Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contraception ; : 110143, 2023 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37820999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this Clinical Recommendation is to review relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for medication abortion between 14 0/7-27 6/7 weeks of gestation, with focus on mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-only regimens. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed articles published between 2008 and 2022 and reviewed reference lists of included articles to identify additional publications. See Search Strategy for more details. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Several randomized trials of medication abortion between 14 0/7-27 6/7 weeks of gestation demonstrate that mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol increases effectiveness (complete abortion at 24 or 48 hours) compared to misoprostol only. Studies continue to evaluate different doses, routes, and dosing intervals for misoprostol. If mifepristone is unavailable, several misoprostol regimens with individual doses of at least 200 mcg or more are effective. Adjunctive osmotic dilators are of limited benefit. It is important to individualize care, with consideration to reducing misoprostol dose in low resources settings or at 24 0/7 weeks of gestation or later (or equivalent uterine size). Misoprostol in the setting of two or more previous cesarean sections is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture compared to one or none, but risk remains low. Most contraceptives can be started during or immediately following abortion. Appropriately trained and credentialed advanced practice clinicians can provide medication abortion between 14 0/7-27 6/7 weeks of gestation with appropriate backup within the confines of local regulations and licensure.

2.
Contraception ; : 110143, 2023 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821241

RESUMO

The objective of this Clinical Recommendation is to review relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation, with a focus on mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-only regimens. We systematically reviewed PubMed articles published between 2008 and 2022 and reviewed reference lists of included articles to identify additional publications. See Search Strategy for more details. Several randomized trials of medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation demonstrate that mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol increases effectiveness (complete abortion at 24 or 48 hours) compared to misoprostol only. Studies continue to evaluate different doses, routes, and dosing intervals for misoprostol. If mifepristone is unavailable, several misoprostol regimens with individual doses of at least 200 mcg or more are effective. Adjunctive osmotic dilators are of limited benefit. It is important to individualize care, with consideration to reducing misoprostol dose in low-resource settings or at 24 0/7 weeks of gestation or later (or equivalent uterine size). Misoprostol in the setting of two or more previous cesarean sections is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture compared to one or none, but risk remains low. Most contraceptives can be started during or immediately following abortion. Appropriately trained and credentialed advanced practice clinicians can provide medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation with appropriate backup within the confines of local regulations and licensure.

3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2023 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821258

RESUMO

The objective of this Clinical Recommendation is to review relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation, with a focus on mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-only regimens. We systematically reviewed PubMed articles published between 2008 and 2022 and reviewed reference lists of included articles to identify additional publications. See Search Strategy for more details. Several randomized trials of medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation demonstrate that mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol increases effectiveness (complete abortion at 24 or 48 hours) compared to misoprostol only. Studies continue to evaluate different doses, routes, and dosing intervals for misoprostol. If mifepristone is unavailable, several misoprostol regimens with individual doses of at least 200 mcg or more are effective. Adjunctive osmotic dilators are of limited benefit. It is important to individualize care, with consideration to reducing misoprostol dose in low-resource settings or at 24 0/7 weeks of gestation or later (or equivalent uterine size). Misoprostol in the setting of two or more previous cesarean sections is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture compared to one or none, but risk remains low. Most contraceptives can be started during or immediately following abortion. Appropriately trained and credentialed advanced practice clinicians can provide medication abortion between 14 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation with appropriate backup within the confines of local regulations and licensure.

5.
Semin Perinatol ; 44(5): 151272, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32624200

RESUMO

Poor access to contraception can lead to several undesired health outcomes, including high rates of unintended pregnancy, high rates of teen pregnancy, spontaneous preterm delivery, preeclampsia and maternal death. Properly addressing these public health issues often require a coordinated response at the state government level. States with conservative legislatures have traditionally fought attempts to expand access to contraception. However, several of these states are now implementing policies that increase access to their citizens. While the motives for each state differ, the goals are the same: reduce poor health outcomes by increasing access to contraception.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo , Anticoncepção , Eficácia de Contraceptivos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Política , Adolescente , Anticoncepcionais , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Mortalidade Materna , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Gravidez , Gravidez na Adolescência , Gravidez não Planejada , Nascimento Prematuro , Estados Unidos
6.
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol ; 2019: 8347983, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31016057

RESUMO

Splenic artery aneurysm rupture is a rare complication of pregnancy with very high maternal and fetal mortality rate. In this paper, a case of splenic artery aneurysm rupture at 34 weeks of gestation with both maternal and fetal survival is presented.

7.
AMA J Ethics ; 19(10): 978-988, 2017 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29028466

RESUMO

In this case scenario, a medical student, Jenny, is conducting congenital heart disease research in a resource-limited setting faced with water insecurity. She has concerns about how ethical it is for her to conduct advanced clinical research in a region with more basic health needs. The first commentary argues that advanced clinical research in resource-limited settings follows the ethical principle of beneficence and interactional justice but violates the principle of distributive justice. The second commentary questions whether beneficence is enough, since the Belmont Report states that beneficence is the obligation to simultaneously reduce harm and increase benefit. It calls upon public health physician-scientists to think deeply about how to involve communities in their research-and how to insert themselves into health policy development processes.


Assuntos
Beneficência , Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Países em Desenvolvimento , Recursos em Saúde , Obrigações Morais , Pobreza , Alocação de Recursos/ética , Ética Médica , Ética em Pesquisa , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Justiça Social , Água , Abastecimento de Água
8.
Am J Perinatol ; 34(3): 211-216, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27434694

RESUMO

Scottish obstetrician James Young Simpson first introduced the use of ether and chloroform anesthesia for labor in 1847, just 1 year after William Morton's first successful public demonstration of ether anesthesia at the Massachusetts General Hospital. The contemporaneous development of surgical anesthesia and obstetrics enabled obstetric anesthesia to address the pain of childbirth. Shortly after its introduction, obstetricians raised concerns regarding placental transport, or the idea that drugs not only crossed the placenta, but exerted detrimental effects on the neonate. The development of regional anesthesia and clinical work in obstetric anesthesia and perinatology addressed issues of the safety of the neonate, enabling obstetric anesthesia to safely and dramatically reduce the pain of childbirth.


Assuntos
Anestesia Epidural/história , Anestesia por Inalação/história , Anestesia Obstétrica/história , Perinatologia/história , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Índice de Apgar , Clorofórmio/efeitos adversos , Éter/efeitos adversos , Feminino , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Troca Materno-Fetal , Parto Normal/história , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA