RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the development of anesthesia teleconsultation in many countries. In pediatric anesthesia, data about anesthesia teleconsultation are scarce. The main objective of this prospective descriptive study was to provide an evaluation of the feasibility of pediatric anesthesia teleconsultation. Perception of the safety and quality, parental and medical satisfaction were also assessed. METHODS: From September to December 2020, patients undergoing a pediatric anesthesia teleconsultation in Toulouse University Hospital, using the TeleO™ dedicated teleconsultation platform were prospectively included. Feasibility was defined as the rate of anesthesia teleconsultations successfully performed using the TeleO™ platform alone. Questionnaires regarding the quality, safety, and satisfaction were filled in by physicians and families. RESULTS: A total of 114 children (3 months-17 years) were included in the study. Feasibility was 82%, failure was mainly caused by technical issues. Physicians estimated that the safety and quality of anesthetic preparation were optimal in 100% of cases. Anesthetists were satisfied (VAS ≥70/100) with the medical, technical, and relational (child/parents) aspects of anesthesia teleconsultation in 91%, 64%, and 84%/90% of cases respectively. Almost all parents (97%) stated that they would agree to anesthesia teleconsultation for a future procedure. CONCLUSION: In this first assessment, pediatric anesthesia teleconsultation appears to be feasible, with high rates of medical and parental satisfaction. Physicians' perception of the safety and quality of this process were positive. Improving the technical process might be a key determinant to promote further development of pediatric anesthesia teleconsultation.
Assuntos
Anestesia , COVID-19 , Consulta Remota , Telemedicina , Criança , Humanos , Consulta Remota/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Pandemias , Satisfação Pessoal , FrançaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The world is currently facing an unprecedented healthcare crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of these guidelines is to produce a framework to facilitate the partial and gradual resumption of intervention activity in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The group has endeavoured to produce a minimum number of recommendations to highlight the strengths to be retained in the 7 predefined areas: (1) protection of staff and patients; (2) benefit/risk and patient information; (3) preoperative assessment and decision on intervention; (4) modalities of the preanaesthesia consultation; (5) specificity of anaesthesia and analgesia; (6) dedicated circuits and (7) containment exit type of interventions. RESULTS: The SFAR Guideline panel provides 51 statements on anaesthesia management in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. After one round of discussion and various amendments, a strong agreement was reached for 100% of the recommendations and algorithms. CONCLUSION: We present suggestions for how the risk of transmission by and to anaesthetists can be minimised and how personal protective equipment policies relate to COVID-19 pandemic context.
Assuntos
Analgesia/normas , Anestesia/normas , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus , Controle de Infecções/normas , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Adulto , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Analgesia/efeitos adversos , Analgesia/métodos , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Criança , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Comorbidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Procedimentos Clínicos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Desinfecção , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Salas Cirúrgicas/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Isolamento de Pacientes , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Comitê de Profissionais , Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Avaliação de Sintomas , Precauções UniversaisRESUMO
Procalcitonin (PCT), has been identified as a reliable marker of bacterial infection in critically ill patients. After cardiac surgery, infectious and non infectious inflammatory processes can cause a significant increase in PCT production. At present, literature data seem to confirm that repeated measurements of PCT are a better marker than other parameters, both as prognosis and diagnosis aid. Normal PCT levels are less than 0.1 ng/ml. PCT levels < 2ng/ml can be observed after extracorporeal circulation in case of systemic inflammatory response, in the absente of any post operative complication. However, bacterial infection with organ dysfunction should be suspected when PCT levels are higher 5 ng/ml.