RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Infant- and family-centered developmental care can reduce adverse outcomes in both infants and parents. Parents' experiences of the care and staff treatment remain to be evaluated. METHODS: Parents of infants admitted to neonatal units in Sweden from July 2020 to May 2022 responded to a questionnaire with standardized questions about in-hospital care. Exposures were hospital, gestational age, length of hospital stay, unit level, and bed density. The proportions of parents rating aspects of neonatal care as excellent, defined as five on a Likert scale, and the determinants of excellence were described. The results were benchmarked with ratings in adult somatic care. RESULTS: A total of 4,475/13,108 (34%) parents responded. The ratings of excellent care varied by question from 65% to 90%. The largest variation in excellence between neonatal units (range 43-80%) was found for "participation and involvement." The proportion of excellence was significantly lower among parents of extremely preterm infants. Confidence in the staff was lower in parents of extremely preterm infants than in parents of term infants (56% vs. 83%). Longer hospital stays affected the experience of neonatal care adversely, whereas level of care and bed density were overall unrelated to the parental experience. Parents in neonatal care rated the care as excellent to a higher extent than patients cared for in adult medicine. CONCLUSION: A majority of parents rated neonatal care in Sweden as excellent. The less frequent ratings of excellence among parents of extremely preterm infants indicate that more could be done to optimize parental involvement and support.
Assuntos
Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Pais , Lactente , Adulto , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Suécia , Tempo de Internação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva NeonatalRESUMO
During the last 20 years Lao People's Democratic Republic has successfully developed and adopted some 30 health policies, strategies, decrees and laws in the field of health. Still, the implementation process remains arduous. This article aims at discussing challenges of health policy development and effective implementation by contextualizing the policy evolution over time and by focusing particularly on the National Drug Policy and the Health Care Law. Special attention is given to the role of research in policymaking. The analysis was guided by the conceptual framework of policy context, process, content and actors, combined with an institutional perspective, and showed that effective implementation of a health policy is highly dependent on both structures and agency of those involved in the policy process. The National Drug Policy was formulated and adopted in a short period of time in a resource-scarce setting, but with dedicated policy entrepreneurs and support of concerned international collaborators. Timely introduction of operational health systems research played a crucial role to support the implementation, as well as the subsequent revision of the policy. The development of the Health Care Law took several years and once adopted, the implementation was delayed by institutional legacies and issues concerning the choice of institutional design and financing, despite strong support of the law among the policymakers. Among many factors, timing of the implementation appeared to be of crucial importance, in combination with strong leadership. These two examples show that more research, that problematizes the complex policy environment in combination with improved communication between researchers and policymakers, is necessary to inform about measures for effective implementation. A way forward can be to strengthen the domestic research capacity and the international research collaboration regionally as well as globally.
Assuntos
Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Pesquisa Biomédica , Laos , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about current public health nutrition workforce development in Europe. The present study aimed to understand constraining and enabling factors to workforce development in seven European countries. DESIGN: A qualitative study comprised of semi-structured face-to-face interviews was conducted and content analysis was used to analyse the transcribed interview data. SETTING: The study was carried out in Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. SUBJECTS: Sixty key informants participated in the study. RESULTS: There are constraining and enabling factors for public health nutrition workforce development. The main constraining factors relate to the lack of a supportive policy environment, fragmented organizational structures and a workforce that is not cohesive enough to implement public health nutrition strategic initiatives. Enabling factors were identified as the presence of skilled and dedicated individuals who assume roles as leaders and change agents. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to strengthen coordination between policy and implementation of programmes which may operate across the national to local spectrum. Public health organizations are advised to further define aims and objectives relevant to public health nutrition. Leaders and agents of change will play important roles in fostering intersectorial partnerships, advocating for policy change, establishing professional competencies and developing education and training programmes.
Assuntos
Dietética , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Ciências da Nutrição , Competência Profissional , Saúde Pública , Política Pública , Fortalecimento Institucional , Dietética/organização & administração , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Liderança , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing effort across Europe to develop national policies in food and nutrition during the last decade. However, little is known about how public health nutrition issues get on the public health agenda and the roles individuals have when these agendas are being set. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to scrutinise the development process of the Slovenian national food and nutrition policy, and to identify the roles and functions of individuals who have contributed to that process. METHODS: This study undertook a qualitative approach. Data collection included 18 semi-structured interviews between 2007 and 2011, and grey and scientific literature search. Text analysis was based on Kingdon's streams model, which involved highlighting the relationship between problem identification, policy solutions and political opportunities. Data were coded to identify the roles and functions of individuals participating in the agenda-setting process. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the opportunity for the Slovenian food and nutrition policy to be developed was largely explained by a change in political circumstances, namely the accession of Slovenia to the European Union and the Common Agricultural Policy. Individuals with experience in policy development were identified because of their analytical, strategic and policy entrepreneurial skills. The analyst was responsible for communicating the key nutrition issues to policy-makers, the strategist joined international networks and promoted policy solutions from international experts including the World Health Organization, and the policy entrepreneur took advantage of the political situation to enlist the participation of previous opponents to a national nutrition policy. CONCLUSION: This study found that individuals, their roles and skills, played an important role in the development of the Slovenian National Food and Nutrition Policy. The roles and functions of these individuals, which are identified in this study, may assist future endeavours to advance public health nutrition as a key political issue.
Assuntos
Política Nutricional , Formulação de Políticas , Pessoal Administrativo , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Política , EslovêniaRESUMO
We show that the centrosome- and microtubule-regulating protein γ-tubulin interacts with E2 promoter binding factors (E2Fs) to modulate E2F transcriptional activity and thereby control cell cycle progression. γ-Tubulin contains a C-terminal signal that results in its translocation to the nucleus during late G(1) to early S phase. γ-Tubulin mutants showed that the C terminus interacts with the transcription factor E2F1 and that the E2F1-γ-tubulin complex is formed during the G(1)/S transition, when E2F1 is transcriptionally active. Furthermore, E2F transcriptional activity is altered by reduced expression of γ-tubulin or by complex formation between γ-tubulin and E2F1, E2F2, or E2F3, but not E2F6. In addition, the γ-tubulin C terminus encodes a DNA-binding domain that interacts with E2F-regulated promoters, resulting in γ-tubulin-mediated transient activation of E2Fs. Thus, we report a novel mechanism regulating the activity of E2Fs, which can help explain how these proteins affect cell cycle progression in mammalian cells.
Assuntos
Fatores de Transcrição E2F/metabolismo , Fator de Transcrição E2F1/metabolismo , Sinais de Localização Nuclear/fisiologia , Fase S/fisiologia , Tubulina (Proteína)/metabolismo , Animais , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Cromatina/metabolismo , Humanos , Camundongos , Células NIH 3T3 , Osteossarcoma/metabolismo , Ativação Transcricional , Tubulina (Proteína)/genéticaRESUMO
In this study, we analysed stakeholder perceptions of the process of implementing the coordination of health-sector aid in Zambia, Africa. The aim of coordination of health aid is to increase the effectiveness of health systems and to ensure that donors comply with national priorities. With increases in the number of donors involved and resources available for health aid globally, the attention devoted to coordination worldwide has risen. While the theoretical basis of coordination has been relatively well-explored, less research has been carried out on the practicalities of how such coordination is to be implemented. In our study, we focused on potential differences between the views of the stakeholders, both government and donors, on the systems by which health aid is coordinated. A qualitative case study was conducted comprising interviews with government and donor stakeholders in the health sector, as well as document review and observations of meetings. Results suggested that stakeholders are generally satisfied with the implementation of health-sector aid coordination in Zambia. However, there were differences in perceptions of the level of coordination of plans and agreements, which can be attributed to difficulties in harmonizing and aligning organizational requirements with the Zambian health-sector plans. In order to achieve the aims of the Paris Declaration; to increase harmonization, alignment and ownership--resources from donors must be better coordinated in the health sector planning process. This requires careful consideration of contextual constraints surrounding each donor.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Apoio ao Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Cooperação Internacional , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Comitês Consultivos , Comportamento Cooperativo , Países em Desenvolvimento , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Liderança , Modelos Organizacionais , Propriedade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Confiança , ZâmbiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The increasing resources available for and number of partners providing health sector aid have stimulated innovations, notably, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, which aim to improve aid coordination. In this, one of the first studies to analyse implementation of aid coordination below national level, the aim was to investigate the effect of the Paris Declaration on coordination of health sector aid at the district level in Zambia. METHODS: The study was carried out in three districts of Zambia. Data were collected via interviews with health centre staff, district managers and officials from the Ministry of Health, and from district action plans, financial reports and accounts, and health centre ledger cards. Four indicators of coordination related to external-partner activity, common arrangements used by external partners and predictability of funding were analysed and assessed in relation to the 2010 targets set by the Paris Declaration. FINDINGS: While the activity of external partners at the district level has increased, funding and activities provided by these partners are often not included in local plans. HIV/AIDS support show better integration in planning and implementation at the district level than other support. Regarding common arrangements used for fund disbursement, the share of resources provided as programme-based support is not increasing. The predictability of funds coming from outside the government financing mechanism is low. CONCLUSION: Greater efforts to integrate partners in district level planning and implementation are needed. External partners must improve the predictability of their support and be more proactive in informing the districts about their intended contributions. With the deadline for achieving the targets set by the Paris Declaration fast approaching, it is time for the signatories to accelerate its implementation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lao PDR is a low-income country with an urgent need for evidence-informed policymaking in the healthcare sector. During the last decade a number of Health Systems Research (HSR) projects have been conducted in order to meet this need. However, although knowledge about research is increasing among policymakers, the use of research in policymaking is still limited. METHODS: This article investigates the relationship between research and policymaking from the perspective of those participating in HSR projects. The study is based on 28 interviews, two group discussions and the responses from 56 questionnaires. RESULTS: The interviewees and questionnaire respondents were aware of the barriers to getting research into policy and practice. But while some were optimistic, claiming that there had been a change of attitudes among policymakers in the last two years, others were more pessimistic and did not expect any real changes until years from now. The major barriers to feeding research results into policy and practice included an inability to influence the policy process and to get policymakers and practitioners interested in research results. Another barrier was the lack of continuous capacity development and high-quality research, both of which are related to funding and international support. Many of the interviewees and questionnaire respondents also pointed out that communication between those conducting research and policymakers must be improved. CONCLUSION: The results show that in the case of Lao PDR, research capacity development is at a crucial stage for implementing research into policy and practice. If research is going to make a consistent impact on policymaking in the Lao health care sector, the attitude towards research will need to be changed in order to get research prioritised, both among those conducting research, and among policymakers and practitioners. Our findings indicate that there is awareness about the barriers in this process.