Utility of culture and molecular methods using AllplexTM Bacterial Vaginosis Plus Assay (SeegeneⓇ) as a tool for endometriosis, infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss diagnosis.

Endometriosis, infertility, or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) are entities characterised by a decrease in Lactobacillus spp. and an increase in bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria, (BVAV) according with 16S rRNA sequencing studies. However, the use of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) as a tool for diagnosis algorithms is unknown. Seventy-four patients were included, with a median age of 36.5 years old (IQR: 34-39) including infertility (n=31), endometriosis (n=25), or RPL (n=18), for culturing and NAAT using the Allplex™ Bacterial Vaginosis Plus (ABVP) assay (SeegeneⓇ) with endometrial samples. The objective was determining the utility of ABVP assay for diagnosing the entities. Forty-six microorganisms were isolated from 31 out of 74 patients (41.9 %). Twenty-five endometrial samples (33.8 %) were positive for some targets included in the ABVP-assay, with median Ct value ∼37 (IQR: 31.3-37.1) and Qt value 1.43 Log10copies/reaction (IQR:1.1-2.6). For Lactobacillus species, sensitivity and specificity were 80 % and 84 %, respectively. Gardnerella vaginalis, 63.6 % and 95.7 %. No significant increase in BVAV was detected in any of the gynaecological entities. The ABVP and culture based algorithm did not show utility as a tool for endometriosis, infertility, or RPL diagnosis.

[Urogenital prolapse repair using polypropylene mesh]. / Reparación del prolapso urogenital con malla de polipropileno.

BACKGROUND: Urogenital prolapse is a condition that affects 1 to 43% of post-hysterectomized patients. Since several years some synthetic meshes have been used to repair pelvic floor, and apparently they have advantages over them predecessors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and security of polypropylene meshes in the repair of urogenital prolapse. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective and non-randomized study in 106 patients that had different kinds of urogenital prolapse repaired using polypropylene meshes. The follow-up was carried out by two visits to the hospital, 2 and 6 months after surgery. The variables analyzed were age, parity, menopause presence, kind of surgical technique, surgical time, time at hospital and complications. Afterwards, the information was analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Average age was 64.4 years. The rate of multiparity and menopause women was 91.51% and 92.45% respectively. The most used surgical technique was the anterior mesh with tension-free band (34,90%) to repair the associated urinary incontinence. The rate of intraoperatory complications was 2.8%, immediate complications was 37.7% and late complications was 21.6%. The success rate after 6 months was 80 to 100%, depending on the technique. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low rate of intraoperatory and medium-term complications in the reconstructive surgery of pelvic floor for the urogenital prolapses using polypropylene meshes, which makes this technique a secure and effective option for the treatment of this problem.