Prevention of hepatitis C recurrence by bridging sofosbuvir/ribavirin from pre- to post-liver transplant: a real-life strategy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection following liver transplant (LT) is associated with reduced graft and patient survival. Before transplant, Sofosbuvir/Ribavirin (SOF/R) treatment prevents recurrent HCV in 96% of those patients achieving viral suppression for at least 4 weeks before transplant. We evaluated whether a bridging SOF-regimen from pre- to post-transplant is safe and effective to prevent HCV recurrence in those patients with less than 4 weeks of HCV-RNA undetectability at the time of transplant. METHODS: From July 2014 SOF/R was given in 233 waitlisted HCV cirrhotics with/without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within an Italian Compassionate Program. One hundred patients were transplanted and 31 patients (31%) treated with SOF/R bridging therapy were studied. RESULTS: Liver transplant indication in bridge subgroup was HCC in 22 and decompensated cirrhosis in 9. HCV-genotype was 1/4 in 18 patients. SOF 400 mg/day and R (median dosage 800 mg/day) were given for a median of 35 days before LT. At transplant time, 19 patients were still HCV-RNA positive (median HCV-RNA 58 IU/mL). One recipient had a virological breakthrough at week 4 post-transplant; one died, on treatment, 1-month post-transplant for sepsis and 29/31 achieved a 12-week sustained virological response (94%). Acute cellular rejection occurred in three recipients. On September 2016, 30 recipients (97%) were alive with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 13-25). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suboptimal virological response at LT, a bridging SOF/R regimen helps avoiding post-transplant graft reinfection.

The Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Directly Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C Virus Treatment in Liver Transplanted Patients: Is It Real?

INTRODUCTION: Since directly acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) were introduced, conflicting data emerged about the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after interferon (IFN)-free treatments. We present a case of recurrent, extra-hepatic HCC in a liver-transplanted patient soon after successful treatment with DAAs, along with a short review of literature. CASE PRESENTATION: In 2010, a 53-year old man, affected by chronic HCV (genotype 1) infection and decompensated cirrhosis, underwent liver resection for HCC and subsequently received orthotopic liver transplantation. Then, HCV relapsed and, in 2013, he was treated with pegylated-IFN plus ribavirin; but response was null. In 2014, he was treated with daclatasvir plus simeprevir to reach sustained virological response. At baseline and at the end of HCV treatment, computed tomography (CT) scan of abdomen excluded any lesions suspected for HCC. However, alpha-fetoprotein was 2.9 ng/mL before DAAs, increasing up to 183.1 ng/mL at week-24 of follow-up after the completion of therapy. Therefore, CT scan of abdomen was performed again, showing two splenic HCC lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nine studies have been published about the risk of HCC after DAAs. Patients with previous HCC should be carefully investigated to confirm complete HCC remission before starting, and proactive follow-up should be performed after DAA treatment.

Recipient female gender is a risk factor for graft loss after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C: Evidence from the prospective Liver Match cohort.

BACKGROUND: Female gender has been reported to be a risk factor for graft loss after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis but evidence is limited to retrospective studies. AIMS: To investigate the impact of recipient gender and donor/recipient gender mismatch on graft outcome. METHODS: We performed a survival analysis of a cohort of 1530 first adult transplants enrolled consecutively in Italy between 2007 and 2009 and followed prospectively. After excluding possible confounding factors (fulminant hepatitis, human immunodeficiency virus co-infection, non-viremic anti-HCV positive subjects), a total of 1394 transplant recipients (604 HCV-positive and 790 HCV-negative) were included. RESULTS: Five-year graft survival was significantly reduced in HCV-positive patients (64% vs 76%, p=0.0002); Cox analysis identified recipient female gender (HR=1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.00, p=0.0319), Mayo clinic End stage Liver Disease score (every 10 units, HR=1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.50; p=0.022), portal thrombosis (HR=2.40, 95% CI 1.20-4.79, p=0.0134) and donor age (every 10 years, HR=1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.24, p=0.0024) as independent determinants of graft loss. All additional mortality observed among female recipients was attributable to severe HCV recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study unequivocally shows that recipient female gender unfavourably affects the outcome of HCV-infected liver grafts.

Long-term maintenance of sustained virological response in liver transplant recipients treated for recurrent hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence of hepatitis C viral infection is common after liver transplant, and achieving a sustained virological response to antiviral treatment is desirable for reducing the risk of graft loss and improving patients' survival. AIM: To investigate the long-term maintenance of sustained virological response in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C recurrence. METHODS: 436 Liver transplant recipients (74.1% genotype 1) who underwent combined antiviral therapy for hepatitis C recurrence were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The overall sustained virological response rate was 40% (173/436 patients), and the mean follow-up after liver transplantation was 11±3.5 years (range, 5-24). Patients with a sustained virological response demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 97% and a 10-year survival rate of 93%; all but 6 (3%) patients remained hepatitis C virus RNA-negative during follow-up. Genotype non-1 (p=0.007), treatment duration >80% of the scheduled period (p=0.027), and early virological response (p=0.002), were associated with the maintenance of sustained virological response as indicated by univariate analysis. Early virological response was the only independent predictor of sustained virological response maintenance (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Sustained virological response achieved after combined antiviral treatment is maintained in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C and is associated with an excellent 5-year survival.

Treatment of genotype-1 hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplant improves survival in both sustained responders and relapsers.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting the response to treatment and how it could affect survival in a large series of genotype-1 HCV-transplanted patients. Three-hundred and twenty six genotype-1 HCV patients were enrolled. One hundred and ninety-six patients (60.1%) were nonresponders and 130 (39.9%) showed negative HCV-RNA at the end of treatment. Eighty-four of them (25.8%) achieved sustained virological response, while 46 (14.1%) showed viral relapse. Five-year cumulative survival was significantly worse in nonresponders (76.4%) compared with sustained viral response (93.2) or relapsers (94.9%). Sustained responders and relapsers were therefore considered as a single 'response group' in further analysis. Pretreatment variables significantly associated with virological response at multivariate regression analysis were the absence of ineffective pretransplant antiviral therapy, the recurrence of HCV-hepatitis more than 1 year after transplant, an histological grading ≥4 at pretreatment liver biopsy, a pretreatment HCV-RNA level <1.2 × 10(6 ) IU/ml, and the absence of diabetes. As expected, also on-treatment variables (rapid and early virological response) were significantly associated to the response to antiviral treatment. In conclusion, this study shows that postliver transplant antiviral treatment results in beneficial effect on survival not only in sustained responders but also in relapsers.

Treatment of hepatitis C recurrence is less successful in female than in male liver transplant recipients.

It has been recently suggested that the risk of graft loss after liver transplantation (LT) may increase in female HCV patients. The aim of the study was to examine gender differences in HCV therapy tolerance and outcome in LT patients treated for HCV recurrence. A retrospective study was conducted on liver recipients with HCV recurrence, who were given antiviral therapy from 2001 to 2009 in 12 transplant centers in Italy. Sustained virological response (SVR), adherence-to-therapy, and side effects were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used after adjusting for possible confounders. The data regarding 342 treated patients were analyzed. SVR was reported in 38.8% of patients. At baseline, male and female did not differ in HCV viral load, histology, or rate of diabetes. SVR was lower in females than in males (29.5% vs. 42.1%; P=0.03). Adherence-to-therapy was also lower in females than in males 43.4% vs. 23.8%; P=0.001); anemia was the main reason for lower adherence. In a multivariate analysis in patients Genotype1, female gender (P<0.04), early virological response (P<0.0001), and adherence to therapy (P<0.0001) were independent predictors for SVR. In conclusion, female gender represents an independent negative prognostic factor for the outcome of HCV antiviral therapy after LT.

Timing of reinfection and mechanisms of hepatocellular damage in transplanted hepatitis C virus-reinfected liver.

Pathogenic mechanisms and dynamics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are poorly defined. This study focuses on these aspects by studying 55 frozen biopsy specimens from transplant recipients with various histological diagnoses obtained from 4 days to 4 years post-OLT and 10 patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis. The percentage of HCV-infected hepatocytes, number and distribution of CD8 and natural killer cells, and rates of hepatocellular apoptosis and proliferation were quantified by immunohistochemistry. HCV antigens were detected in 37% of biopsy specimens obtained within 20 days and 90% of biopsy specimens obtained from 21 days to 6 months after OLT. The number of HCV-infected hepatocytes was never less than 40% in acute hepatitis specimens and never greater than 30% in the other cases. Hepatocellular apoptosis was high in biopsy specimens of acute hepatitis and moderate in those from transplant recipients with normal histological characteristics, but still greater than in specimens of chronic active hepatitis. Proliferation correlated significantly with apoptosis. Lymphocyte infiltration was high and similar among cases of acute hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, and rejection. These data: (1) show that the detection of liver HCV antigens is sensitive enough to be used in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool to detect infection of the transplanted liver and might be useful, combined with conventional histological evaluation to detect hepatitic damage, for therapeutic decision making; (2) suggest direct cytotoxicity of HCV, as well as immunologic mechanisms possibly prevalent in chronic hepatitis and rejection, at least in the phase of acute massive liver infection; and (3) show that hepatocellular apoptosis and regeneration might be active enough to lead to replacement of the entire transplanted liver in 2 weeks.