Residual limb strength and functional performance measures in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with lower limb amputation exhibit lower residual limb strength compared to their sound limb. Deficits in residual limb knee flexion and extension strength may impact functional performance during tasks relevant to daily living. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does knee flexor and extensor strength in the residual limb impact functional outcome measures, such as walking energetics and performance metrics, in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation? METHODS: Fourteen individuals with traumatic unilateral transtibial amputation were recruited for this observational study. Participants completed metabolic testing at three standardized speeds based on leg length, as well maximum isokinetic knee flexion and extension strength for both residual and sound limbs. Participants also completed a series of functional outcome tests, including a two-minute walk test, timed stair ascent test, and four-square step test. Walking energetics (metabolic cost, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion) and performance metrics were compared to percent deficit of residual limb to sound limb knee flexion and extension muscle strength. A linear regression assessed significant relationships (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A significant relationship was observed between percent deficit of knee extension strength and heart rate (p = 0.024) at a fast walking speed. Additionally, percent deficit knee flexion strength related to rating of perceived exertion at slow and moderate walking speeds (p = 0.038, p = 0.024). Percent deficit knee extension strength related to two-minute walk time performance (p = 0.035) and percent deficit knee flexion strength related to timed stair ascent time (p = 0.025). SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest the importance of strength retention of the residual limb knee flexion and extension musculature to improve certain functional outcomes in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation.

Effect of Custom Carbon Ankle-Foot Orthosis Use on Energetic Demands of Walking and Comparisons With Individuals With Amputation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the metabolic demands of walking in individuals with lower limb injury with and without ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) use. A secondary aim was to compare these results with those from individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) and able-bodied controls. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Two clinical research centers. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen individuals (N=13) with lower limb injury who used a passive-dynamic AFO underwent metabolic analysis at 3 standardized speeds with and without their AFO. Results were compared with individuals with unilateral TTA who used a passive prosthetic foot and able-bodied controls with no musculoskeletal, neurologic, or cardiovascular deficits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oxygen consumption, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion. RESULTS: The use of the passive-dynamic AFO did not significantly change energetic demand (oxygen consumption, heart rate, perceived exertion) in participants with a lower limb [LL] injury. Heart rate (P<.037) was significantly greater than able-bodied controls, but perceived exertion was significantly lower (P≤.031). There were no significant differences between participants with an LL injury (with or without the AFO) and individuals with TTA. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals with LL injuries may expect to use passive-dynamic AFOs with little to no metabolic consequence. The stabilizing and assistive benefits of the AFO likely balance with its well-known range of motion limitations and power reductions. Passive-dynamic AFO use can sometimes be an alternative for individuals considering TTA. These results support that AFO users may be able to achieve similar energetic demands as those with amputation.

Effect of Sex and Ankle Brace Design on Knee Biomechanics During a Single-Leg Cut.

BACKGROUND: Despite success at preventing ankle sprain, prophylactics that restrict ankle plantarflexion motion may produce deleterious knee biomechanics and increase injury risk. PURPOSE: To determine if ankle prophylactics that restrict plantar- and dorsiflexion motion produce changes in knee biomechanics during a single-leg cut and whether those changes differ between sexes. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 17 male and 17 female participants performed a single-leg cut with 4 conditions: Ankle Roll Guard (ARG), lace-up brace, nonelastic tape, and an unbraced control. Peak stance knee flexion, abduction, and internal rotation joint angle and moment; total knee reaction moment (TKM) and its components (sagittal, frontal, and transverse); and ankle plantarflexion and inversion range of motion (ROM) and peak stance joint moments were tested with a repeated measures analysis of variance to determine the main effect and interaction of condition and sex. RESULTS: Brace and tape restricted plantarflexion ROM as compared with ARG and control (all P < .001). With the brace, women had increased peak knee abduction angle versus ARG (P = .012) and control (P = .009), and men had decreased peak knee internal rotation moment as compared with ARG (P = .032), control (P = .006), and tape (P = .003). Although the restrictive tape decreased inversion ROM when compared with ARG (P = .004) and brace (P = .017), it did not change knee biomechanics. Neither brace nor tape produced significant changes in TKM or components, yet sagittal TKM increased with ARG versus control (P = .016). Women exhibited less ankle inversion ROM (P = .003) and moment (P = .049) than men, while men exhibited significantly greater frontal TKM (P = .022) and knee internal rotation moment with the ARG (P = .029), control (P = .007), and tape (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Prophylactics that restrict ankle plantarflexion motion may elicit knee biomechanical changes during a single-leg cut, but these changes may depend on prophylactic design and user's sex and may increase women's injury risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sex-specific ankle prophylactic designs may be warranted to reduce knee injury during sports.

Effectiveness of Novel Ankle Prophylactic Compared With Lace-Up Brace or Tape.

CONTEXT: Conventional ankle prophylactics restrict harmful ankle inversion motions that lead to injury. But these existing prophylactics also limit other ankle motions, potentially leading to detriments in functional joint capacity. The ankle roll guard (ARG) may alleviate the prevailing issues of existing ankle prophylactics and prevent harmful ankle inversion, while allowing other joint motions. OBJECTIVE: This technical report sought to compare the ARG's ability to prevent ankle inversion, but not restrict other ankle motions with existing prophylactics. DESIGN: Repeated-measures study. SETTING: Motion capture laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants. INTERVENTION: Each participant had dominant limb ankle kinematics recorded during 5 successful trials of a sudden inversion event and 30-cm drop landing task with each of 4 conditions (ARG, ASO ankle stabilizer [brace], closed-basket weave athletic tape [tape], and unbraced [control]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak ankle inversion angle, range of inversion motion (ROM), and time to peak inversion during the sudden inversion event, and ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion ROM during the drop landing were submitted to a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance to test the main effect of prophylaxis. RESULTS: Participants exhibited greater inversion ROM with control compared with tape (P = .001), and greater plantar- and dorsiflexion ROM with ARG and control compared with brace (P = .02, P = .001) and tape (P = .02, P < .001). It took significantly longer to reach peak ankle inversion with brace and tape compared with ARG (P < .001, P = .001) and control (P = .01, P = .01). No significant difference in peak ankle inversion was observed between any condition (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The ARG may prevent ankle inversion angles where injury is thought to occur (reportedly >41°), but is less restrictive than existing prophylactics. The less restrictive ARG may make its use ideal during rehabilitation as it allows ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion motions, while preventing inversion related to injury.