Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Z Vet J ; 67(6): 295-305, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272290

RESUMO

Aims: To compare the effect of a topically applied anaesthetic to no pain relief or meloxicam on the behavioural responses, pain sensitivity and weight gain of calves following disbudding with or without sedation. Methods: A total of 364, 2-6 week-old calves from three commercial farms were systematically allocated to one of six treatment groups. All calves received a cornual nerve block prior to disbudding, with half restrained in a crate and half sedated with xylazine. Within these groups one third received no further treatment (control), one third were treated with meloxicam >10 minutes prior to disbudding and one third received a topical anaesthetic applied to the horn bud wounds following disbudding. The frequency of ear flicks, head shakes, head scratches and pain sensitivity of the wound were recorded on up to eight occasions over 24 hours after disbudding. Calves were weighed before, and 7 and 28 days after, disbudding to determine average daily weight gain (ADG). Results: Compared to calves in the crate-control group, all other groups had reduced ear flicks at all times following disbudding (p < 0.01). Treatment with meloxicam and topical anaesthesia in addition to sedation reduced head scratches compared to calves in the crate-control group (p ≤ 0.013). At 22 hours after disbudding head shakes were reduced in sedated calves treated with topical anaesthetic compared to calves in the crate-control group (p < 0.001). Pain sensitivity was lower in all sedated calves than unsedated calves (p < 0.001). The ADG between Days 0-7 was 0.14 (95% CI = 0.015-0.274) kg/day greater in sedated calves treated with meloxicam than calves in the crate-control group (p = 0.03), and the ADG between Days 0-28 tended to be 0.06 (95% CI=-0.01-0.13) kg/day greater in sedated calves treated with topical anaesthetic than calves in the crate-control group (p = 0.09). Conclusion and clinical relevance: Sedation of calves for disbudding reduced the pain experienced in the following 24 hours. There was a benefit to providing calves with topical anaesthetic following disbudding on behavioural responses and pain sensitivity, which was similar to that of treating calves with meloxicam.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bovinos/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Cornos/cirurgia , Manejo da Dor/veterinária , Dor/veterinária , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestesia Local/veterinária , Animais , Bovinos/cirurgia , Indústria de Laticínios , Feminino , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Aumento de Peso
2.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 24: 38-41, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29885597

RESUMO

We report the case of a patient who died from the rare complication of Listeriosis in the immediate phase following alemtuzumab administration one month after discontinuing dimethyl fumarate (DMF). There is considerable overlap with typical post-infusion symptoms therefore high surveillance and low threshold for empirical or possible prophylactic antibiotic therapy is advocated.


Assuntos
Alemtuzumab/efeitos adversos , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Meningite por Listeria/complicações , Meningoencefalite/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Alemtuzumab/uso terapêutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Listeria monocytogenes , Masculino , Meningite por Listeria/diagnóstico , Meningoencefalite/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
BMC Neurol ; 17(1): 63, 2017 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28347292

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nocturia (the symptom of needing to wake up to pass urine) is common in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. Moderate-to-severe nocturia affects quality of life, can exacerbate fatigue and may affect capacity to carry out daily activities. Melatonin is a natural hormone regulating circadian cycles, released by the pineal gland at night-time, and secretion is impaired in MS. Melatonin levels can be supplemented by administration in tablet form at bedtime. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of melatonin on mean number of nocturia episodes per night in MS patients. Secondary outcome measures will assess impact upon quality of life, urinated volumes, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), cognition, sleep quality and sleep disturbance of partners. METHODS: A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial consisting of two, six week treatment phases (active drug melatonin 2 mg or placebo), with a 1 month wash-out period in between. The primary outcome (change in nocturia episodes per night) in this two arm, two treatment, two period crossover design, will be objectively measured using frequency volume charts (FVC) at baseline and following both treatment phases. Questionnaires will be used to assess quality of life, sleep quality, safety and urinary tract symptoms. Qualitative interviews of participants and partners will explore issues including quality of life, mechanisms of sleep disturbance and impact of nocturia on partners. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate whether melatonin reduces the frequency of nocturia episodes in MS patients, and therefore whether 'Circadin' has the potential to reduce LUTS and fatigue, and improve cognition and overall quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (EudraCT reference) 2012-00418321 registered: 25/01/13. ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN38687869.


Assuntos
Depressores do Sistema Nervoso Central/farmacologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Melatonina/farmacologia , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Noctúria/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Depressores do Sistema Nervoso Central/administração & dosagem , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melatonina/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noctúria/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida
4.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 4(6): 607-13, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26590670

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The promising utility of multi-modality evoked potential batteries to objectively measure multi-tract dysfunction has been evaluated by several groups using different methods. OBJECTIVE: To independently evaluate the use of multi-modality evoked potential batteries as surrogate biomarkers for both physical and cognitive status in a cohort of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis patients and identify the most potentially useful scoring method of those described. METHODS: 28 Patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis underwent clinical evaluation with Kurtzke's Modified EDSS and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC). 19 Participants also underwent the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis. Visual, Brainstem Auditory, Somatosensory and Motor Evoked Potentials were recorded on all. Results were graded by variants of the Global Evoked Potential Score, Multiple Evoked Potential Score and Summation of Z transformed Evoked Potential Latencies for correlation against the clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-modal evoked potential batteries generally show moderate and useful correlation with clinical status as measured by the regulatory standard of EDSS (r = .65 vs. mEPS p < .005) and MSFC (r = .39 vs. mEPS p < .05). The graded qualitative mEPS scoring system displayed the strongest relationship although the influence of scoring system applied appeared reassuringly minimal. Non-association with cognitive impairment is an important limitation however.


Assuntos
Eletrodiagnóstico/métodos , Potenciais Evocados , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/fisiopatologia , Exame Neurológico/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva/psicologia
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 14(2): 145-51, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10742429

RESUMO

The outcomes of 489 patients undergoing 500 carotid endarterectomies were reviewed to compare results from using general anesthesia with those from using regional (cervical block) anesthesia. From September 1982 to May 1998, 228 procedures (221 patients) were performed under general anesthesia and 272 procedures (268 patients) were performed under local anesthesia. A detailed comparison of the two groups revealed close similarity in age, sex, presenting symptoms, and associated risk factors. Overall, perioperative mortality was 0.8%. In comparison to regional anesthesia, the general anesthesia group had greater overall morbidity (23.3 vs. 13. 6%, p < 0.008) and more frequent use of postoperative vasoactive drugs to control blood pressure (40.4 vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, anesthesia time, operative time, and frequency of shunt use were significantly greater in the general anesthesia group (p < 0.03).


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução , Anestesia Geral , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/métodos , Idoso , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA