Dietary potassium liberalization with fruit and vegetables versus potassium restriction in people with chronic kidney disease (DK-Lib CKD): a clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Potassium regulation in the body is primarily done in the kidney. In addition to this, hyperkalemia, occurs in approximately 10% of individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with elevated all-cause mortality. Individuals with CKD are often told to restrict dietary potassium (K), however, this recommendation is based on low quality evidence. Reduced quality of life, limited dietary choices and nutritional deficiencies are all potential negative outcomes that may occur when restricting dietary K in CKD patients. There is a need for randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of dietary K modification on serum K concentrations in people with CKD. METHODS: A randomized 2-period crossover design comparing a liberalized K fruit and vegetable diet where participants will be required to consume ~ 3500 mg of dietary K daily, to a standard K restricted diet where participants will be required to consume < 2000 mg of dietary K daily. All participants will begin on a liberalized K run-in period for 2 weeks where they will receive fruit and vegetables home deliveries and for safety will have clinical chemistry, including serum potassium measurements taken after 1 week. Participants will then be randomized into either liberalized K or standard K diet for six weeks and then crossover to the other intervention for another 6 weeks after a 2-week washout period. DISCUSSION: 30 male and female CKD outpatients, ≥ 18 years of age, who have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 15 and 45 ml/min/1.73m2 and serum K between 4.5 and 5.5 mEq/L. This design would have greater than 80% power to detect a difference of 0.35 mEq/L serum K between groups. Anthropometric measurements, clinical chemistry, dietary recalls, physical function assessments, as well as a quality of life assessments will also be measured in this trial. These findings will provide high quality evidence for, or against, recommendations for dietary K restriction in individuals living with CKD. The removal of K restriction could provide individuals living with CKD more dietary choice leading to improved dietary status and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has received approval from the University of Manitoba Research Ethics board (HS25191 (B2021:104)).

Dietary Patterns and Perceptions in Older Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease in the Canadian Frailty Observation and Interventions Trial (CanFIT): A Mixed-Methods Study.

Background: People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have identified diet as an important aspect of their life and care. Understanding current consumption patterns in this population, and how they relate to patient perspectives of dietary recommendations, may help identify and design potential dietary intervention strategies in CKD. Objective: To investigate the dietary intake patterns of people with advanced-stage CKD, as well as subjective perspectives regarding dietary recommendations from participants and their caregivers. Design: Mixed-methods study with a sequential explanatory design. Setting: Manitoba, Canada. Participants: Individuals with late-stage CKD (CKD stages G4-G5, including dialysis) participating in the Canadian Frailty Observation and Interventions Trial (CanFIT). Methods: First, quantitative data were collected via a cross-sectional dietary assessment, using three 24-hour dietary recalls, a 36-question short diet questionnaire (SDQ), and a Nutrition Quality of Life (NQoL) tool (n = 59). Second, qualitative data were collected during 2 focus groups (n 1 = 12 and n 2 = 7) held with a subsample of individuals who had completed the dietary surveys, along with their caregivers. Focus groups explored topics related to diet and CKD; transcribed data were analyzed thematically. In the interpretation stage, the qualitative findings were combined with the quantitative results to help explain the latter and reach a deeper understanding of the subjective experiences of adults with CKD. Results: Quantitatively, nearly all (48/51; 94%) participants (mean age 70.8 ± 10.8 years) reported energy intakes below recommendations and most (86%) did not achieve recommended fiber intake. In addition, 15/21 (71%) of patients on dialysis had low protein intake. Qualitatively, 2 themes were identified: (1) Lacking/Needing dietary guidance-incomplete "information overload," and (2) Experiencing difficulty in adapting to restrictions. Within the former theme, participants spoke of getting too much information at once, often at the wrong time. Within the latter theme, participants spoke of a loss of appetite, and cheating on their dietary recommendations. Limitations: Potential recall bias recalling dietary patterns, small sample size limiting generalizability, self-selection bias. Conclusion: Despite the reported lifestyle changes made by individuals with CKD, which negatively impacted their lives, many had suboptimal nutrition, especially in terms of energy and fiber. In addition, those on dialysis were not eating enough protein, which could be due to changing dietary recommendations as CKD progresses. Qualitative findings provided additional insight into how requisite CKD-dietary changes were perceived and how participants coped with these changes. The timing and delivery of the dietary education within CKD care in Manitoba may not be working for people with CKD as they progress through the disease.

Contexte: Les personnes atteintes d'IRC mentionnent le régime alimentaire comme un aspect important de leur vie et de leurs soins. Mieux comprendre les habitudes alimentaires actuelles de cette population et leur lien avec la façon dont les patients perçoivent les recommandations diététiques pourrait contribuer à orienter et concevoir de potentielles stratégies d'intervention diététique en contexte d'IRC. Objectif: Examiner les habitudes alimentaires des personnes atteintes d'IRC à un stade avancé, ainsi que les perspectives subjectives des participants et de leurs soignants sur les recommandations alimentaires. Conception: Étude par méthode mixte avec une conception séquentielle explicative. Cadre: Manitoba, Canada. Sujets: Les personnes atteintes d'IRC de stade avancé (stades G4-G5, y compris les patients sous dialyse) qui participent à l'essai CanFIT (Canadian Frailty Observation and Interventions Trial). Méthodologie: Des données quantitatives ont d'abord été colligées au moyen d'une évaluation transversale du régime alimentaire pour trois périodes de 24 heures, d'un questionnaire abrégé de 36 questions sur le régime alimentaire et d'un outil évaluant la qualité de vie liée à l'alimentation (n=59). Des données qualitatives ont ensuite été recueillies lors de deux groupes de discussion (n1 = 12 et n2 = 7) avec un sous-échantillon constitué de personnes ayant terminé les enquêtes sur l'alimentation et leurs soignants. Les groupes de discussion ont examiné des sujets liés à l'alimentation et à l'IRC; les données transcrites ont été analysées par thème. Au stade de l'interprétation, les résultats qualitatifs ont été combinés aux résultats quantitatifs pour aider à expliquer ces derniers et mieux comprendre les expériences subjectives des adultes atteints d'IRC. Résultats: Quantitativement, presque tous les participants (48/51; 94 %) (âge moyen: 70,8 ans ±10,8 ans) ont signalé des apports énergétiques inférieurs aux recommandations et la plupart (86 %) n'atteignaient pas l'apport recommandé en fibres. Sur les 21 patients sous dialyse, 15 (71 %) consommaient peu de protéines. Qualitativement, deux thèmes ont été dégagés: 1) le manque/besoin de directives alimentaires ­ « surcharge d'information ¼ ou information incomplète; 2) la difficulté de s'adapter aux restrictions. Pour le premier thème, les participants ont mentionné recevoir trop d'informations en même temps, souvent au mauvais moment. Pour le deuxième thème, les participants ont parlé de perte d'appétit et de tricherie par rapport aux recommandations alimentaires. Limites: Un possible biais de rappel pour les habitudes alimentaires; petite taille de l'échantillon qui limite la généralisabilité; biais d'auto-sélection. Conclusion: Malgré les changements signalés par les personnes atteintes d'IRC, lesquels ont eu des répercussions négatives sur leur vie, nombre d'entre elles avaient un régime alimentaire sous-optimal, surtout en ce qui concerne l'énergie et les fibres. En outre, les patients sous dialyse ne consommaient pas suffisamment de protéines, ce qui peut être attribuable aux changements dans les recommandations alimentaires au fur et à mesure que l'IRC progresse. Les résultats qualitatifs ont permis de mieux comprendre la façon dont les restrictions alimentaires nécessaires à l'IRC ont été perçues par les participants, et la façon dont ceux-ci ont fait face à ces changements. Le moment et le mode de prestation de l'information diététique dans le cadre des soins de l'IRC au Manitoba ne conviennent peut-être pas aux personnes atteintes d'IRC à mesure qu'elles progressent dans leur maladie. Enregistrement de l'essai: L'enregistrement n'est pas nécessaire pour cet essai.

Patient Navigators for CKD and Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review.

Rationale & Objective: To what degree and how patient navigators improve clinical outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure is uncertain. We performed a systematic review to summarize patient navigator program design, evidence, and implementation in kidney disease. Study Design: A search strategy was developed for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that evaluated the impact of navigators on outcomes in the setting of CKD and kidney failure. Articles were identified from various databases. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and identified those meeting the inclusion criteria. Setting & Participants: Patients with CKD or kidney failure (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, or kidney transplantation). Selection Criteria for Studies: Studies that compared patient navigators with a control, without limits on size, duration, setting, or language. Studies focusing solely on patient education were excluded. Data Extraction: Data were abstracted from full texts and risk of bias was assessed. Analytical Approach: No meta-analysis was performed. Results: Of 3,371 citations, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria including 14 original studies. Navigators came from various healthcare backgrounds including nursing (n=6), social worker (n=2), medical interpreter (n=1), research (n=1), and also included kidney transplant recipients (n=2) and non-medical individuals (n=2). Navigators focused mostly on education (n=9) and support (n = 6). Navigators were used for patients with CKD (n=5), peritoneal dialysis (n=2), in-center hemodialysis (n=4), kidney transplantation (n=2), but not home hemodialysis. Navigators improved transplant workup and listing, peritoneal dialysis utilization, and patient knowledge. Limitations: Many studies did not show benefits across other outcomes, were at a high risk of bias, and none reported cost-effectiveness or patient-reported experience measures. Conclusions: Navigators improve some health outcomes for CKD but there was heterogeneity in their structure and function. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate navigator program efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Assessing physical function in chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: People with chronic kidney disease have a high prevalence of poor physical function, which in turn is associated with poor health-related quality of life, and an increased risk of adverse events, including hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. Implementing early interventions may prove to be effective for preventing decline in physical function; however, it is imperative that clinicians screen patients to identify those at the highest risk of decline. In this review, we present subjective and objective screening tools that can easily and cost-effectively be implemented into routine nephrology practice to assess physical function. RECENT FINDINGS: Physical function can be assessed using commonly used physical performance tests that include objective measures, such as tests measuring gait speed, balance, chair-stand ability, and handgrip strength, as well as tests that include subjective self-reported measures. SUMMARY: The validated tools summarized in this review offer clinicians the ability to identify people at risk of poor physical function, in turn affording the opportunity to implement interventions for optimum management of risk of physical decline, preventing adverse health outcomes, and encouraging independence.