Difference in early all-cause mortality among patients having hip arthroplasty a Swedish perioperative registry study 2013-2022.

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroplasty is a common orthopaedic procedure worldwide. There is an ongoing debate related to the fixation and anaesthesia impact on the 30-day mortality, particularly in the aging population with higher American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) Physical-Status. AIM: To study the 30-day all-cause mortality in patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty, with regards to the impact of age, ASA-class, anaesthesia techniques, indication for surgery and fixation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perioperative data for primary hip arthroplasty procedures for osteoarthritis and hip fractures registered in the Swedish Perioperative Registry (SPOR) between 2013 and June 2022 were collected. Binary logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of age, ASA-class, anaesthetic technique, indication for surgery and fixation on odds ratio for 30-day mortality in Sweden. RESULTS: In total, 79,114 patients, 49,565 with osteoarthritis and 29,549 with hip fractures were included in the main study cohort. Mortality was significantly higher among hip fracture patients compared with osteoarthritis, cumulative 8.2% versus 0.1% at 30-days respectively (p < 0.001). Age above 80 years (OR3.7), ASA 3-5 (OR3.3) and surgery for hip fracture (OR 21.5) were associated with significantly higher odds ratio, while hybrid fixation was associated with a significantly lower odds ratio (OR0.4) of 30-day mortality. In the same model, for the subgroups of osteoarthritis and hip fracture, only age (OR 3.7) and ASA-class (OR 3.3) had significant impact, increasing the odds ratio for 30-day mortality. Hemi arthroplasty was commonly used among the hip fracture patients 20.453 (69.2%), and associated with a significantly higher odds ratio for all-cause 30-day mortality as compared to total hip arthroplasty when adjusting for age and ASA-class and fixation 2.3 (95%CI 1.9-2.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All-cause 30-day mortality associated with arthroplasty differed significantly between the two cohorts, hip fracture, and osteoarthritis (8.2% and 0.1% respectively) and mortality expectedly increased with age and higher ASA-class. Anaesthetic method and cement-fixation did not impact the odds ratio for all-cause 30-day mortality after adjustment for age and ASA-class.

High frequency jet ventilation for motion management during ablation procedures, a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is a method of ventilation that has gained renewed interest over the recent years as it can reduce organ movement to near static conditions, thus enhancing surgical precision in minimal invasive procedures, for example, ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation and solid organ tumours. The aim of this review was to create a summary of the current evidence concerning the clinical use of HFJV for ablative procedures. METHOD: PubMed was searched for the key words high frequency ventilation and ablation January 1990-December 2016. RESULT: The search initially identified 34 papers, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Articles in other languages than English (n = 1), comments regarding other articles (n = 4) and articles that did not include HFJV or ablative procedures (n = 15) were excluded. Two articles were added from references in papers included from the primary search. Sixteen studies were finally included in the review; four updates/reviews and 12 papers with results from studies of HFJV on humans, with a total of 889 patients; 498 patients ventilated with HFJV and 391 controls. There were no randomised studies. The overall scientific quality of the studies was low. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of well-designed studies evaluating HFJV during ablation procedures. The available information, while sparse, supports the effect of less tissue movement, resulting in better surgical precision and outcome; such as shorter procedural time, fewer shock waves (ESWL) and less recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Randomised controlled studies are needed in this promising area of research to prove its superiority to standard ventilation.

Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia is commonly used for management of pain during childbirth. Need for emergent Caesarean section e.g. because of signs of foetal distress or lack of progress is however not an uncommon event. In females having an established epidural; general anaesthesia, top-up of the epidural or putting a spinal are all possible options. Dosing of the spinal anaesthesia in females having epidural is a matter of discussion. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We describe a healthy 32 years, 0 para mother in gestation week 36 having labour epidural analgesia but due to foetal distress scheduled for an emergent Caesarean section category 2 that developed upper extremity weakness and respiratory depression after administration of standard dose high density bupivacaine/morphine/fentanyl intrathecal anaesthesia. She was emergent intubated and resumed motor function after 15-20min. DISCUSSION: A too extensive cephalic spread was the most plausible explanation to the event. Whether or not reducing the dose for a spinal anaesthesia in mothers having an established labour epidural analgesia is a matter of discussion. It is of course of importance to achieve a rapid and effective surgical anaesthesia but also avoiding overdosing with the risk for a too high cephalic spread. CONCLUIOSN: To perform spinal anaesthesia for emergent Caesarean in patients having an epidural for labour pain is a feasible option and should be considered in category 2-3 section. The dose for a convert spinal block should be assessed on an individual basis and reasonably reduced.

Anaesthetics and analgesics; neurocognitive effects, organ protection and cancer reoccurrence an update.

Available general and local anaesthetics, third generation inhaled anaesthetics, propofol and amide class local anaesthetics are effective and reassuringly safe. They are all associated to low incidence of toxicology and or adverse-effects. There is however a debate whether anaesthetic drug and technique could exhibit effects beyond the primary effects; fully reversible depression of the central nervous system, dose dependent anaesthesia. Anaesthetics may be involved in the progression of neurocognitive side effects seen especially in the elderly after major surgery, so called Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction. On the other hand anaesthetics may exhibit organ protective potential, reducing ischemia reperfusion injury and improving survival after cardiac surgery. Anaesthetics and anaesthetic technique may also have effects of cancer reoccurrence and risk for metastasis. The present paper provides an update around the evidence base around anaesthesia potential contributing effect on the occurrence of postoperative cognitive adverse-effects, organ protective properties and influence on cancer re-occurrence/metastasis.

Cognitive testing with the Post-Operative Quality of Recovery Scale in pre-surgery cancer patients--a controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Post-Operative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) has been revised to allow for the normal variation in cognitive performance seen in healthy volunteers. This modification could result in exclusion of test subjects because of poor baseline performance. Our aim was to investigate the impact of severe disease and waiting for cancer surgery on PQRS baseline cognitive performance and exclusion rate, and also on variation in cognitive performance at test re-test. METHODS: Sixty-one subjects, 31 women diagnosed with breast cancer and waiting for surgery and 30 healthy women, performed the PQRS cognitive, nociceptive and emotional domains three times in 48 h. Exclusion rate, change in score and the proportion fulfilling 'recovery' criteria at re-tests were assessed. RESULTS: Nine out of 31 patients (29%) and two out of 30 controls (7%) had too low baseline score to be further assessed (P = 0.043). The change in score at re-tests was similar between the groups. Sixty-four per cent and 83% at 20 h and 79% and 86% at 48 h in the patient and control groups respectively fulfilled the 'recovery' criteria (P = 0.45). The 'recovery' for nociceptive and emotional distress was similar between the groups, but anxiety and sadness absolute scores were significantly higher in the patient group. CONCLUSION: Women with breast cancer waiting for surgery expressed a higher level of emotional distress, performed lower at baseline but showed no difference in test re-test variability in cognitive performance according to the PQRS when compared with controls. The considerable exclusion rate among patients waiting for cancer surgery should be acknowledged.

Preoperative platelet count and volume could not help predict PONV in women undergoing breast cancer surgery: A prospective cohort study.

UNLABELLED: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) still represents one of the most distressing side effects of anaesthesia and surgery. Clinical risk scores e.g. Apfel score is today commonly used to identify patients at risk. We found in a previous study different platelet counts in patients with and without PONV. The aim of the present explorative study was to assess whether females experiencing PONV after breast surgery had any difference in preoperative platelet count and/or volume assessed by platelet testing. METHODS: All women scheduled for elective breast cancer surgery at Danderyds Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, during one year were asked to participate in this study. Occurrence of PONV during the 24 first postoperative hours was studied. Blood samples collected preoperatively were analysed by platelet counts determined by impedance (PTLi) and optical (PTLo) methods, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) and plateletcrit (PCT). Platelet data were compared between patients with and without PONV. RESULTS: In all 183 patients were included in the study, 65 (35%) suffered from PONV, increasing incidence with increased risk score 4 out 5 with 4 risk factors. Mean platelet count was 266 [114-538], mean platelet volume 8.59 [5.94-12.1] and mean platelet weight 16.17 [14.2-25.9] but no differences in any platelet test variables studied were found between patients with or without PONV or with increasing risk factors. CONCLUSION: One third of patients' experienced PONV, increased incidence associated to Apfel score but platelet numbers and simple platelet test provided no additional information around risk for PONV.

Tools for the assessment of the recovery process following discharge from day surgery: a literature review.

This literature review provides an overview of ten studies which assessed the patient's general recovery after discharge from hospital following elective surgery and anaesthesia. Ten multi-dimensional tools were identified and these included six common domain assessments: pain, physiological function, activities of daily living (ADL), emotions, nausea/vomiting and nutrition/elimination. Most of the tools assessed the recovery process by using patient-subjective reported outcomes on visual analogue (VAS) or pre-graded scales.

Cognitive recovery after ambulatory anaesthesia based on desflurane or propofol: a prospective randomised study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of anaesthetic agents on cognitive recovery during the first post-operative week in a middle-aged population undergoing general anaesthesia is insufficiently studied. We hypothesised that patients receiving anaesthesia based on desflurane would have a quicker recovery and regain cognitive capacity faster than patients receiving anaesthesia based on propofol. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing the effects of desflurane and propofol as primary anaesthetic agents on cognitive recovery in 59 American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System I-II women undergoing breast surgery. Cognitive recovery was evaluated using the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire and a modified version of the Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale. RESULTS: Post-operative cognitive recovery according to Cognitive Failure Questionnaire was 65% and 66% at 72 h, and 71% and 72% at 1 week for the desflurane and the propofol groups, respectively. Recovery according to Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale was 52% and 50% at 2 h, increasing to 71% and 87% at 48 h for the desflurane and the propofol groups, respectively. At the final point of measurement (Cognitive Failure Questionnaire 1 week, Post-operative Quality of Recovery Scale 48 h), many of the patients had still not reached their baseline cognitive performance. There was no difference in overall cognitive recovery between the desflurane and propofol groups. CONCLUSION: Cognitive recovery was not complete 1 week after surgery in any of the groups. There was no difference in the rate of cognitive recovery in middle-aged patients receiving desflurane or propofol anaesthesia during ambulatory breast surgery.

Non-opioid analgesics for pain management following ambulatory surgery: a review.

Multimodal pain management, combining analgesics with different mode of action in order to minimize occurrence of side-effects still providing safe and efficacious pain management after ambulatory surgery has become standard of care. The combined use of local anaesthesia in order to reduce noxious influx during the procedure and reduce postoperative pain is strongly recommended whenever feasible. Providing oral analgesics paracetamol, and none-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs or selective Cox-II-inhibitors already prior to induction in order to provide effective therapeutic concentrations at end of surgery is a simple and easy way to facilitate the recovery. Single iv. preoperative dose dexamethasone has been shown not only to be effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting but also to improve recovery reduce pain and improve satisfaction. Pregabalin may be used in order to further enhance the recovery and pain management.

Personnel breathing zone sevoflurane concentration adherence to occupational exposure limits in conjunction with filling of vaporisers.

BACKGROUND: Work place pollution during filling of anaesthetic vaporisers has been a matter of concern. We studied personnel breathing zone ambient air sevoflurane concentrations during filling of sevoflurane with three different filling systems: Quik-Fil™ for Abbott and Dräger Fill™ resp. Easy-Fil™ adapters for Baxter sevoflurane bottles, referred to as 'Abbott and Baxter filling systems'. METHOD: Sequential filling of three vaporisers was performed for a 15-min period, once with each of Abbott and Baxter filling systems, by four nurses. Ambient-air sevoflurane p.p.m. concentration in the breathing zone was continuously measured using a Miran 1a device during filling, and the mean 15 min sevoflurane concentration was calculated. RESULTS: All eight measured (4 × 2 sequences) 15-min mean breathing zone sevoflurane concentrations covering filling of three vaporisers were well below the recommended short-term value (STV) provided by the Swedish Work Environment Authority (STV 20 p.p.m.). CONCLUSION: The breathing zone sevoflurane concentration during filling of sevoflurane with Baxter or Abbott filling systems, in an ordinary operating theatre, was found to be reassuringly below the Swedish recommended STV (20 p.p.m. average for a 15-min period).

Use of conventional ECG electrodes for depth of anaesthesia monitoring using the cerebral state index: a clinical study in day surgery.

BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit relationship for depth of anaesthesia monitors is complicated by the high cost of specially designed EEG electrodes. The cerebral state index (CSI) monitor will accept regular ECG electrodes with snap connectors. The purpose of this study was to determine if generic ECG electrodes could replace the more expensive proprietary EEG electrodes for the CSI monitor. METHODS: Two identical cerebral state monitors were used simultaneously during sevoflurane anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy in 14 ASA I-II patients. One monitor used proprietary (Danmeter) EEG electrodes and the other used ECG electrodes (3M Red Dot Diagnostic ECG Electrodes). Paired CSI values were recorded every other minute. Anaesthetic depth was titrated clinically. Sedation depth was scored according to the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAAS) scale. RESULTS: The agreement between the two measures was found to be high, mean difference--0.23, and the overall repeatability mean bias was 6.6 and 153/163 pairs (94%) were located within the 95% limits of agreement. No major difference was noted in impedance, noise, or artifacts. A large overlap in CSI was noted for each level of the OAAS scale; patients with CSI values as low as 40-50 responded whereas patients not responding to surgical stimulation had CSI values as high as 75. The direct cost of disposables decreased from 4euro to 0.50euro per patient by using ordinary ECG electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from proprietary EEG electrodes to ordinary generic ECG electrodes maintains the same accuracy at about a 10th of the cost when measuring CSI during day surgery with sevoflurane anaesthesia.

The effects of fresh gas flow on the amount of sevoflurane vaporized during 1 minimum alveolar concentration anaesthesia for day surgery: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Even small costs per case can become economically significant in high volume day surgical units. While general anaesthesia with higher fresh gas flow rates has technical advantages, they result in higher costs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate drug consumption and direct costs related to variations in the fresh gas flow and use of nitrous oxide at a 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane end-tidal anaesthesia for day surgery. METHODS: Thirty-two ASA I-II patients undergoing elective day surgery under general anaesthesia [14 (10-21) min] were studied. Induction was with propofol and fentanyl 100 microg. After laryngeal mask airway placement, patients were randomized to one of four different fresh gas flows: 1 or 2 l/min oxygen in air (50% oxygen), 3 l/min (33% oxygen), or 3 l/min oxygen in nitrous oxide (33% oxygen). Anaesthesia was maintained at 1 MAC. The vaporizer was weighed before and after each procedure. The primary study variable was the sevoflurane utilization per minute. RESULTS: Sevoflurane utilization increased with increasing fresh gas flow for oxygen in air (r2 = 0.89). The nitrous oxide in oxygen group had the lowest sevoflurane utilization, even compared with the lowest oxygen in air group (0.36 vs. 0.48 g/min). CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane utilization during 1 MAC anaesthesia increases linearly with fresh gas flow and is still higher than when nitrous oxide is used even with very low fresh gas flow rates. Direct inhaled anaesthesia-related costs are consequently 20% higher than when nitrous oxide is used, even for the lowest oxygen in air fresh gas flows.

Cerebral state index response to incision: a clinical study in day-surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate anaesthesia, with somatic/autonomic response or awareness, is often revealed at intubation and surgical incision. Anaesthetic depth monitors should be able to prevent this risk. This explorative study examined the ability of the cerebral state monitor to predict autonomic/somatic responses to incision. METHODS: Forty-two ASA I-II day-surgical patients [19 men and 23 females; mean age 52 (29-79) years, mean weight 77 (50-118) kg] were induced clinically with fentanyl/propofol with sevoflurane after placement of the laryngeal mask airway. The cerebral state index (CSI) was blindly recorded 4 min prior to and 4 min after incision. RESULTS: During the 4 min prior to incision, the mean CSI was 45 (16-62) and increased by 9 (-13-40) when the mean value for the first 4 min after incision was subtracted from the value prior to incision, corresponding to a relative change of 21% (-21-118). The change in CSI did not show any consistent relation to the value before incision. Five patients showed minor movements after incision and six patients had > 25% increase in blood pressure. Neither CSI nor the change in index differed between patients who did or did not respond somatically or autonomically to incision. The last CSI value just prior to incision was 44 for non-responders and 40 and 42 for somatic and autonomic responders, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CSI in the majority of patients was within acceptable ranges during clinically adjusted anaesthesia prior to incision but seems not to be able to reliably predict an autonomic or somatic response to incision.

Cerebral state index: comparison between pairwise registrations from the left and the right sides of the brain.

BACKGROUND: Lateralization of cerebral blood flow and EEG activity is known to vary during cognition, sleep and waking. In spite of this, electrode placement for the cerebral state index (CSI) monitor is not specified to a particular side of the brain. This study is designed to determine if pairwise registrations differ for CSI measured simultaneously from the left or right sides of the brain. METHODS: In total, 25 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective day surgery under general anaesthesia were recruited. Pairwise recordings were made every minute from two CSI monitors (Cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter A/S; Odense, Denmark) connected to the left and the right side of the head. Sedation was graded according to the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation rating scale and correlated with CSI. RESULTS: A large overlap of indices, of similar magnitude, for each side of the brain was seen between different levels of sedation. The agreement between pairwise registrations was high, correlation between the 584 CSI pairs of recordings left/right was r(2)=0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Despite known lateralization of the EEC, this study found a very high correlation in CSI derived simultaneously from the left and right sides of the brain by two independent monitors.

Desflurane vs. sevoflurane as the main inhaled anaesthetic for spontaneous breathing via a laryngeal mask for varicose vein day surgery: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has become widely used in day surgery; however, desflurane may be a valuable alternative even in this setting. This study compares emergence from anaesthesia for day surgery with spontaneous breathing using either desflurane or sevoflurane. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study examined 70 ASA III patients undergoing elective ambulatory varicose vein surgery. Primary endpoint was emergence time (cessation of anaesthetic gas to communicating). Secondary endpoints included post-operative pain, nausea, time to discharge, and patient satisfaction. Patients were anaesthetized according to a standardized protocol including multimodal analgesia and antiemetic therapy and were randomized to receive sevoflurane or desflurane as the main anaesthetic while breathing spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway. Fresh gas flow was oxygen in air 1 : 2 l/min. RESULTS: Intra-operative anaesthesia was uneventful apart from airway irritation observed in 5/35 desflurane and 1/35 sevoflurane patients. Emergence was 25-40% faster in patients anaesthetized with desflurane. Pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were equally infrequent in both groups. Overall, patient satisfaction was high with no difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Desflurane is associated with a faster emergence with no differences during the post-operative course except a somewhat higher incidence of airway irritation.

Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia: a clinical comparison with the bispectral index during day-surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The cerebral state index (CSI) derived from a new small handheld electroencephalogram monitor was studied during routine day surgical anaesthesia titrated according to the bispectral index (BIS). The objective was to determine the degree of agreement between the two monitors. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl (0.1 mg) in 38 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for routine day-surgery. Maintenance anaesthesia (sevoflurane (20/38), desflurane (10/38) or propofol (8/38)) titrated by BIS XP (Aspect Medical, Natwick, MA, USA) and BIS and CSI (cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter; Odense, Denmark) index values were recorded every minute. No patient received muscle relaxation. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation rating scale was used to assess level of sedation. RESULTS: Pair-wise recordings (914) of CSI and BIS were collected. The indices showed similar pattern and decreased with increasing level of sedation, however with large ranges for each level of sedation. Median indices were similar during surgery (BIS: 50 (14-89); CSI: 51 (7-88)) and both indices increased (P 20% from BIS-index in 24% of readings, and on rare occasions CSI indices deviated >100% from the BIS reading. When BIS < 40, CSI decreased slower than BIS and with wider spreading. CONCLUSIONS: When used for day-surgery anaesthesia without muscle relaxation, CSI and BIS show similar patterns and numerical values but with the incidence of occasionally large discrepancies between pair-wise readings. Which monitor is the more dependable remains to be established and cannot be implied from this initial explorative study.

Cerebral state index during anaesthetic induction: a comparative study with propofol or nitrous oxide.

BACKGROUND: Confidently predicting the depth of anaesthesia for the individual patient and independently of drug(s) type using EEG-based monitors has proven difficult. This open, randomized, explorative study of day surgical patients evaluates the ability of the Cerebral State Monitor (Danmeter AB, Odense, Denmark) of anaesthetic depth to identify loss of response (LOR) using either propofol or N(2)0 for induction. METHODS: In this open, randomized study, day surgical patients (n=10 in each group) were studied using the Cerebral State Index Monitor. After baseline measurements, induction to LOR was achieved with either repeated 30-mg boluses of propofol every second minute or with N(2)0 (after premedication 5 min before with 30 mg propofol) increased every other minute in 15% increments (max. 75%). Sedation level was evaluated every other minute using the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. RESULTS: Baseline values were 91 (82-98) and 94 (82-100) for N(2)0 and propofol patients, respectively. During induction CSI decreased with increasing sedation in patients given propofol (P<0.001) but not in patients given nitrous oxide. Median value at LOR was 56 (40-76) and 95 (87-100) for the propofol and nitrous oxide group of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Cerebral State Index(trade mark) behaves as other depth of anaesthesia monitors with a progressive decrease during propofol induction but loss of consciousness with N(2)0 results in no change in CSI.