Screening Methods for Diagnosing Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) has become more common due to higher life expectancy with cystic fibrosis. Early recognition and prompt treatment of CFRD leads to improved outcomes. METHODS: We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) in order to identify the most valuable diagnostic metrics for diagnosing CFRD out of available screening tools (index test), using the oral glucose tolerance test as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and superiority indices were calculated and used to rank the index tests. RESULTS: A total of 31 articles with 25 index tests were eligible for inclusion. Two-day, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) ranked the highest (Se: 86% Sp: 76%), followed by glucose measurement from blood capillary samples (Se: 70%, Sp: 82%) and three-day CGM (Se: 96%, Sp: 56%). When we compared the CGM of different durations, two-day CGM performed best (Se: 88%, Sp: 80%), followed by three-day (Se: 96%, Sp: 59%) and six-day CGM (Se: 66%, Sp: 79%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering its overall performance ranking, as well as the high sensitivity, two-day CGM appears to be a promising screening test for CFRD.

Vitamin D supplementation in patients with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite routine supplementation, vitamin D insufficiency is often seen in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients on account of pancreatic insufficiency. Vitamin D is a crucial component of bone health and affects nearly all cells of the immune system. However, clinical benefits or harms associated with supplementation are poorly documented. In this systematic review, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vitamin D supplementation with placebo (i.e. 'non-increased dose') in CF patients. Analysing the 8 included RCTs, the intervention group had significantly higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (se25OHD) levels, but there were no significant differences found in the quantitative synthesis of clinical outcomes, including bone disease-, respiratory status- and immunological status-related outcomes. Based on our current results, while a higher vitamin D dose elevates se25OHD, it does not seem to influence clinical outcomes. Future RCTs should include outcomes of past studies and apply longer follow-up periods to document long-term patient-important outcomes.