Overall survival and central nervous system activity of crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged lung cancer-final results of the EUCROSS trial.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, we reported the first efficacy and safety analysis of EUCROSS, a phase II trial investigating crizotinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer. At that time, overall survival (OS) was immature and the effect of crizotinib on intracranial disease control remained unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of OS, systemic and intracranial activity, and the impact of co-occurring aberrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EUCROSS was a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and efficacy in pre-defined subgroups. RESULTS: Median OS of the intention-to-treat population (N = 34) was 54.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.3 months-not reached (NR); median follow-up 81.4 months] and median all-cause PFS of the response-evaluable population (N = 30) was 19.4 months (95% CI 10.1-32.2 months). Time on treatment was significantly correlated with OS (R = 0.82; P < 0.0001). Patients with co-occurring TP53 aberrations (28%) had a significantly shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 11; 95% CI 2.0-56.0; P = 0.006] and all-cause PFS (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-15; P = 0.025). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement at baseline (N = 6; 20%) had a numerically shorter median OS and all-cause PFS. Median intracranial PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.7 months-NR) and the rate of isolated CNS progression was 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Our final analysis proves the efficacy of crizotinib in ROS1-positive lung cancer, but also highlights the devastating impact of TP53 mutations on survival and treatment efficacy. Additionally, our data show that CNS disease control is durable and the risk of CNS progression while on crizotinib treatment is low.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on a Cancer Fast-Track Programme.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted many aspects of clinical practice in oncology, particularly regarding early cancer diagnosis, sparking public health concerns that possible delays could increase the proportion of patients diagnosed at advanced stages. In 2009, a cancer fast-track program (CFP) was implemented at the Clinico-Malvarrosa Health Department in Valencia, Spain with the aim of shortening waiting times between suspected cancer symptoms, diagnosis and therapy initiation. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our cancer diagnosis fast-track program. METHODS: The program workflow (patients included and time periods) was analysed from the beginning of the state of alarm on March 16th, 2020 until March 15th, 2021. Data was compared with data from the same period of time from the year before (2019). RESULTS: During the pandemic year, 975 suspected cancer cases were submitted to the CFP. The number of submissions only decreased during times of highest COVID-19 incidence and stricter lockdown, and overall, referrals were slightly higher than in the previous 2 years. Cancer diagnosis was confirmed in 197 (24.1%) cases, among which 33% were urological, 23% breast, 16% gastrointestinal and 9% lung cancer. The median time from referral to specialist appointment was 13 days and diagnosis was reached at a median of 18 days. In confirmed cancer cases, treatment was started at around 30 days from time of diagnosis. In total, 61% of cancer disease was detected at early stage, 20% at locally advanced stage, and 19% at advanced stage, displaying time frames and case proportions similar to pre-pandemic years. CONCLUSIONS: Our program has been able to maintain normal flow and efficacy despite the challenges of the current pandemic, and has proven a reliable tool to help primary care physicians referring suspected cancer patients.

Ten-year assessment of a cancer fast-track programme to connect primary care with oncology: reducing time from initial symptoms to diagnosis and treatment initiation.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Integrating different levels of care by implementing screening programmes, extending diagnostic tools and applying therapeutic advances may increase survival. We implemented a cancer fast-track programme (CFP) to shorten the time between suspected cancer symptoms, diagnosis and therapy initiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Descriptive data were collected from the 10 years since the CFP was implemented (2009-2019) at the Clinico-Malvarrosa Health Department in Valencia, Spain. General practitioners (GPs), an oncology coordinator and 11 specialists designed guidelines for GP patient referral to the CFP, including criteria for breast, digestive, gynaecological, lung, urological, dermatological, head and neck, and soft tissue cancers. Patients with enlarged lymph nodes and constitutional symptoms were also considered. On identifying patients with suspected cancer, GPs sent a case proposal to the oncology coordinator. If criteria were met, an appointment was quickly made with the patient. We analysed the timeline of each stage of the process. RESULTS: A total of 4493 suspected cancer cases were submitted to the CFP, of whom 4019 were seen by the corresponding specialist. Cancer was confirmed in 1098 (27.3%) patients: breast cancer in 33%, urological cancers in 22%, gastrointestinal cancer in 19% and lung cancer in 15%. The median time from submission to cancer testing was 11 days, and diagnosis was reached in a median of 19 days. Treatment was started at a median of 34 days from diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study show that the interval from GP patient referral to specialist testing, cancer diagnosis and start of therapy can be reduced. Implementation of the CFP enabled most patients to begin curative intended treatment, and required only minimal resources in our setting.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (2018).

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for up to 85% of all lung cancers. The last few years have seen the development of a new staging system, diagnostic procedures such as liquid biopsy, treatments like immunotherapy, as well as deeper molecular knowledge; so, more options can be offered to patients with driver mutations. Groups with specific treatments account for around 25% and demonstrate significant increases in overall survival, and in some subgroups, it is important to evaluate each treatment alternative in accordance with scientific evidence, and even more so with immunotherapy. New treatments similarly mean that we must reconsider what should be done in oligometastatic disease where local treatment attains greater value.

Two biomarker-directed randomized trials in European and Chinese patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the BRCA1-RAP80 Expression Customization (BREC) studies.

BACKGROUND: In a Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) phase II trial, the combination of BRCA1 and receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80) expression was significantly associated with outcome in Caucasian patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The SLCG therefore undertook an industry-independent collaborative randomized phase III trial comparing nonselected cisplatin-based chemotherapy with therapy customized according to BRCA1/RAP80 expression. An analogous randomized phase II trial was carried out in China under the auspices of the SLCG to evaluate the effect of BRCA1/RAP80 expression in Asian patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and sufficient tumor specimen for molecular analysis. Randomization to the control or experimental arm was 1 : 1 in the SLCG trial and 1 : 3 in the Chinese trial. In both trials, patients in the control arm received docetaxel/cisplatin; in the experimental arm, patients with low RAP80 expression received gemcitabine/cisplatin, those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and low/intermediate BRCA1 expression received docetaxel/cisplatin, and those with intermediate/high RAP80 expression and high BRCA1 expression received docetaxel alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients in the SLCG trial and 124 in the Chinese trial were assessable for PFS. PFS in the control and experimental arms in the SLCG trial was 5.49 and 4.38 months, respectively [log rank P = 0.07; hazard ratio (HR) 1.28; P = 0.03]. In the Chinese trial, PFS was 4.74 and 3.78 months, respectively (log rank P = 0.82; HR 0.95; P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Accrual was prematurely closed on the SLCG trial due to the absence of clinical benefit in the experimental over the control arm. However, the BREC studies provide proof of concept that an international, nonindustry, biomarker-directed trial is feasible. Thanks to the groundwork laid by these studies, we expect that ongoing further research on alternative biomarkers to elucidate DNA repair mechanisms will help define novel therapeutic approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00617656/GECP-BREC and ChiCTR-TRC-12001860/BREC-CHINA.

Mutational analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Mediterranean Spanish women with early-onset breast cancer: identification of three novel pathogenic mutations.

In Spain, the contribution of BRCA mutations to the population incidence of early-onset breast cancer was unknown. We carried out a mutational analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 124 Spanish women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age 41 and who were not selected for a family history of this disease. The genetic study was performed by PCR-SSCP analysis and DNA sequencing. We identified 6 pathogenic BRCA mutations in 7 unrelated probands (5.6%; 95% CI=2.3% to 11.3%): 1 BRCA1 (c.2080delA) and 5 BRCA2 (p.Y3006X, p.Q1994X, c.9204_9217del14, c.9254_9258del5 and c.295+2T>C). Three out of 6 mutations were novel (BRCA2 p.Y3006X, c.9204_9217del14, and c.295+2T>C), and two further mutations had not been previously found in Spain (BRCA1 c.2080delA and BRCA2 p.Q1994X). The one remaining (BRCA2 c.9254_9258del5) was detected in two probands of our sample. Additionally, we identified two new missense mutations: BRCA1 p.P1812A and BRCA2 p.G2044A. Our data support the notion that Spaniards represent a heterogeneous population with its own spectrum of BRCA mutations, some of which appear as founding mutations. We categorized patients into familial or non-familial groups on the basis of her family history of breast/ovarian cancer; this analysis indicated that among Spanish women with early-onset breast cancer, an even moderate family history is a good predictor of being a BRCA mutation carrier.

Molecular genetic analysis of HLA-DR and -DQ alleles in Spanish patients with melanoma.

Controversial data have been reported about HLA alleles and susceptibility to melanoma. The relationship between distribution of HLA alleles in patients with melanoma and susceptibility to tumour was analysed, to study the possible correlation between HLA class II DQA1, DQB1 and DRBI genes and melanoma in a Spanish population. Genomic DNA from 82 patients with melanoma and 367 random healthy donors, from the same geographic area, were typed by PCR-SSP (sequence specific primers). The patients were also divided into different groups according to the age and presence of cancer relatives, and compared with the controls. None of these HLA class II alleles showed significant positive or negative associations with either the overall population of patients with melanoma or the considered subgroups. Moreover, values for relative risk of DQB1*0301, DQB1*0302, DQB1*0303, DQB*05, DQA1*0401, DQA1*0101/0104 and DRB*08, which have been reported to be increased or decreased in patients with melanoma, were very low and of no statistical significance. Our results indicate that HLA class II alleles may not contribute to a strong susceptibility to melanoma in the Spanish population, although further studies on larger series are needed to corroborate this. Key words:

Paclitaxel plus vinorelbine: an active regimen in metastatic breast cancer patients with prior anthracycline exposure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anti-tumour activity and tolerance of the combination of paclitaxel plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracyclines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six MBC patients who have had at least one previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen were enrolled in this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 over one-hour infusion) and vinorelbine (30 mg/m2) both on day 1 of each three-week course of therapy (maximum eight courses or until disease progression was evident). RESULTS: Six complete and nineteen partial responses were observed among the fifty-four assessable patients (response rate of 46%, 95% CI: 33%-60%). Responses were observed in all disease sites and in all subsets of patients. The response rates when paclitaxel plus vinorelbine were used as first, second and third-line chemotherapy for metastases were 67%, 41% and 35%, respectively. The response rate among anthracycline-refractory patients was 46% (6 of 13). Median time to progression in the overall patient group was 28 weeks. The main toxicities (CTC grade 2 or more) were alopecia, myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy (85%, 46% and 19% of patients, respectively). Nine patients (17%) had neutropenic fever in fifteen of the three hundred twenty-eight courses administered (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel and vinorelbine on day 1 every three weeks is active in MBC patients with prior anthracycline exposure. The regimen is safe, well tolerated and convenient for the patients.

Antineoplastic therapy-induced palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia ('hand-foot') syndrome. Incidence, recognition and management.

Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is a distinctive and relatively frequent toxic reaction related to some chemotherapeutic agents. Doxorubicin, cytarabine, docetaxel, and fluorouracil are the most frequently implicated agents. PPE seems to be dose dependent and both peak drug concentration and total cumulative dose determine its occurrence. PPE presents as a painful erythema, often preceded by paresthesia, located on the palms and soles in the context of treatment with chemotherapy. Histologically, PPE shows few specific findings. Mild spongiosis, scattered necrotic and dyskeratotic keratinocytes and vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer is seen. Dermal changes in most cases include dilated blood vessels, papillary edema, and a sparse superficial perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate can be found in varying degrees in the epidermis. Withdrawal or dose reduction of the implicated drug usually gives rise to amelioration of the symptoms. Supportive treatments such as topical wound care, elevation, and cold compresses may help to relieve the pain. Use of systemic corticosteroids, pyridoxine (vitamin B6), blood flow reduction, and, recently, topical 99% dimethyl-sulfoxide have been used with variable outcomes. It could be of interest to consider them as preventive measures when drugs with a strong association with PPE are going to be administered.

Prognostic factors predicting survival from first recurrence in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 439 patients.

We have analyzed retrospectively 439 women with recurrent breast cancer, followed at a single institution, in order to define potential prognostic factors for survival at the time of first recurrence. Median age at the time of first recurrence was 58 and the median disease free interval (DFI) from initial diagnoses to recurrence was 33 months. Thirteen percent of the patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy while 87% received different combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy as adjuvant treatment. With a median follow-up of 44 months from the time of recurrence the median survival (MSR) was 24 months (SE 1.24) and five-year overall survival was 18% (SE 2.02). On the univariate analysis, pathological tumor size (pT) at diagnosis (p < 0.0006), axillary lymph node status at diagnosis (p < 0.00001), negative estrogen receptor (ER) status (p < 0.0001), negative progesterone receptor (PgR) status (p < 0.0001), adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001), disease free interval (p < 0.00001), location of recurrence (p < 0.0002) and number of metastatic sites (> or = 3: p < 0.0003), were significantly associated with shorter survival from first relapse. On the multivariate analysis, only the site of recurrence, axillary lymph node status at diagnosis, ER status and DFI remained independently associated with decreased MSR after first relapse.