Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment in adults with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are common in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance (SD) and Sleep-Related Impairment (SRI) are validated questionnaires to assess sleep in adults. Little is known about their measurement properties in adults with AD. OBJECTIVES: To assess the measurement properties of the PROMIS SD and SRI eight-item short forms in AD. METHODS: We performed a prospective dermatology-practice-based study using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 420). RESULTS: PROMIS SD and SRI showed moderate correlations to each other (ρ = 0·67), and weak correlations with Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (ρ = 0·43 and 0·39, respectively); average (ρ = 0·31/0·30) and worst numerical rating scale for itch (ρ = 0·32/0·30); Eczema Area and Severity Index (ρ = 0·41/0·31); and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) (ρ = 0·44/0·30) (Spearman correlations, P < 0·001). PROMIS SD and SRI increased significantly and stepwise with more frequent sleep disturbance, severe itch and self-reported global AD severity (ancova, P < 0·001). PROMIS SD and SRI showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0·84 and 0·91). Changes from baseline in PROMIS SD and SRI were weakly to moderately correlated with each other and with changes of multiple patient-reported and clinician-reported AD outcomes. There were no floor or ceiling effects for PROMIS SD or SRI. The median completion time for PROMIS SD and SRI was 2 min. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS SD and SRI showed good construct validity, internal consistency, responsiveness and feasibility to assess sleep in adult patients with AD. What is already known about this topic? The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance (SD) and Sleep-Related Impairment (SRI) scales were found to be valid in adults with chronic disease. However, the validity and feasibility of PROMIS SD and SRI in atopic dermatitis remain unknown. What does this study add? This study demonstrated that PROMIS SD and SRI had good content, concurrent, convergent and discriminant validity; feasibility; and responsiveness, with no floor or ceiling effects observed. What are the clinical implications of this work? The PROMIS SD and SRI eight-item bank short forms appear to have sufficient validity and feasibility to be used as assessments for burden of sleep in adults with atopic dermatitis in clinical practice.

Measurement properties of three assessments of burden used in atopic dermatitis in adults.

BACKGROUND: Standardized quality-of-life (QoL) assessments can provide important and clinically relevant information. There is currently a lack of standardization in QoL assessments used in atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: To determine the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, differential reporting, responsiveness, floor or ceiling effects and feasibility of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Itchy Quality of Life (ItchyQoL) and 5-dimensions (5-D) itch scales for assessing burden of AD in adults and to compare their performance. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires and skin examination were performed in 340 adults with AD in a dermatology practice setting. RESULTS: DLQI, ItchyQoL and 5-D all had good content validity. DLQI, mean ItchyQoL and 5-D itch all had strong correlations with frequency of AD symptoms (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure) and intensity of itch (numerical rating scale for itch), and moderate correlations with AD severity (Eczema Area and Severity Index and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) (Spearman correlations, P < 0·001 for all). DLQI and 5-D itch showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0·89 and 0·84), although ItchyQoL appeared to have several redundant items (alpha = 0·96). Uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning by age, sex and/or race/ethnicity was found for multiple items in DLQI, ItchyQoL and 5-D itch. DLQI, ItchyQoL and 5-D itch scores all demonstrated responsiveness, although ItchyQoL demonstrated the greatest responsiveness. There were no floor or ceiling effects for total scores. The median times for completion of DLQI, ItchyQoL and 5-D itch were 2 min. CONCLUSIONS: The DLQI, ItchyQoL and 5-D itch scales all showed good content and construct validity, and responsiveness in the assessment of AD in adults, and were feasible for use in clinical trials and practice.

Validation of patient-reported global severity of atopic dermatitis in adults.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. There is a lack of simple and validated severity assessments that are feasible for clinical practice and epidemiological research. OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate patient-reported global AD severity in adults. METHODS: We performed a prospective dermatology practice-based study using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 265). RESULTS: At baseline and follow-up, patient-reported global AD severity significantly correlated with oSCORAD (Spearman ρ = 0.56 and 0.49), SCORAD (0.64 and 0.56), EASI (0.56 and 0.50), BSA (0.52 and 0.45), NRS-itch (0.60 and 0.53), POEM (0.50 and 0.48), and DLQI (0.50 and 0.49) (P < .0001 for all). Patient-reported moderate and severe AD vs mild AD were associated with significantly higher oSCORAD, SCORAD, EASI, BSA, NRS-itch, POEM, and DLQI (P < .0001 for all). There was moderate concordance between patient-reported AD severity (mild, moderate, and severe) and previously developed severity strata for oSCORAD (κ = 0.39), SCORAD (κ = 0.47), EASI (κ = 0.37), NRS-itch (κ = 0.49), POEM (κ = 0.37), and DLQI (κ = 0.40). Among patients with severe disease at baseline, those who reported mild or moderate disease on follow-up had significantly greater absolute reductions of oSCORAD (-23.4/-9.7/-1.8), SCORAD (-33.0/-13.2/-2.3), EASI (-17.1/-9.8/-3.2), BSA (-46%/-15%/-4%), NRS-itch (-5/-2/0), POEM (-5/-2/0), and DLQI (-8/-6/-1) than those who continued to report severe disease (Kruskal-Wallis, P ≤ .0003 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported AD severity appears to be sufficiently valid for assessing AD severity in the clinical and epidemiological setting.

Severity strata for five patient-reported outcomes in adults with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Several patient-reported outcomes have been used to assess the burden of atopic dermatitis (AD). Some are disease specific, such as the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), while others pertain to itch, for example the numerical rating scale (NRS)-itch, ItchyQoL and 5-D itch, or dermatological disease in general, for example the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Development of severity strata is essential for proper interpretability of these assessments. OBJECTIVES: To confirm previously developed strata for POEM, DLQI and raw ItchyQoL, and develop strata for the NRS-itch, mean ItchyQoL and 5-D itch scale for use in adults with AD. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires were completed by 210 adults with AD in a dermatology practice setting. Strata were selected using an anchoring approach based on patient-reported disease severity. RESULTS: We confirmed the existing strata for POEM (mild 0-7, moderate 8-16, severe 17-28; κ = 0·440), DLQI (mild 0-5, moderate 6-10, severe 11-30; κ = 0·398) and NRS-itch (mild 0-3, moderate 4-6, severe 7-10; κ = 0·499). However, the preferred band for raw ItchyQoL was mild 22-58, moderate 59-74 and severe 75-110 (κ = 0·379) and for mean ItchyQoL, mild 1-2·9, moderate 3·0-3·9, severe 4·0-5·0 (κ = 0·374). The preferred band for 5-D itch scale was mild 0-11, moderate 12-17 and severe 18-25 (κ = 0·331). CONCLUSIONS: Existing strata for POEM and DLQI performed well in adult AD. Previously reported strata for visual analogue scale-itch performed best for NRS-itch. We identified banding for the raw ItchyQoL for our AD population that varies slightly from the banding published for a more heterogeneous population. Finally, we proposed strata for mean ItchyQoL and 5-D itch scale in adult AD.

Severity strata for Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), modified EASI, Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), objective SCORAD, Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index and body surface area in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Scoring systems for assessing the signs of atopic dermatitis (AD) are complex and difficult to interpret. Severity strata are helpful to interpret these assessments properly. OBJECTIVES: To confirm previously reported strata for the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and the objective component of SCORAD (oSCORAD), and to develop strata for the modified EASI (mEASI), Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) and body surface area (BSA) for use in adults with AD. METHODS: Skin examination was performed in 673 adolescents and adults (age ≥ 13 years) with diagnosed AD, in a dermatology practice setting. Strata were selected using an anchoring approach based on a four-point Investigator's Global Assessment of severity (clear of active skin lesions, mild, moderate or severe disease). RESULTS: We determined potential severity strata for EASI (0 clear, 0·1-5·9 mild, 6·0-22·9 moderate, 23·0-72 severe; κ = 0·69), mEASI (0-0·9 clear, 1-8·9 mild, 9·0-29·9 moderate, 30·0-90 severe; κ = 0·71), oSCORAD (0-7·9 clear, 8·0-23·9 mild, 24·0-37·9 moderate, 38·0-83 severe; κ = 0·70), SCORAD (0-9·9 clear, 10·0-28·9 mild, 29·0-48·9 moderate, 49·0-103 severe; κ = 0·68), ADSI (0-1·9 clear, 2-5·9 mild, 6·0-8·9 moderate, 9·0-15 severe; κ = 0·55) and BSA (0 clear, 0·1-15·9 mild, 16·0-39·9 moderate, 40·0-100 severe; κ = 0·66). oSCORAD values > 0 were found in clear skin due to the presence of xerosis, which is scored in oSCORAD. Similarly, SCORAD values > 0 were found in clear skin due to the scoring of xerosis, pruritus and sleeplessness. Similarly, mEASI and ADSI scores > 0 occurred in patients with clear skin due to scoring of pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using these strata for interpretation of their respective measures in clinical trials of AD. There are important differences between the five assessments, which profoundly impact the interpretation of their scores.

Assessment of atopic dermatitis using self-report and caregiver report: a multicentre validation study.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) in the U.S.A. has been described largely via US population-based questionnaire studies. However, the validity of the questions used for self- and caregiver-reported eczema has not been previously demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: To validate the assessment of self- and caregiver-reported eczema. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicentre dermatology-practice-based study (three sites) to determine the validity of caregiver- and self-reported ever having eczema and 1-year history of eczema. Questionnaires were administered to unselected patients prior to their encounter. Patients (n = 782) were then evaluated by expert dermatologists trained in utilizing the Hanifin and Rajka criteria for AD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value were determined. RESULTS: Caregiver-reported 1-year history of childhood eczema was found to have a sensitivity (95% confidence interval) of 0·70 (0·59-0·80), specificity of 0·96 (0·93-0·99) and PPV of 0·87 (0·78-0·96) when compared with a physician's diagnosis of AD at that visit. Similarly, self-reported 1-year history of adult eczema was found to have a sensitivity of 0·70 (0·59-0·80), specificity of 0·95 (0·93-0·97) and PPV of 0·76 (0·64-0·85). The specificities and PPVs of a history of ever having caregiver- (0·89, 0·82-0·96 and 0·81, 0·70-0·93) and self-reported eczema (0·97, 0·95-0·99 and 0·91, 0·85-0·97) were high, with a high sensitivity in children (0·83, 0·72-0·95) but not in adults (0·43, 0·37-0·51). CONCLUSIONS: Self- and caregiver-reported diagnosis of eczema ever or in the past year based on a single question demonstrates sufficient validity for the epidemiological study of AD.