Patterns of service utilisation within Australian hepatology clinics: high prevalence of advanced liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Liver diseases in Australia are estimated to affect 6 million people with a societal cost of $51 billion annually. Information about utilisation of specialist hepatology care is critical in informing policy makers about the requirements for delivery of hepatology-related healthcare. AIMS: This study examined the aetiology and severity of liver disease seen in a tertiary hospital hepatology clinic, as well as the resource utilisation patterns. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study included consecutive patients booked in hepatology outpatient clinics during a 3-month period. Subsequent outpatient appointments for these patients over the following 12 months were then recorded. RESULTS: During the initial 3-month period, 1471 appointments were scheduled with a hepatologist, 1136 of which were attended. Twenty-one per cent of patients were 'new cases'. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the most common disease aetiology for new cases (37%). Advanced disease at presentation varied between aetiology; only 5% of HBV cases had advanced liver disease at presentation, in contrast with HCV, NAFLD and ALD, in which advanced disease was identified at presentation in 31%, 46% and 72% of cases, respectively. Most patients (83%) attended multiple hepatology appointments, and a range of referral patterns for procedures, investigations and other specialty assessments were observed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of HBV in new case referrals. Patients with HCV infection, NAFLD and ALD have a high prevalence of advanced liver disease at referral, requiring ongoing surveillance for development of decompensated liver disease and liver cancer. These findings that describe the patterns of health service utilisation among patients with liver disease provide useful information for planning sustainable health service provision for this clinical population.

Burden of decompensated cirrhosis and ascites on hospital services in a tertiary care facility: time for change?

BACKGROUND: Ascites, the most frequent complication of cirrhosis, is associated with poor prognosis and reduced quality of life. Recurrent hospital admissions are common and often unplanned, resulting in increased use of hospital services. AIMS: To examine use of hospital services by patients with cirrhosis and ascites requiring paracentesis, and to investigate factors associated with early unplanned readmission. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical chart and clinical databases was performed for patients who underwent paracentesis between October 2011 and October 2012. Clinical parameters at index admission were compared between patients with and without early unplanned hospital readmissions. RESULTS: The 41 patients requiring paracentesis had 127 hospital admissions, 1164 occupied bed days and 733 medical imaging services. Most admissions (80.3%) were for management of ascites, of which 41.2% were unplanned. Of those eligible, 69.7% were readmitted and 42.4% had an early unplanned readmission. Twelve patients died and nine developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Of those eligible for readmission, more patients died (P = 0.008) and/or developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (P = 0.027) if they had an early unplanned readmission during the study period. Markers of liver disease, as well as haemoglobin (P = 0.029), haematocrit (P = 0.024) and previous heavy alcohol use (P = 0.021) at index admission, were associated with early unplanned readmission. CONCLUSION: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites comprise a small population who account for substantial use of hospital services. Markers of disease severity may identify patients at increased risk of early readmission. Alternative models of care should be considered to reduce unplanned hospital admissions, healthcare costs and pressure on emergency services.

Assessment of alcohol histories obtained from patients with liver disease: opportunities to improve early intervention.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol is an important primary and comorbid cause of liver injury in patients referred for investigation and management of liver disease. Early assessment and documentation of alcohol consumption is therefore essential, and recommended in both general practice and hospital settings. AIMS: To determine the extent and accuracy of documentation of alcohol consumption in patients referred for evaluation of liver disease. METHODS: Patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The medical records of all patients interviewed were reviewed to obtain information from the referral letter and the hepatology consultations. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were surveyed. Only 14 referrals had an informative alcohol history, despite 27 patients admitting risky alcohol consumption at the initial hepatology consultation. Ninety per cent of initial consultations had an informative alcohol history documented, whereas only 56% of patients attending a follow-up appointment had informative documentation. Assessment of alcohol consumption was comparable between the hepatology consultation and the structured questionnaire, but four subjects had substantially different alcohol histories. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test identified all patients reporting harmful alcohol consumption on the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Hazardous alcohol use is prevalent in subjects attending hepatology clinics, but informative alcohol histories, which are crucial to patient management, are rarely documented in referrals. Screening tools improve documentation and accuracy of alcohol histories, and their use by general practitioners and hospital clinicians would improve detection rates of hazardous drinking and allow earlier intervention. Systematic use of screening tools in hepatology clinics will provide opportunities for education and reinforce recommendations to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption.

Estimating genetic and environmental effects of alcohol use and dependence from a national survey: a "quasi-adoption" study.

OBJECTIVE: A growing number of studies have examined the role of genetic and environmental influences on various aspects of alcohol use and abuse for women and men. We briefly review relevant twin and adoption studies; overall, these studies suggest: (1) both genetic and environmental factors play a role in the development of various alcohol-related problems, (2) these factors affect both males and females, and (3) genetic factors may be more significant for males than females. METHOD: This study is the first to address the question of genetic and environmental effects using data from a nationally representative probability sample, the National Health Interview Survey, 1988 Alcohol Supplement (NHIS-88A). We model the effects of biological family history of alcoholism (FHB) and environmental exposure to alcoholism during childhood (FHE) on (1) whether the respondent ever drank (current/former drinker), and, given that the respondent is a current drinker, (2) whether he or she developed DSM-III-R symptoms of alcohol dependence. RESULTS: Results suggest (1) main effects of FHB and FHE on both current/former drinker and alcohol dependence and (2) evidence of greater FHB effects among males. No other gender differences were detected, and no gene by environment interaction effects were found, either for all respondents or by gender. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with previous research showing a greater effect of genetic risk factors among men than women, yet important effects of both environment and genetic factors for both sexes. The study design appears to provide an alternative to standard twin and adoption studies as a way to separate genetic and environmental risk factors, with both advantages and disadvantages compared to such designs. Some of these disadvantages might be addressed in questionnaire construction, but some are probably inherent.