Degenerative L4-L5 spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery: does over-level flavectomy technique influence clinical outcomes and rates of cranial adjacent segment disease?

BACKGROUND: One of the most dreaded long-term complications related to L4-L5 lumbar arthrodesis is the onset of adjacent segment disease, which most frequently occurs at the cranial level. Few studies have compared the rates of cranial adjacent segment disease (CASD) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion associated with total laminectomy at the same level with those undergoing partial laminectomy. No study has examined the role of selective over-level flavectomy (OLF; i.e., L3-L4). METHODS: A total of 299 patients undergoing posterolateral arthrodesis (PLA) for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed with a 5-year follow-up. 148 patients underwent PLA + L4-L5 flavectomy + L4 partial laminectomy (control group), while 151 underwent PLA + L4-L5 flavectomy + total L4 laminectomy + L3-L4 flavectomy (OLF group). Rates of reoperations due to CASD were examined utilizing Cox proportional hazard models, while clinical improvement at follow-up (measured in ODI) was analyzed using generalized linear models (GLMs). Adjustments for potential confounders were made (grade of lumbar lordosis, age, sex, BMI, intervertebral disc degeneration, and presurgical cranial spinal stenosis). RESULTS: At 5 years from the operation, 16 patients (10.8%) in the control group had undergone revision surgery for CASD compared to 5 patients (3.3%) in the OLF group (p = 0.013). Survival analysis and GLM demonstrated that the OLF group had a significantly lower incidence of CASD and presented more favorable clinical outcome. There were no differences in the rate of discal degeneration or the onset of Meyerding's grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis at the adjacent segment. BMI was the only other significant predictor of ODI improvement and of the incidence of CASD. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis, the OLF technique may lower rates of CASD and improve clinical outcomes by preventing cranial spinal stenosis without increasing iatrogenic instability or accelerating intervertebral disc degenerative changes.

Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis Surgery: Predictive Factors of Clinical Outcome-Experience with 1001 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) carries a high risk of morbidity and represents a financial burden to society. A late diagnosis can lead to severe disability. Although lumbar decompressive surgery has been widely used worldwide, the proper preoperative factors to define the ideal candidates for decompression are missing. METHODS: A total of 1001 patients who had undergone decompressive surgery from 2012 to 2019 for DLSS were screened for the presence of 9 clinical and radiological parameters. For all cases, the differences between the baseline and postoperative Oswestry disability index were calculated and the results categorized as 5 different classes (ranging from very poor outcomes to excellent outcomes) according to the specific scores. Generalized ordinal logistic regression was then used to analyze the significance of the 9 parameters (coded as dummy variables) in predicting the outcome as measured by Oswestry disability index improvement after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 9 parameters, 8 were found to be significant predictors. The radiological grade of compression was the strongest, followed by polyneuropathy, obesity, symptom duration, gait autonomy, radicular deficits, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and level of surgery. In contrast, previous back surgery was not predictive of the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have indicated that the ideal candidate for surgery will have the following preoperative characteristics: Schizas grade D, no signs of peripheral polyneuropathy, body mass index <30 kg/m2, symptom duration of <2 years, gait autonomy <100 m, no radicular deficits, 1 level of stenosis, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1, 2, or 3.

Contralateral interlaminar approach for intraforaminal lumbar degenerative disease with special emphasis on L5-S1 level: A technical note.

BACKGROUND: Intraforaminal disc herniations at the L5-S1 level are extremely surgically challenging lesions. Intracanal approaches frequently require partial or total facetectomy, which may lead to instability. Solely extraforaminal approaches may offer limited visualization of the more medial superiorly exiting and inferiorly exiting nerve roots; this approach is also more complicated at L5-S1 due to the often large L5 transverse process and the iliac wing. METHODS: Nine patients with intraforaminal L5-S1 disc herniations, foraminal stenosis, or synovial cysts underwent contralateral interlaminar approaches for lesion resection. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores were evaluated, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: All 9 patients demonstrated immediate postoperative clinical improvement. None of the patients exhibited complications and none developed instability or neuropathic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of cases in our sample was very small (9 in total), the contralateral interlaminar approach appeared to effectively address multiple degenerative L5-S1 foraminal pathologies. Large studies are needed to further evaluate the pros and cons of this approach.

Single cerebral metastasis from colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Single cases are described in 50% of reported intracranial metastases. Single cerebral metastasis from colorectal adenocarcinoma is not very common, with a frequency varying between 0.5% and 1%. In our institute between 1960 and 2000, 44 patients affected by single metastasis from colorectal carcinoma were surgically treated. Surgical treatment with postoperative radiant therapy is necessary. These patients show improved quality of life, above all in relation to the maintenance of functional autonomy during the survival period.

Dorsal foramenal extraosseous epidural cavernous hemangioma.

Cavernous hemangiomas are vascular hamartomatous malformations that affect the central nervous system. This pathology is frequently encountered in the cerebral hemispheres, cerebellum, and brainstem. Cavernous hemangiomas infrequently occur at the spinal level or relative to an intramedullary localization; extramedullary epidural sites are also sometimes affected by this pathology. We report an extradural, extramedullary, cavernous hemangioma with foramenal extension of the dorsal section and discuss the differential diagnosis with dorsal foramenal neurinoma. A 52-year-old woman was admitted with irritation and deficit symptoms radiating into the left D3 spinal root space. The first radiological diagnosis was of a foramenal neurinoma beginning at the D3 root. The presence of a heterogeneous MR signal in both T1 and T2 images led us to consider the differential diagnosis of a cavernous hemangioma lesion. The patient underwent microsurgical treatment with a far lateral extraforamenal approach. Symptoms quickly improved: pain and dysesthesia disappeared after surgery and only light hypoesthesia was found. We want to stress the importance of MR imaging in formulating a correct differential diagnosis with foramenal neurinoma and underline that microsurgical treatment with a far lateral extraforamenal approach allowed us to remove the lesion completely without affecting Denis's posterior column, the lamina, and the articular facet.

Management of acute cerebellar infarction: one institution's experience.

OBJECTIVE: The management of cerebellar infarctions is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which patients require surgical treatment and which surgical procedure should be performed when a patient with a cerebellar infarction exhibits progressive neurological deterioration. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (24 male and 20 female patients; average age, 56 yr) were treated at our institution for cerebellar infarctions in the past 8 years. Twenty-five patients received conservative treatment; two patients who were deeply comatose received no treatment. The remaining 17 patients underwent emergency surgery. Of those 17 patients, 8 underwent external ventricular drainage alone, 5 underwent external ventricular drainage as the first treatment plus secondary suboccipital craniectomy, and 4 underwent suboccipital craniectomy, with removal of necrotic tissue, as the first treatment. RESULTS: Of the 25 conservatively treated patients, 20 experienced good outcomes, 4 experienced moderate outcomes, and 1 died as a result of pulmonary embolism. Of the 17 surgically treated patients, 10 experienced good functional recoveries (7 treated with external ventricular drainage only and 3 treated with drainage followed by suboccipital craniectomy) and 3 survived with mild neurological deficits (one patient underwent ventriculostomy, one suboccipital craniectomy plus external ventricular drainage, and one suboccipital craniectomy only). The overall mortality rate was 13.6% (6 of 44 patients). CONCLUSION: For patients with worsening levels of consciousness and radiologically evident ventricular enlargement, we recommend external ventricular drainage. We reserve surgical resection of necrotic tissue for patients whose clinical status worsens despite ventriculostomy, those for whom worsening is accompanied by signs of brainstem compression, and those with tight posterior fossae.