Incidence of Thrombosis in COVID-19 Patients Compared to Non-COVID-19 Sepsis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.

Background/Objectives: The hypercoagulable state associated with COVID-19 infection is associated with adverse outcomes and mortality. Studies have also demonstrated high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events among patients with sepsis. We aimed to evaluate how the increase in thrombotic events in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection compares to that of critically ill patients with non-COVID-19 sepsis. Methods: A chart review was performed of patients 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Tampa General Hospital between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 diagnosed with COVID-19 or sepsis secondary to other pathogens. Non-COVID-19 sepsis patients and COVID-19 patients were propensity-matched 3:1 on the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Multivariate analyses adjusting for confounding were conducted to report odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of predictors for thrombotic events and overall mortality. Results: After propensity score matching, 492 sepsis patients and 164 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis. COVID-19 patients were significantly older (p = 0.021) and showed higher BMI (p < 0.001) than sepsis patients. COVID-19 patients did not show significantly higher odds of thrombosis after adjustment for confounders (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42-1.72), but had significantly lower odds of mortality than sepsis patients (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66). Conclusions: Our results suggest that further study is required to lower the rate of VTE in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 sepsis patients admitted to the ICU; it is also reasonable to consider similar thromboembolism practices between these two patient groups.

Geographic and Racial Disparities in Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells and Bispecific Antibodies Trials Access for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: We investigate the geographical and racial disparities in accessing CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials for DLBCL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was searched, and 75 trials with at least 1 open site in the US were included. 2020 US Census Bureau data was used to obtain data on race and ethnicity. SPSS version 26 was used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 62 CAR-T and 13 bispecific antibodies trials with 6221 enrolled or expected to enroll patients. Eighty-five percent of the clinical trials were only open in the US, and the majority 64% were pharmaceutical-funded. There were 126 unique study sites distributed over 31 states with 11 (0-51) mean number of trials per state and 4.5 (1-26) and 4.4 (1-24) mean number of CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials per site, respectively. Southern states had the most number of trials 31%, followed by Midwestern 25%, Northeastern 24%, and Western 20%. The highest number of study locations were in California 13, New York 9, and Pennsylvania 9, while the highest number of open studies were in California 51, Texas 32, and New York 23. Twenty states had no open CAR-T or bispecific antibodies trials. Only 33% of African Americans (AA) lived in a county with a trial, and 7 out of 10 states with the highest proportion of AA residents (18.6%-41.4%) have no or less than 4 trial sites. Of the 62 counties analyzed, 92% were White predominant, while only 8% were AA predominant (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies should be framed to address the observed disparities and to improve access.

Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy treated with anticomplement protein 5 therapy, a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (CM-TMA), also called atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), is a difficult-to-diagnose rare disease that carries severe morbidity and mortality. Anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies (aC5-mab) are standard treatments, but large studies and long-term data are scarce. Here, we report our single institution experience to augment the knowledge of CM-TMA treated with aC5-mab therapy. METHODS: We aimed to assess the short and long-term effects of aC5-mab in patients diagnosed with CM-TMA treated outside of a clinical trial. This was a retrospective study. We included all patients diagnosed with CM-TMA and treated with aC5-mab at our institution. There were no exclusion criteria. Endpoints included complete TMA response (CR) defined as normalization of hematological parameters and ≥25% improvement in serum creatinine (Cr) from baseline in patients with renal disease, relapse defined as losing the previously achieved CR, morbidity, adverse events, and survival. RESULTS: We found 28 patients with CM-TMA treated with aC5-mab. The median age was 50 years. Baseline laboratories: platelet counts 93 × 109 /L, hemoglobin 8.6 g/dL, lactate dehydrogenase 1326 U/L, serum Cr 4.7 mg/dL, and estimated glomerular filtration rate 19 mL/min. One individual was on renal replacement therapy (RRT) and 10 initiated RRT within 5 days of the first dose of aC5-mab. Genetic variants associated with CM-TMA included mutations in C3, CFB, CFH, CFHR1/3, CFI, and MCP. The mean duration of hospitalization was 24 days. The median time to initiation of aC5-mab was 10 days. Sixteen subjects received RRT. At the time of hospital discharge, 27 were alive, 14 remained on RRT, and 4 had a CR. At 6 months, 23 patients were alive, 18 continued aC5-mab, 8 remained on RRT, and 9 had a CR. At the last follow-up visit past 6 months, 20 were alive, 14 continued aC5-mab, 5 remained on RRT, 12 had a CR, and 1 was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides real-world experience and insight into the long-term outcomes of CM-TMA treated with aC5-mab. Our findings validate that CM-TMA is an aggressive disease with significant morbidity and mortality, and confirm that aC5-mab is a relatively effective therapy for CM-TMA. Our study adds practical, real-world experience to the literature, but future research remains imperative.

Insights into the Impact of Hesitancy on Cancer Care and COVID-19.

World Health Organization findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected cancer diagnosis and management. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the optimal management of outpatient appointments, scheduled treatments, and hospitalizations for cancer patients because of hesitancy among patients and health-care providers. Travel restrictions and other factors likely affected medical, surgical, and radiation treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer patients were more likely to be affected by severe illness and complications if they contracted COVID-19. A compromised immune system and comorbidities in cancer patients may have contributed to this increased risk. Hesitancy or reluctance to receive appropriate therapy or vaccination advice might have played a major role for cancer patients, resulting in health-care deficits. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on screening, entry into clinical trials, and hesitancy among patients and health-care professionals, limiting adjuvant and metastatic cancer treatment.

First description of atrial fibrillation and congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura treated by left atrial appendage occlusion.

Given an increased risk of both thrombosis and bleeding, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) presents a unique challenge when anticoagulation is required for comorbid disease, particularly in the setting of major bleeding events. We present for the first time a patient with TTP and atrial fibrillation, presenting with recurrent stroke, but unable to tolerate anticoagulation due to prior intra-cerebral hemorrhage. To address both issues concomitantly, we describe the successful application of a novel management approach to facilitate left atrial appendage occlusion, there by offering a non-pharmacologic means of stroke prevention without added bleeding risk.

Risks and outcomes of hospitalizations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia admitted with immune thrombocytopenia: an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a known autoimmune complication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Currently, there is limited data regarding the risk CLL confers on hospitalization outcomes in patients admitted with ITP.The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify hospitalizations for ITP and then subclassified the data into hospitalizations with and without CLL. A multivariate logistic regression was designed to account for patient characteristics and comorbidities. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and the need for platelet transfusions, intravenous immunoglobulin, and splenectomy. Among 662,171 cases of ITP between 2005 and 2019, 15,672 had concurrent CLL. CLL patients were significantly older and had more comorbidities compared to patients without CLL. Multivariate analysis revealed CLL patients with ITP had a risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.19-1.37; p < 0.01). CLL patients also had a higher risk of complications, second-line ITP treatments, blood transfusions, and bleeding, with the exception of intracranial hemorrhage. Our study suggests CLL is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients with ITP. Prospective studies are needed to determine if refractoriness to conventional treatments for ITP can account these results.

Can we lower the platelet threshold of ≥ 50 × 109/L for performing a lumbar puncture safely in patients with hematological malignancies?

Lumbar punctures (LP) are routinely used to administer intrathecal chemotherapy for children and adults with hematologic malignancies. The current guidelines suggest a platelet threshold of ≥ 50 × 109/L prior to LP for intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). This can be challenging in patients with hematological malignancies who are thrombocytopenic. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 900 LPs for ITC and compared adverse events in patients with a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 109/L and < 50 × 109/L. Cohort 1 included 682 LPs (75.8%) with a pre-procedure platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/L, and cohort 2 included 218 LPs (24.2%) with a pre-procedure platelet count < 50 × 109/L. Cohort 2 was further subdivided into pre-procedure platelet counts of 41 × 109/L-49 × 109/L (n = 43), 31 × 109/L-40 × 109/L (n = 77), 21 × 109/L-30 × 109/L (n = 84), and 11 × 109/L-20 × 109/L (n = 14). Among 900 LP procedures, a pre-procedure platelet count < 50 × 109/L did not demonstrate a higher rate of post-procedure adverse events (6.5% vs 6.8%, p = 0.8237). When cohort 2 was further stratified, the cohort with a pre-procedure platelet count of 21 × 109/L-30 × 109/L had the highest percentage of complications from LP (9.5%) and the highest rates of traumatic taps with observed LP RBC count > 200 (35.7%, p = 0.0015). The rate of red blood cells (RBC) in the CSF was significantly higher in the group with platelets < 50 × 109/L with observed LP RBC count ≥ 200 (31.2% vs 20.5%, p = 0.0016), ≥ 500 (27.1% vs 14.6%, p < 0.0001), and ≥ 1000 (23% vs 11.6%, p < 0.0001). No instances of epidural hematomas were seen. We found no significant difference in bleeding complications between patients undergoing LPs for ITC with a platelet count above or below 50 × 109/L.

An evaluation of the content of hematology and medical oncology fellowship websites.

Introduction: The growing demand for Hematology and Oncology services has greatly piqued the interest of potential residents towards this specialty. Since the programs' official websites are now becoming the primary source of information that potential residents turn to, we aimed to analyze program websites' content and availability across parameters that have been used by evaluators of websites. Methods: & Materials: A list of 181 fellowship programs were identified using The Fellowship and Residency Electronic and Interactive Database (FRIEDA). 160/181 were accessed via a hyperlink or Google search. Content of these websites was evaluated on a 40-point criteria system in 10 distinct domains. Websites without accessible links were excluded from the search. Results: The 160 programs were divided based on the region with the North-East having the most programs (32.5%) and the West having the least programs (12.4%). Exactly 3/4th of the websites had been updated with the latest available information. "Program overview" (89%) was the most common domain present on the websites while "Alumni" was the least common, present on only (25%) of the websites. Conclusion: When compared with previous similar research, there have been a few significant improvements across the programs' websites, however many still lack important information regarding certain domains. The content and availability of the program's website can encourage or deter an applicant, in their decision to apply to the program, hence making it necessary for programs to augment their websites.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia: a 'diagnosis of exclusion'?

Current diagnosis of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is presumptive, centered on excluding other causes of thrombocytopenia. The diagnosis of ITP is challenging because of the wide range of potential inherited and acquired causes of thrombocytopenia. The treatment of ITP is empiric with steroids, high-dose immunoglobulin, immunosuppressants and thrombopoietin agonists with potential side effects. We searched Medline and Cochrane databases, reviewed the study data and analyzed the individual diagnostic tests for their evidence-based role in the diagnosis of ITP. We then analyzed the strength of the scientific evidence for each diagnostic test in the diagnosis of ITP and identified gaps in the diagnostic accuracy. The diagnostic challenges in ITP include: insufficient evidence for the individual test for diagnosis of ITP, no standardized protocol/guideline for diagnosis, hurdles in accessing the available resources and failure to correlate the clinical data while reviewing the blood smear. We did not identify a diagnostic test that clinicians can use to confirm the diagnosis of ITP. In the absence of a diagnostic test of proven value in ITP, the clinician is best served by a comprehensive history and physical examination, complete blood count and review of the peripheral blood smear in evaluating thrombocytopenia.

Assessment of Bleeding Risk in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Tertiary Hospital Experience during the Pandemic in a Predominant Minority Population-Bleeding Risk Factors in COVID-19 Patients.

Introduction: In the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, our world has faced multiple challenges. Infection with this virus has commonly been associated with thrombotic events. However, little is known about bleeding risk and anticoagulation therapy. This study aims to determine factors that are associated with increased risk of bleeding in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the records of COVID-19 patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through May 2020. Using patient charts, investigators manually collected data regarding patient characteristics and bleeding. Patients were included in the analysis if they had a confirmed COVID-19 PCR test, were older than 18 years of age and were admitted to the hospital. Patients who were pregnant or had incomplete charts were excluded from the study. ANOVA and logistic regression were used to determine the statistical significance of the data using SPSS version 27. Results: A total of 651 patients were included in the analysis out of 685 patients located in the database of COVID-19 infected patients during that time frame. The general characteristics of the patients were as follows: 54.2% were males; females 45.8% ages ranged from 28 to 83 years old (median age = 66 years old). There were 31 patients (4.9%) who required more than 1 unit of packed red blood cell (PRBC). A total of 16 (2.85%) patients had a documented gastrointestinal bleed (GIB), of which 8 received a total of 29 units of PRBC transfusions. The HAS-BLED score (without alcohol/drug due to inadequate charting) is calculated for patients who had a documented GI bleed and who received more than one unit of PRBC. It was noted that the higher the HAS-BLED score the greater the likelihood of having a GI bleed (p < 0.001). The HAS-BLED score (not including alcohol/drug) was also predictive for patients who received more than one unit of PRBC during their hospital stay (p < 0.001). Discussion: Using the HAS-BLED score without alcohol/drugs, patients with COVID-19 can be stratified in regard to their risk of GI bleeding and their risk of transfusion while in the hospital. When administering anticoagulation therapy, cautious monitoring should be carried out. Decisions regarding anticoagulant therapy should be based on individual patient characteristics.

Outcomes using direct-acting antiviral hepatitis-C treatment in older versus younger Veterans.

BACKGROUND: Historically, older adults have been excluded from trials evaluating hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, in part, due to the adverse effects associated with previous regimens. Veterans are at high risk of HCV infection. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LED/SOF) is a once daily antiviral regimen with demonstrated efficacy and tolerability among the younger population. We examined the tolerability and effectiveness of LED/SOF in Veterans age ≥65 years versus those <65 years who were treated at the Atlanta VA Health Care System (AVAHCS). METHODS: Using the VA Clinical Case Registry, all persons who filled a LED/SOF prescription at the AVAHCS from January 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016, were identified. The electronic medical records were reviewed to identify basic demographic information: comorbidities; polypharmacy; and outcomes. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was defined as an undetectable HCV RNA, at least 12 weeks after completing treatment. Descriptive statistics were employed using SAS v9.2. RESULTS: We identified 345 Veterans who filled LED/SOF during the study period; 94 were excluded due to exposure to ribavirin and IFN containing regimens; 97 (38.6%) were ≥65 years. Veterans were predominantly black (57%) and male (97%). Cancer was more prevalent among older Veterans (p = 0.047) as was polypharmacy (p = 0.001). Treatment completion rates between older and younger Veterans were not significantly different (99 vs. 95%, respectively; p = 0.16), but significantly more older Veterans achieved SVR (98 vs. 91%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: LED/SOF was a well-tolerated and effective regimen in an older Veteran population despite their multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy presence.

Post Approval Experience with Caplacizumab for Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura at a Single Institution.

Caplacizumab prevents platelet adhesion and has been approved for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP). This study was retrospective, including all patients diagnosed with aTTP and treated with caplacizumab since commercial availability in 2019 until 28 February 2021 at a single academic hospital with no exclusion criteria. Results used definitions for outcomes in aTTP from the International Working Group Consensus. Ten patients with aTTP received caplacizumab. The median age was 52 years. Six (60%) patients had refractory aTTP while 4 (40%) had newly diagnosed aTTP. The median laboratory values prior to therapy demonstrated: platelet count (PC) 29/uL, LDH 518 U/L (182-1850), ADAMTS13 activity 3% and ADAMTS13 inhibitor 1.4 BU. Everyone received glucocorticoids, rituximab, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and caplacizumab. The median number of TPE was 12 days. Caplacizumab was started at a median of 5 days after the first TPE and the median treatment duration was 31 days. Normalization of PC, LDH and ADAMTS13 activity in days were 5, 3.5, and 32.5, respectively. Six (60%) patients achieved complete response, 3 (30%) had refractory disease and 1 (10%) had relapsed aTTP. No subject suffered abnormal bleeding, or thrombotic event. There were no deaths. Caplacizumab with TPE, glucocorticoids and rituximab was a safe and effective therapy for aTTP.

Risk of pulmonary emboli after removal of an upper extremity central catheter associated with a deep vein thrombosis.

Standard treatment of catheter-associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE-DVT) is anticoagulation, although catheters are often removed for this indication. The optimal time for catheter removal and whether the act and/or timing of catheter removal is associated with pulmonary embolism (PE) remain unknown. A retrospective cohort study was performed at 8 participating institutions through the Venous thromboEmbolism Network US. Patients with hematologic malignancies and central venous catheter (CVC)-associated UE-DVT were included from 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2016. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed PE within 7 days of UE-DVT diagnosis in anticoagulated patients comparing early (≤48 hours) vs delayed (>48 hours) catheter removal. A total of 626 patients were included, among whom 480 were treated with anticoagulation. Among anticoagulated patients, 255 underwent early CVC removal, while 225 had delayed or no CVC removal; 146 patients received no anticoagulation, among whom 116 underwent CVC removal alone. PE within 7 days occurred in 2 patients (0.78%) with early removal compared with 1 patient (0.44%) with delayed or no CVC removal (P > .9). PE or any cause of death within 7 days occurred in 3 patients in both the early removal (1.18%) and delayed/no removal (1.33%) groups (P > .9). In patients treated with CVC removal only (no anticoagulation), there were no PEs but 3 deaths within 7 days. In patients with hematological malignancy and CVC-associated UE-DVT, early removal of CVCs was not associated with an increased risk of PE compared with delayed or no removal.

Treatment of catheter-related thrombosis in patients with hematologic malignancies: A Venous thromboEmbolism Network U.S. retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal treatment of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is uncertain in patients with hematologic malignancy. We aimed to evaluate the treatment strategies, outcomes, and predictors of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in patients with hematologic malignancy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of eight institutions through the Venous thromboEmbolism Network US. Patients with hematologic malignancies with documented CRT were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Semi-competing risks proportional hazard regression models were created. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of the 663 patients in the cohort, 124 (19%) were treated with anticoagulation alone, 388 (58%) were treated with anticoagulation and catheter removal, 119 (18%) treated with catheter removal only, and 32 (5%) had neither catheter removal nor anticoagulation. 100 (15%) patients experienced a recurrent VTE event. In the 579 patients who had catheter removal, the most common reason for catheter removal was the CRT [392 (68%)]. For subjects who received any anticoagulation (n = 512), total anticoagulation duration was not associated with VTE recurrence [1.000 (0.999-1.002)]. After adjustment patients treated with catheter removal only had an increased risk of VTE recurrence [2.50 (1.24-5.07)] and death [4.96 (2.47-9.97)]. Patients with no treatment had increased risk of death [16.81 (6.22-45.38)] and death after VTE recurrence [27.29 (3.13-238.13)]. In this large, multicenter retrospective cohort, we found significant variability in the treatment of CRT in patients with hematologic malignancy. Treatment without anticoagulation was associated with recurrent VTE.

Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: results from a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy may synergize with programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/PD1 ligand (PD-L1) blockade. The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose, safety/tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of combining pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody, with hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation (HFSRT) and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs). METHODS: Eligible subjects with recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma were treated with pembrolizumab (100 or 200 mg based on dose level Q3W) concurrently with HFSRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions) and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled (bevacizumab-naïve, n = 24; bevacizumab-resistant, n = 8). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were proteinuria (40.6%), fatigue (25%), increased alanine aminotransferase (25%), and hypertension (25%). TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 1 patient who experienced a grade 3 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase. In the bevacizumab-naïve cohort, 20 patients (83%) had a complete response or partial response. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 13.45 months (95% CI: 9.46-18.46) and 7.92 months (95% CI: 6.31-12.45), respectively. In the bevacizumab-resistant cohort, PR was achieved in 5 patients (62%). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.97-18.86) with a median PFS of 6.54 months (95% CI: 5.95-18.86). The majority of patients (n = 20/26; 77%) had tumor-cell/tumor-microenvironment PD-L1 expression <1%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HFSRT with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent HGG is generally safe and well tolerated. These findings merit further investigation of HFSRT with immunotherapy in HGGs.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of cancer associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be good alternatives to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT). We conducted a meta-analysis of ten randomized clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with CAT. All had study populations composed in entirety or in part of patients with CAT. The primary outcome (efficacy) was recurrent VTE and the secondary outcomes (safety outcomes) included major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and all bleeding (major bleeding + CRNMB). Participants treated with DOACs had lower risk of recurrent VTE, overall (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.79; p < 0.0001), compared to LMWH (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.40-0.83; p = 0.003), but not compared to VKA (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.44-1.06; p = 0.09). Compared to LMWH, DOACs showed no difference in major bleeding risk (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.78-2.18; p = 0.31), though had higher risk of CRNMB (RR 1.60; 95% CI 1.13-2.26; p = 0.008) and all bleeding (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10-2.01; p = 0.010). These results indicate that DOACs are more effective than LMWH for prevention of recurrent VTE with CAT though carry an increased risk for non-major bleeding compared to standard of care, LMWH.

A phase I/II study of docetaxel in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Taxanes and anthracyclines have been among the best-studied chemotherapy classes in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Docetaxel (D) 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks has been the standard first line chemotherapy for CRPC. Encapsulation of doxorubicin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes (PLD) was developed to enhance the safety and efficacy of conventional doxorubicin. We hypothesize that the combination of weekly low dose-D and PLD would result in a high response rate and low toxicity. Eligibility criteria included metastatic progressive CRPC, no prior D or PLD and good organ function. After a short phase I with no dose-limiting toxicity, D 30 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 8 and 15; and PLD 30 mg/m2 on day 1 only, every 28 days. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. The PSA response rate was 53%. Twenty-two subjects had measurable disease; one (5%) achieved complete response, five (23%) partial response, and twelve (54%) stable disease. Twenty-seven patients (73%) manifested pain relief. The median time to progression was 3.7 months for all patients and 7.9 months for responders. Median overall survival was 16.3 months. Grade 4 neutropenia without infection and anemia occurred in 1 patient each. Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included: 15% fatigue; 9% neutropenia, anemia and nausea; 6% dehydration and hand-foot syndrome; and 3% infection, febrile neutropenia, thrombosis, stomatitis, headache, vomiting, weight loss and weakness. In this non-comparative study D-PLD demonstrated a higher activity than previously reported with single agent D with favorable side effect profile. A phase 3 study would be needed to evaluate the true benefit of this combination.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00456989.