Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Fertil Steril ; 115(3): 793-801, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461754

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of carbetocin versus placebo in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion during abdominal myomectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital from September 2019 to February 2020. PATIENT(S): A total of 138 women with symptomatic leiomyoma who were candidates for abdominal myomectomy (n = 69 in each group). INTERVENTION(S): We randomized the study participants in a 1:1 ratio to carbetocin and placebo groups. Intravenous 100 µg carbetocin or placebo was administered slowly after induction of anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, postoperative hemoglobin, operative time, length of hospitalization, and drug side-effects. RESULT(S): The baseline characteristics were similar among all groups. Carbetocin had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss compared with placebo (mean difference 184 mL). Hemoglobin level 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the placebo group than in the carbetocin group (9.1 ± 0.8 vs. 10.3 ± 0.6 g/dL). Eight women in the carbetocin group needed blood transfusion compared with 17 in placebo group. Operative time, length of hospitalization, and side-effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): A single preoperative intravenous dose of 100 µg carbetocin is a simple, practical, and effective method of decreasing intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion during abdominal myomectomy, with tolerable, few, nonsignificant side-effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04083625.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Ocitocina/análogos & derivados , Miomectomia Uterina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Adulto , Preparações de Ação Retardada/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Leiomioma/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocitocina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Miomectomia Uterina/tendências , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 85(5): 388-395, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33075789

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Many pharmaceutical, surgical, and complementary medical interventions are used for primary dysmenorrhea treatment. However, no consensus has been reached about the most effective intervention. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of IV tramadol versus IV paracetamol in relieving acute pain of primary dysmenorrhea. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital and included 100 patients between 18 and 35 years old diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea. Patients received either 1-g paracetamol or 100-mg tramadol in 100-mL normal saline as an IV infusion over 10 min. Pain intensity was measured by using a visual analog scale at 15, 30, 60 min, and 2 h. We recorded drug side effects and requirements for rescue analgesics. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in the tramadol group compared with the paracetamol group at 15, 30, 60 min, and 2 h (p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the tramadol group needed rescue analgesics compared with the paracetamol group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were reported in side effects between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: IV tramadol is superior to IV paracetamol in relieving acute pain of primary dysmenorrhea with a comparable side effect profile.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dismenorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Tramadol/administração & dosagem , Tramadol/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 351, 2020 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of multiple pregnancies in IVF/ICSI ranges from 20 to 30%. The incidence of preterm birth in multiple pregnancies is as high as 60% and is even higher in pregnancies conceived after IVF & ICSI. The effect of progesterone on prevention of preterm birth in twins is controversial. Our group has proven a positive effect in reduction of preterm birth, by starting progesterone from the mid-trimester, in exclusively IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies but not twins. The purpose of our current study was to explore the effect of earlier administration of natural progesterone, in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies starting at 11-14 weeks for prevention of preterm birth. METHODS: This is a double-blind, placebo controlled, single center, randomized clinical trial. Women with dichorionic twin gestations, having an IVF/ICSI trial were randomized to receive natural rectal progesterone (800 mg daily) vs placebo, starting early from 11 to 14 weeks. They also received oral and vaginal antimicrobial agents as part of our routine treatment for vaginitis and urinary tract infection. They were randomized regardless of cervical length and had no previous history of preterm birth or known Mullerian anomalies. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth rate before 37 weeks. The secondary outcome was; spontaneous preterm birth before 34, 32, 28 weeks and neonatal outcome. RESULTS: A total of 203 women were randomized to both groups, final analysis included 199 women as 4 were lost to follow up. The base line characteristics as well as gestational age at delivery were not significantly different between the study and the placebo group (34.7 ± 3.6 vs 34.5 ± 4.5, P = 0.626). Progesterone administration was not associated with a significant decrease in the spontaneous preterm birth rates before 37 weeks (73.5% vs 68%, P = 0.551), before 34 (20.6% vs 21.6%, P = 0.649), before 32 (8.8% vs 12.4%, P = 0.46) & before 28 (4.9% vs 3.1%, P = 0.555) weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal natural progesterone starting from the first trimester in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies did not reduce spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on 31 January 2014 at www.ISRCTN.com, number 69810120.


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Gravidez de Gêmeos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Adulto , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Método Duplo-Cego , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Progesterona/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA