Perception, acceptance, and adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines: Insights from Indian population.

Background: Vaccination has been pivotal in eradicating numerous infectious diseases. Nonetheless, concerns about the safety and side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine persist. This study aimed to gauge the perceptions and experiences of the Indian population concerning COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey of 313 participants aged 18 and above from diverse regions in India. Data was sourced using an electronic questionnaire disseminated via Google Forms. The survey evaluated demographics, vaccine awareness, attitudes, and side effects post-vaccination with Covishield and Covaxin. Results: 22.6% of participants exhibited vaccine hesitancy; however, 78.3% believed the advantages superseded the risks. Most participants (81.5%) were aware of vaccine side effects. Most of the Indian respondents (97.1%) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine. Post-vaccination, 27.9% experienced adverse effects such as fever, headache, malaise, dizziness, and pain at the local site. Only 1.3% necessitated hospitalization. Conclusion: Our study underscores the dichotomy between vaccine apprehensions and real-world experiences. Although concerns surrounding vaccine safety were prevalent, the majority of the Indian respondents (97.1%) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine, with most experiencing only transient, mild side effects. While 22.6% initially exhibited hesitancy, primarily due to misinformation, the actual experience post-vaccination was largely positive. To further address hesitancy, streamlined vaccine awareness campaigns emphasizing the safety and efficacy of vaccination are essential.

Bronchoscopic Electrocautery Versus Adrenaline and Cold Saline Instillation for Prophylactic Haemostasis Prior to Biopsy of Endobronchial Lesions (BEVACS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Flexible bronchoscopy-guided endobronchial biopsy (EBB) is routinely performed as an outpatient daycare procedure. Bleeding after EBB is a common complication, that at times disrupts the procedure and can rarely lead to a catastrophe. We aimed to compare the efficacy of prebiopsy prophylactic bronchoscopic electrocautery with adrenaline and cold saline instillation in achieving hemostasis in patients with endobronchial lesions with a higher risk of bleeding during EBB. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with endobronchial lesions were randomized to either the prophylactic electrocautery arm or the adrenaline and cold saline arm. Postbiopsy endobronchial bleed was quantified in millimeters using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and graded as per the British Thoracic Society grading system. Electrocautery-induced tissue damage was graded by the pathologist as "no damage," "mild," "moderate," and "severe." RESULTS: The median VAS score of bleeding was 6.14 mm (interquartile range: 8 mm) in the electrocautery arm and 10.17 mm (interquartile range: 7 mm) in the adrenaline and cold saline arm. Though the difference in the VAS score of bleeding between the two groups was statistically significant, there was no significant difference in the proportion of grade 2 or higher bleeding. CONCLUSION: No difference in postbiopsy bleed was observed between the application of electrocautery or instillation of cold saline plus adrenaline before biopsy of those endobronchial lesions which were likely to bleed more after biopsy. Although controlled prophylactic electrocautery using 15 watts did not impair the quality of EBB specimens, a higher wattage may change this observation, as well as the bleeding quantity.

Co-infections in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients- A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: SARS -CoV-2 was first reported in Wuhan and declared a pandemic in March 2020. Co-infections during other pandemics have been associated with severe outcomes, but data are scarce regarding co-infections in COVID-19 patients. Our study evaluated co-infections prevalence and its impact on morbidity and mortality in hospitalized COVID -19 patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 100 patients admitted to a high-dependency unit at a tertiary care hospital in India. Prevalence of co-infections and clinical outcome-related data were analyzed in COVID-19 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: 14% of patients had co-infections, out of which urinary tract infection was found in 9%. Patients with co-infections had a higher mortality rate (p<0.0004). Urinary co-infection emerged as an independent risk factor for mortality (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: Co-infections associated with COVID-19 infections are an essential risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Early identification and timely treatment of co-infections may help in improving clinical outcomes.

Mortality and Its Predictors in COVID-19 Patients With Pre-existing Interstitial Lung Disease.

Background The data on the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on interstitial lung disease (ILD) is still limited. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no study from India to date to assess the impact of COVID-19 in patients with preexisting ILD. We undertook this study to assess the clinical outcome of ILD patients admitted to our hospital with COVID-19. Methods In this retrospective observational study, records of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD who were admitted to the hospital in the period from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021, were obtained from the hospital database. The clinical outcomes of the patients were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to find relation between various predetermined risk factors for mortality and those with significant p values (p<0.05) were subjected to multiple logistic regression to determine independent risk factors. Results In our study of 28 patients, the overall mortality was 35.7%. On comparing the parameters associated with increased mortality, there was no effect of age, gender, comorbidities, type of ILD, CT thorax findings on diagnosis, use of corticosteroids and antifibrotics in the past, spirometric findings on mortality. On multivariate analysis, the significant parameters were interleukin 6 (IL-6), p=0.02, OR=1.020 (1.006-1.043) and D-dimer, p=0.04, OR=2.14 (5.55-1.14). Conclusion COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing ILD has a comparatively higher mortality. D-dimer and IL-6 are significant predictors of mortality in ILD patients infected with COVID-19.

Clinical features and mortality in COVID-19 SARI versus non COVID-19 SARI cases from Western Rajasthan, India.

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) issued guidelines that all patients presenting with severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) should be investigated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Following the same protocol, in our institute, all patients with SARI were transferred to the COVID-19 suspect intensive care unit (ICU) and investigated for COVID-19. METHODS: This study was planned to examine the demographical, clinical features, and outcomes of the first 500 suspected patients of COVID-19 with SARI admitted in the COVID-19 suspect ICU at a tertiary care center. Between March 7 and July 20, 2020, 500 patients were admitted to the COVID-19 suspect ICU. We analyzed the demographical, clinical features, and outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative SARI cases. The records of all the patients were reviewed until July 31, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 500 suspected patients admitted to the hospital, 88 patients showed positive results for COVID-19 by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of the nasopharyngeal swabs. The mean age in the positive group was higher (55.31 ± 16.16 years) than in the negative group (40.46 ± 17.49 years) (P < 0.001). Forty-seven (53.4%) of these patients in the COVID-19 positive group and 217 (52.7%) from the negative group suffered from previously known comorbidities. The common symptoms included fever, cough, sore throat, and dyspnea. Eighty-five (20.6%) patients died in the COVID-19 negative group, and 30 (34.1%) died in the COVID-19 positive group (P = 0.006). Deaths among the COVID-19 positive group had a significantly higher age than deaths in the COVID-19 negative group (P < 0.001). Among the patients who died with positive COVID-19 status had substantially higher neutrophilia and lymphopenia (P < 0.001). X-ray chest abnormalities were almost three times more likely in COVID-19 deaths (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the present article, 17.6% of SARI were due to COVID-19 infection with significantly higher mortality (34.1%) in COVID-19 positive patients with SARI. Although all patients presenting as SARI have considerable mortality rates, the COVID-19-associated SARI cases thus had an almost one-third risk of mortality.