Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(10): 3160-3166.e1, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29903459

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve blockade is used to provide analgesia for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. This study compared a single-injection adductor canal block (SACB) with adjuvants to continuous adductor canal blockade (CACB). The hypothesis was that the 2 groups would have equivalent analgesia at 30 hours after neural blockade. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, equivalency trial. Sixty patients were randomized to either the SACB group (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 1.67 mcg/mL of clonidine, 2 mg of dexamethasone, 150 mcg of buprenorphine, and 2.5 mcg/mL of epinephrine) or the CACB group (20 mL 0.25% of bupivacaine injection with 2.5 mcg/mL of epinephrine followed by an 8 mL/h infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine continued through postoperative day 2). The primary outcome was movement pain scores at 30 hours using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes included serial postoperative NRS pain scores (rest and movement every 6 hours), opioid consumption, time to first opioid administration, ability to straight leg raise, patient satisfaction, length of stay, and the incidence of nausea/vomiting. RESULTS: An intention-to-treat analysis included 59 patients. The NRS pain scores with movement were equivalent at 30 hours (SACB 5.5 ± 2.8 vs CACB 5.7 ± 2.9 [mean NRS ± standard deviation]; mean difference 0.2 [-1.5 to 1.0 {90% confidence interval}]). All NRS pain scores were equivalent until 42 hours (rest) and 48 hours (rest and movement) with the CACB group having lower pain scores. Other secondary outcomes were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: An SACB provides equivalent analgesia for up to 36 hours after block placement when compared with a CACB for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, though a CACB was favored at 42 hours and beyond.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Analgesia/métodos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Buprenorfina/administração & dosagem , Cateterismo , Clonidina/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Parenterais , Injeções , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 30(2): 118-23, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27159548

RESUMO

Although there are many potentially effective therapeutic options for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), no definitive treatment exists. Therefore, patients often exhaust both medical and surgical treatment options attempting to find relief for their symptoms. As pain control and restoration of physical movement are primary treatment goals, strategies that include regional anesthesia techniques are commonly employed, but potentially underutilized, treatment modalities. The authors present a patient with refractory CRPS that had significant improvement in both pain control and the ability to tolerate intensive physical therapy following the placement of a superficial radial nerve catheter and an infusion of local anesthetic for 6 days as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen. This treatment approach also assisted in the decision-making process related to future treatment options. Although the use of regional anesthesia and perineural infusions of local anesthetic have previously been described as viable treatment options for CRPS, this case report represents the first known use of a superficial radial nerve catheter for treating CRPS as well as the first description of a technique for placing a superficial radial nerve (SRN) catheter using ultrasound guidance.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/tratamento farmacológico , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Síndromes da Dor Regional Complexa/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Nervo Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
3.
J Clin Anesth ; 24(7): 555-60, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23101770

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of adding simulation-based education to the pre-intervention mandatory hospital efforts aimed at decreasing central venous catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) in intensive care units (ICU). DESIGN: Pre- and post-intervention retrospective observational investigation. SETTING: 24-bed ICU and a 562-bed university-affiliated, urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: ICU patients July 2004-June 2008 were studied for the development of central venous catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI). MEASUREMENTS: ICU patients from July 2004-June 2008 were studied for the development of central venous catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI). PRE-INTERVENTION: mandatory staff and physician education began in 2004 to reduce CRBSI. The CRBSI-prevention program included online and didactic courses, and a pre- and post-test. Elements in the pre-intervention efforts included hand hygiene, full barrier precautions, use of Chlorhexidine skin preparation, and mask, gown, gloves, and hat protection for operators. A catheter-insertion cart containing all supplies and checklist were was a mandatory element of this program; a nurse was empowered to stop the procedure for non-performance of checklist items. INTERVENTION: As of July 1, 2006, a mandatory simulation-based program for all intern, resident, and fellow physicians was added to teach central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected pre- and post-intervention were CRBSI incidence, number of ICU catheter days, mortality, laboratory pathogen results, and costs. MAIN RESULTS: The pre-intervention CRBSI incidence of 6.47/1,000 catheter days was reduced significantly to 2.44/1,000 catheter days post-intervention (58%; P < 0.05), resulting in a $539,902 savings (USD; 47%), and was attributed to shorter ICU and hospital lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Following simulation-based CVC program implementation, CRBSI incidence and costs were significantly reduced for two years post-intervention.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Educação Médica/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Redução de Custos , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Universitários , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Incidência , Capacitação em Serviço/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Internato e Residência , Tempo de Internação , Manequins , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA