phase. The phenotypes of SIC and TIC are different, especially in their initial presentations; however, patients who survive TIC may also develop subsequent infections and potentially sepsis and SIC. Although the pathophysiology of SIC and TIC are different, endothelial injury, dysregulated fibrinolysis, and coagulation abnormalities are common. Management includes treatment of the underlying cause, tissue injury vs infection is critical, and supportive therapies, such as hemostatic resuscitation and circulatory support are essential, and adjunct therapies are recommended in guidelines. Based on clinical studies and certain guidelines, additional therapies include tranexamic acid in the limited timing of initial traumatic injury and anticoagulants, such as antithrombin and recombinant thrombomodulin in disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Defining heparin resistance: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee of Perioperative and Critical Care Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

The term heparin resistance (HR) is used by clinicians without specific criteria. We performed a literature search and surveyed our SSC membership to better define the term when applied to medical and intensive care unit patients. The most common heparin dosing strategy reported in the literature (53%) and by survey respondents (80.4%) was the use of weight-based dosing. Heparin monitoring results were similar based on the proportion of publications and respondents that reported the use of anti-Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time. The most common literature definition of HR was >35 000 U/d, but no consensus was reported among survey respondents regarding weight-based and the total dose of heparin when determining resistance. Respondent consensus on treating HR included antithrombin supplementation, direct thrombin inhibitors, or administering more heparin as the strategies available for treating HR. A range of definitions for HR exist. Given the common use of heparin weight-based dosing, future publications employing the term HR should include weight-based definitions, monitoring assay, and target level used. Further work is needed to develop a consensus for defining HR.

Super Formula for Diagnosing Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Using Soluble C-Type Lectin-like Receptor 2.

The scoring systems for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) criteria require several adequate cutoff values, vary, and are complicated. Accordingly, a simpler and quicker diagnostic method for DIC is needed. Under such circumstances, soluble C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (sCLEC-2) received attention as a biomarker for platelet activation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The diagnostic usefulness of sCLEC-2 and several formulas, including sCLEC-2xD-dimer, sCLEC-2/platelet count (sCLEC-2/PLT), and sCLEC-2/PLT × D-dimer (sCLEC-2xD-dimer/PLT), were evaluated among 38 patients with DIC, 39 patients with pre-DIC and 222 patients without DIC or pre-DIC (non-DIC). RESULTS: Although the plasma level of sCLEC-2 alone was not a strong biomarker for the diagnosis of DIC or pre-DIC, the sCLEC-2xD-dimer/PLT values in patients with DIC were significantly higher than those in patients without DIC, and in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the diagnosis of DIC, sCLEC-2xD-dimer/PLT showed the highest AUC, sensitivity, and odds ratio. This formula is useful for the diagnosis of both pre-DIC and DIC. sCLEC-2xD-dimer/PLT values were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. CONCLUSION: The sCLEC-2xD-dimer/PLT formula is simple, easy, and highly useful for the diagnosis of DIC and pre-DIC without the use of a scoring system.