Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study. METHODS: Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA. CONCLUSIONS: Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment.

Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for operable early-stage lung cancer; a prospective nationwide registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the toxicity and survival outcomes of proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer who are eligible for lobectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter nationwide prospective cohort study included patients with operable early-stage lung cancer. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy was performed according to the schedule stipulated in the unified treatment policy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were enrolled and included in efficacy and safety analyses. The most common tumor type was adenocarcinoma (44 %), while 105 cases (38 %) were not histologically confirmed or diagnosed clinically. Overall, 250 (91 %) of the 274 patients had tumors that were peripherally situated, while 138 (50 %) and 136 (50 %) patients were treated by proton and carbon ion radiotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up time for all censored patients was 42.8 months (IQR 36.7-49.0). Grade 3 or severe treatment-related toxicity was observed in 4 cases (1.5 %). Three-year PFS was 80.5 % (95 % CI: 75.7 %-85.5 %) and OS was 92.5 % (95 % CI: 89.3 %-95.8 %). Pathological confirmation and clinical stage were factors significantly associated with PFS, while tumor location and particle-ion type were not. Meanwhile, clinical stage was significantly associated with OS, but pathological confirmation, tumor location, and particle-ion type were not. CONCLUSIONS: Particle therapy for operable early-stage lung cancer resulted in excellent 3-year OS and PFS in each subset. In this disease context, proton and carbon ion beam therapies are feasible alternatives to curative surgery.

Proton Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan.

Introduction: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can be treated with chemotherapy in unresectable cases, but outcomes are poor. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an alternative treatment and has good dose concentration that may improve local control. Methods: Fifty-nine patients who received initial PBT for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 at nine centers were included in the study. The treatment protocol was based on the policy of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Forty patients received 72.6-76 Gy (RBE) in 20-22 fr, 13 received 74.0-76.0 Gy (RBE) in 37-38 fr, and 6 received 60-70.2 Gy (RBE) in 20-30 fr. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The 59 patients (35 men, 24 women; median age: 71 years; range: 41-91 years) had PS of 0 (n = 47), 1 (n = 10), and 2 (n = 2). Nine patients had hepatitis and all 59 cases were considered inoperable. The Child-Pugh class was A (n = 46), B (n = 7), and unknown (n = 6); the median maximum tumor diameter was 5.0 cm (range 2.0-15.2 cm); and the clinical stage was I (n = 12), II (n = 19), III (n = 10), and IV (n = 18). At the last follow-up, 17 patients were alive (median follow-up: 36.7 months; range: 24.1-49.9 months) and 42 had died. The median OS was 21.7 months (95% CI: 14.8-34.4 months). At the last follow-up, 37 cases had recurrence, including 10 with local recurrence. The median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-11.3 months). In multivariable analyses, Child-Pugh class was significantly associated with OS and PFS, and Child-Pugh class and hepatitis were significantly associated with local recurrence. Four patients (6.8%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher. Conclusion: PBT gives favorable treatment outcomes for unresectable ICC without distant metastasis and may be particularly effective in cases with large tumors.

Long-term survival outcomes and quality of life of image-guided proton therapy for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study evaluated long-term efficacy, safety, and changes in quality of life (QOL) of patients after image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-institutional prospective phase 2 study enrolled patients with operable histologically confirmed stage IA or IB NSCLC (7th edition of UICC). The prescribed dose was 66 Gy relative biological effectiveness equivalents (GyRBE) in 10 fractions for peripheral lesions, or 72.6 GyRBE in 22 fractions for central lesions. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included disease control, toxicity, and changes in QOL score. RESULTS: We enrolled 43 patients (median age: 68 years; range, 47-79 years) between July 2013 to January 2021, of whom 41 (95 %) had peripheral lesions and 27 (63 %) were stage IA. OS, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 95 % (95 % CI: 83-99), 95 % (82-99), and 86 % (72-94), respectively, at 3 years, and 83 % (66-92), 95 % (82-99), and 77 % (60-88), respectively, at 7 years. Four patients (9 %) developed grade 2, and one patient (2 %) developed grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. No other grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. In the QOL analysis, global QOL remained favorable; however, approximately 40 % of patients reported dyspnea at 3 and 24 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that IGPT provides effective disease control and survival in operable stage I NSCLC, particularly for peripheral lesions. Moreover, toxicity associated with IGPT was minimal, and patients reported favorable QOL.

Spot scanning proton therapy for unresectable bulky retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a case report.

The development of effective treatment strategies for unresectable retroperitoneal sarcoma is desirable. Herein, we suggest that definitive proton therapy (PT) could be a promising treatment option, regardless of the large size of the tumor. A 52-year-old man presented with a discomfort of the lower abdomen. Computed tomography revealed a retroperitoneal tumor, measuring over 20 cm in the largest dimensions, which was surrounded by the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Biopsy revealed dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was ineffective, and the tumor was ultimately deemed unresectable. The patient opted to receive PT instead of continuation of chemotherapy. Spot scanning PT (SSPT) at a total dose of 60.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions was employed. SSPT administered a dose to the tumor while successfully sparing the surrounding GI tract. He did not receive any maintenance systemic therapy after PT. The tumor gradually shrunk over more than 7 years, with no evidence of recurrence outside the irradiation field. The initial measurable tumor volume of 2925 cc decreased to 214 cc at the final follow-up, seven and a half years after PT. The patient is alive without any severe complications.

Dose Prescription to Isodose Lines in Static Multi-Beam Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors: Which Line Is Optimal?

This study investigated the appropriate dose prescription method in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors. Static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy is a mainstream treatment in Japan. Based on the hypothesis that dose prescription to lower isodose lines may improve planning target volume dose coverage and decrease doses to organs at risk, we investigated changes in dose-volume histograms with prescription to various isodose lines for planning target volume in static multi-beam stereotactic body radiotherapy. In all treatment plans, 45 Gy in 4 fractions were prescribed to 95% of the planning target volume. By adjusting the leaf margins of each beam, various prescription isodose lines encompassing 95% volume of the planning target volume were generated. The prescription isodose lines investigated were 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90% lines relative to the maximum dose of each planning target volume. The conformity index, homogeneity index, mean lung dose, and V5-V40 of the lung were evaluated. The dose was calculated by the adaptive convolve algorithm. The conformity index was lowest in the 70% or 80% isodose plan. The mean lung doses and V10-V40 of the lung decreased steeply from the 90% to the 70% isodose plan, and was lowest in the 60% and 70% isodose plans. These indices increased in the 40% and 50% isodose plans. The optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy plans appeared to be dose prescription to the 60% or 70% isodose line. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the advantage of using this method clinically.

Defining Minimum Treatment Parameters of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expert Consensus.

PURPOSE: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a highly effective treatment in select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system does not recommend the use of EBRT in HCC due to a lack of sufficient evidence and intends to perform an individual patient level meta-analysis of ablative EBRT in this population. However, there are many types of EBRT described in the literature with no formal definition of what constitutes "ablative." Thus, we convened a group of international experts to provide consensus on the parameters that define ablative EBRT in HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fundamental parameters related to dose, fractionation, radiobiology, target identification, and delivery technique were identified by a steering committee to generate 7 Key Criteria (KC) that would define ablative EBRT for HCC. Using a modified Delphi (mDelphi) method, experts in the use of EBRT in the treatment of HCC were surveyed. Respondents were given 30 days to respond in round 1 of the mDelphi and 14 days to respond in round 2. A threshold of ≥70% was used to define consensus for answers to each KC. RESULTS: Of 40 invitations extended, 35 (88%) returned responses. In the first round, 3 of 7 KC reached consensus. In the second round, 100% returned responses and consensus was reached in 3 of the remaining 4 KC. The distribution of answers for one KC, which queried the a/b ratio of HCC, was such that consensus was not achieved. Based on this analysis, ablative EBRT for HCC was defined as a BED10 ≥80 Gy with daily imaging and multiphasic contrast used for target delineation. Treatment breaks (eg, for adaptive EBRT) are allowed, but the total treatment time should be ≤6 weeks. Equivalent dose when treating with protons should use a conversion factor of 1.1, but there is no single conversion factor for carbon ions. CONCLUSIONS: Using a mDelphi method assessing expert opinion, we provide the first consensus definition of ablative EBRT for HCC. Empirical data are required to define the a/b of HCC.

Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Prospective Registry Study in Japan.

PURPOSE: A prospective multicenter registry study was started May 2016 in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who received PBT for HCC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered in the database of the Particle Beam Therapy Committee and Subcommittee of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 755 registered patients, 576 with initial PBT and no duplicate cancer were evaluated. At final follow-up, 322 patients were alive and 254 had died. The median follow-up period for survivors was 39 months (0-58 months). The median OS time of the 576 patients was 48.8 months (95% CI, 42.0-55.6 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 83.8% (95% CI, 80.5%-86.6%), 68.5% (64.5%-72.2%), 58.2% (53.9%-62.2%), and 50.1% (44.9%-55.0%), respectively. Recurrence was observed in 332 patients, including local recurrence in 45 patients. The median PFS time was 14.7 months (95% CI, 12.4-17.0 months) and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year PFS rates were 55.2% (95% CI, 51.0%-59.2%), 37.5% (33.5%-41.5%), 30.2% (26.3%-34.2%), and 22.8% (18.5%-27.4%), respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were significantly higher for tumor size <5 versus 5 to 10 cm (P < .001) and <5 versus ≥10 cm (P < .001); Child-Pugh score A/B versus C (P < .001); and distance of the tumor from the gastrointestinal tract <1 versus 1 to 2 cm (P < .008) and <1 versus >2 cm (P < .001). At final follow-up, 27 patients (4.7%) had late adverse events of grade 3 or higher, with liver failure (n = 7), and dermatitis (n = 7) being most common. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter prospective data registry indicated that PBT for HCC gives good therapeutic effects (3-year local control rate of 90%) with a low risk of severe late adverse events.

Lobectomy versus proton therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent years, an increasing number of patients with lung cancer have been treated using proton therapy (PT). We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the treatment outcomes of these 2 modalities. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 275 patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent lobectomy (n = 206) or PT (n = 69) at our institution from July 2013 to December 2020. The end points were overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), local control, regional lymph node control, and distant control. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias in the 2 groups. RESULTS: The matched cohort consisted of 59 patients who underwent lobectomy and 59 patients who underwent PT with a median follow-up period of 50 months. There were no significant differences in OS (P = .26), cause-specific survival (P = .33), RFS (P = .53), local control (P = .41), regional lymph node control (P = .98), and distant control (P = .31). In the lobectomy and PT groups, the 5-year OS rate was 85.8% and 79.1%, respectively, the RFS rate was 82.3% and 77.8%, and the local control rate was 92.1% and 96.6%. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in survival or disease control between lobectomy and PT in patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC. Despite these findings, the potential for unmeasured confounding factors remains, and randomized control trials are needed to better compare these treatment modalities.

Factors related to fixedness after transbronchial fiducial marker placement for image-guided proton therapy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of transbronchially inserted gold fiducial markers has been reported in radiation therapy and proton therapy for mobile lesions, such as lung tumors. However, there is occasional dropout of inserted markers. This retrospective study investigated the factors related to dropout of markers inserted for image-guided proton therapy (IGPT). METHODS: Between June 2013 and October 2021, 535 markers were inserted in 171 patients with lung tumors. We investigated whether marker dropout was affected by the location of marker insertion, distance between the marker and the chest wall (DMC), and difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC). Marker dropout from the time of planning computed tomography (CT) to follow-up CT was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 535 inserted markers, 417 were confirmed on planning CT and 356 on follow-up CT after IGPT. Multivariate analysis revealed that marker insertion into the upper lobe and FEV1/FVC ≥70% were factors associated with total marker dropout. Marker dropout between planning CT and follow-up CT was associated with DMC, FEV1/FVC ≥70%, and planning CT performed within 4 days of marker insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Marker dropout can be minimized by inserting markers more peripherally, by considering the planned insertion location, and FEV1/FVC. Additionally, planning CT should be scheduled at least 5 days after marker insertion.

Luminescence imaging of water irradiated by protons under FLASH radiation therapy conditions.

Objective.FLASH radiation therapy with ultrahigh dose rates (UHDR) has the potential to reduce damage to normal tissue while maintaining anti-tumor efficacy. However, rapid and precise dose distribution measurements remain difficult for FLASH radiation therapy with proton beams. To solve this problem, we performed luminescence imaging of water following irradiation by a UHDR proton beam captured using a charge-coupled device camera.Approach. We used 60 MeV proton beams with dose rates of 0.03-837 Gy s-1from a cyclotron. Therapeutic 139.3 MeV proton beams with dose rates of 0.45-4320 Gy s-1delivered by a synchrotron-based proton therapy system were also tested. The luminescent light intensity induced by the UHDR beams was compared with that produced by conventional beams to compare the dose rate dependency of the light intensity and its profile.Main results. Luminescence images of water were clearly visualized under UHDR conditions, with significantly shorter exposure times than those with conventional beams. The light intensity was linearly proportional to the delivered dose, which is similar to that of conventional beams. No significant dose-rate dependency was observed for 0.03-837 Gy s-1. The light-intensity profiles of the UHDR beams agreed with those of conventional beams. The results did not differ between accelerators (synchrotron or cyclotron) and beam energies.Significance. Luminescence imaging of water is achievable with UHDR proton beams as well as with conventional beams. The proposed method should be suitable for rapid and easy quality assurance investigations for proton FLASH therapy, because it facilitates real-time, filmless measurements of dose distributions, and is useful for rapid feedback.

Dosimetric impact of systematic spot position errors in spot scanning proton therapy of head and neck tumor.

Purpose: The spot position is an important beam parameter in the quality assurance of scanning proton therapy. In this study, we investigated dosimetric impact of systematic 15 spot position errors (SSPE) in spot scanning proton therapy using three types of optimization methods of head and neck tumor. Materials and Methods: The planning simulation was performed with ± 2 mm model SSPE in the X and Y directions. Treatment plans were created using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and single-field uniform dose (SFUD). IMPT plans were created by two optimization methods: with worst-case optimization (WCO-IMPT) and without (IMPT). For clinical target volume (CTV), D95%, D50%, and D2cc were used for analysis. For organs at risk (OAR), Dmean was used to analyze the brain, cochlea, and parotid, and Dmax was used to analyze brainsetem, chiasm, optic nerve, and cord. Results: For CTV, the variation (1 standard deviation) of D95% was ± 0.88%, 0.97% and 0.97% to WCO-IMPT, IMPT, and SFUD plan. The variation of D50% and D2cc of CTV showed <0.5% variation in all plans. The dose variation due to SSPE was larger in OAR, and worst-case optimization reduced the dose variation, especially in Dmax. The analysis results showed that SSPE has little impact on SFUD. Conclusions: We clarified the impact of SSPE on dose distribution for three optimization methods. SFUD was shown to be a robust treatment plan for OARs, and the WCO can be used to increase robustness to SSPE in IMPT.

Clinical results of proton beam radiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese national registry study.

This study presents the first data of a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional cohort and compares them with the findings of systematic literature reviews on radiation therapies and inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) conducted by the Lung Cancer Working Group in the Particle Beam Therapy (PBT) Committee and Subcommittee at Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. The Lung Cancer Working Group extracted eight reports and compared their data with those of the PBT registry from May 2016 to June 2018. All the analyzed 75 patients aged ≤80 years underwent proton therapy (PT) with concurrent chemotherapy for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The median follow-up period of the surviving patients was 39.5 (range, 1.6-55.6) months. The 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rates were 73.6%/64.7% and 28.9%/25.1%, respectively. During the follow-up period, six patients (8.0%) had adverse events of Grade ≥ 3, excluding abnormal laboratory values. These included esophagitis in four patients, dermatitis in one and pneumonitis in one. Adverse events of Grade ≥ 4 were not observed. The results of these PBT registry data in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC suggest that the OS rate was at least equivalent to that of radiation therapy using X-rays and that the incidence of severe radiation pneumonitis was low. PT may be an effective treatment to reduce toxicities of healthy tissues, including the lungs and heart, in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC.

Radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma of the prostate: an analysis based on the Japanese radiation oncology study group survey.

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of prostate ductal carcinoma is still unclear, and treatment strategy has not yet been established due to its rarity. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter survey of radiation therapy for prostate ductal carcinoma in Japan. METHOD: Data of patients with ductal carcinoma of the prostate treated with radiation therapy between 1996 and 2018 were extracted from the database of each facility. RESULTS: Fifty-two treatment records of 41 patients were collected from nine institutions. The treatment purpose and situations were varied curative intent to palliation. Twenty-eight patients received curative treatments. The median follow-up period of these patients was 68 months. Androgen deprivation therapy was combined with radiation therapy in 26 cases (93%). X-ray and particle irradiation was used. Radiation dose range was 63-78 Gy; 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival and biochemical relapse-free survival were 87.0, 79.3 and 79.3%, respectively. One patient experienced Grade 3 radiation proctitis and one experienced Grade 3 radiation cystitis. There were no Grade 4 or worse adverse events. CONCLUSION: Most patient received similar treatment with adenocarcinoma of prostate, and the clinical results were compatible. For more reliable evidence, further studies are required.

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with the 5-field technique, helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer.

The outcomes of three methods of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer were evaluated. Between 2010 and 2018, 308 D'Amico intermediate- or high-risk patients were treated with 2.2 Gy daily fractions to a total dose of 74.8 Gy in combination with hormonal therapy. Overall, 165 patients were treated with 5-field IMRT using a sliding window technique, 66 were then treated with helical tomotherapy and 77 were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The median age of patients was 71 years. The median follow-up period was 75 months. Five-year overall survival (OS) and biochemical or clinical failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 95.5 and 91.6% in the 5-field IMRT group, 95.1 and 90.3% in the tomotherapy group and 93.0 and 88.6% in the VMAT group, respectively, with no significant differences among the three groups. The 5-year cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 7.3 and 6.2%, respectively, for all patients. Late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicities were less frequent in patients undergoing VMAT (0%) than in patients undergoing 5-field IMRT (7.3%) and those undergoing tomotherapy (11%) (P = 0.025), and this finding appeared to be correlated with the better rectal DVH parameters in patients undergoing VMAT. Other toxicities did not differ significantly among the three groups, although bladder dose-volume parameters were slightly worse in the tomotherapy group than in the other groups. Despite differences in the IMRT delivery methods, X-ray energies and daily registration methods, all modalities may be used as IMRT for localized prostate cancer.

Outcomes of proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a disease with a poor prognosis. In addition, IP patients are more likely to develop lung cancer. Since IP patients frequently develop toxicities during cancer treatment, minimally invasive cancer treatment is warranted for such patients to maintain their quality of life. This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of proton therapy (PT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with IP. METHODS: Twenty-nine NSCLC patients with IP were treated with PT between September 2013 and December 2019. The patients had stage IA to IIIB primary NSCLC. Ten of the 29 patients exhibited the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. The prescribed dose was 66-74 Grays (relative biological effectiveness) in 10-37 fractions. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21.1 months [interquartile range (IQR), 15.6-37.3] for all patients and 37.2 months (IQR, 24.0-49.9) for living patients. The median patient age was 77 years (IQR, 71-81). The median planning target volume was 112.0 ml (IQR, 56.1-246.3). The 2-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85% (95% confidence interval: 57-95), 30% (15-47), and 45% (26-62), respectively. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0), grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis (RP) was observed in 1 patient. Two patients developed grade 3 late RP, but no other patients experienced serious toxicities. The patients' quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 and SF-36) scores had not changed after 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: PT may be a relatively safe treatment for NSCLC patients with IP, without deteriorating quality of life scores within 3 months.

Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes after Moderately Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Proton Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

We retrospectively evaluated the three-year patient-reported quality of life (QOL) after moderately hypofractionated proton therapy (MHPT) for localized prostate cancer in comparison with that after normofractionated PT (NFPT) using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-50. Patients who received MHPT (60-63 Gy (relative biological effectiveness equivalents; RBE)/20-21 fractions) (n = 343) or NFPT (74-78 Gy (RBE)/37-39 fractions) (n = 296) between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) threshold was defined as one-half of a standard deviation of the baseline value. The median follow-up was 56 months and 83% completed questionnaires at 36 months. Clinically meaningful score deterioration was observed in the urinary domain at 1 month in both groups and in the sexual domain at 6-36 months in the NFPT group, but not observed in the bowel domain. At 36 months, the mean score change for urinary summary was -0.3 (MHPT) and -1.6 points (NFPT), and that for bowel summary was +0.1 and -2.0 points; the proportion of patients with MCID was 21% and 24% for urinary summary and 18% and 29% for bowel summary. Overall, MHPT had small negative impacts on QOL over three years, and the QOL after MHPT and NFPT was similar.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors.

PURPOSE: Treatment of sinonasal malignant tumors is challenging, and evidence to establish a standard treatment is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT) for sinonasal malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with sinonasal malignant tumors (T1-4bN0-2M0) who underwent SSPT between May 2014 and September 2019. The prescription dose was typically either 60 GyRBE in 15 fractions or 60.8 GyRBE in 16 fractions for mucosal melanoma and 70.2 GyRBE in 26 fractions for other histologic subtypes. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and incidence of toxicity. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 62 enrolled patients, the common histologic subtypes were mucosal melanoma (35%), squamous cell carcinoma (27%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%), and olfactory neuroblastoma (10%). Locally advanced stages were common (T3 in 42% and T4 in 53%). Treatment-naïve tumors and postsurgical recurrent tumors accounted for 73% and 27%, respectively. No patient had previous radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6-66) for all patients and 21.5 months (range, 6-66) for survivors. The 2-year LC, progression-free survival, and OS rates of all patients were 92%, 50%, and 76%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed histology as a prognostic factor for OS, being higher in adenoid cystic carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma than in other tumors. Sixteen grade ≥3 late toxicities were observed in 12 patients (19%), including 11 events resulting in visual impairment; the most common was cataract. There was 1 grade 4 toxicity, and there were no grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION: SSPT was well tolerated and yielded good LC for sinonasal malignant tumors. Although we consider SSPT to be a leading treatment modality, further studies are required to establish its status as a standard treatment.

Dosimetric effects of quality assurance-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of quality assurance (QA)-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer. We used 20 typical computed tomography (CT) images of prostate cancer: 10 patients with and 10 patients without spacers. The following 12 model errors were assumed: output error ± 2%, range error ± 1 mm, setup error ± 1 mm for three directions, and multileaf collimator (MLC) position error ± 1 mm. We created verification plans with model errors and compared the prostate-rectal (PR) distance and dose indices with and without the spacer. The mean PR distance at the isocenter was 1.1 ± 1.3 mm without the spacer and 12.9 ± 2.9 mm with the spacer (P < 0.001). The mean rectum V53.5 GyE, V50 GyE, and V34.5 GyE in the original plan were 2.3%, 4.1%, and 12.1% without the spacer and 0.1%, 0.4%, and 3.3% with the spacer (P = 0.0011, < 0.001, and < 0.001). The effects of the range and lateral setup errors were small; however, the effects of the vertical/long setup and MLC error were significant in the cases without the spacer. The means of the maximum absolute change from original plans across all scenarios in the rectum V53.5 GyE, V50 GyE, and V34.5 GyE were 1.3%, 1.5%, and 2.3% without the spacer, and 0.2%, 0.4%, and 1.3% with the spacer (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.0019). This study indicated that spacer injections were also effective in reducing the change in the rectal dose due to setup errors.