RESUMO
Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itching and recurrent eczematous lesions. Important factors in the etiopathogenesis of AD include genetic predisposition, epidermal barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and gut and skin dysbiosis. Probiotics could be a potential preventive strategy for allergies including AD through immune system modulation as well as enhancement of the epithelial barrier integrity. To further understand the role of probiotics in the management of AD, a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey was conducted. Materials and methods A steering committee comprising nine experts formulated consensus recommendations on the role of probiotics in the management of AD and associated flare-ups through the use of the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices questionnaire while analyzing literature reviews and responses from a national panel consisting of 175 members. The evidence strength and quality were evaluated based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) criteria. The acceptance of expert opinions as recommendations was considered upon receiving an endorsement from ≥70% of the panelists, as indicated by a Likert scale. Results The national panel emphasized that the improvement in nutritional status, immunomodulatory properties, and beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and skin support the use of probiotics in AD. The panel agreed that probiotics should be a part of the complementary therapy in the management of AD and associated flare-ups. Mostly, a probiotics supplementation duration of eight to 12 weeks is preferred by dermatologists. Probiotics, when used as an adjuvant therapy, may serve as a strategy to reduce steroid usage or maintenance therapy in high-risk cases with flares. Conclusion A Delphi-mediated KAP response provides a real-life approach to the use of probiotics in the management of AD. It suggests that probiotics could be useful as an adjuvant therapy in the management of AD and associated flare-ups when used along with traditional treatment.
RESUMO
Mycobacterium marinum is a non-tuberculous mycobacterium which can be found in naturally occurring, non-chlorinated water sources and is a known pathogen that affects fish. In humans, M. marinum typically results in cutaneous lesions, it can occasionally lead to more invasive disorders. We discuss four cases of M. marinum-related cutaneous infections examined in a tertiary care facility. We want to draw attention to the challenges of accurately diagnosing this infection, stress the significance of having a high level of clinical suspicion in order to identify it, and discuss the available treatment choices.
Assuntos
Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium marinum , Dermatopatias Bacterianas , Humanos , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/microbiologia , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Mycobacterium marinum/isolamento & purificação , Índia , Masculino , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/microbiologia , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Introduction: Melasma is an acquired disorder, which presents with well-demarcated, brown-colored hyperpigmented macules, commonly involving the sun-exposed areas such as the face. It is a chronic and distressing condition, affecting the patients' quality of life, and has been conventionally treated with "first-line" agents including hydroquinone (HQ) alone or as a part of a triple combination cream (TCC), while "second-line" options include chemical peels, and third line options include laser therapy. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed for all topical and systemic treatments for melasma up till May 4, 2021, using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The search terms "melasma" and "treatment" were used to search for the relevant articles on both these databases, and a total of 4020 articles were identified. After removing the duplicate entries and screening the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, we identified 174 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials. Results: Based on our review, HQ, TCCs, sunscreens, kojic acid (KA), and azelaic acid receive grade A recommendation. Further large-scale studies are required to clearly establish the efficacy of topical vitamin C, resorcinol, and topical tranexamic acid (TXA). Several newer topical agents may play a role only as an add-on or second-line drugs or as maintenance therapy. Oral TXA has a strong recommendation, provided there are no contraindications. Procyanidins, Polypodium leucotomos (PL), and even synbiotics may be taken as adjuncts. Discussion: Several newer topical and systemic agents with multimodal mechanisms of action have now become available, and the balance seems to be tipping in favor of these innovative modalities. However, it is worth mentioning that the choice of agent should be individualized and subject to availability in a particular country.
RESUMO
Background: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic has been immense. An innocent casualty of this disaster is medical education and training. Dermatology, which primarily deals with out-patient services, medical and surgical interventions, and in-patient services, was one of the worst hit. The National Medical Commission of India has implemented competency-based medical education (CBME) in Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy since 2019. The new curriculum relies on acquiring practical and procedural skills, training skills in research methodology, professionalism, attitude, and communication. Objectives: The study was undertaken to understand the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate dermatology CBME training in India. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was carried out on postgraduate dermatology teachers and residents in India after obtaining ethics committee approval. An online semi-structured English questionnaire was administered by Google Forms. The calculated sample size was 366 dermatology faculty and 341 postgraduate students. Validity (Content validity ratio (CVR) ≥0.56) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.7249) of the questionnaire were determined. Results: Among the 764 responses received, 51.4% reported that their institutes were converted to exclusive COVID hospitals. Domains of dermatology education affected were procedural training (n = 655), bedside clinical teaching (n = 613), outpatient department-based clinical teaching (n = 487), bedside laboratory procedures (n = 463), research activities (n = 453), histopathology (n = 412), and theory classes (n = 302). To keep up with the teaching-learning process, online platforms were mostly utilized: Zoom Meeting (n = 379), Google Meet (n = 287), and WhatsApp Interaction (n = 224). Teaching during ward rounds was significantly more affected in exclusively COVID institutes than non-exclusive COVID institutes (P < 0.001). Psychomotor skill development suffered a major jolt with 26.7% of respondents reporting a standstill (P < 0.001). Communication skills among students suffered due to social distancing, mask, and poor attendance of patients. According to 23.84% of respondents, formative assessment was discontinued. Conclusion: Online seminars, journal clubs, and assessments have been incorporated during the pandemic. Online modalities should be used as a supplementary method as psychomotor skills, communication skills, research work, and bedside clinics may not be replaced by the e-learning.
RESUMO
Introduction There is ambiguity regarding usage of tranexamic acid for melasma in India, be it in its pre-administration evaluation, administration route, dosing or monitoring. Hence, we conducted this study to understand various tranexamic-acid prescribing patterns and provide practical guidelines. Materials and methods A Google-form-based questionnaire (25-questions) was prepared based on the key areas identified by experts from the Pigmentary Disorders Society, India and circulated to practicing dermatologists across the country. In rounds 2 and 3, the questionnaire was re-presented to the same group of experts and their opinions were sought. The results of the practitioners' survey were denoted graphically alongside, to guide them. Consensus was deemed when at least 80% of respondents chose an option. Results The members agreed that history pertaining to risk factors for thromboembolism, cardiovascular and menstrual disorders should be sought in patients being started on oral tranexamic-acid. Baseline coagulation profile should be ordered in all patients prior to tranexamic-acid and more exhaustive investigations such as complete blood count, liver function test, protein C and S in patients with high risk of thromboembolism. The preferred oral dose was 250 mg orally twice daily, which can be used alone or in combination with topical hydroquinone, kojic acid and sunscreen. Repeated dosing of tranexamic-acid may be required for those relapsing with melasma following initial tranexamic-acid discontinuation. Coagulation profile should ideally be repeated at three monthly intervals during follow-up, especially in patients with clinically higher risk of thromboembolism. Treatment can be stopped abruptly post improvement and no tapering is required. Limitation This study is limited by the fact that open-ended questions were limited to the first general survey round. Conclusion Oral tranexamic-acid provides a valuable treatment option for melasma. Frequent courses of therapy may be required to sustain results and a vigilant watch is recommended for hypercoagulable states during the course of therapy.
Assuntos
Melanose , Tromboembolia , Ácido Tranexâmico , Humanos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Resultado do Tratamento , Administração Oral , Melanose/diagnóstico , Melanose/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/induzido quimicamente , Tromboembolia/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Dermatophytosis is one of the leading causes of visits to the dermatology department, especially in India, where the hot and humid climate favours fungal acquisition and perpetuation. Usual modalities of treatment include the use of either oral or topical antifungals or a combination of both, depending on the severity and extent of infection as well as the type of causative organism. But recently, steroid-modified dermatophytosis, an iatrogenically perpetuated dermatophytosis caused by the indiscriminate use of topical corticosteroids has emerged as a troublesome epidemic. We planned a cost-of-illness analysis of superficial dermatophytosis comparing the direct healthcare costs in steroid-naive and steroid-modified dermatophytosis. In our study, the average total cost of treatment for steroid-naive and steroid-modified dermatophytosis was found to be rupees (Rs) 2172.42 and Rs 3770.61 respectively, meaning that the cost for patients who used topical steroids is an additional 40% on average for treatment, when compared with the cost for patients who are steroid naive. The need for more consultations, investigations (relating to atypical presentation) and extended duration of treatment with higher-grade antifungals were found to contribute to the increased financial burden in steroid-modified dermatophytosis.
Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Tinha , Humanos , Estresse Financeiro , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides , Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Tinha/tratamento farmacológico , Tinha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background: There has been a significant increase in the incidence of recurrent, resistant, and extensive dermatophyte infections worldwide recently. This menace has spurred the need for more well-designed randomized controlled trials to optimize the treatment of dermatophyte skin infections. One of the limitations in designing such studies is the limited availability of standard and validated score, to measure the severity of dermatophyte infections. Aims: To create a severity score for the evaluation of dermatophyte infections. Materials and Methods: A Delphi consensus model was used to frame a severity scoring tool for superficial dermatophyte skin infections. Fourteen experts participated in the first round and twelve experts participated in the second round. Results: Based on the expert consensus, a final scoring system proposed was: Final Severity Score (FSS) = Sum total of Body Surface Area (BSA) in hand units for each patch multiplied by the sum of the scores for pruritis (P), lichenification (L), and actively raised borders (A) for each patch (FSS = BSA in hand units × (P + E + L + A) of patch 1 + BSA in hand units × (P + E + A) of patch 2 etc.). For measuring hand units more accurately fractional values of 0.25 can be used (0.25 corresponding to an approximate 1/4th of a hand unit). A score of +1 will be added in case of the following - 1) Close contact/family member affected, 2) History of at least one recurrence in the previous 6 months after a course of oral antifungals, 3) History of immunosuppression (on immunosuppressive medication or having underlying immunosuppressive disease). The scores will be valid only if the patient has not used any treatment topical or systemic, for at least 2 weeks before enrolment. Conclusion: The proposed Dermatophytosis Area and Severity Index (DeASI) score will help the physicians and researchers standardize the treatment protocol for dermatophytosis, henceforth, assessing the response to therapy. This will also help to standardize the parameters of effectiveness while designing any clinical trial.
RESUMO
The progression of allergic diseases with the development of atopic dermatitis and food allergy in infancy and subsequent asthma and allergic rhinitis in the later childhood is known as 'atopic march'. There have been many arguments in favour of and against this concept. This article reviews the latest epidemiology, immunological mechanisms and translational implications in clinical practice and research, which is relevant to the dermatologists. The role of skin as a site of initiation and the potential for interventions on skin that may prevent subsequent allergic diseases is also highlighted.
RESUMO
Background: With the COVID-19 vaccination taking stride all across the globe, there are multiple reports of vaccine-induced adverse reactions (cutaneous and systemic). Objectives: To study the frequency and characteristics of mucocutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: An online questionnaire-based study was performed among the recipients of COVID-19 vaccines. Results: Majority (73.6%) of the responders had received the Covishield vaccine (AstraZeneca-Oxford), while 26.4% had been vaccinated with Covaxin (Bharat Biotech-ICMR). One or more post-vaccination mucocutaneous effects were experienced in 87 (19.6%) participants. Vaccine-associated mucocutaneous changes were observed in 19.7% and 22.2% of individuals who received Covishield and Covaxin, respectively. Local injection site reaction was the predominant mucocutaneous finding, followed by urticarial rash, exacerbation of preexisting dermatoses, morbilliform rash, apthous ulcers, pityriasis rosea like eruption, telogen effluvium, herpes zoster, purpuric rash, erythema multiforme and others. Anaphylaxis was reported in three individuals. However, fatality was not reported in any of the vaccine recipients. Intergroup assessment of parameters with respect to type of vaccine was found to be insignificant. Conclusion: Majority reported mild and self-limiting reactions. This outcome should not discourage the common man in getting vaccinated.
RESUMO
Janus Kinase inhibitors have been shown to be effective in the treatment of various dermatoses such as alopecia areata, psoriasis, vitiligo and atopic dermatitis. The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is a common junction for the signaling of several dermatologically significant cytokines and the inhibition of this pathway by JAK inhibitors may be broadly useful in the treatment of various other dermatological disorders. A case series is presented of twelve patients (M:6, F:6) with a mean age 47.1 years, presenting with various eczematous dermatoses (histopathology showing spongiotic dermatitis) who had failed to respond to conventional therapy. These patients were prescribed tofacitinib. All 12 patients improved and 10 patients had improvement to clear or almost clear (physician global assessment score 0/1) after 1 month of therapy. No hematological or biochemical abnormalities were noted during the treatment period. Infections were the most common adverse events observed. Conventional treatment options like systemic steroids and steroid sparing agents are the cornerstone in the treatment of chronic eczematous disorders, however, in patients who do not respond to conventional agents, tofacitinib may represent a viable treatment option.
Assuntos
Eczema , Inibidores de Janus Quinases , Vitiligo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 plays a complex role in immune regulation and its inhibition can have effects on the pathogenesis of various skin diseases. Studies have shown that DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid (BP). AIM: To analyse the clinical and histopathological features of cutaneous adverse events in patients on DPP-4 inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with suspected DPP-4 inhibitor-associated cutaneous adverse events, at a tertiary teaching hospital from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020. Exclusion criteria included previous history of chronic skin disease and lack of histopathological reports or follow-up records. The clinical characteristics, latency period, Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 18 patients (10 men, 8 women; mean age 68.6 years, range 38-89 years) were included. The DPP-4 inhibitors used were teneligliptin (n = 6), vildagliptin (n = 6), sitagliptin (n = 4), linagliptin (n = 1) and saxagliptin (n = 1). The mean interval between therapy initiation and lesion onset was 8.8 months (range 1-24 months). The dermatoses noted were BP (n = 12; 66.6%), lichenoid dermatitis (n = 4; 22.2%), psoriasiform dermatitis (n = 1; 5.6%) and spongiotic dermatitis (n = 1; 5.6%). Eight patients (44.4%) had necrotic keratinocytes as one of the distinct histological features. Causality assessment using the Naranjo scale rated the causative role of DPP-4 inhibitors as 'possible' in all patients. Of the 18 patients, 11 (61.1%) noted improvement in their condition following discontinuation of DPP-4 inhibitors, with 5 having complete remission within 6 months of stopping the drug. CONCLUSION: DPP-4 inhibitor-associated dermatoses are not necessarily limited to BP. It is necessary to recognize the possibility of other dermatoses in patients on DPP-4 inhibitors as drug substitution/cessation may improve disease morbidity.
Assuntos
Dermatite , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV , Exantema , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dermatite/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Linagliptina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penfigoide Bolhoso/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Psoriasis is a common skin disease that affects 1-3% of the general population. The treatment depends on body surface area involved, quality of life impairment and associated comorbidities. The treatment options include topical therapy, phototherapy, conventional systemic therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporine and acitretin), biologics and oral small molecules (apremilast and tofacitinib). Despite the availability of newer therapies such as biologics and oral small molecules, many a time, there is a paucity of treatment options due to the chronic nature of the disease, end-organ toxicity of the conventional drugs or high cost of newer drugs. In these scenarios, unconventional treatment options may be utilized as stand-alone or adjuvant therapy. In this review, we have discussed these uncommonly used treatment options in the management of psoriasis.
Assuntos
Psoríase/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Dapsona/uso terapêutico , Dieta , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Fumaratos/uso terapêutico , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Isotretinoína/uso terapêutico , Estilo de Vida , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Somatostatina/uso terapêutico , Sulfassalazina/uso terapêutico , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapêuticoAssuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Vildagliptina/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Bucal/patologia , Estomatite/patologia , Estomatite/terapia , Vildagliptina/uso terapêuticoAssuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Imunomodulação , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/fisiopatologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bleaching with skin-lightening preparations is a common practice in our society. Particularly, a practice simply known as "bleaching"-referring to application of skin-lightening chemicals including ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, and hypochlorite, repeated at intervals, as a salon-based or home-based procedure appears wide-spread among young females in India. However, there is limited medical literature on "bleaching." AIMS: We aimed to estimate the prevalence of "bleaching" among female students of our campus and to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding "bleaching" in the same population. METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was conducted among the female students of the campus following a presurvey focus group discussion with a representative group. A pilot survey conducted to standardize the survey questionnaire showed a high reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.7). Descriptive statistical methods were used to assess survey results, and frequencies were presented as percentages. RESULTS: A total of 880 valid responses were analyzed (age group 17-30 years, mean age-20.24 years). 34.77% had done "bleaching" at least once. 63.8% of respondents did not know the ingredients, and 40.5% did not know about the side effects of "bleaching." 60.06% of those who bleached had experienced an adverse effect. 58.18% respondents knew about "bleaching" from friends/relatives and 17% from parlors. Only 2.3% respondents had consulted a dermatologist, and only 22.8% had used sunscreens. Top motivation to bleach was to lighten facial hairs (19.5%), for a "lighter" complexion (15.1%) and achieve "glow" before a function (15.2%). CONCLUSION: Facial skin and hair "bleaching" is common in our society, and awareness regarding "bleaching" is low even among educated youth.
Assuntos
Ácido Hipocloroso , Estudantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Rosacea is a relatively common inflammatory dermatosis in persons with fair skin. It is uncommonly reported in people with skin of color (darker skin tone; Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V or VI). Apart from reduced incidence, underreporting due to decreased awareness might also be a probable explanation. Rosacea commonly presents with telangiectasias and persistent facial erythema on the sun-exposed parts, which can be distressing to the patient and affect the quality of life. The diagnosis is made clinically, in the absence of any confirmatory investigation. Several treatment modalities have been employed to date with varying results. Light-based therapies should be used cautiously in the colored skin to avoid distressing pigmentation. This article focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical features, treatment recommendations and other aspects of this uncommon disorder along with a review of the literature.