Performance Evaluation of Interim Analysis in Bioequivalence Studies.

Under current bioequivalence guidelines in Japan, it is mandatory to establish bioequivalence using a single pivotal study. Clinical trials with limited resources usually have a pre-defined maximum permissible number of participants. In this manuscript, we considered a trial design that would allow for bioequivalence evaluation at an interim analysis in which the total number of participants takes into account the resource constraints. Then, available options at the interim analysis are group sequential designs and adaptive designs, A comparison of the performance of the two methods under same maximum participant number has not been conducted thus far. So we examined which method should be used by conducting a simulation study. Since bioequivalence is expected to be achieved at the interim analysis, a study design using a Pocock-type alpha spending function is preferrable. Simulation results using a Pocock-type alpha spending function showed similar performance between group sequential and adaptive designs. Consequently, due to statistical and operational complexity, it is preferable to choose group sequential designs for bioequivalence study in Japan.

Efficacy, General Safety, and Joint Safety of Tanezumab in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthritis: Subgroup Analyses from Two Randomized, Phase 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Tanezumab is a monoclonal antibody against nerve growth factor that is under investigation for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) pain. We conducted subgroup analyses of two randomized phase 3 studies to summarize efficacy, general safety, and adjudicated joint safety of tanezumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe OA. METHODS: In Study 1 (NCT02528188), patients received subcutaneous tanezumab 2.5 mg or 5 mg every 8 weeks or daily oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for 56 weeks. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain subscale score and WOMAC Physical Function subscale score at Week 16 (overall study and Japan-specific endpoints) as well as Patient Global Assessment (PGA)-OA score at Week 16 (overall study endpoint only). In Study 2 (NCT02709486), patients received subcutaneous tanezumab 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or placebo every 8 weeks for 24 weeks. Safety monitoring included adjudicated composite joint safety endpoint (CJSE) including rapidly progressive osteoarthritis type 1 (RPOA1), RPOA2, primary osteonecrosis, pathological fracture, or subchondral insufficiency fracture. RESULTS: For Study 1, Japanese patients (n = 200) treated with tanezumab 2.5 mg and 5 mg showed numerically greater improvements in WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, and PGA-OA scores versus NSAID at Week 16. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were generally similar between tanezumab 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and NSAID groups. In the integrated safety analysis (Studies 1 + 2; n = 306), ten patients were adjudicated to have a component of CJSE: RPOA1 [tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 2), tanezumab 5 mg (n = 5)], RPOA2 [tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 1), tanezumab 5 mg (n = 1)], or primary osteonecrosis [tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 1)]. Time-adjusted adjudicated rates of RPOA1 and RPOA2 were higher with tanezumab than NSAID or placebo and increased with dose of tanezumab. CONCLUSION: Observations from the Japanese subgroup were generally consistent with the overall study populations.

Real-World Insurance Claims Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism in Japanese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which encompasses both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). AIM: To investigate the incidence of, and risk factors for, VTE in patients with IBD in Japan. METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-interventional study in patients with IBD from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database. Incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years) were calculated for VTE, DVT, and PE among the IBD, UC, and CD cohorts. Odds ratios of potential risk factors were calculated by univariate and multivariate analyses in a nested case-control design. RESULTS: Overall, 16 273 patients with IBD were included: 13 585 with UC and 3443 with CD. VTE events occurred in 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.9% of patients with IBD, UC, and CD, respectively. In patients with IBD, UC, and CD, IRs of VTE were 0.45, 0.40, and 0.64, respectively, IRs of DVT were 0.42, 0.38, and 0.61, respectively, and IRs of PE were 0.07, 0.07, and 0.11, respectively. In patients with IBD, treatment history (immunomodulators), cardiovascular risk (hypertension, high-density lipoprotein or diabetes mellitus, and history of coronary artery disease or heart failure), malignancy, and undergoing major surgery were identified as potential risk factors for VTE in the multivariate analysis, with similar risk factors reported for patients with UC and CD. CONCLUSIONS: This large study provides insight into the incidence and risk factors for VTE in patients with IBD from Japan.

Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a long-term, randomized, celecoxib-controlled Japanese Phase III safety study.

Aim & methods: This trial investigated long-term (56-week treatment/24-week follow-up) use of subcutaneous tanezumab (5 or 10 mg every 8 weeks) or oral celecoxib (200 mg/day) in Japanese patients with chronic low back pain. Results & conclusion: Tanezumab safety was consistent with previous studies, except overall adverse events (tanezumab 5 mg = 63.0%, tanezumab 10 mg = 54.8%, celecoxib = 67.4%) and events of abnormal peripheral sensation (tanezumab 5 mg = 9.8%, tanezumab 10 mg = 4.3%, celecoxib = 4.3%) were more frequent with 5 mg than 10 mg tanezumab. Joint safety event rates were 1.1% for tanezumab 5 mg, 2.2% for tanezumab 10 mg and 0% for celecoxib. All treatments improved pain and function throughout the treatment period. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02725411.

In this study, researchers looked at the safety of tanezumab (a medication that blocks nerve growth factor) in Japanese people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Researchers also looked at how well tanezumab improves the symptoms (pain and difficulty doing activities) of CLBP. People in the study were given oral (taken by mouth) celecoxib (a medication commonly used to treat CLBP) or injections of tanezumab (5 or 10 mg doses) under the skin of the belly or upper leg every 8 weeks for a total of 56 weeks. Side effects (something expected or unexpected that people experienced during the study that may or may not be due to the medication they received) occurred in 63.0% of people receiving tanezumab 5 mg, 54.8% of people receiving tanezumab 10 mg and 67.4% of patients receiving celecoxib. More people receiving tanezumab 5 mg (9.8% of people) had a side effect related to abnormal peripheral sensation (tingling, burning, numbness or sensitivity to heat or cold hands or feet) than people receiving tanezumab 10 mg (4.3% of people) or celecoxib (4.3% of people). More people receiving tanezumab (5 mg = 1.1% of people, 10 mg = 2.2% of people) had a problem with one of their joints (knees or hips) during the study than people receiving celecoxib (0% of people). All treatments improved pain and the ability to do activities. Overall, the researchers concluded that tanezumab was well tolerated in most people and may improve the symptoms of CLBP.

Subcutaneous tanezumab for osteoarthritis: Is the early improvement in pain and function meaningful and sustained?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if early improvements in pain and function with subcutaneous tanezumab are meaningful and sustained over 24 weeks. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (hip or knee) in Europe and Japan were randomized to placebo, tanezumab 2.5 mg or tanezumab 5 mg (baseline, Week 8 and Week 16). Outcomes included: average daily index joint pain score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) subscales, rescue medication use, WOMAC responders (within-patient ≥30% reduction in WOMAC Pain or Physical Function), Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responders (within-patient) and Patient-reported Treatment Impact Assessment-Modified questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients received placebo (n = 282), tanezumab 2.5 mg (n = 283) or tanezumab 5 mg (n = 284). Changes from baseline in average daily index joint pain (within the first week) and WOMAC subscales (Week 2 through Week 24) were greater for each tanezumab group versus placebo (least squares [LS] mean, unadjusted p ≤ .05). Rescue medication use (days/week) was lower for each tanezumab group versus placebo from Week 2 through Week 12 (LS mean, unadjusted p ≤ .05) but not at Week 16 or 24. A higher proportion of each tanezumab group than placebo achieved ≥30% reduction from baseline in WOMAC Pain or Physical Function, or OMERACT-OARSI response (Week 2 through Week 24, unadjusted p ≤ .05), or were satisfied with treatment at Week 24 (unadjusted p ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous tanezumab, compared with placebo, reduced pain within the first week, and pain and function were improved throughout 24 weeks. The proportions of responders and patients satisfied were higher with tanezumab than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02709486. SIGNIFICANCE: This exploratory analysis of data from a placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study of patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee for whom standard analgesics were not effective or could not be taken, found that onset of efficacy of subcutaneous tanezumab was within the first week, and efficacy was maintained through the 24-week treatment period. Tanezumab was effective in those patients with the most radiologically severe osteoarthritis.

A Comparison Between a Meta-analytic Approach and Power Prior Approach to Using Historical Control Information in Clinical Trials With Binary Endpoints.

BACKGROUND: In the process of research and development of a new treatment, clinical trials are conducted to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Key to streamlining the process is to utilize appropriate historical information on an outcome of a control treatment when designing and analyzing a clinical trial. METHODS: For the use of such historical control information, there exist a meta-analytic approach and power prior approach. In this article, we evaluate their performance with regard to the type I error (TIE) rate and power through a simulation study where we analyze the data on a binary outcome of an experimental treatment and a control treatment from a new small-scale trial, along with the corresponding data of the control treatment from multiple historical trials. The reason is that the difference in the performance between the 2 approaches has not been clear. RESULTS: When historical trials were homogeneous, the power was higher in the power prior approach and the meta-analytic approach using a beta-binomial model with a less noninformative prior than the other approaches. However, when heterogeneous historical trials were mixed, the power was lower, or the TIE rates got inflated. CONCLUSIONS: To make use of historical control data, if importance is attached to control of the TIE rate, the meta-analytic approach using a normal-normal hierarchical model may be preferable to the power prior approach, whereas if attached to improvement of the power, this preference be reversed. Anyway, the best approach should be chosen by comparing the operational characteristics of the approaches.

Borrowing external information to improve Bayesian confidence propagation neural network.

PURPOSE: A Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) is a signal detection method used by the World Health Organization Uppsala Monitoring Centre to analyze spontaneous reporting system databases. We modify the BCPNN to increase its sensitivity for detecting potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHOD: In a BCPNN, the information component (IC) is defined as an index of disproportionality between the observed and expected number of reported drugs and events. Our proposed method adjusts the IC value by borrowing information about events that have occurred in drugs defined as similar to the target drug. We compare the performance of our method with that of a traditional BCPNN through a simulation study. RESULTS: The false positive rate of the proposed method was lower than that of the traditional BCPNN method and close to the nominal value, 0.025, around the true difference in ICs between the target drug and similar drugs equal to 0. The sensitivity of the proposed method was much higher than that of the traditional BCPNN method in case in which the difference in ICs between the target drug and similar drugs ranges from 0 to 2. When applied to a database managed by Japanese regulatory authority, the proposed method could detect known ADRs earlier than the traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method is a novel criterion for early detection of signals if similar drugs have the same tendencies. The proposed BCPNN tends to have higher sensitivity when the true difference is greater than 0.

Anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody (PF-00547659) for active refractory Crohn's disease in Japanese and Korean patients: the OPERA study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: PF-00547659 is a monoclonal antibody against human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) that prevents the binding of α4ß7+ lymphocytes to MAdCAM-expressing sites in the gastrointestinal tract with high affinity and selectivity, and is being developed for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: OPERA is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of PF-00547659 following subcutaneous administration in subjects with active CD, a history of failure or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor and/or immunosuppressants, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein > 3.0 mg/L, and ulcers on colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was Crohn's Disease Activity Index-70 response at week 8 or 12. Subpopulation analyses for Asian subjects were performed as some differences are observed in genetics and clinical phenotypes in Asian CD patients compared with Western patients. RESULTS: In this study, 265 CD subjects were randomized, with a subpopulation of 21 subjects (8 Japanese and 13 Korean) defined as the Asian population. In the overall and Asian populations; PF-00547659 was pharmacologically active as evidenced by soluble MAdCAM and circulating ß7+ central memory CD4+ T-lymphocytes, although no clear evidence of efficacy was observed in any clinical endpoints; pharmacokinetics of PF-00547659 in the Asian subpopulation was generally comparable to the overall population; and the safety profile of PF-00547659 appeared acceptable up to 12 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the overall and Asian populations, efficacy of PF-00547659 could not be demonstrated using any clinical endpoints compared with placebo. Pharmacokinetics and safety of PF-00547659 were generally comparable. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are required to confirm our results. (Trial Registration Number: NCT01276509).

Tofacitinib as Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Japanese Patients with Active Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor approved in Japan for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Differences in the safety profile of tofacitinib in Japanese patients versus the global population, such as a higher risk of herpes zoster, have been reported. OBJECTIVES: We conducted post hoc analyses of tofacitinib treatment in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe UC in two global phase III studies. METHODS: In OCTAVE Induction 1 (NCT01465763), 62 patients were randomized to placebo or tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). In OCTAVE Sustain (NCT01458574), 39 patients with clinical response in OCTAVE Induction 1 were re-randomized to placebo, tofacitinib 5 mg, or 10 mg b.i.d. Efficacy endpoints included: remission (primary endpoint; total Mayo score ≤2; no individual subscore >1; rectal bleeding subscore 0); mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1); clinical response (≥30% and ≥3-point decrease from induction study baseline total Mayo score; decrease in rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or absolute subscore ≤1). Adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory parameters were recorded. RESULTS: At week 8 of OCTAVE Induction 1, 22.4% of patients achieved remission with tofacitinib (placebo, 7.7%). At week 52 of OCTAVE Sustain, 31.3% and 66.7% of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg b.i.d., respectively, achieved remission (placebo, 9.1%). The occurrence of AEs or serious AEs in Japanese patients was generally similar to that in the global study population, with no new or unexpected safety risks observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although patient numbers were small, tofacitinib demonstrated numerically greater efficacy versus placebo among Japanese patients in OCTAVE Induction 1 and OCTAVE Sustain, with a safety profile consistent with that of the global study population.

A Comparison Between a Meta-analytic Approach and Power Prior Approach to Using Historical Control Information in Clinical Trials With Binary Endpoints.

BACKGROUND: In the process of research and development of a new treatment, clinical trials are conducted to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Key to streamlining the process is to utilize appropriate historical information on an outcome of a control treatment when designing and analyzing a clinical trial. METHODS: For the use of such historical control information, there exist a meta-analytic approach and power prior approach. In this article, we evaluate their performance with regard to the type I error (TIE) rate and power through a simulation study where we analyze the data on a binary outcome of an experimental treatment and a control treatment from a new small-scale trial, along with the corresponding data of the control treatment from multiple historical trials. The reason is that the difference in the performance between the 2 approaches has not been clear. RESULTS: When historical trials were homogeneous, the power was higher in the power prior approach and the meta-analytic approach using a beta-binomial model with a less noninformative prior than the other approaches. However, when heterogeneous historical trials were mixed, the power was lower, or the TIE rates got inflated. CONCLUSIONS: To make use of historical control data, if importance is attached to control of the TIE rate, the meta-analytic approach using a normal-normal hierarchical model may be preferable to the power prior approach, whereas if attached to improvement of the power, this preference be reversed. Anyway, the best approach should be chosen by comparing the operational characteristics of the approaches.

Corrigendum: Tofacitinib induction and maintenance therapy in East Asian patients with active ulcerative colitis: subgroup analyses from three phase 3 multinational studies.

[This corrects the article on p. 233 in vol. 16, PMID: 29743836.].

Tofacitinib induction and maintenance therapy in East Asian patients with active ulcerative colitis: subgroup analyses from three phase 3 multinational studies.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). In OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, patients with moderately to severely active UC received placebo or tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks. Clinical responders in OCTAVE Induction were re-randomized to 52 weeks' therapy with placebo, tofacitinib 5 mg BID, or tofacitinib 10 mg BID. METHODS: We conducted post-hoc efficacy and safety analyses of East Asian patients in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 and OCTAVE Sustain. RESULTS: A total of 121 East Asian (Japan, Korea, and Taiwan) patients were randomized in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 (placebo, n=26; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=95), and 63 in OCTAVE Sustain (placebo, n=20; tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n=22; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=21). At week 8 of OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, 18.9% of patients (18/95) achieved remission with tofacitinib 10 mg BID versus 3.8% (1/26) with placebo. In OCTAVE Sustain, the week 52 remission rates were 45.5% (10/22), 47.6% (10/21), and 15.0% (3/20) with 5 mg BID, 10 mg BID, and placebo, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar between groups in OCTAVE Induction and numerically higher with tofacitinib in OCTAVE Sustain. Serious adverse event rates were similar across groups in all studies. Infections were numerically more frequent with tofacitinib than placebo. Increases in serum lipid levels were observed with tofacitinib. CONCLUSIONS: In East Asian patients with UC, tofacitinib demonstrated numerically greater efficacy versus placebo as induction and maintenance therapy, with a safety profile consistent with the global study population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01465763; NCT01458951; NCT01458574.

Tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis in Japanese patients: Subgroup analyses from a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor. These post-hoc analyses assessed tofacitinib efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with psoriasis enrolled in a 52-week global phase 3 study. Patients received tofacitinib 5 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg or placebo twice daily (b.i.d.); placebo-treated patients advanced to tofacitinib at week 16. Primary efficacy end-points were the proportions of patients with 75% or more reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of "clear" or "almost clear" (PGA response) at week 16. Other end-points included: Itch Severity Item (ISI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Overall, 58 Japanese patients were included in this analysis (tofacitinib 5 mg b.i.d., n = 22; 10 mg b.i.d., n = 24; placebo, n = 12); 29 completed the study. At week 16, significantly more patients receiving tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg b.i.d. versus placebo achieved PASI-75 (50% and 75% vs 0%, P < 0.01) and PGA response (59% and 75% vs 0%, P < 0.001). Substantial improvements in ISI, DLQI and NAPSI score were observed with both tofacitinib doses. Over 52 weeks, similar rates of AEs were reported across treatment groups; one serious AE occurred with tofacitinib 10 mg b.i.d. Herpes zoster occurred in three patients receiving tofacitinib 10 mg b.i.d. No deaths, serious infections, malignancies or gastrointestinal perforations were reported. Results were generally consistent with global analysis, suggesting sustained efficacy and a manageable safety profile, with increased herpes zoster incidence, of tofacitinib in Japanese patients with psoriasis.

[Japan phase 3 study of pegaptanib sodium in patients with diabetic macular edema].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections of pegaptanib sodium in subjects with diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: There were 243 subjects with DME who were randomized to receive, every 6 weeks, either an intravitreal injection of pegaptanib sodium or a sham injection. The study was double-masked for the first 24 weeks, and then an open label phase continued to week 54. The primary efficacy endpoint was evaluated at week 24, and safety was assessed throughout the 54 weeks. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The proportion of subjects who experienced more than 10 letters improvement of visual acuity in ETDRS chart from baseline to week 24 was statistically significantly greater (p-value = 0.0003) in the pegaptanib sodium group, 20.3%, than in the sham group, 5.0%. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between the treatment groups (pegaptanib sodium group: 10.6%, sham group: 10.0%). The reported adverse events were mainly mild or moderate ophthalmic events and related to the injection procedure. During open-label phase up to 54 weeks, no new safety concerns were identified compared with the double-masked phase. However, in light of the issue concerning proper maintenance of masking of the study treatments, the study was not considered as a well-controlled, double-masked study.