RESUMO
Detection and timely intervention of acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major challenge worldwide. Electronic alerts for AKI may improve process- and patient-related endpoints. The present study evaluated the efficacy of an AKI electronic alert system and care bundle. This is a two-arm, prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled trial enrolling patients with AKI (KDIGO criteria) and cardiac diseases. Patients were randomly assigned to a routine care group or intervention group (DRKS-IDDRKS00017751). Two hundred patients (age 79 years, 46% female) were enrolled, with 100 patients in each group. The primary endpoint did not differ between patients in the routine care group 0.5 (-7.6-10.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 versus patients in the intervention group 1.0 (-13.5-15.1) mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.527. Proportions of patients in both study groups with hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, and renal acidosis were comparable. The stop of antihypertensive medication during hypotensive periods was more frequent in patients in the intervention group compared to patients in the control group, p = 0.029. The AKI diagnosis and text module for AKI in the discharge letter were more frequently documented in patients in the intervention group (40%/48% vs. 25%/34%, p = 0.034; p = 0.044, respectively). Continued intake of RAAS inhibitors and the presence of a cardiac device were independently associated with a less pronounced decrease in eGFR from admission to the lowest value. In this RCT, electronic alerts for AKI and a care bundle improved process- but not patient-related endpoints.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Severe complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are rare due to increasing procedural safety. However, TAVI procedure-related haemodynamic instability and increased risk of infection may affect renal functional reserve with subsequent renal acidosis and hyperkalaemia. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated incidence, modifiable risk factors and prognosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) and AKI complicated by hyperkalaemia, pulmonary oedema or metabolic acidosis after TAVI. METHODS: In a retrospective single-centre study, 804 consecutive patients hospitalized during 2017 and 2018 for elective TAVI were included. AKI was defined according to the 'Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome' (KDIGO) initiative. Variables on co-morbidities, intra-/post-interventional complications and course of renal function up to 6 months after index-hospitalization were assessed. In multivariate regression analyses, risk factors for the development of AKI, complicated AKI, renal non-recovery from AKI and in-hospital mortality were determined. RESULTS: Incidence of AKI was 13.8% (111/804); in-hospital mortality after TAVI was 2.3%. AKI was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality, odds ratio (OR) 10.3 (3.4-31.6), P < 0.001, further increasing to OR = 21.8 (6.6-71.5), P < 0.001 in patients with AKI complicated by hyperkalaemia, pulmonary oedema or metabolic acidosis, n = 57/111 (51.4%). Potentially modifiable, interventional factors independently associated with complicated AKI were infection [OR = 3.20 (1.61-6.33), P = 0.001] and red blood cell transfusion [OR = 5.04 (2.67-9.52), P < 0.001]. Valve type and size, contrast volume and other intra-interventional characteristics, such as the need for tachycardial pacing, did not influence the development of AKI. Eleven of 111 (9.9%) patients did not recover from AKI, mostly affecting patients with cardiac decompensation. In 18/111 (16.2%) patients, information concerning AKI was provided in discharge letter. Within 6 months after TAVI, higher proportion of patients with AKI showed progression of pre-existing chronic kidney disease compared with patients without AKI [14/29, 48.3% versus 54/187, 28.9%, OR = 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.0-5.1), P = 0.036]. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is common and may impede patient outcome after TAVI with acute complications such as hyperkalaemia or metabolic acidosis and adverse renal function until 6 months after intervention. Our study findings may contribute to refinement of allocation of appropriate level of care in and out of hospital after TAVI.
