Use of General Health Examination and Cancer Screening among People with Disability Who Need Support from Others: Analysis of the 2016 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions in Japan.

Research on preventive healthcare services among people with disability in Japan is scarce. This study aimed to (1) examine the relationship between disability and the use of general health examination (GHE) and cancer screening (lung, gastric, colorectal, breast and cervical cancer) and (2) explore the reasons for not using GHE. This cross-sectional study used secondary data from individuals aged 20-74 years (n = 15,294) from the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of 2016. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between disability and non-participation in preventive services. In addition, a descriptive analysis was conducted to explore the reasons for non-participation in GHE. Consequently, disability was identified as an independently associated factor for non-participation in GHE (odds ratios (OR): 1.73; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.14-2.62) and screening for colorectal (OR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.08-2.94), gastric (OR: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.27-4.05), cervical (OR: 2.12; 95%CI: 1.04-4.32) and breast cancer (OR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.04-4.72), controlling for confounding factors. The most dominant reason for non-participation was "I can go to see the doctor anytime, if I am worried (25/54, 46.3%)." Our findings imply the existence of disability-based disparity in preventive healthcare service use in Japan.

Barriers and enablers of utilization of low-vision rehabilitation services among people 50 years or older in East and Southeast Asia: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aims to explore and describe the barriers and enablers of low-vision rehabilitation service utilization among people 50 years or older in East and Southeast Asia. INTRODUCTION: Vision impairment is strongly associated with aging. East and Southeast Asia are experiencing a rapidly growing aging population and the associated eye-related health burdens. Despite the benefits of low-vision rehabilitation services, they are underutilized in these regions. Identifying the barriers and enablers of service utilization could be a crucial first step in making the services more accessible and, ultimately, easing the burden of this health issue. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include published quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies and reviews that examine the barriers and/or enablers of low-vision rehabilitation service utilization among people aged 50 years or older living in East and Southeast Asia. Low-vision rehabilitation services are defined as any kind of intervention that aims to mitigate the impact of disability induced by eye-related health conditions. METHODS: A literature search of 4 databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Academic Search Ultimate, and Ichushi-Web), as well as a manual search of the reference lists of included articles, will be conducted to identify eligible articles. Two independent reviewers will assess the articles for inclusion. Data extraction will focus on general information of the study, demographic or descriptive information about the study population, the eye condition being studied, means of low-vision rehabilitation, and the barriers and/or enablers of service utilization. The information will be tabulated to depict the categories of barriers and enablers that influence access to services. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8y2wp.

Perceptions regarding a range of work-related issues and corresponding support needs of individuals with an intractable disease.

A number of persons with an intractable disease (ID) experience work-related problems that could lead to job loss. The aim of this study was to ascertain perceptions regarding a range of work-related issues and corresponding support needs of individuals with an ID. Potential participants were people ages 15 to 64 with one of the 130 intractable chronic diseases designated in the Act to Comprehensively Support the Daily and Social Activities of Persons with Disabilities (Comprehensive Support for the Disabled Act). Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. With the assistance of patients' organizations, 3,000 questionnaires were mailed to potential participants. Questions included demographic characteristics, family concerns, employment/supported employment, work accommodations, and other aspects of life. Responses were received from 889 (29.6%) participants, and respondents had 57 IDs. Forty-six-point-seven percent of respondents reported being unemployed due to fatigue and/or long-term treatment. Nearly half of the unemployed respondents reported that they had been unable to work despite their willingness to do so. Common requests for accommodation included flexible work hours, working at home, and job/workplace modifications. Only 30% of respondents knew about job training programs and supported work available for persons with disabilities. The results of the study are relevant for employees, employers, and occupational health/human resource professionals. The issue of reasonable accommodations for persons with an ID needs to be addressed in future research in order to promote continued work by those persons.

Clinical status and dependency of the elderly requiring long-term care in Japan.

More than 4 million of the elderly receive long-term care services using the public long-term care insurance in Japan. In order to use the insurance system, the insured person needs to be classified in one of the six care levels according to his/her clinical status. Though each level is defined in terms of the total amount of estimated care time needed per day, the clinical status of each level is not precisely defined. This study aimed to compare the clinical status of the six levels in order to suggest indicators of deterioration for each care level. We analyzed the clinical status for 7,222 cases who applied for care-need certification in a rural area of Japan. Sixty-seven items were used to determine physical function, activities of daily living, and cognitive and sensory status. Even in the mildest care level (Support Required), more than 50% of the individuals were dependent with regard to standing and sitting, while weakness of the lower extremities and dependency in walking were identified in Care Level 1, dependency in dressing and toilet habits in Care Level 2, dependency in grooming and transferring in Care Level 3, dependency in communication and feeding in Care Level 4, and dependency in swallowing, orientation and limitations of joint movement in Care Level 5. Care providers should be tracking these changes to estimate and prevent the decline of care level because more than 20% of the individuals assessed in 2004 belonged to the worse care level one year later.