Opioid usage differs significantly following ureteroscopy and shockwave lithotripsy, while development of long-term usage is positively correlated with total days' supply and total MME supplied.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated possible predictors of long-term opioid usage among patients with ureteric stones who received ureteroscopy (URS) or shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). We also assessed opioid usage characteristics of URS and SWL recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study used IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics administrative claims database from years 2006-2020 to identify patients with a diagnosis of kidney or ureteral stones who were treated with either SWL or URS. We performed unadjusted bivariate analyses to compare opioid use characteristics of URS and SWL recipients, and performed logistic regression to determine demographic and clinical factors associated with becoming a long-term opioid user. RESULTS: The study population consisted of opioid naive individuals having a diagnosis of a kidney stone who underwent URS (N = 9407) or SWL (N = 4894). About 6.7% (N = 964) of study subjects were long-term opioid users. Unadjusted bivariate associations showed that compared to non-long-term opioid users, long-term opioid users had significantly greater total days' supply, total morphine milliequivalents (MME) supplied, and claims per month. A similar trend was observed for URS (vs. SWL) recipients. However, compared to SWL recipients, URS recipients had 14.3% (1.2-25.6%; p = 0.034) lower odds of becoming long-term users. Total days' supply (OR: 1.041 (95% CI 1.030-1.052; p < 0.001) and total MME supplied (OR 1.001 (95% CI 1.000-1.001; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with long-term usage. CONCLUSION: Higher total days' supply and total MME supplied as well as SWL were identified as risk factors for becoming long-term opioid users.

Hydronephrosis and Hydroureter Improvement Rates in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Uretero-Ureterostomies: Does Anastomotic Site Matter?

OBJECTIVE: To compare improvement/change of hydronephrosis and hydroureter in patients with complete ureteral duplications that underwent upper and lower robotic-assisted laparoscopic uretero-ureterostomies. The hypothesis being that improvement of hydronephrosis and hydroureter between the two groups was similar. METHODS: 35 subjects met inclusion criteria and were reviewed retrospectively. 'Upper' anastomoses were defined as those being done below the lower pole of the kidney (Group 1), while 'lower' anastomoses were those done below the iliac vessels (Group 2). Primary variables analyzed were antero-posterior and diameter measurements of the renal pelvis and ureter, respectively, before and after surgery. Secondary variables included operative time, length of hospital stay, and complication rates. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 20 subjects while Group 2 consisted of 15 subjects. Presenting diagnoses were hydronephrosis in 31 subjects and incontinence in 4 subjects. Group 1 mean AP renal diameters decreased by 62.9% (P<.05), while Group 2 decreased by 65.4% (P<.05). Group 1 mean hydroureter diameter measurements decreased by 80.3% (P<.05), while Group 2 decreased by 83% (P<.05). The improvement in hydronephrosis and hydroureter between the two groups was not statistically different. Group 1 median operative time (271 minutes) was longer than Group 2 (201 minutes) (P<.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay between the groups and there were no significant complications within the cohort. CONCLUSION: The improvement rate of hydronephrosis and hydroureter is similar in upper versus lower RAL UU. Operative time was significantly shorter in the lower anastomosis group.