The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer.

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

Sensitivity of CA 15-3, CEA and serum HER2 in the early detection of recurrence of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this project was to investigate the sensitivity of CA 15-3, CEA and HER2 in the early diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Serial serum values of CA 15-3, CEA and HER2 were determined in 107 patients with recurrence after breast cancer. Fifteen of the patients had primary disseminated disease, nine patients only developed local recurrence during the follow-up period and the remaining 83 developed distant metastases. RESULTS: In the group of patients with distant metastatic disease (n=83), elevated serum levels of CA 15-3 (>32.4 U/mL), CEA (>2.5 µg/L for non-smokers and >10 µg/L for smokers) and HER2 (>15 µg/L) were found in 49.4%, 38.6% and 32.5%, respectively, at the time of diagnosis of recurrence. CA 15-3 was significantly better than HER2 (p=0.027). The most sensitive combination was obtained using CA 15-3/CEA (60.2%) or CA 15-3/HER2 (57.8%). Combining all three tumour markers raised the sensitivity to 63.9%. In the subgroup of patients with tissue HER2+ tumours, the sensitivity of HER2 increased to 55.6%. The best combination in this group was CEA/HER2 (66.7%). In the subgroup of patients with tissue HER2- tumours, CA 15-3 was significantly better. The best combination was CA 15-3/HER2 or CA 15-3/CEA with a sensitivity of 55.8% and 59.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of several tumour markers enhances the sensitivity for detection of metastatic breast cancer. We recommend HER2 or the combination of CEA and HER2 in tissue HER2+ and CA 15-3 or the combination of CA 15-3 and CEA in tissue HER2-.