The path to cancer diagnosis for the elderly.

Older cancer patients are more often than younger diagnosed via an unplanned hospital admission which may negatively influence the prognosis. An increasing number of cancers is expected due to ageing of populations, and these phenomena are likely to result in an increase in older cancer patients with multiple complications, extended hospital stays, and reduced quality of life and survival. In this review, we present recent data about routes to cancer diagnosis for older vs younger patients to emphasize that diagnostic pathways need improvements to avoid an increase in unplanned hospital admissions due to cancer.

Radiation therapy in older patients with cancer.

The general population is aging, which expectedly will lead to a future increase in older patients with cancer. This review summarises the recent advances in radiotherapy. Technological advances have led radiotherapy to be an efficient and well-tolerated treatment option in older patient with cancer. Studies show no difference in toxicity and disease control rates compared with the ones in younger patients with cancer. MR-guided radiotherapy, proton therapy, and integration of artificial intelligence in treatment planning represent the latest advances in the field of radiotherapy and hold potential to further improve the treatment of older patients with cancer.

Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel in Combination with the Histone Deacetylate Inhibitor, Vorinostat, in Patients with Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer.

Background: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, vorinostat, administered in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods: Women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, peritoneal, or Fallopian tube carcinoma, a performance status of 0-2, and good overall organ function were eligible. Patients received 6 courses of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) of 5.0 mg/mL/min administered via intravenous infusion on day 1 of a 3-week schedule. In addition, patients received vorinostat 400 mg orally once daily on days -4 through 10 of Cycle 1 and days 1 through 14 of each subsequent treatment cycle. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. The secondary endpoints were the objective response rate and overall survival. Results: Fifty-five patients were included. CR was obtained in 14 patients (26.4%) and PR in 19 patients (35.8%), resulting in an ORR of 62.2%. Twenty patients (37.7%) had SD. The median duration of response (DoR) was 12.6 (range 6-128) months. The median PFS was 11.6 months (95% CI, 10.3-18.0; p < 0.001). Median OS was 40.6 months (95% Cl, 25.1-56.1). The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, nausea, pain, sensory neuropathy, myalgia, stomatitis and diarrhea. Conclusions: Vorinostat combined with carboplatin plus paclitaxel was tolerable and generated significant responses including a long median overall survival in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment-guided interventions on physical performance and quality of life in older patients with advanced cancer: A randomized controlled trial (PROGNOSIS-RCT).

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with frailty starting oncological treatment are at higher risk of experiencing declining physical performance, loss of independence, and quality of life (QoL). This study examines whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided interventions added to standard oncological care can prevent declining physical performance and QoL in older patients with frailty initiating palliative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥70 years, with a Geriatric-8 score of ≤14, initiating palliative oncological treatment were enrolled in an open label randomized controlled trial and randomized 1:1 to receive either CGA-guided interventions in addition to oncological standard care or oncological care alone. Baseline characteristics, physical performance measures, and QoL questionnaires were retrieved before group allocation. CGA was performed using a fixed set of domains and validated tests by a geriatrician-led team. The primary endpoint, physical performance, was measured by the 30-s chair stand test (30s-CST) at three months. Additional outcomes included 30s-CST at six months, handgrip strength test, and QoL. Outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed regression models. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.org (NCT04686851). RESULTS: From November 1, 2020 to May 31, 2022, 181 patients were included; 88 in the interventional arm and 93 in the control arm. Median age was 77 (interquartile range [IQR] 73-81) years, 69% were male, median Geriatric-8 score was 12 (IQR 10-13), 69% had a Performance Status of 0-1, and the median 30s-CST was 9 (IQR 5-11) repetitions. The between-group difference in 30s-CST at three months was 0.67 (95%CI: -0.94 - 2.29) and 1.57 (95%CI: -0.20 - 3.34) at six months, which were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis including participants with a baseline Geriatric-8 of 12-14 found borderline significant between-group differences in 30s-CST scores at three and six months of 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.07 - 4.2, P = 0.06) and 2.25 (95%CI: 0.01-4.5, P = 0.05), respectively. No within-group or between-group differences in the summary score or the Elderly Functional Index score (measuring QoL) were found. DISCUSSION: This study did not find significant between-group differences in the 30s-CST in older patients receiving palliative care. However, a tendency towards improved physical performance was seen in the least frail. These patients may represent a target group wherein CGA interventions provide particular benefit.

Determinants of poor quality of life in older patients with cancer: A longitudinal mixed methods study (PROGNOSIS-Q).

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes are becoming more employed in oncologic research because many older patients with cancer prioritize preserved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over prolonged survival. However, few studies have examined the determinants of poor HRQoL in older patients with cancer. This study aims to determine whether HRQoL findings are truly reflective of cancer disease and treatment, as opposed to external factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal, mixed-methods study included outpatients, age 70 years or more, with a solid cancer, who reported poor HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global health status/QoL (GHS) score ≤ 33.3), at treatment initiation. A convergent design was employed, in which HRQoL survey data and telephone interview data was collected in parallel at baseline and three-months follow-up. Survey and interview data was analyzed separately and subsequently compared. Thematic analysis of interview data was conducted according to Braun & Clarke, and changes in patients GHS score were calculated using mixed model regression. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 74.7 years were included (12 men and 9 women) and data saturation was achieved at both time intervals. Baseline interviews (n = 21) showed that poor HRQoL at cancer treatment initiation was primarily reflective of participants' initial shock upon receiving their cancer diagnosis and their change in circumstance and sudden functional independence. At three months, three participants were lost to follow-up and two provided only partial data. Most participants experienced an increase in HRQoL, with 60% showing a clinically significant improvement in GHS scores. Interviews showed that this was due to lessening functional dependency and disease acceptance achieved by mental and physical adjustment. HRQoL measures were less reflective of cancer disease and treatment in older patients with preexisting highly disabling comorbidity. DISCUSSION: This study showed good alignment between survey responses and in-depth interviews, demonstrating that both methodologies are highly relevant measures during oncologic treatment. However, for patients with severe comorbidity, HRQoL findings are often more reflective of the steady state of their disabling comorbidity. Response shift may play a part in how participants adjusted to their new circumstances. Promoting caregiver involvement from the time of diagnosis may increase patients´ coping strategies.

Clinical impact of venous thromboembolism in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Prospective investigation on cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective real-world study using combined computed tomography venography and pulmonary angiography (CTVPA) to screen patients with NSCLC for VTE (cohort A). A retrospective multicenter cohort without additional screening with CTVPA was included as control (cohort B). A model with VTE as a time-dependent event using competing risk analysis model with death as a competing event was used to evaluate outcomes and differences in cumulative VTE incidences. RESULTS: Cohort A (n = 146) and cohort B (n = 426) had median follow-up for VTE of 16.5 months (IQR 6.7-35.6). Cumulative VTE events at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 7.5 %, 9.6 %, 13.0 %, 14.4 % for cohort A and 1.9 %, 3.8 %, 4.9 %, 5.6 % for cohort B with SHR 2.42 (CI 95 % 1.37-4.27) p = 0.0024. Recurrent VTE comprised 52 % and 37 %, respectively. In multivariate overall survival analysis, VTE was significantly associated with impaired OS (HR 2.12 CI 95 % [1.49-3.03], p < 0.0001). Risk factors for VTE comprised prior VTE and ICI administered in first line. CONCLUSION: Cumulative VTE incidence in NSCLC patients following palliative ICI may be significantly higher than reported in randomised clinical trials and retrospective real-world reports. VTE development during ICI impair OS significantly. Thus, more focus on VTE during ICI is warranted to optimise both prevention and management of VTE. Whether there is a causal relationship between VTE and ICI remains to be explored.

Effect and Tolerability of Immunotherapy in Patients with NSCLC with or without Brain Metastasis.

Sparse data exist on immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis (BM), especially for those with no local therapy (LT) (whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic RT (SRT) or neurosurgery) preceding ICI. Our aims were to investigate the prevalence of BM, rate of intracranial response (ICR), and survival and quality of life (QoL) in real-life patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing palliative ICI. This was a prospective non-randomized study (NCT03870464) with magnetic resonance imaging of the brain (MR-C) performed at baseline resulting in a clinical decision to administer LT or not. ICR evaluation (MR-C) at week 8-9 (mRECIST criteria) for group A (LT) and group B (untreated) was assessed. Change in QoL was assessed using EQ-5D-5L. Of 159 included patients, 45 (28%) had baseline BM. Median follow-up was 23.2 months (IQR 16.4-30.2). Of patients in group A (21) and B (16), 16/37 (43%) had symptomatic BM. ICR was 8/21, 38% (complete or partial response) for group A versus 8/16, 50% for group B. No statistical difference in median overall survival of patients with BM (group A: 12.3 (5.2-NR), group B: 20.5 months (4.9-NR)) and without (22.4 months (95% 16.2-26.3)) was obtained. Baseline QoL was comparable regardless of BM, but an improved QoL (at week 9) was found in those without BM. Patients with NSCLC and BM receiving ICI had long-term survival comparable to those without BM.

Predictive value of geriatric oncology screening and geriatric assessment of older patients with cancer: A randomized clinical trial protocol (PROGNOSIS-RCT).

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been shown to reduce frailty in older patients in general. In older patients with cancer, frailty affects quality of life (QoL), physical function, and survival. However, few studies have examined the effect of CGA as an additional intervention to antineoplastic treatment. This protocol presents a randomized controlled trial, which aims to evaluate the effects of CGA-based interventions in older patients with cancer and Geriatric 8 (G8) identified frailty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial will include patients, age 70+ years, with solid malignancies and G8 frailty (G8 ≤ 14). Patients will be separated into two groups, with different primary endpoints, depending on palliative or curative antineoplastic treatment initiation, and subsequently randomized 1:1 to either CGA with corresponding interventions or standard of care, along with standardized antineoplastic treatment. A geriatrician led CGA with corresponding interventions and clinical follow-up will be conducted within one month of antineoplastic treatment initiation. The interdisciplinary CGA will cover multiple geriatric domains and employ a standard set of validated assessment tools. Primary endpoints will be physical decline measured with the 30-s Chair-Stand-Test at three months (palliative setting) and unplanned hospital admissions at six months (curative setting). Additional outcomes include QoL, treatment toxicity and adherence, occurrence of polypharmacy, potential drug interactions, potential inappropriate medications, and survival. The primary outcomes will be analyzed using a mixed model regression analysis (30-s chair stand test) and linear regression models (unplanned hospitalizations), with an intention to treat approach. Power calculations reveal the need to enroll 134 (palliative) and 188 (curative) patients. DISCUSSION: The present study will examine whether CGA, as an additional intervention to antineoplastic treatment, can improve endpoints valued by older patients with cancer. Inclusion began November 2020 and is ongoing, with 37 and 29 patients recruited April 15th, 2021. Registration:NCT04686851.

[Challenges in cancer treatment for the elderly].

About half of all Danish cancer patients are 70 years or older at diagnosis. The incidence is expected to increase further over the coming years because of an increasing longevity. Therefore, this review recommends that the Danish health care system develops and implement models to ensure optimal care for older adults with cancer. We are still in need of knowledge about the optimal treatment, rehabilitation, palliation and care for older adults with cancer. We encourage the Danish health authorities to formulate a national strategy for this area.

Patient Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Discussing life expectancy helps inform decisions related to preventive medication, screening, and personal care planning. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on patient preferences for discussing life expectancy and to identify predictors for these preferences. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and gray literature from inception until 17 February 2021. Two authors screened titles/abstracts and full texts, and extracted data and one author assessed quality. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients willing to discuss life expectancy. We reported descriptive statistics, performed a narrative synthesis, and explored sub-groups of patients according to patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies with an accumulated population of 27,570 participants were included, comprising quantitative survey/questionnaire studies (n=27) and qualitative interview studies (n=14). Willingness to discuss life expectancy ranged from 19 to 100% (median 61%, interquartile range (IQR) 50-73) across studies, with the majority (77%) reporting more than half of subjects willing to discuss. There was considerable heterogeneity in willingness to discuss life expectancy, even between studies from patients with similar ages, diseases, and cultural profiles. The highest variability in willingness to discuss was found among patients with cancer (range 19-100%, median 61%, IQR 51-81) and patients aged 50-64 years (range 19-97%, median 61%, IQR 45-87). This made it impossible to determine predictors for willingness to discuss life expectancy. DISCUSSION: Most patients are willing to discuss life expectancy; however, a substantial proportion is not. Heterogeneity and variability in preferences make it challenging to identify clear predictors of willingness to discuss. Variability in preferences may to some extent be influenced by age, disease, and cultural differences. These findings highlight the individual and complex nature in which patients approach this topic and stress the importance of clinicians considering eliciting patient's individual preferences when initiating discussions about life expectancy.

Predictive Value of Geriatric Oncology Screening and Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Solid Cancers: Protocol for a Danish prospective cohort study (PROGNOSIS-G8).

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with cancer constitute a heterogeneous group with varying degrees of frailty; therefore, geriatric assessment with initial geriatric oncology screening is recommended. The Geriatric 8 (G8) and the modified Geriatric 8 (mG8) are promising screening tools with high accuracy and an association with survival. However, evidence is sparse regarding patient-centered outcomes. This protocol describes a study, which aims to address the predictive and prognostic value of the G8 and mG8, with quality of life (QoL) as the primary outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center prospective cohort study, patients, age ≥70 years with solid malignancies, will be screened with the G8 and mG8 prior to receiving 1st line antineoplastic treatment. Patients will contribute medical record data including; cancer type, Charlson comorbidity index score, performance status, and treatment intent, type, and dosage, at baseline. Patients will complete QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD-14) at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months follow-up. Two functional measurements (the 30-s chair stand test and the handgrip strength test) will be conducted at baseline to assess the added predictive and prognostic value. At 12 months follow-up, initially administered treatment and treatment adherence will be recorded and assessed with generalized linear models, while overall survival and cancer-specific survival will be assessed using survival analysis models with time-varying covariates. The relationship between frailty (G8 ≤ 14, mG8 ≥ 6) and QoL within 12 months will be examined using mixed regression models. DISCUSSION: Geriatric oncology screening may identify a subgroup of older patients with frailty, at risk of experiencing diminishing QoL and poor treatment adherence. With the proposed screening program, patients who require treatment modification and additional support to maintain their QoL may be identified. It is our hope, that these insights may facilitate the formation of national guidelines for the treatment of older patients with cancer. Registration:NCT04644874.

End-of-life anticancer treatment - a nationwide registry-based study of trends in the use of chemo-, endocrine, immune-, and targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: Anticancer treatments near the end of a patient's life should generally be avoided, as it leaves the patient with no significant anticancer effect but increases the risk of severe side effects. We described the pattern of all end-of-life anticancer treatment in a population of Danish cancer patients. METHODS: Using the Danish national health registries, we identified all patients deceased due to cancer 2010-2015. Anticancer treatment registered in the last 30 days of life was categorized as end-of-life treatment. Predictors of such treatment were investigated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 42,277 patients (median age 70 years) of whom 16% received end-of-life anticancer treatment. This proportion did not change during the study period (p = .09). Chemotherapy alone was the most frequent treatment, accounting for 78% of all end-of-life treatment in 2010, decreasing to 71% in 2015. In contrast, end-of-life use of immunotherapy, targeted therapy and endocrine therapy increased during the study period. Breast cancer as index cancer was associated with the highest frequency of end-of-life treatment (23%), followed by malignant melanoma (21%), and prostate cancer (18%). Factors associated with lower odds for end-of-life treatment were female sex, older age, high burden of comorbidity, and being diagnosed >6 months prior to death. CONCLUSIONS: We found a stable overall rate at 16% of patients receiving anticancer treatment within one month prior to death in this nationwide sample of cancer deaths. Further research is needed to assess whether this level of end-of-life treatment is justified or reflects inappropriate use.

The influence of polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, and drug interactions on treatment completion and prognosis in older patients with ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with cancer are at increased risk of exposure to polypharmacy (PP), potential drug interactions (PDIs), and Potentially inappropriate Medications (PIMs). Objectives of this study were to describe PP, PIMs, and PDIs, and to analyse the associations with completion of 1st line chemotherapy and prognosis in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. METHODS: Registry-based study including a 10-year national cohort of patients diagnosed with epithelial OC in Denmark. Descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses were performed to analyse the data. RESULTS: A total of 3795 patients were included and described. Further analyses were performed on 2219 patients registered with a date of surgery and combination chemotherapy with platinum and a taxane or platinum monotherapy. Exposure to ≥2 PDIs was associated with not completing chemotherapy, odds ratio (OR) 2.27 (1.18-4.37). Major and extensive PP were associated with increased mortality at 0-6 months after diagnosis, HR 3.15(1.59-6.22) and 5.43(2.34-12.6), respectively. PIMs were associated with increased mortality from six months after diagnosis. At 6-12 months: hazard ratio (HR) 1.50(1.06-2.11) and 2.38(1.25-4.50) with 1-2 and ≥ 3 PIMs, respectively. At 12 months: HR 2.08(1.31-3.29) with ≥3 PIMs. Age was not associated with treatment completion. CONCLUSIONS: Drug use influences treatment completion and prognosis in OC patients. A thorough review of patients' medications aiming to minimize the number of PIMs and PDIs might improve the course of these patients' disease.

The impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment for optimal treatment of older patients with cancer: A randomized parallel-group clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate if oncologic treatment decision based on G8 screening followed by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and a multidisciplinary team conference in patients with G8 ≤ 14 was better than treatment decision based on standard assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02671994. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2018, 96 patients with cancer, aged ≥70 years, were included. Patients were randomized to treatment decision based on the oncologist's clinical judgement (control) or based on screening with G8. If G8 > 14 treatment decision was made as in the control group and if G8 ≤ 14, patients were referred to CGA including intervention as needed and treatment decision after a multidisciplinary team conference (MDT). RESULTS: The study was closed early. 47 patients were randomized to the control group and 49 to the intervention group; 28 had a G8 ≤ 14, 24 of whom attended CGA. In the intervention group 48% completed treatment as planned compared to 54% in the control group (p = .208). Thirty-eight percent experienced grade 3-4 toxicity in the control group compared with only 20% in the intervention group (p = .055). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months in the control group and 19.1 months in the intervention group (p = .911). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.0 months in the control group and 7.8 months for the intervention group (p = .838). CONCLUSION: Treatment decision based on G8 screening followed by CGA had no impact on completion rate of planned oncologic treatment, OS or PFS, but resulted in a borderline significant lower incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity.

Impact of Age, Comorbidity, and FIGO Stage on Treatment Choice and Mortality in Older Danish Patients with Gynecological Cancer: A Retrospective Register-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The number of older patients with cancer is increasing in general, and ovarian and endometrial cancer are to a large extent cancers of the elderly. Older patients with cancer have a high prevalence of comorbidity. Comorbidity and age may be predictive of treatment choice and mortality in older patients with cancer along with stage and performance status. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe comorbidity in a population of older Danish patients with gynecological cancer, and to evaluate the predictive value of comorbidity and age on treatment choice and cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 459 patients aged ≥ 70 years. Patients were diagnosed with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer from 1 January, 2007 to 31 December, 2011 and were evaluated and/or treated at Odense University Hospital. Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Treatment was classified as curative intended, palliative intended, or no treatment. RESULTS: Age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and performance status were found to be significant predictors of treatment choice, while comorbidity was not. Multivariate analyses showed that both cancer-specific and all-cause mortality were significantly associated with treatment choice, FIGO stage, and performance status. Age was not associated with mortality, with the exception of ovarian cancer, where age was associated with all-cause mortality. Comorbidity was not an independent predictor of treatment choice or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our population of older Danish patients with gynecological cancer, age, FIGO stage, and performance status were predictors of treatment choice, while comorbidity was not. Treatment choice, FIGO stage, and performance status were significantly associated with both cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Age was only associated with mortality in ovarian cancer, while comorbidity was not associated with mortality.

Can we predict toxicity and efficacy in older patients with cancer? Older patients with colorectal cancer as an example.

Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly. As older and frail patients are under-represented in clinical trials, most of the evidence available on treatment of older metastatic colorectal patients with cancer originates from pooled analyses of the older patients included in large prospective clinical trials and from community-based studies. The aging process is highly individual and cannot be based on the chronological age alone. It is characterised by a decline in organ function with an increased risk of comorbidity and polypharmacy. These issues can result in an increased susceptibility to the complications of both the disease and treatment. Therefore, evaluation of performance status and the chronological age alone is not sufficient, and additionally assessment must be included in the treatment decision process. In the present review, we will focus on clinical aspects of treating older and frail metastatic colorectal patients with cancer, but also on the present knowledge on how to select and tailor therapy for this particular group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2014-000394-39, pre-results.

Significance of age and comorbidity on treatment modality, treatment adherence, and prognosis in elderly ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Age is associated with poor prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Reasons could be increased comorbidity, more advanced stage, or nonoptimal surgery or chemotherapy. Objectives of this study were to evaluate the significance of comorbidity and age ≥70 years on receiving cytoreductive surgery, standard combination chemotherapy (TC), adherence to TC treatment, and prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women registered in a nation-wide database with ovarian or peritoneal cancer in 2005-2006. Logistic regression was employed for determining the predictive value of age and comorbidity (ASA score) on receiving cytoreductive surgery and TC, and on adhering to TC. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analysis were employed for survival analyses. RESULTS: Of 961 patients, 348 (36.2%) were elderly. Age ≥70 years was independently predictive of not receiving surgery, OR 0.2(95% CI 0.1-0.5) and TC treatment, OR 0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.1). Comorbidity was also independently predictive of not receiving standard treatment: OR for receiving surgery with ASA score of ≥3 was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.5), and for receiving TC it was 0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.1). Overall, age ≥70 was a poor prognostic factor in OS and PFS, but the effect of age ceased after 16 months. Comorbidity was a poor prognostic factor throughout the study period but with time-varying effect. For patients treated with TC, age was not a prognostic factor, whereas ASA score ≥3 was. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients and patients with comorbidity less often receive optimal surgical and medical treatment. For those receiving optimal treatment, age ≥70 is not an independent poor prognostic factor, whereas severe comorbidity is.

Comorbidity and survival after early breast cancer. A review.

INTRODUCTION: Survival after breast cancer is determined by disease related factors such as stage at diagnosis, patient characteristics, e.g., age, and treatment. AIM: To review evidence published during the last ten years on the effect of comorbidity on survival after early breast cancer. METHODS: A search in Pubmed with keywords, breast neoplasm, comorbidity, and survival, was performed. A total of 18 studies published between 2000 and August 2010 was included in this review. RESULTS: All 18 studies demonstrated that comorbidity had a significant impact on survival after breast cancer with poorer survival among patients with one or more comorbid conditions. The effect of comorbidity persisted after adjustment for age at diagnosis and stage of disease. Older patients with comorbidity were less likely to receive therapy according to guidelines. CONCLUSION: Presence of comorbidity at diagnosis is an important prognostic factor in early breast cancer, irrespective of age and stage of disease.

Addition of sunitinib to cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Results of continuous sunitinib, in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan every other week (SIC) for compassionate use in heavily pre-treated patients with mCRC are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC resistant to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-FU and cetuximab received SIC at two Danish oncologic departments. The regimen consisted of sunitinib given as a continuous-dosing in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan every other week (CetIri). The first six patients started with a daily oral dose of sunitinib of 12.5 mg. Subsequent patients started at a daily dose of 25 mg with the possibility to escalate to 37.5 mg. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received SIC. No patient had an objective response, but 13 patients had subjective relief and 42% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 3.2 months and median overall survival was 7.4 months. Fatigue and leukopenia were the most frequently reported severe adverse event (18% grade 3 and 18% grade 3/4, respectively). DISCUSSION: Sunitinib continuous-dosing with 25 mg/day can safely be combined with CetIri administered every other week.